<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>James L. Carter</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Scott A. Grotheer</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Thomas F. Cuffney</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Terry M. Short</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Stephen R. Moulton II</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2000</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Qualitative and quantitative methods to&#13;
process benthic macroinvertebrate (BMI)&#13;
samples have been developed and tested&#13;
by the U.S. Geological Survey?s National&#13;
Water Quality Laboratory Biological Group.&#13;
The qualitative processing method is&#13;
based on visually sorting a sample for up to&#13;
2 hours. Sorting focuses on attaining organisms&#13;
that are likely to result in taxonomic&#13;
identifications to lower taxonomic levels (for&#13;
example, Genus or Species). Immature and&#13;
damaged organisms are also sorted when&#13;
they are likely to result in unique determinations.&#13;
The sorted sample remnant is&#13;
scanned briefly by a second person to determine&#13;
if obvious taxa were missed.&#13;
The quantitative processing method is&#13;
based on a fixed-count approach that targets&#13;
some minimum count, such as 100 or&#13;
300 organisms. Organisms are sorted from&#13;
randomly selected 5.1- by 5.1-centimeter&#13;
parts of a gridded subsampling frame. The&#13;
sorted remnant from each sample is resorted&#13;
by a second individual for at least 10&#13;
percent of the original sort time. A large-rare&#13;
organism search is performed on the unsorted&#13;
remnant to sort BMI taxa that were&#13;
not likely represented in the sorted grids.&#13;
After either qualitatively or quantitatively&#13;
sorting the sample, BMIs are identified by&#13;
using one of three different types of taxonomic&#13;
assessment. The Standard Taxonomic&#13;
Assessment is comparable to the&#13;
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency&#13;
Rapid Bioassessment Protocol III and typically&#13;
provides Genus- or Species-level taxonomic&#13;
resolution. The Rapid Taxonomic Assessment&#13;
is comparable to the U.S. Environmental&#13;
Protection Agency Rapid Bioassessment&#13;
Protocol II and provides Familylevel&#13;
and higher taxonomic resolution. The&#13;
Custom Taxonomic Assessment provides&#13;
Species-level resolution whenever possible&#13;
for groups identified to higher taxonomic&#13;
levels by using the Standard Taxonomic&#13;
Assessment. The consistent use of standardized&#13;
designations and notes facilitates&#13;
the interpretation of BMI data within and&#13;
among water-quality studies. Taxonomic&#13;
identifications are quality assured by verifying&#13;
all referenced taxa and randomly reviewing&#13;
10 percent of the taxonomic identifications&#13;
performed weekly by Biological&#13;
Group taxonomists. Taxonomic errors discovered&#13;
during this review are corrected.&#13;
BMI data are reviewed for accuracy and&#13;
completeness prior to release. BMI data are&#13;
released phylogenetically in spreadsheet&#13;
format and unprocessed abundances are&#13;
corrected for laboratory and field subsampling&#13;
when necessary.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3133/ofr00212</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Geological Survey</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Methods of analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory-Processing, taxonomy, and quality control of benthic macroinvertebrate samples</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>