<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Jennifer Giroux</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Kathryn R. Kasicky</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Bethany H. Fatupaito</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Eric C. Wood</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Renee Crichlow</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Neil A. Sun Rhodes</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jennifer Tingueley</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Andrea Walling</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Kathryn Langwell</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>N. Cobb</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Robin T. Wilson</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;h3&gt;Objectives.&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We investigated factors associated with primary and secondary breast and cervical cancer screening among American Indian (AI) women receiving care from the Indian Health Service (IHS) in Montana and Wyoming.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods.&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Rates of primary screening (i.e., screening without evidence of a prior abnormal) and secondary screening during a three-year period (2004–2006) were determined in an age- and clinic-stratified random sample of 1,094 women at six IHS units through medical record review.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results.&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Three-year mammography prevalence rates among AI women aged ≥45 years were 37.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34.1, 41.3) for primary and 58.7% (95% CI 43.9, 73.5) for secondary screening. Among women aged ≥18 years, three-year Pap test prevalence rates were 37.8% (95% CI 34.9, 40.6) for primary and 53.2% (95% CI 46.0, 60.4) for secondary screening. Primary mammography screening was positively associated with number of visits and receiving care at an IHS hospital (both&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&amp;lt;0.001). Primary Pap test screening was inversely associated with age and positively associated with the number of patient visits (both&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&amp;lt;0.001). Secondary mammography screening was inversely associated with driving distance to an IHS facility (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;=0.035).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion.&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Our results are consistent with other surveys among AI women, which report that Healthy People 2010 goals for breast (90%) and cervical (70%) cancer screening have not been met. Improvements in breast and cervical cancer screening among AI women attending IHS facilities are needed.&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1177/003335491112600606</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Sage</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Breast and cervical cancer screening patterns among American Indian women at IHS clinics in Montana and Wyoming</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>