<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Ralph W. Tingley III</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Charles P. Madenjian</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Lynn M. Ogilvie</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Brian Roth</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jory L. Jonas</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jason B. Smith</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Benjamin Scott Leonhardt</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="abstracts" class="Abstracts u-font-serif text-s"&gt;&lt;div id="ab005" class="abstract author"&gt;&lt;div id="as005"&gt;&lt;p id="sp0005"&gt;Most studies of Lake Michigan lake trout (&lt;i&gt;Salvelinus namaycush&lt;/i&gt;) have focused on adults, with scant attention to juveniles (&amp;lt;400&amp;nbsp;mm). We explored the spatial distribution and diet of juvenile lake trout using U.S. Geological Survey September bottom trawl data (2015–2022) and stomach content information opportunistically collected since 2012 by various agencies using multiple gear types. Most juvenile lake trout in the September bottom trawl survey were caught at 37–64&amp;nbsp;m bottom depths. Length frequency data from the bottom trawl survey identified three size classes likely associated with wild juvenile lake trout age: &amp;lt; 85&amp;nbsp;mm (∼age-0), 85–170&amp;nbsp;mm (∼age-1) and &amp;gt; 170&amp;nbsp;mm (∼age-2+). Largest catches of wild lake trout&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;&amp;nbsp;170&amp;nbsp;mm occurred along a northeastern transect (near Frankfort, Michigan), whereas most &amp;gt; 170&amp;nbsp;mm were collected along southern transects.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Mysis diluviana&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;was the dominant prey for juvenile lake trout&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;&amp;nbsp;170&amp;nbsp;mm, and &amp;gt; 250&amp;nbsp;mm were primarily piscivorous, while 170–250&amp;nbsp;mm appeared to be a transitional period of switching from&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Mysis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;to fish. Species composition of prey fishes consumed by lake trout varied spatially and we found evidence of seasonal and annual diet variation within Grand Traverse Bay.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Diporeia&lt;/i&gt;, once an important component of juvenile lake trout diet, appears to no longer be consumed by juvenile lake trout in Lake Michigan to any measurable degree. Continued research on the ecology of juvenile lake trout may provide insight into the effects of a changing ecosystem on juvenile lake trout diet and growth, thereby contributing to the effort to rehabilitate the Lake Michigan lake trout population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jglr.2023.102244</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Spatial distribution and diet of Lake Michigan juvenile lake trout</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>