<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Philip A. Freeman</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Emil Attanasi</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="Abs1-section" class="c-article-section"&gt;&lt;div id="Abs1-content" class="c-article-section__content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;This paper analyzes the relationship between actual reservoir conditions and predicted measures of performance of carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery (CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;–EOR) programs. It then shows how CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;–EOR operators might maximize the value of their projects by approaching implementation using a “flexible selective” pattern development strategy, where the CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;–EOR program patterns are selectively developed based on site-specific reservoir properties. It also analyzes performance measures and economic consequences of utilizing a continuous CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;injection strategy intended to maximize CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;retention for a defined time period. “Net CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;utilization,” calculated as difference between the volumes of CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;injected and CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;recovered in the production stream divided by the oil produced, is a standard measure of CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;–EOR carbon utilization, but it can be a misleading predictor of the actual CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;retained in the reservoir. Asset value can be added to a CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;–EOR project by recognizing effects of variations in reservoir parameter values and basing incremental development decisions on those data. For policy analysts, the consequences of ignoring geologic variability within a reservoir that is a candidate for CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;–EOR will likely be to substantially overestimate predicted adoption of CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;–EOR in response to economic incentives. This result holds true whether the CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;–EOR program objective is to maximize net value by maximizing oil production or maximize CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;storage with oil recovery.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1007/s11053-021-09983-6</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Springer</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Decision analysis and CO2–Enhanced oil recovery development strategies</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>