<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>L. Michelle Gilley</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Gregory G. Turner</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>W. Mark Ford</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Corinne A. Diggins</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Surveying for flying squirrels by using traditional techniques produces extremely low detection rates compared with ultrasonic acoustics. Within Pennsylvania, the northern flying squirrel subspecies&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Glaucomys sabrinus macrotis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;is state listed as endangered due to habitat loss and parasite-mediated competition by and hybridization with the southern flying squirrel&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Glaucomys volans&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;. This subspecies is isolated from adjacent populations in West Virginia and New York and has experienced drastic population declines. The discovery and characterization of ultrasonic vocalizations of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;G. s. macrotis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;G. volans&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, as well as successful field surveys with ultrasonic acoustic detectors in the southern Appalachian Mountains, highlight the potential use of this technique for determining the presence of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;G. s. macrotis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;. To confirm the feasibility of using this technique on declining populations of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;G. s. macrotis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;sympatric with&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;G. volans&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, we conducted 108 nights of passive ultrasonic acoustic surveys for&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;G. s. macrotis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;at six survey sites by using two detectors per survey site (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;= 12 detectors) in June 2017. We considered sites high quality (“high”) or low quality (“low”) based on the number of physical capture records during the past 2 decades and the dominance of boreo-montane conifer tree species in the overstory. We detected&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;G. s. macrotis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;at four study sites and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;G. volans&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;at all six study sites. We found higher average probability of detection for&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;G. s. macrotis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;in high vs. low sites (0.28 ± 0.06 [mean ± SE] and 0.09 ± 0.07, respectively), whereas probability of detection was similar for&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;G. volans&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;between high and low sites (0.13 ± 0.05 and 0.17 ± 0.05, respectively). We also found&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;G. s. macrotis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;had lower latency of detection at high vs. low sites (2.7 ± 0.8 and 7.83 ± 1.5 nights, respectively) but G. volans did not vary in latency of detection between sites (5 ± 1.6 and 3.8 ± 1.5 nights, respectively). Our study shows acoustics can be successfully used to efficiently survey&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;G. s. macrotis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;in Pennsylvania, where populations are small and monitoring these populations more effectively is critical to determining changes in persistence due to climate- and disease-induced factors.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3996/JFWM-20-020</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Ultrasonic Acoustic Surveys of State Endangered Northern Flying Squirrels in the Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>