<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Alyssa M. Thornton</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Each year, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) personnel collect approximately 52,000 water-quality samples from rivers and streams across the United States. Several samplers are used by the USGS for water-quality sample collection in riverine environments. These samplers are coated with Plasti Dip to protect the exterior of the sampler; however, Plasti Dip is susceptible to fraying and wear, requiring maintenance. Alternative coatings were tested to determine if a different coating is better suited for the samplers. The alternative coatings included Raptor, powder coating, and DuraCoat; a fifth option was bare metal. Samplers with different coatings were evaluated based on initial coating application, equipment blank samples, a controlled wear test, blank sample collection with worn samplers, maintenance and re-coating of samplers, and field-use and wear tracking. The powder-coated sampler proved to be the top performer overall in the study.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3133/ofr20251016</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Geological Survey</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Evaluation of alternative coatings for U.S. Geological Survey water-quality samplers</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>