<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Karyn D. Rode</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Joy A Erlenbach</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Suzanne Budge</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Charles T. Robbins</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Gregory W. Thiemann</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="Abs1-section" class="c-article-section"&gt;&lt;div id="Abs1-content" class="c-article-section__content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Accurate information on diet composition is central to understanding and conserving carnivore populations. Quantitative fatty acid signature analysis (QFASA) has emerged as a powerful tool for estimating the diets of predators, but ambiguities remain about the timeframe of QFASA estimates and the need to account for species-specific patterns of metabolism. We conducted a series of feeding experiments with four juvenile male brown bears (&lt;i&gt;Ursus arctos&lt;/i&gt;) to (1) track the timing of changes in adipose tissue composition and QFASA diet estimates in response to a change in diet and (2) quantify the relationship between consumer and diet FA composition (i.e., determine “calibration coefficients”). Bears were fed three compositionally distinct diets for 90–120&amp;nbsp;days each. Two marine-based diets were intended to approximate the lipid content and composition of the wild diet of polar bears (&lt;i&gt;U. maritimus&lt;/i&gt;). Bear adipose tissue composition changed quickly in the direction of the diet and showed evidence of stabilization after 60&amp;nbsp;days. During hibernation, FA profiles were initially stable but diet estimates after 10&amp;nbsp;weeks were sensitive to calibration coefficients. Calibration coefficients derived from the marine-based diets were broadly similar to each other and to published values from marine-fed mink (&lt;i&gt;Mustela vison&lt;/i&gt;), which have been used as a model for free-ranging polar bears. For growing bears on a high-fat diet, the temporal window for QFASA estimates was 30–90&amp;nbsp;days. Although our results reinforce the importance of accurate calibration, the similarities across taxa and diets suggest it may be feasible to develop a generalized QFASA approach for mammalian carnivores.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1007/s00360-021-01414-5</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Springer</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Fatty acid profiles of feeding and fasting bears: Estimating calibration coefficients, the timeframe of diet estimates, and selective mobilization during hibernation</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>