<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Thure E. Cerling</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>David W. Marchetti</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Amy L. Ellwein</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Shannon A. Mahan</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>David R. Bowling</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Benjamin H. Passey</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Victor J. Polyak</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Yemane Asmerom</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Tyler E. Huth</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Laminated soil carbonate rinds are a Quaternary paleoclimate archive whose isotope composition is linked to soil formation conditions. At Rio Mesa, Utah (USA), we investigated the fidelity of rind records in a river terrace setting by determining the seasonal timing of rind formation and testing for inter-record replication. We infer soil carbonate formed in the spring season, contrasting with our prior inference of summer formation at Teasdale, Utah, ≈200&amp;nbsp;km distant. This apparent discrepancy occurs because of differences in the timing of the largest annual infiltration (spring vs. summer). At Rio Mesa, modern soil data show that soil carbonate δ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;C would have high values (−2 to 2‰ VPDB) regardless of seasonal activity of C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;versus C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;plants because respiration rate is a strong control. We accordingly suggest reassessment of published records interpreting soil carbonate δ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;C only via C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;versus C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;plant abundance. Three rind δ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;C and δ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;O records generally replicated. Intriguingly, rind δ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;C may inversely correlate with summer insolation, evidence for global-scale influence on soils. Rind δ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;O is not as clearly correlated with published western USA paleoclimate records, potentially due to regional differences in climate and because rinds record soil-specific processes. Our results support the fidelity of the soil carbonate rind paleoarchive and suggest that because rind formation seasonality is intimately tied to infiltration seasonality, spatial transects of rind records might be used to delineate boundaries between areas dominated by spring and summer infiltration, permitting reconstruction of the geographic extent of large-scale hydrologic phenomena such as the North American Monsoon.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1029/2025GC012660</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Geophysical Union</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Springtime formation of laminated soil carbonate rinds and changes in fluvial terrace soils on orbital timescales at Rio Mesa, Utah, USA</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>