<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Scott D. Waltemeyer</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2001</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Data collected from 20 U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging&#13;
stations, most of which were operated in New Mexico between &#13;
about 1969 and 1977, were used to define hydrograph characteristics &#13;
for small New Mexico streams. Drainage areas for the gaging stations&#13;
ranged from 0.23 to 18.2 square miles. Observed values for &#13;
the hydrograph characteristics were determined for 87 of the most &#13;
significant rainfall-runoff events at these gaging stations &#13;
and were used to define regional regression relations with basin &#13;
characteristics. Regional relations defined lag time (tl), time &#13;
of concentration (tc), and time to peak (tp) as functions of stream &#13;
length and basin shape. The regional equation developed for &#13;
time of concentration for New Mexico agrees well with the Kirpich &#13;
equation developed for Tennessee. The Kirpich equation is based on &#13;
stream length and channel slope, whereas the New Mexico equation is &#13;
based on stream length and basin shape. Both equations, however, &#13;
underestimate tc when applied to larger basins where tc is greater &#13;
than about 2 hours.&#13;
&#13;
The median ratio between tp and tc for the observed data was &#13;
0.66, which equals the value (0.67) recommended by the Natural &#13;
Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation &#13;
Service). However, the median ratio between tl and tc was only &#13;
0.42, whereas the commonly used ratio is 0.60.&#13;
&#13;
A relation also was developed between unit-peak discharge (qu) &#13;
and time of concentration. The unit-peak discharge relation is &#13;
similar in slope to the Natural Resources Conservation Service &#13;
equation, but the equation developed for New Mexico in this study &#13;
produces estimates of qu that range from two to three times as &#13;
large as those estimated from the Natural Resources Conservation &#13;
Service equation. &#13;
&#13;
An average value of 833 was determined for the empirical constant&#13;
Kp. A default value of 484 has been used by the Natural &#13;
Resources Conservation Service when site-specific data are not &#13;
available. The use of a lower value of Kp in calculations generally&#13;
results in a lower peak discharge. A relation between the &#13;
empirical constant Kp and average channel slope was defined in this &#13;
study. The predicted Kp values from the equation ranged from 530 &#13;
to 964 for the 20 flood-hydrograph gaging stations. The standard &#13;
error of estimate for the equation is 36 percent.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3133/wri014154</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:title>Relations for estimating unit-hydrograph parameters in New Mexico</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>