<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Phillip Dennison</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>W. Dean Hively</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Raymond F. Kokaly</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Guy Serbin</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Zhuoting Wu</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Philip W. Dabney</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jeffery G. Masek</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Michael Campbell</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Craig S. T. Daughtry</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Brian T. Lamb</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;This study focused on optimizing the placement of shortwave infrared (SWIR) bands for pixel-level estimation of fractional crop residue cover (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;f&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;R&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;) for the upcoming Landsat Next mission. We applied an iterative wavelength shift approach to a database of crop residue field spectra collected in Beltsville, Maryland, USA (n = 916) and computed generalized two- and three-band spectral indices for all wavelength combinations between 2000 and 2350 nm, then used these indices to model field-measured&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;f&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;R&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;. A subset of the full dataset with a Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) &amp;lt; 0.3 threshold (n = 643) was generated to evaluate green vegetation impacts on&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;f&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;R&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;estimation. For the two-band wavelength shift analyses applied to the NDVI &amp;lt; 0.3 dataset, a generalized normalized difference using 2226 nm and 2263 nm bands produced the top&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;f&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;R&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;estimation performance (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;R&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;= 0.8222;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;RMSE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;= 0.1296). These findings were similar to the established two-band Shortwave Infrared Normalized Difference Residue Index (SINDRI) (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;R&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;= 0.8145;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;RMSE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;= 0.1324). Performance of the two-band generalized normalized difference and SINDRI decreased for the full-NDVI dataset (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;R&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;= 0.5865 and 0.4144, respectively). For the three-band wavelength shift analyses applied to the NDVI &amp;lt; 0.3 dataset, a generalized ratio-based index with a 2031–2085–2216 nm band combination, closely matching established Cellulose Absorption Index (CAI) bands, was top performing (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;R&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;= 0.8397;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;RMSE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;= 0.1231). Three-band indices with CAI-type wavelengths maintained top&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;f&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;R&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;estimation performance for the full-NDVI dataset with a 2036–2111–2217 nm band combination (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;R&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;= 0.7581;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;RMSE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;= 0.1548). The 2036–2111–2217 nm band combination was also top performing in&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;f&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;R&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;estimation (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;R&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;= 0.8690;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;RMSE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;= 0.0970) for an additional analysis assessing combined green vegetation cover and surface moisture effects. Our results indicate that a three-band configuration with band centers and wavelength tolerances of 2036 nm (±5 nm), 2097 nm (±14 nm), and 2214 (±11 nm) would optimize Landsat Next SWIR bands for&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="html-italic"&gt;f&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;R&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;estimation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3390/rs14236128</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Optimizing Landsat Next shortwave infrared bands for crop residue characterization</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>