<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Michael Barall</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Grace Alexandra Parker</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Evan Tyler Hirakawa</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Ruth A. Harris</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;he Hayward, Calaveras, and Rodgers Creek faults in the San Francisco Bay region of California have a high probability of producing a large earthquake in the next decades. Although these faults creep, the creep is insufficient to keep up with their relatively rapid slip rates on their deepest sections, so they have been storing tectonic strain since their last large earthquakes, with the Hayward’s and Rodgers Creek’s more than 150&amp;nbsp;yr ago. We do not know what the next large Hayward–Calaveras–Rodgers Creek earthquakes will look like or how strongly they will shake the San Francisco Bay region.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a class="link link-ref xref-bibr" data-modal-source-id="rf18"&gt;Harris&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;et&amp;nbsp;al.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;(2021)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;used the 3D dynamic (spontaneous) rupture method to simulate large earthquakes on these creeping faults. In this article, we examine the resulting simulated long‐period (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;T&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;gt; 1&amp;nbsp;s) ground shaking from 0 to 50&amp;nbsp;km distance, for earthquakes nucleating on the Hayward fault and earthquakes nucleating on the Rodgers Creek fault. We compare these simulated long‐period ground motions with the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a class="link link-ref xref-bibr" data-modal-source-id="rf8"&gt;Boore&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;et&amp;nbsp;al.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;(2014)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;well‐established empirically based ground‐motion model suitable for the slowest material velocity in our 3D velocity structure. We find that the simulated long‐period ground motions from the creeping‐fault earthquake scenarios produce a reasonable agreement with the empirical expectations if frictional cohesion is included only where it is appropriate.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1785/0220250194</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Long‐period ground motions from dynamic rupture simulations of large earthquakes on the creeping Hayward–Calaveras–Rodgers Creek fault system</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>