<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Maurice Lamontagne</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>John E. Ebel</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>L. Baise</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Susan E. Hough</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In 1925, three moderately large damaging earthquakes occurred in North America over four months: the 28 February (local time; LT)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;M&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;6.2 Charlevoix, 27 June (LT)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;M&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;6.6 Montana, and 29 June&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;M&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;6.5 Santa Barbara earthquakes. The centennial anniversaries of these events motivated this retrospective consideration focused on the ground motions generated by the three events, including a reconsideration of early intensity assignments for the Montana earthquake. At the time, these three earthquakes appeared to support the arguments of some geologists who downplayed the severity of seismic hazard in southern California relative to other parts of the country. Some of the arguments advanced at that time, for example that Los Angeles “has the least to fear from ‘Acts of God’ of any city under the American flag,” (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a class="link link-ref xref-bibr" data-modal-source-id="rf34"&gt;Hill, 1928&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;) sound naïve if not laughable now, but a comparison of well‐constrained shaking distributions for the three earthquakes reveals the dramatic difference in wave propagation efficiency in western versus eastern North America (ENAM), which leads to moderate ENAM events being felt to much larger distances. At&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;M&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;6.2, the 1925 Charlevoix earthquake was a notably large event in ENAM. This earthquake was the largest event in eastern Canada since 1870 and caused damage in the epicentral region in addition to towns as far away as 200&amp;nbsp;km, with felt shaking extending over 1000&amp;nbsp;km. In contrast, felt shaking from the Santa Barbara earthquake barely extended beyond ∼200&amp;nbsp;km. Compiling published intensity distributions for larger ENAM earthquakes, we show that perceptible earthquake shaking is not uncommon in ENAM over century time scales, but experience with weakly felt shaking may incline people to downplay potential earthquake risk.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1785/0220250149</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Reflections on a trio of North American earthquakes in 1925</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>