<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Elowyn Yager</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Carl J. Legleiter</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Gordon Grant</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Laura A. Hempel</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Christina M. Leonard</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Katherine Adler</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Merritt Elizabeth Harlan</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Becky Fasth</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Daniel  C. White</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Rapids are common in steep rivers, often forming where flow transitions from supercritical (Froude number,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Fr&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;1) to subcritical (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Fr&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;&amp;nbsp;1) through a hydraulic jump. When upstream&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Fr&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;is supercritical but close to 1, this transition may occur as an undular hydraulic jump, exhibiting a train of stationary waves downstream of the jump toe. Previous studies proposed a method to estimate discharge using only UHJ wave spacing and channel width combined with a wave dispersion equation for large water depths relative to the UHJ wavelength. This method is based on the hypotheses that, by their presence, UHJs indicate near-critical flow conditions (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Fr&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt; ≈&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;1) and that wave celerity&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;c&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;is equal to and opposite the cross-sectionally averaged flow velocity&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;U&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;. However, these hypotheses have not been thoroughly tested. We used data from published UHJ flume experiments to test the hypotheses that&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Fr&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt; ≈&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;1 and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;c&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;U&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, compare the deep-water and general wave dispersion equations, and evaluate the accuracy of discharge estimates. In these experiments, the stationary waves exhibited shallow depths relative to wavelength and flow was subcritical (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Fr&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;&amp;nbsp;1) when averaged across multiple wavelengths. Additionally, wave celerity more closely approximated the surface flow velocity than&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;U&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;. By using a&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Fr&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;representative of actual conditions and applying a coefficient to correct for &lt;i&gt;c&lt;/i&gt; ≠ &lt;i&gt;U&lt;/i&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;, the accuracy of the discharge estimates improved. This finding suggests that the critical flow-based method is robust and can produce reliable streamflow estimates if the remotely observed wave trains are correctly interpreted as UHJs, without requiring in situ measurements.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1029/2025WR040997</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Geophysical Union</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Estimating discharge from undular hydraulic jumps: Feasibility assessment based on flume experiments</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>