Nathan J. Hostetter Jeffrey A. Buckel Ryan M. Tharp 2026 <p><span>Home range is a vital component to understanding animal ecology and can vary with factors like species, body size, and habitat. Artificial reefs are increasingly used to supplement or enhance habitat for reef fish. Quantifying reef fish home range sizes and the factors affecting home ranges is thus critical to understanding the efficacy of artificial reefs to sustain communities that reflect those on natural reefs. We estimated home ranges of reef fishes at artificial reefs in the southeast United States, evaluated what factors affected those home ranges, and compared them to home ranges of similarly sized fish on natural reefs. From June–October 2021 and 2022, we deployed acoustic tags on five fishery targeted reef species, black sea bass (</span><i>Centropristis striata</i><span>), gag (</span><i>Mycteroperca microlepis</i><span>), greater amberjack (</span><i>Seriola dumerili</i><span>), almaco jack (</span><i>S. rivoliana</i><span>), and red snapper (</span><i>Lutjanus campechanus</i><span>), on four artificial reefs near Cape Lookout, North Carolina. Tagged fish were tracked using a fine-scale positioning system for ~ 120&nbsp;days. Home ranges varied by species and fish size (i.e., total length). Black sea bass had the smallest home ranges (mean = 6266&nbsp;m</span>²<span>), gag and red snapper had moderate home ranges (38,265&nbsp;m</span>²<span>&nbsp;and 53,553&nbsp;m</span>²<span>, respectively), and almaco jack and greater amberjack had the largest (152,146&nbsp;m</span>²<span>, and 414,107&nbsp;m</span>²<span>, respectively). Black sea bass, gag, and red snapper displayed increased home range size with total length while greater amberjack and almaco jack home ranges remained relatively constant across lengths. Greater amberjack home ranges were further influenced by artificial reef complex area with an increase in reef area leading to a larger home range. Our data from artificial reefs showed considerable overlap in the relationship between home range and body size when compared to similarly sized predatory reef fish on natural reefs. This information will be vital in improving ecological understanding of how artificial reefs can influence area use of reef-associated species to help inform future artificial reef deployments. Moreover, these results provide an important comparison between artificial reefs and natural reefs as habitats for reef-associated species, a topic that will become increasingly important as the quantity of artificial structures in our oceans increases.</span> deployments. Moreover, these results provide an important comparison between artificial reefs and natural reefs as habitats for reef-associated species, a topic that will become increasingly important as the quantity of artificial structures in our oceans increases.</p> application/pdf 10.1186/s40317-025-00442-0 en Springer Home ranges of economically important reef fishes at North Carolina artificial reefs article