<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Carlyne D. Cool</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Heather A. Lowers</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Leonard H. T. Go</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Lauren M. Zell-Baran</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Emily A. Sarver</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Kirsten S. Almberg</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Kathy D. Pang</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Susan M. Majka</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Angela D. Franko</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Naseema I. Vorajee</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Robert A. Cohen</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Cecil S. Rose</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Jeremy T. Hua</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div class="title -title"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Context.—&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Current approaches for characterizing retained lung dust using pathologists' qualitative assessment or scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) have limitations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="title -title"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective.—&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;To explore polarized light microscopy coupled with image-processing software, termed quantitative microscopy–particulate matter (QM-PM), as a tool to characterize in situ dust in lung tissue of US coal miners with progressive massive fibrosis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="title -title"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design.—&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;We developed a standardized protocol using microscopy images to characterize the in situ burden of birefringent crystalline silica/silicate particles (mineral density) and carbonaceous particles (pigment fraction). Mineral density and pigment fraction were compared with pathologists' qualitative assessments and SEM/EDS analyses. Particle features were compared between historical (born before 1930) and contemporary coal miners, who likely had different exposures following changes in mining technology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="title -title"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results.—&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lung tissue samples from 85 coal miners (62 historical and 23 contemporary) and 10 healthy controls were analyzed using QM-PM. Mineral density and pigment fraction measurements with QM-PM were comparable to consensus pathologists' scoring and SEM/EDS analyses. Contemporary miners had greater mineral density than historical miners (186 456 versus 63 727/mm&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;= .02) and controls (4542/mm&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;), consistent with higher amounts of silica/silicate dust. Contemporary and historical miners had similar particle sizes (median area, 1.00 versus 1.14 μm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;= .46) and birefringence under polarized light (median grayscale brightness: 80.9 versus 87.6;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;= .29).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="title -title"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions.—&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;QM-PM reliably characterizes in situ silica/silicate and carbonaceous particles in a reproducible, automated, accessible, and time/cost/labor-efficient manner, and shows promise as a tool for understanding occupational lung pathology and targeting exposure controls.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.5858/arpa.2022-0427-OA</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Allen Press</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Characterizing lung particulates using quantitative microscopy in coal miners with severe pneumoconiosis</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>