<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Rachel A. Loehman</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Britt Windsor Smith</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Christopher E. Soulard</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Jessica J. Walker</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div class="section"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p id="d6e228"&gt;Fire radiative power (FRP) shows promise as a diagnostic and predictive indicator of fire behavior and post-fire effects in Alaska, USA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="section"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aims&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p id="d6e233"&gt;To investigate relationships between FRP, vegetation functional groups, and environmental settings in Alaska (2003–2022) under various fire history conditions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="section"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p id="d6e238"&gt;We tested for distinctness of MODIS FRP distributions associated with vegetation classes and fire legacies (frequency and number of previous burns). We used a random forest model to examine relative importance of vegetation class for FRP versus bottom-up biophysical and temporal parameters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="section"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Key results&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p id="d6e243"&gt;FRP distributions are statistically distinct among vegetation functional groups with contrasting fuel biomass, or within functional groups with contrasting burn characteristics. Location and topography, which constrain vegetation class, strongly determine FRP, and fire history is of lesser importance over the 19-year analysis period.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="section"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p id="d6e248"&gt;FRP can be used to identify wildfire consumption in dissimilar vegetation classes but is highly conditioned by geographic location. The complex and evolving vegetation composition of post-fire boreal landscapes precludes a clear association of expected FRP at distinct stages of recovery.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="section"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Implications&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p id="d6e253"&gt;These results can inform further study of FRP as an indicator of fire behavior and fuel consumption and for informing dynamics of post-fire recovery across Alaska.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1071/WF24062</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>CSIRO Publishing</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Linking fire radiative power to land cover, fire history, and environmental setting in Alaska, 2003–2022</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>