<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Wesley W. Stone</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Nancy T. Baker</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2015</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Annual county-level pesticide use was estimated for 423 herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides applied to agricultural crops grown in the conterminous United States during 2008&amp;ndash;12. For all States except California, pesticide-use data were compiled from proprietary surveys of farm operations located within U.S. Department of Agriculture Crop Reporting Districts (CRDs). Surveyed pesticide-use data were used in conjunction with county annual harvested-crop acres reported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture 2007 and 2012 Censuses of Agriculture and the 2008&amp;ndash;11 County Agricultural Production Survey to calculate use rates per harvested-crop acre, or an &amp;ldquo;estimated pesticide use&amp;rdquo; (EPest) rate, for each crop by year. County-use estimates were then calculated by multiplying EPest rates by harvested-crop acres for each pesticide crop combination. Use estimates for California were obtained from annual Department of Pesticide Regulation-Pesticide Use Reports.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proprietary surveyed pesticide-use data were not available for all CRDs and years. When pesticide-survey data were unavailable for a CRD in a particular year, EPest extrapolated rates were calculated from adjoining or nearby CRDs to ensure that pesticide use was estimated for all counties where harvested-crop acres were reported. Two estimation methods were used&amp;mdash;EPest-low and EPest high&amp;mdash;and differed in how they treated situations when a CRD was surveyed and pesticide use was not reported for a particular pesticide-by-crop combination. California pesticide-use estimates were not extrapolated; therefore, EPest-low and EPest-high are the same for counties in California.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This data series is a continuation of the 1992&amp;ndash;2009 pesticide-use estimates reported by Stone (2013). It is an update of estimates for 2008&amp;ndash;9 (Stone, 2013), as well as an update of the 2010&amp;ndash;11 preliminary estimates reported by Baker and Stone (2013). EPest values from these compilations (1992&amp;ndash;2012) are suitable for making national, regional, and watershed assessments of annual pesticide use. County-level estimates are provided to make it easier to compile watershed assessments; however, users should be aware there is a greater degree of uncertainty in individual county-level estimates when compared to CRD or State-level estimates. This report provides EPest-low and EPest-high annual agricultural pesticide use for counties of the conterminous United States for 423 compounds during 2008&amp;ndash;12 in tab-delimited files organized by compound, year, State Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) code, county FIPS code, and amount in kilograms (kg).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EPest-high county pesticide-use estimates were divided into tables 1 through 7 by pesticide name:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Table 1: 2, 4-D through Chlorantraniliprole&lt;br /&gt;Table 2: Chlorethoxyfos through Diflufenzopyr&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table 3: Dimethenamid through Gibberellic acid&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table 4: Glufosinate through Metiram&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table 5: Metolachlor through Propazine&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table 6: Propiconazole through Triasulfuron&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table 7: Tribenuron methyl through Zoxamide&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EPest-low county pesticide-use estimates were divided into tables 8 through 14 by pesticide name:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Table 8: 2, 4-D through Chlorantraniliprole&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table 9: Chlorethoxyfos through Diflufenzopyr&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table 10: Dimethenamid through Gibberellic acid&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table 11: Glufosinate through Metiram&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table 12: Metolachlor through Propazine&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table 13: Propiconazole through Triasulfuron&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table 14: Tribenuron methyl through Zoxamide&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3133/ds907</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Geological Survey</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Estimated annual agricultural pesticide use for counties of the conterminous United States, 2008-12</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>