<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Grace Alexandra Parker</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Sarah E. Minson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Annemarie S. Baltay</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Elizabeth S. Cochran</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;We estimate ground-motion variability near the 2019 &lt;strong&gt;M&lt;/strong&gt; 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake&amp;nbsp;sequence. Accurate seismic hazard estimation requires understanding ground-motion spatial correlations, yet many studies lack the dense station coverage needed to resolve small-scale variability. The 2019 &lt;strong&gt;M&lt;/strong&gt; 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence presents a unique opportunity to examine ground motions and their spatial correlations at a range of interstation distances. The permanent seismic network was augmented with hundreds of temporary&amp;nbsp;stations including several fault-crossing nodal arrays. We compute the event (&lt;i&gt;&lt;strong&gt;δE&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/i&gt;) and&amp;nbsp;within-event (&lt;i&gt;&lt;strong&gt;δW&lt;sub&gt;ij&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/i&gt;) residuals from the observed peak ground velocity and peak ground&amp;nbsp;acceleration data to isolate potential sources of ground-motion variability. We then compare &lt;i&gt;&lt;strong&gt;δW&lt;sub&gt;ij&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/i&gt; between station pairs that record an event to understand the semivariance of&amp;nbsp;the ground motion versus interstation distance. By fitting an exponential model to the&amp;nbsp;semivariances, we determine a correlation range of 25 km for the Ridgecrest region.&amp;nbsp;Although the exponential model fits the broad-scale increase of semivariance with interstation distance, we also observe smaller-scale trends. We find that ground motions are&amp;nbsp;less correlated for station pairs that are near or across faults that ruptured during the 2019&amp;nbsp;Ridgecrest sequence. We also find large, positive median &lt;i&gt;&lt;strong&gt;δW&lt;sub&gt;ij&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/i&gt; with relative values 2–3&amp;nbsp;times larger than nearby stations for individual stations’ near-fault traces. Near-fault&amp;nbsp;amplification and greater ground-motion variability can delineate fault zones and may&amp;nbsp;locally increase the seismic hazard.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1785/0120250160</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Near-fault amplification and ground motion variability during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California sequence</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>