<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Dana L. Winkelman</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Eric R. Fetherman</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Brian W. Avila</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div class="abstract-group "&gt;&lt;div class="article-section__content en main"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aquatic pathogens are a major concern for fish hatchery production, fisheries management, and conservation, and disease control needs to be addressed. Two important salmonid pathogens are&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Myxobolus cerebralis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Flavobacterium psychrophilum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;that cause whirling disease and bacterial coldwater disease (BCWD), respectively. Innate disease resistance is a potential option for reducing disease-related mortality in hatchery-reared rainbow trout (&lt;i&gt;Oncorhynchus mykiss&lt;/i&gt;, Walbaum). Two experiments were conducted to assess pathogen resistance of first-generation (F1) rainbow trout created by crossing&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;M. cerebralis&lt;/i&gt;- and&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;F. psychrophilum&lt;/i&gt;-resistant strains. In the first experiment, we exposed two rainbow trout strains and one F1 cross to six treatments: control (no exposure), mock injection,&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;F. psychrophilum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;only,&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;M. cerebralis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;only,&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;F. psychrophilum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;then&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;M. cerebralis&lt;/i&gt;, and&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;M. cerebralis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;then&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;F. psychrophilum&lt;/i&gt;. Results indicated that the F1 cross was not resistant to either pathogen. In the second experiment, we exposed five rainbow trout strains and four rainbow trout crosses to&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;F. psychrophilum&lt;/i&gt;. The second experiment indicated that at least one rainbow trout cross was&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;F&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;psychrophilum&lt;/i&gt;-resistant. Achieving dual resistance may be possible using selective breeding but only some multigenerational strains are suitable candidates for further evaluation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1111/jfd.13605</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wiley</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Dual resistance to Flavobacterium psychrophilum and Myxobolus cerebralis in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum)</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>