<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Jeremy D. Womer</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jeffrey S. Ziller</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Christina Amy Murphy</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Daison Weedop</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div class=" sec"&gt;&lt;div class="title"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p class="chapter-para"&gt;Understanding whether fishes quickly respond to shifting temperatures and flows, especially as they pass through river reaches that may be thermally unsuitable, may help to prioritize climate-informed management strategies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=" sec"&gt;&lt;div class="title"&gt;Methods&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p class="chapter-para"&gt;Here, we use 15 years of daily fish passage data (2005–2020) from the Leaburg Dam on the McKenzie River, Oregon, USA, with water temperatures and river flows from two associated gauges. We examine the relative influence of temperature, flow, and calendar date on fish moving upstream, the range of conditions experienced by each species, and long-term patterns in timing, supported by annual count data from the years 1971–2020.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=" sec"&gt;&lt;div class="title"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p class="chapter-para"&gt;Comparisons of timing and conditions while each species passed upstream through the Leaburg Dam fish ladders revealed that some taxa were more consistent seasonally (e.g., Pacific Lamprey&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Entosphenus tridentatus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and Largescale Sucker&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Catostomus macrocheilus&lt;/i&gt;), experiencing a more restricted range of conditions, while others moved throughout the year under highly variable environmental conditions (e.g., trout). For both groups, calendar date appeared to be a primary driver of movement timing, even when local environmental factors of temperature and flow were considered. We note broad trends toward earlier passage across all species except Chinook Salmon&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Oncorhynchus tshawytscha&lt;/i&gt;. Notable declines in movement of Mountain Whitefish&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Prosopium williamsoni&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and Largescale Suckers occurred during years of extreme weather events, indicating that they may be particularly sensitive to the combined impacts of water temperature and flow and could serve as sentinel taxa.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=" sec"&gt;&lt;div class="title"&gt;Conclusions&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p class="chapter-para"&gt;Although timing is recognized as a driver for the onset of migrations, this suggests that most fish may continue to move upriver during consistent time periods, potentially increasing their risk of exposure to suboptimal environmental conditions. Our results demonstrate the utility of long-term passage data for detecting patterns in local timing, environmental conditions co-occurring with fish movement, and the sensitivity of different fish species in responding to environmental extremes during upstream migrations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1093/tafafs/vnag008</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Oxford Academic</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Timing is everything: Drivers of upstream movement of fishes</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>