<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>D. Briane Adams</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>T. W. Danielson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>John F. Ficke</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1977</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Seven reservoirs in central Colorado, operated by the Denver Board of Water Commissioners, were studied during 1967-73 to determine evaporation losses. These reservoirs, Elevenmile Canyon, Dillon, Gross, Antero, Cheesman, Williams Fork, and Ralston, are located on both sides of the Continental Divide. Methods for computing evaporation include energy-budget, mass-transfer, and pan relationships. Three reservoirs, Elevenmile Canyon, Dillon, and Gross, had mass-transfer coefficients calibrated by energy-budget studies. At the remaining reservoirs, an empirical technique was used to estimate the mass-transfer coefficient. The enery-budget-calibrated methods give the most accurate evaporation values; the empirical coefficients give only a best estimate of evaporation. All reservoirs should be calibrated by energy-budget studies. The pan method of computing evaporation is the least reliable method because of problems of advected energy through the sides of the pan, representative pan exposure , and the irregularity of ratios of reservoir to pan evaporation. (Woodard-USGS)</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3133/wri76114</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division,</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Evaporation from seven reservoirs in the Denver water-supply system, central Colorado</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>