<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Paul J. Kinzel</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Carl J. Legleiter</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Although established techniques for remote sensing of river bathymetry perform poorly in turbid water, image velocimetry can be effective under these conditions. This study describes a framework for mapping both of these attributes: Depths Inferred from Velocities Estimated by Remote Sensing, or DIVERS. The workflow involves linking image-derived velocities to depth via a flow resistance equation and invoking an optimization algorithm. We generalized an earlier formulation of DIVERS by: (1) using moving aircraft river velocimetry (MARV) to obtain a continuous, spatially extensive velocity field; (2) working within a channel-centered coordinate system; (3) allowing for local optimization of multiple parameters on a per-cross section basis; and (4) introducing a second objective function that can be used when discharge is not known. We also quantified the sensitivity of depth estimates to each parameter and input variable. MARV-based velocity estimates agreed closely with field measurements (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="math"&gt;&lt;span id="MathJax-Element-1-Frame" class="MathJax_SVG" data-mathml="&lt;math xmlns=&amp;quot;http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML&amp;quot;&gt;&lt;msup is=&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;&gt;&lt;mi is=&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;&gt;R&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mn is=&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;&gt;2&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/msup&gt;&lt;mo is=&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;&gt;=&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mn is=&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;&gt;0.81&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/math&gt;"&gt;&lt;span class="MJX_Assistive_MathML"&gt;&lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;=0.81&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;) and the use of DIVERS led to cross-sectional mean depths that were correlated with in situ observations (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="math"&gt;&lt;span id="MathJax-Element-2-Frame" class="MathJax_SVG" data-mathml="&lt;math xmlns=&amp;quot;http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML&amp;quot;&gt;&lt;msup is=&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;&gt;&lt;mi is=&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;&gt;R&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mn is=&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;&gt;2&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/msup&gt;&lt;mo is=&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;&gt;=&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mn is=&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;&gt;0.75&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/math&gt;"&gt;&lt;span class="MJX_Assistive_MathML"&gt;&lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;=0.75&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;). Errors in the input velocity field had the greatest impact on depth estimates, but the algorithm was not highly sensitive to initial parameter estimates when a known discharge was available to constrain the optimization. The DIVERS framework is predicated upon a number of simplifying assumptions — steady, uniform, one-dimensional flow and a strict, purely local proportionality between depth and velocity — that impose important limitations, but our results suggest that the approach can provide plausible, first-order estimates of river depths.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109732</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>A generalized framework for inferring river bathymetry from image-derived velocity fields</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>