<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Dusty A. Swedberg</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Evan P. Tanner</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Samuel D. Fuhlendorf</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Shannon K. Brewer</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Skylar L. Wolf</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2023</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="preview-section-abstract"&gt;&lt;div id="abstracts" class="Abstracts u-font-serif"&gt;&lt;div id="ab0010" class="abstract author"&gt;&lt;div id="abs0010"&gt;&lt;p id="sp0035"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Studies of thermal selection by organisms, including fishes, are common and provide data that are useful for conservation and management. Advances in temperature sensing technology have improved these studies; however, the benefits of new technology (e.g., increased accuracy and greater deployment flexibility) should be carefully considered and compared to disadvantages (e.g., higher costs and training requirements). Fiber-optic distributed temperature sensing (FO-DTS) has become more common in aquatic applications and may provide a novel and useful method of relating thermal patchiness to habitat selection by fishes or other&amp;nbsp;aquatic organisms. We present a&amp;nbsp;case study&amp;nbsp;using FO-DTS to conduct a microhabitat-scale resource selection study using stream fishes of the Ozark Highland ecoregion in the south-central United States. We describe the setup and deployment of FO-DTS and how it was integrated into traditional&amp;nbsp;microhabitat&amp;nbsp;survey methods at three stream sites that were repeatedly surveyed over consecutive days. We successfully used FO-DTS to characterize thermal selection by Neosho Bass&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Micropterus&lt;i&gt;&amp;nbsp;velox&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;at our sites and conclude that the technology would be applicable to similar, microhabitat-scale evaluations. We then compare costs, benefits, and disadvantages of FO-DTS to other sensing methods that could have been used to complete our study. We found that FO-DTS provided accurate measures and greater coverage compared to most alternatives but that equipment costs were far greater. We provide suggestions for additional fisheries applications where FO-DTS may be useful while acknowledging that in some instances, the upfront costs of the technology may outweigh the potential benefits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="preview-section-introduction"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106542</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Using fiber-optic distributed temperature sensing in fisheries applications: An example from the Ozark Highlands</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>