<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Scott M. Miehls</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Nicholas S. Johnson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>C. Michael Wagner</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Alexander Haro</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div class=" sec"&gt;&lt;div class="title"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p class="chapter-para"&gt;We evaluated white light as a potential guidance cue for juvenile Sea Lamprey&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Petromyzon marinus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;in a natural setting as well as the effect of water velocity (0.25-, 0.50-, 0.75-, and 1.0-m/s test velocities) on light guidance behavior in a controlled laboratory flume, and characterized emigration timing and movement rates in a small stream (∼10 m wide and 0.7 m deep).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=" sec"&gt;&lt;div class="title"&gt;Methods&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p class="chapter-para"&gt;Behaviors and rates of downstream movement were monitored using PIT telemetry in both studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=" sec"&gt;&lt;div class="title"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p class="chapter-para"&gt;In the field study, downstream movement by juveniles released during October 30–November 27 appeared to be cued by precipitation-induced flow events when water temperatures ranged between 4°C and 8°C. Juveniles expressed lateral attraction to a short, bank-mounted linear light array, but the guidance effect was not strong or consistent between bank light locations. Downstream movement rates decreased slightly when juveniles were exposed to the light cue. In the laboratory flume experiment, at water velocities of 0.25 and 0.75 m/s, lamprey were 2.8 and 3.3 times more likely to be detected at antennas along a wall with a linear light array compared with other antennas across the width of the flume. Significant changes in distribution were detected farther upstream in the flume during 0.25- and 0.50-m/s water velocity trials compared with 0.75-m/s trials. Further, the rate of downstream movement through the length of the flume decreased under artificial lighting compared with dark controls under the 0.25- and 0.75-m/s velocity conditions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=" sec"&gt;&lt;div class="title"&gt;Conclusions&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p class="chapter-para"&gt;The results suggest lamprey exhibit a behavioral response to the light cue in both lab and field, but water velocity influences how effectively juveniles can respond to light cues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1093/tafafs/vnaf008</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Oxford Academic</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Field and laboratory evaluations of visible light as a cue for guiding downstream-migrating juvenile Sea Lamprey</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>