<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Hsiao-Hsuan Wang</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Serena Hamilton</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Volker Grimm</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Tomasz Koralewski</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Alejandro Salado</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Sondoss Elsawah</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Saman Razavi</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jing Yang</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Pierre D. Glynn</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jennifer Badham</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Alexey Voinov</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Mingshu Chen</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>William Grant</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Tarla Peterson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Karin Frank</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Gary W. Shenk</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>C. Michael Barton</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Anthony J. Jakeman</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>John C. Little</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Takuya Iwanaga</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="abstracts" class="Abstracts u-font-gulliver text-s"&gt;&lt;div id="abs0010" class="abstract author" lang="en"&gt;&lt;div id="abssec0010"&gt;&lt;p id="abspara0010"&gt;System-of-systems approaches for integrated assessments have become prevalent in recent years. Such approaches integrate a variety of models from different disciplines and modeling paradigms to represent a socio-environmental (or social-ecological) system aiming to holistically inform policy and decision-making processes. Central to the system-of-systems approaches is the representation of systems in a multi-tier framework with nested scales. Current modeling paradigms, however, have disciplinary-specific lineage, leading to inconsistencies in the conceptualization and integration of socio-environmental systems. In this paper, a multidisciplinary team of researchers, from engineering, natural and social sciences, have come together to detail socio-technical practices and challenges that arise in the consideration of scale throughout the socio-environmental modeling process. We identify key paths forward, focused on explicit consideration of scale and uncertainty, strengthening interdisciplinary communication, and improvement of the documentation process. We call for a grand vision (and commensurate funding) for holistic system-of-systems research that engages researchers, stakeholders, and policy makers in a multi-tiered process for the co-creation of knowledge and solutions to major socio-environmental problems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104885</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Socio-technical scales in socio-environmental modeling: Managing a system-of-systems modeling approach</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>