<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Evan A. Thaler</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Brian A. Ebel</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Kevin D. Bladon</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Cedric Pimont</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Wildfires can substantially impact the hydrology of forested watersheds, increasing the risk of hydrologic hazards such as flash floods and debris flows. Soil hydraulic properties related to infiltration are a key control in determining the timing and magnitude of these hydrogeomorphic events. In our study, we collected 445 soil cores from burned (216 cores) and unburned (229 cores) reference catchments and analyzed them for soil hydraulic properties 10&amp;nbsp;months after the 2022 Cedar Creek Fire in Oregon, USA. We observed significantly greater field-saturated hydraulic conductivity (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;K&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;&lt;i&gt;fs&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;), sorptivity (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;), and wetting front potential (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Ψ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;&lt;i&gt;f&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;) in burned soils relative to unburned soils, with median ratios of 5.7, 4.4, and 5.0, respectively. Among low-, moderate-, and high burn severity groups, soil hydraulic properties were not statistically different. Reductions in median soil bulk density with increasing burn severity suggested an expansion of pore sizes, which may have been partially responsible for increasing&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;K&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;fs&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;. Additionally, in some burned soil samples, the increase in soil hydraulic properties may have been partially related to a concurrent reduction in “natural background” water repellency that is characteristic of dry, unburned soils in the Western Cascades. We observed no evidence of spatial autocorrelation in&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;K&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;fs&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;using semivariogram analysis. Principal component analysis paired with a&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;k-&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;means cluster analysis suggested that soil physical properties explained variations in soil hydraulic properties better than landscape attributes. Although there is a lack of regional results for comparison, our results trend in the opposite direction from drier, lower net primary productivity regions that are typically studied for post-wildfire soil hydraulic properties.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1029/2025JG009611</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Geophysical Union</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Effects of wildfire on soil hydraulic properties in the western Oregon Cascades</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>