<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Conde R. Thorn</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Carole L. Thomas</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2000</dc:date>
  <dc:description>The City of Albuquerque Public Works Department, Water Resources &#13;
Management (City), is interested in quantifying aquifer hydraulic &#13;
properties in the Albuquerque, New Mexico, area to better understand &#13;
and manage water resources in the Middle Rio Grande Basin. In 1998, &#13;
the City and the U.S. Geological Survey entered into a cooperative &#13;
program to determine hydraulic properties of aquifer material &#13;
adjacent to screened intervals of piezometers in the Albuquerque &#13;
area.&#13;
&#13;
Investigators conducted slug tests from March 8 through April &#13;
8, 1999, to estimate hydraulic conductivity of aquifer material &#13;
adjacent to the screened intervals of 25 piezometers from 11 nested-&#13;
piezometer sites in the Albuquerque area. At 20 of the &#13;
piezometers, slug-test responses were typical; at 2 piezometers, &#13;
tests were prematurely terminated because the tests were taking too &#13;
long to complete; and at 3 piezometers, test responses were &#13;
oscillatory. Methods used to estimate hydraulic conductivity &#13;
were the Bouwer and Rice method or the Cooper, Bredehoeft, and &#13;
Papadopulos method for most tests; the Shapiro and Greene method for &#13;
prematurely terminated tests; and the van der Kamp method for &#13;
oscillatory tests.&#13;
&#13;
Hydraulic-conductivity estimates ranged from about 0.15 &#13;
to 92 feet per day. In general, the smaller estimated values are &#13;
associated with fine-grained aquifer materials and the larger &#13;
estimated hydraulic-conductivity values are associated with coarse-&#13;
grained aquifer materials adjacent to the screened intervals of the &#13;
piezometers. Hydraulic-conductivity estimates ranged from &#13;
0.15 to 8.2 feet per day for aquifer materials adjacent to the &#13;
screened intervals at 12 piezometers and from 12 to 41 feet &#13;
per day for aquifer materials adjacent to the screened intervals &#13;
at 10 piezometers. Hydraulic-conductivity estimates at four &#13;
piezometers were greater than 41 feet per day.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3133/wri004253</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey ;&#13;
Information Services [distributor],</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Use of air-pressurized slug tests to estimate hydraulic conductivity at selected piezometers completed in the Santa Fe Group aquifer system, Albuquerque area, New Mexico</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>