Melissa A. Haltuch Ellen Willis-Norton David D. Huff Elliott L. Hazen Lisa G. Crozier Michael G. Jacox Mark W. Nelson Kelly S. Andrews Lewis A. K. Barnett Aaron M. Berger Sabrina Beyer Joe Bizzarro David A. Boughton Jason M. Cope Mark H. Carr Heidi Dewar Edward Dick Dorval Emmanis Jason Dunham Vladlena Gertseva Correigh M. Greene Richard G. Gustafson Hamel Owen S. Chris J. Harvey Mark J. Henderson Chris E. Jordan Isaac C. Kaplan Steven T. Lindley Nathan J. Mantua Sean E. Matson Melissa H. Monk Peter B. Moyle Colin L Nicol John Pohl Ryan R. Rykaczewski Jameal F. Samhouri Susan Sogard Nick Tolimieri John Wallace Chantel Wetzel Steven J. Bograd Michelle M McClure 2023 <div class="JournalAbstract"><p><strong>Introduction:</strong><span>&nbsp;</span>Understanding how abundance, productivity and distribution of individual species may respond to climate change is a critical first step towards anticipating alterations in marine ecosystem structure and function, as well as developing strategies to adapt to the full range of potential changes.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong><span>&nbsp;</span>This study applies the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Fisheries Climate Vulnerability Assessment method to 64 federally-managed species in the California Current Large Marine Ecosystem to assess their vulnerability to climate change, where vulnerability is a function of a species’ exposure to environmental change and its biological sensitivity to a set of environmental conditions, which includes components of its resiliency and adaptive capacity to respond to these new conditions.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong><span>&nbsp;</span>Overall, two-thirds of the species were judged to have Moderate or greater vulnerability to climate change, and only one species was anticipated to have a positive response. Species classified as Highly or Very Highly vulnerable share one or more characteristics including: 1) having complex life histories that utilize a wide range of freshwater and marine habitats; 2) having habitat specialization, particularly for areas that are likely to experience increased hypoxia; 3) having long lifespans and low population growth rates; and/or 4) being of high commercial value combined with impacts from non-climate stressors such as anthropogenic habitat degradation. Species with Low or Moderate vulnerability are either habitat generalists, occupy deep-water habitats or are highly mobile and likely to shift their ranges.</p><p><strong>Discussion:</strong><span>&nbsp;</span>As climate-related changes intensify, this work provides key information for both scientists and managers as they address the long-term sustainability of fisheries in the region. This information can inform near-term advice for prioritizing species-level data collection and research on climate impacts, help managers to determine when and where a precautionary approach might be warranted, in harvest or other management decisions, and help identify habitats or life history stages that might be especially effective to protect or restore.</p></div> application/pdf 10.3389/fmars.2023.1103767 en Frontiers Media Vulnerability to climate change of managed stocks in the California Current large marine ecosystem article