<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Ashley B.C. Goode</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Philip W. Tipping</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Melissa C. Smith</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Lyn A. Gettys</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Brittany K. Knowles</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Eileen Pokorny</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Luz Salinas</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Don DeAngelis</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Linhao Xu</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2023</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="abstracts" class="Abstracts u-font-serif text-s"&gt;&lt;div id="abs0002" class="abstract author"&gt;&lt;div id="abss0002"&gt;&lt;p id="spara012"&gt;An experiment along with simulation modeling was applied to study the combinations of herbicide treatment and biological control that best limit invasive water hyacinth (&lt;i&gt;Pontederia crassipes&lt;/i&gt;, formerly&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Eichhornia crassipes&lt;/i&gt;) in freshwater aquatic systems. The experiment consisted of 14 different treatments of&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. crassipes&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;in 1.67&amp;nbsp;m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;outdoor tank mesocosms. Seven treatments were with and seven were without insect biological control agents,&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Neochetina eichhorniae&lt;/i&gt;. In both of the sets of seven treatments, there was one no-herbicide treatment, a one-time full-strength herbicide treatment with 40&amp;nbsp;%, 80&amp;nbsp;% and 100&amp;nbsp;% coverage of the&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. crassipes&lt;/i&gt;, and a one-time half-strength herbicide treatment with 40&amp;nbsp;%, 80&amp;nbsp;%, and 100&amp;nbsp;% surface area coverage. An overarching hypothesis was that leaving part of a tank unsprayed, providing habitat for the maintenance of biological control agents, would optimize control. Data from the experiment, measured on five days over the 167-day period, were used to calibrate a difference equation model of&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. crassipes&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;with and without the biological control agent. The model was then used to project longer term dynamics of the system. The model predicted that an initial one-time herbicide treatment, combined with application of the biocontrol agent at 80&amp;nbsp;% areal coverage, could maintain&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. crassipes&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;at levels lower than the carrying capacity of the plant's biomass over the long term, though not enough that&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;N. eichhorniae&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;would be considered, by itself, a highly effective control. However, the results suggest that a combination of biocontrol with 80&amp;nbsp;% spraying coverage every 600 days or so would be an effective integrated biocontrol strategy for maintaining decreased&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;P. crassipes&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;biomass at low levels over the long term.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110566</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Less is more: Less herbicide does more when biological control is present in Pontederia crassipes</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>