<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Johnnie N. Moore</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>David B. Smith</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Sonia A. Nagorski</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2001</dc:date>
  <dc:description>We used ultraclean sampling techniques to study the solute (operationally defined as&#13;
&lt;0.2 ?m) surface water geochemistry at five sites along the Upper Blackfoot River and&#13;
four sites along the Landers Fork, some in more detail and more regularly than others. We&#13;
collected samples also from Hogum Creek, a tributary to the Blackfoot, from Copper&#13;
Creek, a tributary to the Landers Fork, and from ground water seeps contributing to the&#13;
flow along the Landers Fork. To better define the physical dynamics of the hydrologic&#13;
system and to determine geochemical loads, we measured streamflow at all the sites where&#13;
we took samples for water quality analysis. The Upper Blackfoot River, which drains&#13;
historic mines ca. 20 Km upstream of the study area, had higher trace metal concentrations&#13;
than did the Landers Fork, which drains the pristine Scapegoat Wilderness area. In both&#13;
rivers, many of the major elements were inversely related to streamflow, and at some sites,&#13;
several show a hysteresis effect in which the concentrations were lower on the rising limb&#13;
of the hydrograph than on the falling limb. However, many of the trace elements followed&#13;
far more irregular trends, especially in the Blackfoot River. Elements such as As, Cu, Fe,&#13;
Mn, S, and Zn exhibited complex and variable temporal patterns, which included almost no&#13;
response to streamflow differences, increased concentrations following a summer storm&#13;
and at the start of snowmelt in the spring, and/or increased concentrations throughout the&#13;
course of spring runoff. In summary, complex interactions between the timing and&#13;
magnitude of streamflow with physical and chemical processes within the watershed&#13;
appeared to greatly influence the geochemistry at the sites, and streamflow values alone&#13;
were not good predictors of solute concentrations in the rivers.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3133/ofr0159</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Geological Survey</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Geochemical baseline studies and relations between water quality and streamflow in the Upper Blackfoot watershed, Montana: Data for July 1997-December 1998</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>