<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Milton Friend</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In most developed countries, the maintenance of the numbers of wildlife&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;is vested in the natural resource agencies of those countries. During earlier times, game species were the primary focus of natural resource agencies&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2,3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;however, current wildlife conservation continues to transition towards a more holistic focus on biodiversity&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;and environmental health&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5,6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;. Nevertheless, that transition lags behind in addressing wildlife disease in &amp;ldquo;&amp;hellip;the struggle for existence between different forms of life&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;7&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thus, the primary objective of this presentation is to provide a pragmatic assessment of wildlife disease that is irrespective of one&amp;rsquo;s orientation towards wildlife conservation. A secondary objective is to highlight the changing role of disease over time as a wildlife conservation factor. That transition is relevant to the insights provided for current and future efforts focused on sustaining global biodiversity and desired levels of wildlife populations in nature.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3133/cir1401</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Geological Survey</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Why bother about wildlife disease?</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>