<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Heather M. Bragg</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Matthew W. Johnston</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Dwight Q. Tanner</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;html&gt;&lt;body&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When water is released through the spillways of dams, air is entrained in the water, increasing the downstream concentration of dissolved gases. Excess dissolved-gas concentrations can have adverse effects on freshwater aquatic life. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, collected dissolved-gas and water-temperature data at eight monitoring stations on the lower Columbia River in Oregon and Washington in 2010. Significant findings from the data include:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;During the spill season of April through August 2010, hourly values of total dissolved gas (TDG) were occasionally larger than 115-percent saturation for the forebay stations (John Day navigation lock, The Dalles forebay, Bonneville forebay, and Camas). Hourly values of total dissolved gas were occasionally larger than 120-percent saturation for four tailwater stations (John Day Dam tailwater, The Dalles tailwater, Cascade Island, and Warrendale).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;From late July to late August or early September 2010, hourly water temperatures were greater than 20°C (degrees Celsius) at the eight stations on the lower Columbia River. According to the State of Oregon temperature standard, the 7-day average maximum temperature of the lower Columbia River should not exceed 20°C Washington regulations state that the 1-day maximum should not exceed 20°C as a result of human activities.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;All 105 laboratory checks of the TDG sensors (without the membrane attached) with a certified pressure gage were within ± (plus or minus) 0.5 percent saturation after 3 to 4 weeks of deployment in the river.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;All but 1 of the 85 in situ field checks of TDG sensors with a secondary standard were within &lt;span&gt;±&lt;/span&gt;2.0-percent saturation after 3-4 weeks of deployment in the river. All 88 of the field checks of barometric pressure were within &lt;span&gt;±&lt;/span&gt;1 millimeter of mercury of a primary standard, and all 87 water-temperature field checks were within &lt;span&gt;±&lt;/span&gt;0.2&lt;span&gt;°&lt;/span&gt;C of a secondary standard.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;For the eight monitoring stations in water year 2010, a total of 99.7 percent of the TDG data were received in real time and were within 1-percent saturation of the expected value on the basis of calibration data, replicate quality-control measurements in the river, and comparison to ambient river conditions at adjacent stations. Data received from the individual stations ranged from 98.4 to 100.0 percent complete.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3133/ofr20101293</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Geological Survey</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Total dissolved gas and water temperature in the lower Columbia River, Oregon and Washington, water year 2010: Quality-assurance data and comparison to water-quality standards</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>