Paul Rabie
Manuela Huso
Andrew Tredennick
Daniel Dalthorp
2020
<html><body><p>We evaluate three approaches to accounting for incidental carcasses when estimating an upper bound on total mortality (π) as π<sup>β </sup>using the Evidence of Absence model (EoA; Dalthorp and others, 2017) to assess compliance with an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) (Dalthorp & Huso, 2015) under a monitoring protocol that includes formal, dedicated carcass surveys that achieve an overall detection probability of π<sub>π </sub>=0.15 in the first year, followed by 4 years with no formal monitoring but with carcasses potentially discovered incidentally by operations and maintenance crews in their normal course of activity or otherwise discovered outside the formal searches. We refer to carcasses discovered incidentally as βincidentalsβ and define π₯<sub>π</sub> as the count of incidentals. Similarly, we define π₯<sub>π </sub> as the number of carcasses found during the formal searches conducted the first year.</p></body></html>
application/pdf
10.3133/ofr20201027
en
U.S. Geological Survey
Some approaches to accounting for incidental carcass discoveries in non-monitored years using the Evidence of Absence model
reports