<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Zachary B. Klein</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Michael C. Quist</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Darren T. Rhea</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Kathryn E. McBaine</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Burbot (Lota lota) are an apex piscivore that were illegally introduced to the Green River drainage, Wyoming, raising concerns for the conservation and management of fishes throughout the basin.&amp;nbsp; However, relatively little is known about the diet of non-native burbot.&amp;nbsp; The objectives of this research were to characterize diet composition of burbot and identify differences in diet composition as a function of sampling gear.&amp;nbsp; Diet composition was characterized using frequency of occurrence, percent by number, and percent by weight to identify the importance of each prey type to burbot.&amp;nbsp; Diet composition was compared across gears to identify the relationship between gear and diet.&amp;nbsp; Fishes were present in the stomach contents of nearly all burbot sampled and composed 62–100 percent of the stomach contents of burbot greater than 300 mm.&amp;nbsp; Prey diversity was greatest in diets of burbot sampled with small-mesh hoop nets.&amp;nbsp; Results from the current study provide important information on the diet of non-native burbot and highlight the potential influence of gear on diet studies.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Intermountain Journal of Science</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Diet of burbot and implications for sampling</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>