<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Christopher Sutherland</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Chris Bernier</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Kimberly Royar</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jillian R. Kilborn</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Catherine Callahan</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Rachel Cliche</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Leighlan S. Prout</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Toni Lyn Morelli</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Alexej P. K. Siren</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;h3 id="jbi14112-sec-0001-title" class="article-section__sub-title section1"&gt;Aim&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the face of global change, understanding causes of range limits are one of the most pressing needs in biogeography and ecology. A prevailing hypothesis is that abiotic stress forms cold (upper latitude/altitude) limits, whereas biotic interactions create warm (lower) limits. A new framework – Interactive Range-Limit Theory (iRLT) – asserts that positive biotic factors such as food availability can ameliorate abiotic stress along cold edges, whereas abiotic stress can have a positive effect and mediate biotic interactions (e.g., competition) along warm limits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 id="jbi14112-sec-0002-title" class="article-section__sub-title section1"&gt;Location&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Northeastern United States&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 id="jbi14112-sec-0003-title" class="article-section__sub-title section1"&gt;Taxon&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Carnivora&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 id="jbi14112-sec-0004-title" class="article-section__sub-title section1"&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;We evaluated two hypotheses of iRLT using occupancy and structural equation modeling (SEM) frameworks based on data collected over a 6-year period (2014–2019) of six carnivore species across a broad latitudinal (42.8–45.3°N) and altitudinal (3–1451&amp;nbsp;m) gradient.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 id="jbi14112-sec-0005-title" class="article-section__sub-title section1"&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;We found that snow directly limits populations, but prey or habitat availability can influence range dynamics along cold edges. For example, bobcats (&lt;i&gt;Lynx rufus&lt;/i&gt;) and coyotes (&lt;i&gt;Canis latrans&lt;/i&gt;) were limited by deep snow and long winters, but the availability of prey had a strong positive effect. Conversely, snow had a strong positive effect on the warm limits of Canada lynx (&lt;i&gt;Lynx canadensis&lt;/i&gt;), countering the negative effect of competition with the phylogenetically similar bobcat and with coyotes, highlighting how climate mediates competition between species.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 id="jbi14112-sec-0006-title" class="article-section__sub-title section1"&gt;Main conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;We used an integrated dataset that included competitors and prey species collected at the same spatial and temporal scale. As such, this design, along with a causal modeling framework (SEM), allowed us to evaluate community-wide hypotheses at macroecological scales and identify coarse-scale drivers of species' range limits. Our study supports iRLT and underscores the need to consider direct and indirect mechanisms for studying range dynamics and species' responses to global change.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1111/jbi.14112</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wiley</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Abiotic stress and biotic factors mediate range dynamics on opposing edges</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>