<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Charles Berenbrock</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1999</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Information on streamflow gains and losses 
in the lower Boise River Basin is needed by the 
Idaho Department of Water Resources to determine recharge to and discharge from the ground- 
water system. A method was developed to select 
canal and creek reaches such that a minimum of 
two reaches were measured in each of 12 different 
areas that share a set of common environmental 
characteristics. After a large number of environmental characteristics were evaluated, soil type, 
land use, and canal density were selected to define 
the 12 areas.
Seepage runs were made on 39 irrigation 
canal and creek reaches in the lower Boise River 
Basin in June-July and September 1996. During 
the June-July seepage runs, irrigation canals 
gained and lost water, whereas in September, most 
reaches lost. No substantial differences were noted 
in the median and spread of flow gains and losses 
within the 12 areas; therefore, no direct relation 
could be defined between seepage and environmental areas.
Seepage runs were made on three reaches of 
the lower Boise River in November 1996 to identify flow gains and losses after the irrigation season. The two upstream reaches had net gains, 
whereas the most downstream reach, near the confluence with the Snake River, had a net loss. The 
total gain to the river from the three reaches was 
90.71 cubic feet per second.
Because of potential flooding in March 1997, 
water was diverted from the Boise River into the 
New York Canal to reduce flows in the river. This 
allowed a seepage run on the canal when there 
were no irrigation diversions or return flows. Subsequently, two seepage runs were made in March 
when flows near Diversion Dam were about 440 
and 860 cubic feet per second. Both gains and 
losses were measured along the canal, but losses 
were dominant. Total loss from the canal during 
the first seepage run was -54 cubic feet per second; 
during the second, -143 cubic feet per second. Sixteen wells near the canal were measured weekly 
from the last week in February through mid-June. 
Generally, water levels decreased from February 
to mid-April and then increased through June. 
Paired wells near the canal indicated downward 
movement of water, probably recharge from canal 
losses.
Study results indicate that additional seepage 
runs are needed on irrigation canals and creeks, 
the Boise River, and the New York Canal. Piezometers installed at different depths are needed to better define vertical ground-water movement and 
gradients. Additional work is needed to determine 
how seepage in canals and streams relates to environmental characteristics.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3133/wri994105</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Geological Survey</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Streamflow gains and losses in the lower Boise River basin, Idaho, 1996-97</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>