<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Timothy K. Gates</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Eric D. Morway</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>John T. Cox</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jeremy T. White</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Ryan T. Bailey</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Michael N. Fienen</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Ibraheem A. Qurban</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Uranium (U) in rocks and soils of arid and semi-arid environments can be mobilized by irrigation and fertilization, posing environmental and health risks. Elevated U, along with selenium (Se) and nitrate (NO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;) co-constituents, necessitates careful monitoring and management. We developed a distributed-parameter numerical model to assess U pollution in an irrigated stream-aquifer system, applying it to a 552&amp;nbsp;km&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;region in Colorado's Lower Arkansas River Valley (LARV) over 14&amp;nbsp;years. A MODFLOW model, describing groundwater and stream flow, was coupled with an RT3D-OTIS model to portray reactive U transport. Calibration using the PESTPP-iES iterative ensemble smoother (iES) software indicated good agreement with observed U concentrations. The model revealed substantial and variable U levels across the LARV, highlighting potential hotspots and possible contributing factors, such as geological composition of the bedrock and near-surface shale and aquifer sediments derived from them, irrigation practices, and riparian landscape. U levels exceed the chronic standard (85th percentile&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;30&amp;nbsp;μg/L, set by the US Environmental Protection Agency), which is the permissible regulatory threshold, in groundwater across 44&amp;nbsp;% of the region and along the river by an average factor of 2.9. Simulated average U concentrations in the non-riparian aquifer and river are 124&amp;nbsp;μg/L and 60&amp;nbsp;μg/L, respectively, compared with 112&amp;nbsp;μg/L and 62&amp;nbsp;μg/L for measured values. The average 85th percentile U concentration is 222&amp;nbsp;μg/L in the aquifer and 82&amp;nbsp;μg/L in the river. Average simulated U mass loading to the river is 0.17&amp;nbsp;kg/day per km, compared to an estimated 0.23&amp;nbsp;kg/day per km. Findings provide a baseline for comparing future simulated outcomes of alternative best management practices (BMPs) for U pollution mitigation and offer a methodology applicable to other irrigated regions.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179861</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Assessing nonpoint-source uranium pollution in an irrigated stream-aquifer system</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>