<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Thomas S. Weber</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Marika P. Stock</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Marc L. Buursink</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Haoran Piao</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Mingzhe Zhu</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Katey M. Walter-Anthony</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Vasilii V. Petrenko</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Kathleen R. Hall</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span id="_mce_caret" data-mce-bogus="1" data-mce-type="format-caret"&gt;&lt;span&gt;The magnitude of natural geologic methane (CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;) emissions to the atmosphere (including emissions of fossil CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;from offshore and onshore gas and oil seeps, diffuse microseepage, mud volcanoes, volcanic vents, and geothermal areas) is highly uncertain. The largest component of geologic emissions is thought to be microseepage, which is the diffuse flux of CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;from soils across large areas of productive hydrocarbon basins. The accuracy of existing bottom-up estimates of microseepage is limited by low spatial coverage of published microseepage measurements. We present the first soil—atmosphere CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;flux measurements from Michigan Basin, USA. Results from 335 measurements taken during summer and winter seasons across a large portion of the basin suggest microseepage is nonexistent in the sampled region. Even areas with predictive features for microseepage (e.g., underlying mature, organically rich source rocks, proven gas accumulations, faults, and lineaments) yield null or negative fluxes, suggesting that CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;emissions from microseepage are negligible throughout our study region. A Monte Carlo method was used to place an upper limit on the regional-mean microseepage flux, in which synthetic patchy microseepage distributions were generated and tested against our observations to assess the impact of possible emission hot spots that were missed by our sampling strategy. Our analysis finds it is very unlikely that regional-mean emissions are as high as assumed in a previous global microseepage study. The observed lack of seepage may be explained by groundwater flow, active methanotrophy, glacial sediments, and bedded salt deposits, which could inhibit vertical gas migration and release to atmosphere.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1525/elementa.2025.00058</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>University of California Press</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>New measurements indicate that natural geologic methane emissions from microseepage in the Michigan Basin are likely negligible</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>