<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>W. A. Harenberg</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1980</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Measurements at bankfull stage were made at 136 sites &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;to determine whether predictions of flood discharges using &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;channel-geometry characteristics are as good as or better &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;than predictions using basin characteristics. These meas&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;urements are used to determine the variables of bankfull &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;width, area, depth, and velocity. These variables are &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;combined with basin characteristics for the sites, and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;multiple-regression techniques are used to select the best &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;combination of variables to estimate the selected floods. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Generally, discharge estimates obtained from equations using channel characteristics have smaller standard errors than those using basin characteristics, and equations using both basin and channel characteristics have even lower standard errors. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3133/wri8032</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Geological Survey</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Using channel geometry to estimate flood flow at ungaged sites in Idaho</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>