<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Kristin M. Romanok</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Kelly L. Smalling</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Michael J. Focazio</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Robert Charboneau</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Christine Marie George</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Ana Navas-Acien</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Marcia O’Leary</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Reno Red Cloud</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Tracy Zacher</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Sara E. Breitmeyer</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Mary C. Cardon</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Christa K. Cuny</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Guthrie Ducheneaux</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Kendra Enright</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Nicola Evans</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>James L. Gray</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>David E. Harvey</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Michelle L. Hladik</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Leslie K. Kanagy</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Keith A. Loftin</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>R. Blaine McCleskey</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Elizabeth Medlock-Kakaley</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Shannon M. Meppelink</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Joshua F. Valder</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Christopher P. Weis</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Paul M. Bradley</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In the United States (US), private-supply tapwater (TW) is rarely monitored. This data gap undermines individual/community risk-management decision-making, leading to an increased probability of unrecognized contaminant exposures in rural and remote locations that rely on private wells. We assessed point-of-use (POU) TW in three northern plains Tribal Nations, where ongoing TW arsenic (As) interventions include expansion of small community water systems and POU adsorptive-media treatment for Strong Heart Water Study participants. Samples from 34 private-well and 22 public-supply sites were analyzed for 476 organics, 34 inorganics, and 3 in vitro bioactivities. 63 organics and 30 inorganics were detected. Arsenic, uranium (U), and lead (Pb) were detected in 54%, 43%, and 20% of samples, respectively. Concentrations equivalent to public-supply maximum contaminant level(s) (MCL) were exceeded only in untreated private-well samples (As 47%, U 3%). Precautionary health-based screening levels were exceeded frequently, due to inorganics in private supplies and chlorine-based disinfection byproducts in public supplies. The results indicate that simultaneous exposures to co-occurring TW contaminants are common, warranting consideration of expanded source, point-of-entry, or POU treatment(s). This study illustrates the importance of increased monitoring of private-well TW, employing a broad, environmentally informative analytical scope, to reduce the risks of unrecognized contaminant exposures.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1021/acsestwater.2c00293</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Chemical Society</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Tapwater exposures, effects potential, and residential risk management in Northern Plains Nations</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>