<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Dana L. Winkelman</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Eric R. Fetherman</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Brian W. Avila</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Introduced pathogens can affect fish populations, and three main factors affect disease occurrence: the environment, host, and pathogen. Manipulating at least one of these factors is necessary for controlling disease.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Myxobolus cerebralis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, the parasite responsible for salmonid whirling disease, became established in Colorado during the 1990s and caused significant declines in wild Rainbow Trout&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Oncorhynchus mykiss&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;populations. Attempts to re-establish Rainbow Trout have focused on manipulating salmonid host resistance. A Rainbow Trout strain known as GR&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;CRR was developed for stocking in Colorado by crossing a whirling-disease-resistant strain known as the German Rainbow Trout (GR) with the Colorado River Rainbow Trout (CRR). The GR&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;CRR fish exhibit resistance similar to that shown by GR, and survival and reproduction were expected to be similar to those of CRR. One disadvantage of stocking GR&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;CRR is that outcrossing and backcrossing could decrease resistance, and laboratory studies have indicated that this can occur. A potential disadvantage of stocking pure GR is lower survival due to domestication. To compare fry survival between the strains, a field experiment was conducted in 1.6-km reaches of nine Colorado streams. Each stream was stocked in August 2014 with 5,000 GR&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;CRR and 5,000 GR individuals. In October 2014, April 2015, and August 2015, apparent survival was assessed. Two laboratory predation experiments were also conducted. The field experiment revealed that short-term apparent survival was influenced by stream, and growth rate was influenced by strain and stream. However, after 12&amp;nbsp;months, there was no difference in apparent survival or growth rate between the GR and GR&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;CRR strains. Laboratory experiments showed that survival did not differ between the strains when confronted with Brown Trout&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Salmo trutta&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;predation. Our results indicate that the GR strain is a viable option for stocking in streams where&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;M. cerebralis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;is enzootic. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether GR fish will survive to maturity and reproduce.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1002/aah.10040</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Fisheries Society</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Survival of whirling disease resistant rainbow trout fry in the wild: A comparison of two strains</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>