<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Annemarie S. Baltay Sundstrom</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Eric M. Thompson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Grace Alexandra Parker</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;We develop an empirical, spatially continuous model for the single-station within-event (&lt;i&gt;ϕ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;SS&lt;/sub&gt;) component of earthquake ground motion variability in the Los Angeles area. &lt;i&gt;ϕ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;SS&lt;/sub&gt; represents event-to-event variability in site response or remaining variability due to path effects not captured by ground motion models. Site-specific values of &lt;i&gt;ϕ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;SS&lt;/sub&gt; at permanent seismic network stations were estimated during our previous work [1]. Here we first fit a model to &lt;i&gt;ϕ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;SS&lt;/sub&gt; conditioned on the time-averaged shear wave velocity in the upper 30 m (V&lt;sub&gt;S30&lt;/sub&gt;). We observe that stations on soft soil have larger average variability in site response than those on rock, especially at short periods. We use regression kriging to spatially interpolate &lt;i&gt;ϕ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;SS&lt;/sub&gt; to an even grid spacing, using the V&lt;sub&gt;S30&lt;/sub&gt;-scaling as the background model [2]. This improves on previous work that used ordinary kriging for interpolation [1]. We find that &lt;i&gt;ϕ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;SS&lt;/sub&gt; ranges from about 0.1 to 0.4 natural log units in our study area, representing variations in site response at single locations of a factor of 1.1 up to a factor of 1.5. There is both greater variability and more coherency in the variability for short-period site response than for long periods. We recommend using these &lt;i&gt;ϕ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;SS&lt;/sub&gt; models with the site response models of [1] for applications where quantification of variability is needed, such as probabilistic seismic hazard analyses.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Earthquake Engineering Research Institute</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Spatially continuous models of aleatory variability in seismic site response for southern California</dc:title>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>