<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>F. J. Dein</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>D. H. Ellis</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>G.F. Gee</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>C.M. Mirande</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>D. H. Ellis</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1996</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Many techniques are available for pre ve n ting escape of captive cranes. These include tenotomy, tenectomy, wing clipping, confinement under nets, amputation, brailing, and vane trimming (Ellis and Dein 1991). The advantages and limitations of each technique are presented.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>National Biological Service; International Crane Foundation</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Flight restraint</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>