<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Jane M. Hammarstrom</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>E-an Zen</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1975</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;In an effort to evaluate the method of quantitative analysis by X-ray diffraction as a means of determining dawsonite abundances in Green River" oil shale, we performed a series of grinding experiments. Weighed mixtures of dawsonite + quartz and dawsonite + quartz + shale were ground for preset lengths of time, and the following X-ray diffraction peaks were measured for intensity: dawsonite (110) at 15.6 2&lt;span&gt;θ&lt;/span&gt; and (211) (002) at 32.1° 2&lt;span&gt;θ&lt;/span&gt;, and quartz (100) at 20.9° 2&lt;span&gt;θ&lt;/span&gt; and (101) at 26.6° 2&lt;span&gt;θ&lt;/span&gt;. Heights and areas were measured. Intensity ratios were plotted as functions of grinding time with a calculated probable error. Intensity ratios generally decrease as grinding time increases. The intensity of the 15.6° peak, D&lt;sub&gt;15.6°&lt;/sub&gt;, is most affected, and the most drastic reduction occurs during the first 20 min of grinding. The D&lt;sub&gt;32.1°&lt;/sub&gt; peak is least sensitive to grinding but is subject to interference by other minerals in the shale. We conclude that the X-ray diffraction method is not well adapted to the routine quantitative determination of dawsonite in oil shale of the Green River Formation. &lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Geological Survey</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Quantitative determination of dawsonite in Green River Shale by powder-sample X-ray diffraction; effect of grinding</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>