<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Rufus D. Catchings</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Mark R. Goldman</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Coyn J. Criley</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Robert R. Sickler</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Joanne H. Chan</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;To better understand the potential for amplified ground shaking at sites that house critical infrastructure, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) evaluated shear-wave velocities (&lt;i&gt;V&lt;sub&gt;S&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;) at six strong-motion recording stations in Southern California Edison facilities in southern California. We calculated &lt;i&gt;V&lt;sub&gt;S30&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; (time-averaged shear-wave velocity in the upper 30 meters [m]), which is a parameter used in ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) to account for site amplification (Building Safety Seismic Council, 2003; Holtzer and others, 2005; Baltay and Boatwright, 2015). Previous site-characterization studies using multiple methods in Alameda, Napa, and Sonoma Counties, Calif., and in British Columbia (Catchings and others, 2017, 2019; Chan and others, 2018a, 2018b) show that some sites have significant lateral variability; thus, a single measurement of &lt;i&gt;V&lt;sub&gt;S30 &lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;nearest to the strong-motion recording station may not accurately account for the actual subsurface velocity variations. In the summer of 2017, we recorded body and surface waves along linear profiles (118–174 m long) using active-source seismic methods (226-kilogram [kg] accelerated weight-drop and 3.5-kg sledgehammer impacts) near strong-motion recording stations. We used S-wave refraction tomography and a multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) method (using common midpoint cross-correlation; CMPCC) to evaluate two-dimensional (2-D) &lt;i&gt;V&lt;sub&gt;S&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; from body and surface waves, respectively. We evaluated &lt;i&gt;V&lt;sub&gt;S&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; from both Rayleigh- and Love-waves.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3133/ofr20241016</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Geological Survey</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Evaluation of 2-D shear-wave velocity models and VS30at six strong-motion recording stations in southern California using multichannel analysis of surface waves and refraction tomography</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>