{"pageNumber":"109","pageRowStart":"2700","pageSize":"25","recordCount":6233,"records":[{"id":79405,"text":"ds219 - 2006 - Cross-Sectional Data for Selected Reaches of the Chattahoochee River within the Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area, Georgia, 2004","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2017-02-03T11:17:45","indexId":"ds219","displayToPublicDate":"2006-11-20T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":310,"text":"Data Series","code":"DS","onlineIssn":"2327-638X","printIssn":"2327-0271","active":false,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"219","title":"Cross-Sectional Data for Selected Reaches of the Chattahoochee River within the Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area, Georgia, 2004","docAbstract":"This report presents hydrologic data for selected reaches of the Chattahoochee River within the Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area (CRNRA). Data about transect location, width, depth, and velocity of flow for selected reaches of the river are presented in tabular form. The tables contain measurements collected from shoal and run habitats identified as critical sites for the CRNRA. In shoal habitats, measurements were collected while wading using a digital flowmeter and laser range finder. In run habitats, measurements were collected using acoustic Doppler current profiling. Fifty-three transects were established in six reaches throughout the CRNRA; 24 in shoal habitat, 26 in run habitat, and 3 in pool habitat.\r\n\r\nIllustrations in this report contain information about study area location, hydrology, transect locations, and cross-sectional information. A study area location figure is followed by figures identifying locations of transects within each individual reach. Cross-sectional information is presented for each transect, by reach, in a series of graphs.\r\n\r\nThe data presented herein can be used to complete preliminary habitat assessments for the Chattahoochee River within the CRNRA. These preliminary assessments can be used to identify reaches of concern for future impacts associated with continual development in the Metropolitan Atlanta area and potential water allocation agreements between Georgia, Florida, and Alabama.","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/ds219","usgsCitation":"Dalton, M.S., 2006, Cross-Sectional Data for Selected Reaches of the Chattahoochee River within the Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area, Georgia, 2004: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 219, vi, 121 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ds219.","productDescription":"vi, 121 p.","numberOfPages":"127","temporalStart":"2004-01-01","temporalEnd":"2004-12-29","costCenters":[{"id":13634,"text":"South Atlantic Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":194921,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8911,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/2006/219/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"country":"United States","state":"Georgia","otherGeospatial":"Chattahoochee River, Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area","geographicExtents":"{ \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\", \"features\": [ { \"type\": \"Feature\", \"properties\": {}, \"geometry\": { \"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [ [ [ -85,30 ], [ -85,37 ], [ -82,37 ], [ -82,30 ], [ -85,30 ] ] ] } } ] }","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4acce4b07f02db67ec6e","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Dalton, Melinda S. 0000-0002-2929-5573 msdalton@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-5573","contributorId":267,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Dalton","given":"Melinda","email":"msdalton@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"S.","affiliations":[{"id":509,"text":"Office of the Associate Director for Water","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":316,"text":"Georgia Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289818,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1}]}}
,{"id":79408,"text":"sir20065172 - 2006 - Hydrogeologic framework and ground-water Flow in quaternary deposits at the U.S. Army Atterbury Joint Maneuver Training Center near Edinburgh, Indiana, 2002-2003","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2016-07-08T11:05:14","indexId":"sir20065172","displayToPublicDate":"2006-11-20T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5172","title":"Hydrogeologic framework and ground-water Flow in quaternary deposits at the U.S. Army Atterbury Joint Maneuver Training Center near Edinburgh, Indiana, 2002-2003","docAbstract":"<p>A hydrogeologic framework was developed for unconsolidated Quaternary deposits at the U.S. Army Atterbury Joint Maneuver Training Center. The framework describes the potential for the occurrence of ground water on the basis of physiography and the distribution of geologic materials within the study area. Four geologic units-the Jessup, Trafalgar, Atherton, and Martinsville Formations-were identified, and their distribution was mapped as four hydrogeologic regions. The Jessup and Trafalgar Formations are fine-grained, poorly sorted tills. At least two facies of the Atherton Formation, the lacustrine and outwash facies, are in the study area. The Martinsville Formation includes materials deposited or reworked since the glacial period. With the exception of the Atherton Formation outwash facies, the Quaternary deposits are primarily fine-grained, silt- and clay-rich sediments that function as confining layers or aquitards. The Atherton Formation out-wash facies includes sand and gravel deposits that constitute the primary aquifers in the study area. The four hydrogeologic regions mapped in this investigation are designated as the Bedrock, Jessup Till, Trafalgar Till, and Atherton Outwash Regions. Each region represents an area with a distinctive physiographic expression and vertical sequence of Quaternary deposits. The Bedrock Region in the western and southwestern part of the study area commonly is underlain by 0 to 15 feet of Martinsville Formation resting directly on bedrock. Potential ground-water yields are limited. The Jessup Till Region in the southeastern part of the study area includes the uplands on either side of the stream valleys. Sediments commonly range from 30 to 90 feet in thickness. This region includes clay-rich till of the Jessup Formation and sand and gravel deposits of the Atherton Formation outwash facies; the Atherton Formation outwash facies tends to be thin, and ground-water yields will be moderate. The Trafalgar Till Region in the north and northwest-central part of the study area commonly is underlain by 10 to 30 feet of Trafalgar till or Trafalgar till over 25 to 50 feet of Jessup till. Within, separating, and beneath these tills are deposits of the Atherton Formation outwash facies-the sand and gravel deposits with the best potential to support a water-supply well. Generally, the outwash facies in this region are thin sand and gravel lenses, except in a few locations that are in excess of 30 feet thick. The Atherton Outwash Region is the lowland area associated with the major valleys in all but the far southwestern part of the study area. This region has the greatest thickness of outwash facies sands and gravels (often in excess of 20 feet), which are the primary aquifers. In the Atterbury Joint Maneuver Training Center, the combined Atherton Outwash Region and the Trafalgar Till Region have the greatest potential as infiltration areas because of low topographic relief and(or) sandy soils. From water-level data collected in July and August 2003, horizontal ground-water flow was determined generally to be toward the Atherton Outwash Region and the valley of the Drift-wood River to the east. Vertical hydraulic gradients were documented at nested well pairs. At two sites, upwardly directed gradients are reflected by flowing wells. Ground-water discharge to surface water is likely in some eastern reaches of the valleys of Nineveh and Lick Creeks. In the valley of Nineveh Creek, potential for ground-water discharge is indicated by the presence of a flowing well, upwardly directed vertical hydraulic gradients, and ground-water heads that were higher than surface-water elevations. In the valley of Lick Creek, ground-water discharge also is indicated by the presence of flowing wells and ground-water heads that were higher than surface-water elevations.</p>","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/sir20065172","collaboration":"Prepared in Cooperation with the Indiana Army National Guard","usgsCitation":"Robinson, B.A., and Risch, M.R., 2006, Hydrogeologic framework and ground-water Flow in quaternary deposits at the U.S. Army Atterbury Joint Maneuver Training Center near Edinburgh, Indiana, 2002-2003: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5172, v, 58 p.; 11 figs.; 5 tables, https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065172.","productDescription":"v, 58 p.; 11 figs.; 5 tables","startPage":"1","endPage":"52","numberOfPages":"58","onlineOnly":"N","additionalOnlineFiles":"N","temporalStart":"2002-01-01","temporalEnd":"2003-12-31","costCenters":[{"id":346,"text":"Indiana Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":324905,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/sir20065172.GIF"},{"id":8920,"rank":1,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5172/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"country":"United States","state":"Indiana","otherGeospatial":"Camp Atterbury","geographicExtents":"{\n  \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n  \"features\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"Feature\",\n      \"properties\": {},\n      \"geometry\": {\n        \"type\": \"Polygon\",\n        \"coordinates\": [\n          [\n            [\n              -85.98861694335938,\n              39.39640774949963\n            ],\n            [\n              -86.08406066894531,\n              39.39640774949963\n            ],\n            [\n              -86.16439819335938,\n              39.39587712612034\n            ],\n            [\n              -86.25778198242188,\n              39.35659979720227\n            ],\n            [\n              -86.26258850097655,\n              39.24980258296657\n            ],\n            [\n              -86.2591552734375,\n              39.1987374726247\n            ],\n            [\n              -86.18705749511719,\n              39.19660895352297\n            ],\n            [\n              -86.15135192871094,\n              39.13272339930891\n            ],\n            [\n              -86.06208801269531,\n              39.128462299490046\n            ],\n            [\n              -85.98861694335938,\n              39.13165814852468\n            ],\n            [\n              -85.968017578125,\n              39.138581990583525\n            ],\n            [\n              -85.96939086914062,\n              39.26734763353102\n            ],\n            [\n              -85.97282409667969,\n              39.31623792008409\n            ],\n            [\n              -85.97694396972656,\n              39.38101803294523\n            ],\n            [\n              -85.97557067871094,\n              39.39640774949963\n            ],\n            [\n              -85.98861694335938,\n              39.39640774949963\n            ]\n          ]\n        ]\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4a50e4b07f02db628cdd","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Robinson, Bret A. barobins@usgs.gov","contributorId":3897,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Robinson","given":"Bret","email":"barobins@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":289832,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Risch, Martin R. 0000-0002-7908-7887 mrrisch@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-7887","contributorId":2118,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Risch","given":"Martin","email":"mrrisch@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"R.","affiliations":[{"id":346,"text":"Indiana Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":35860,"text":"Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":27231,"text":"Indiana-Kentucky Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289831,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":79383,"text":"sir20065235 - 2006 - Post-Wildfire Sedimentation in Saguaro National Park, Rincon Mountain District, and Effects on Lowland Leopard Frog Habitat","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-03T00:10:04","indexId":"sir20065235","displayToPublicDate":"2006-11-17T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5235","title":"Post-Wildfire Sedimentation in Saguaro National Park, Rincon Mountain District, and Effects on Lowland Leopard Frog Habitat","docAbstract":"The Rincon Mountain District of Saguaro National Park occupies about 272 square kilometers of mountains, canyons, and alluvial fans in southeastern Arizona just east of Tucson. The park contains some of the last remaining habitat in the Tucson Basin of the lowland leopard frog that lives in the bedrock pools called tinajas in canyons at elevations between 850 and 1,800 meters. Those tinajas that contain water year-round are critical winter habitat for tadpoles, and the breeding success of the leopard frogs depends on these features. In recent years, many tinajas that previously had provided habitat for the leopard frogs have been buried beneath large volumes of coarse sandy gravel that resulted from severe, stand-replacing wildfires in the watersheds above them.\r\n\r\nThe U. S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the National Park Service, conducted a study in 2004-06 to determine critical sediment-source areas, and the mechanisms of sediment delivery from hillslopes to stream channels to areas of leopard frog habitat and to estimate the increase in rates of sedimentation resulting from wildfires.\r\n\r\nSpatial data of watershed characteristics, as well as historical data, including photographs, monitoring surveys, precipitation and stream discharge records, were used in conjunction with field observations conducted between spring 2004 and fall 2005. The Helens II fire in 2003, the fifth largest wildfire to burn in the Rincon Mountains since 1989, offered an opportunity to observe mechanisms of sediment erosion, transport, and deposition in the immediate post-fire environment.\r\n\r\nReduction of the forest canopy, understory vegetation, and organic litter on the ground surface in severe burn areas caused increased surface runoff in the Joaquin Canyon watershed that led to intensified erosion of hillslopes. An initial flush of fine material, mostly ash, was transported to lower channel reaches with the first significant precipitation event following the fire. Subsequently, the main erosional mechanisms were rainsplash and sheetwash that delivered high sediment loads to headwater tributaries. The increased runoff also led to scouring of the headwater tributaries and the downstream transport of a sediment slug by a series of episodic debris flows or hyperconcentrated flows. The sediment slug, following intense summer precipitation, moved downstream several hundred meters at a time. Sediment was remobilized during subsequent periods of runoff. As of fall 2005, sediment had traveled 3.3 km downstream from the nearest burn area margin and had buried several tinajas in as much as a meter of sediment. Sediment continued to overwhelm the transport capacity of the channel even as the hillslopes in the burn area were showing evidence of recovery.\r\n\r\nThe sedimentation history and effects on leopard frog habitat in other channels in the Rincon Mountains was evaluated by analyzing observations made by Saguaro National Park staff during monitoring surveys of leopard frog populations. The best record of post-wildfire sediment deposition was that of Loma Verde Wash in which the filling of all tinajas in the two years after the 1999 Box Canyon fire was recorded. Monitoring of leopard frog populations in Wildhorse Canyon appeared to reflect the lingering effects of heavy sedimentation related to the 1989 Chiva fire. Populations appear to be recovering in the upper tinajas, which were mainly free of sediment, but sightings of frogs were sparse in the lower tinajas that still contained high volumes of sediment. In Madrona Canyon, leopard frog sightings were sparse, possibly indicating that habitat had been detrimentally affected by the Rincon fire of 1994.\r\n\r\nBased on rates of filling of tinajas in Joaquin Canyon and Loma Verde Wash, minimum estimated rates of sediment yield from burn areas ranged from 425 to 1,960 kg ha-1. The residence time of sediment in tinajas was found to be highly variable. Tinajas in Loma Verde Wash that were buried following the","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20065235","usgsCitation":"Parker, J.T., 2006, Post-Wildfire Sedimentation in Saguaro National Park, Rincon Mountain District, and Effects on Lowland Leopard Frog Habitat: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5235, vi, 35 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065235.","productDescription":"vi, 35 p.","numberOfPages":"41","costCenters":[{"id":128,"text":"Arizona Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":192729,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8884,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5235/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ad5e4b07f02db683b41","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Parker, John T.C.","contributorId":18766,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Parker","given":"John","email":"","middleInitial":"T.C.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289741,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1}]}}
,{"id":79338,"text":"sir20065222 - 2006 - Hydrologic Characteristics of a Managed Wetland and a Natural Riverine Wetland along the Kankakee River in Northwestern Indiana","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2016-05-09T11:06:35","indexId":"sir20065222","displayToPublicDate":"2006-11-17T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5222","title":"Hydrologic Characteristics of a Managed Wetland and a Natural Riverine Wetland along the Kankakee River in Northwestern Indiana","docAbstract":"<p>Characteristics of ground-water/surface-water interactions were identified at a managed wetland (Hog Marsh) and a natural riverine wetland (LaSalle) located on the north and south sides, respectively, of the Kankakee River in northwestern Indiana. Hog Marsh covers about 390 hectares of the Grand Kankakee Marsh County Park. LaSalle covers about 100 hectares of the LaSalle State Fish and Wildlife Area, and is about 20 kilometers downstream of Hog Marsh. Hydrologic characteristics of the two wetlands were investigated using data from 1997 to 1999 for 22 wells adjacent to the Kankakee River in northwestern Indiana. Surface-water levels at the managed wetland were controlled by a system of channels, levees, and managed flooding. Surface-water levels at the natural riverine wetland were not controlled. Ground-water levels in the unconfined surficial aquifer beneath the two wetlands were analyzed by assessing water-level fluctuations. Fifteen wells at Hog Marsh and seven wells at LaSalle were monitored. The interquartile range in ground-water levels away from the river at Hog Marsh fluctuated less (from 0.4 to 0.7 meters) than all ground-water levels in the same aquifer beneath LaSalle (from 0.9 to 1.0 meters). The difference in the range of water-level fluctuation probably is attributable to the managed flooding of Hog Marsh units, which tends to maintain somewhat uniform water levels in that wetland. Ground-water-flow directions along a vertical section through the unconfined surficial aquifer at the managed wetland were more variable than those at the natural riverine wetland. During winter and spring, when flow in the Kankakee River is high, flow is from the Kankakee River into the adjacent surficial aquifer and towards a 2-meter-wide Brown Ditch on the north side of Hog Marsh. Water levels in Brown Ditch remain lower than those in the Kankakee River during this period. From June to December, when flow in the Kankakee River is moderate to low, a flow divide developed near the center of the managed wetland. Ground-water flow south of the divide is to the Kankakee River; north of the divide, it is toward Brown Ditch. Slight ground-water mounding near the center of the managed wetland is accentuated by water-management practices that intentionally flood that area. Ground-water flow in the surficial aquifer at the natural riverine wetland was not impeded by ditches or managed flooding, and a simple flow-through system from areas south of the Kankakee River to the river was observed. A ground-water flow model was constructed along a representative cross section through the surficial aquifer at the managed wetland and calibrated using data collected at the site. A no-flow boundary was used beneath the Kankakee River, and head-dependent boundaries were used along the north end of the model and at the base of the model. The model simulations indicated that artificial controls on the managed-wetland hydrology create sites of recharge to and discharge from the surficial aquifer that are absent at the natural riverine wetland. The steady-state flow simulation represented flow conditions following a 4-month period of no changes in hydrologic stresses. The simulation results indicated that flow paths originating from flooded areas near the center of the managed wetland are sources of aquifer recharge during the managed-flooding period. Brown Ditch captured almost all of the ground water north of the managed wetland. The simulated water budget along a well transect indicated that 88 percent of inflow to the surficial aquifer beneath the managed wetland was from a distribution channel and from flooding in the management units. These modeling results identify differences in flow patterns between the managed and natural riverine wetlands in addition to those identified by the water-level data. Results of transient simulations indicated that surface water from the Kankakee River penetrated only about 2 to 3 meters into the surficial aquif</p>","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/sir20065222","usgsCitation":"Arihood, L.D., Bayless, E.R., and Sidle, W.C., 2006, Hydrologic Characteristics of a Managed Wetland and a Natural Riverine Wetland along the Kankakee River in Northwestern Indiana: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5222, vi, 78 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065222.","productDescription":"vi, 78 p.","startPage":"1","endPage":"78","numberOfPages":"84","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"N","costCenters":[{"id":346,"text":"Indiana Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":195561,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/sir20065222.GIF"},{"id":8830,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5222/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"country":"United States","state":"Indiana","geographicExtents":"{\n  \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n  \"features\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"Feature\",\n      \"properties\": {},\n      \"geometry\": {\n        \"type\": \"Polygon\",\n        \"coordinates\": [\n          [\n            [\n              -87.27762222290039,\n              41.21750015595371\n            ],\n            [\n              -87.27762222290039,\n              41.226086473772526\n            ],\n            [\n              -87.2720217704773,\n              41.226086473772526\n            ],\n            [\n              -87.2720217704773,\n              41.21750015595371\n            ],\n            [\n              -87.27762222290039,\n              41.21750015595371\n            ]\n          ]\n        ]\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ae1e4b07f02db688a64","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Arihood, Leslie D. 0000-0001-5792-3699 larihood@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5792-3699","contributorId":2357,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Arihood","given":"Leslie","email":"larihood@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"D.","affiliations":[{"id":35860,"text":"Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":346,"text":"Indiana Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289683,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Bayless, E. Randall 0000-0002-0357-3635","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0357-3635","contributorId":42586,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Bayless","given":"E.","email":"","middleInitial":"Randall","affiliations":[{"id":35860,"text":"Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289684,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Sidle, William C.","contributorId":47885,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Sidle","given":"William","email":"","middleInitial":"C.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289685,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3}]}}
,{"id":79391,"text":"sir20065155 - 2006 - Apparent Consumption vs. Total Consumption--A Lead-Acid Battery Case Study","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-02T00:14:07","indexId":"sir20065155","displayToPublicDate":"2006-11-17T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5155","title":"Apparent Consumption vs. Total Consumption--A Lead-Acid Battery Case Study","docAbstract":"Introduction: \r\nThis report compares estimates of U.S. apparent consumption of lead with estimates of total U.S. consumption of this mineral commodity from a materials flow perspective. The difference, attributed to the amount of lead contained in imported and exported products, was found to be significant for this sector. The study also assesses the effects of including mineral commodities incorporated in manufactured products on the interpretation of observed trends in minerals consumption and trade.\r\n\r\nMaterials flow is a systems approach to understanding what happens to the materials we use from the time a material is extracted, through its processing and manufacturing, to its ultimate disposition. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) provides accurate and detailed mineral production and mineral commodity consumption statistics that are essential for government, nongovernment organizations, and the public to gain a better understanding of how and where materials are used and their effect on the environment and society.\r\n\r\nPublished statistics on mineral apparent consumption are limited to estimates of consumption of raw material forms (ore, concentrate, and [or] refined metal). For this study, apparent consumption is defined as mine production + secondary refined production + imports (concentrates and refined metal) ? exports (concentrates and refined metal) + adjustments for government and industry stock changes. These estimates do not account for the amount of mineral commodities contained in manufactured products that are imported to the United States, nor do they deduct the amount of these mineral commodities contained in manufactured products that are exported from the United States.\r\n\r\nWhen imports or exports of manufactured products contribute significantly to the total use of a particular raw material, an estimate of consumption that does not consider the incorporated forms of these mineral commodities within imported or exported manufactured products can be either under- or overreported (depending on the net trade flow). Factors that influence consumption and trade patterns include variations in industry structure, labor or financial markets, legislation, and technology. As U.S. trade patterns of manufactured products change, omitting mineral commodities incorporated into these goods as part of U.S. mineral commodity consumption estimates may affect the interpretation of observed trends in minerals consumption and trade.\r\n\r\nAlthough it may be desirable to include minerals contained in manufactured products as part of consumption estimates, collection and estimation of these data are sometimes difficult. Consumption and trade data for every traded product may not be readily available. Compiling comprehensive consumption statistics for mineral commodities, which have many end uses, each including multiple products, may be time consuming. For these reasons, studies of all mineral commodities are not feasible. Mineral commodity selection for this study is based on data accessibility considerations and the relative importance of lead contained in imported and exported products when considered part of total U.S. lead consumption.\r\n\r\nLead was selected for this initial evaluation of total mineral consumption because of the need to understand the consumption pattern of this potentially toxic metal and its compounds, the relative simplicity of this sector?s end-use structure, and the availability of trade data. This study draws upon the findings of an earlier lead consumption study (Biviano and others, 1999) conducted by the USGS for the period 1984 to 1993, but uses a different study methodology for an industry whose structure has changed from that considered in the earlier study.\r\n\r\nFigure 1 shows the quantity of material contributing to U.S. total consumption of lead metal from domestic and foreign industrial sectors in 2004, based upon trade data reported by the USGS and the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC). For","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20065155","usgsCitation":"Wilburn, D.R., and Buckingham, D.A., 2006, Apparent Consumption vs. Total Consumption--A Lead-Acid Battery Case Study: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5155, iv, 9 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065155.","productDescription":"iv, 9 p.","numberOfPages":"13","onlineOnly":"Y","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":192068,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8891,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5155/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ac7e4b07f02db67adbb","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Wilburn, David R. 0000-0002-5371-7617 wilburn@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5371-7617","contributorId":1755,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Wilburn","given":"David","email":"wilburn@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"R.","affiliations":[{"id":432,"text":"National Minerals Information Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289767,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Buckingham, David A.","contributorId":57947,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Buckingham","given":"David","email":"","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289768,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":79330,"text":"ofr20061121 - 2006 - Surface-Water Quantity and Quality of the Upper Milwaukee River, Cedar Creek, and Root River Basins, Wisconsin, 2004","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-02T00:14:20","indexId":"ofr20061121","displayToPublicDate":"2006-11-16T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-1121","title":"Surface-Water Quantity and Quality of the Upper Milwaukee River, Cedar Creek, and Root River Basins, Wisconsin, 2004","docAbstract":"The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC), collected discharge and water-quality data at nine sites in previously monitored areas of the upper Milwaukee River, Cedar Creek, and Root River Basins, in Wisconsin from May 1 through November 15, 2004. The data were collected for calibration of hydrological models that will be used to simulate how various management strategies will affect the water quality of streams. The data also will support SEWRPC and Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) managers in development of the SEWRPC Regional Water Quality Management Plan and the MMSD 2020 Facilities Plan. These management plans will provide a scientific basis for future management decisions regarding development and maintenance of public and private waste-disposal systems.\r\n\r\nIn May 2004, parts of the study area received over 13 inches of precipitation (3.06 inches is normal). In June 2004, most of the study area received between 7 and 11 inches of rainfall (3.56 inches is normal). This excessive rainfall caused flooding throughout the study area and resultant high discharges were measured at all nine monitoring sites. For example, the mean daily discharge recorded at the Cedar Creek site on May 27, 2004, was 2,120 cubic feet per second. This discharge ranked ninth of the largest 10 mean daily discharges in the 75-year record, and was the highest discharge recorded since March 30, 1960. Discharge records from continuous monitoring on the Root River Canal near Franklin since October 1, 1963, indicated that the discharge recorded on May 23, 2004, ranked second highest on record, and was the highest discharge recorded since March 4, 1974.\r\n\r\nWater-quality samples were taken during two base-flow events and six storm events at each of the nine sites. Analysis of water-quality data indicated that most concentrations of dissolved oxygen, biological oxygen demand, fecal coliform bacteria, chloride, suspended solids, nitrate plus nitrite nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, Kjeldahl nitrogen, total phosphorus, dissolved orthophosphorus, total copper, particulate mercury, dissolved mercury, particulate methylmercury, dissolved methylmercury, and total zinc were below U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and State of Wisconsin water-quality standards at all sites, with the exception of dissolved oxygen at the Kewaskum, Farmington, Root River Canal, Root River Racine, and Root River Mouth sites. Each of these sites had from several days to several weeks of daily average dissolved oxygen concentrations below the 5 milligrams per liter State of Wisconsin standard for aquatic life. The lowest dissolved oxygen concentrations were measured at the heavily urbanized Root River Mouth site in downtown Racine, Wisconsin, where elevated concentrations of ammonia may have contributed to oxygen consumption during oxidation of ammonia to nitrate. Additionally, the maximum concentrations of copper in several Root River samples exceeded draft USEPA Ambient Water-Quality Criteria (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003) for acute toxicity to several species of aquatic organisms.\r\n\r\nSubstantial water-quality changes were not correlated with hydrologic changes at any of the nine sites. Base-flow water-quality was generally indistinguishable from that sampled during storm events. The sparsely developed upper Milwaukee River and Cedar Creek Basins had relatively low ranges of contamination for all laboratory-reported parameters. For all nine sites, the highest reported concentrations of chloride (216 mg/L), total phosphorus (0.627 mg/L), ortho-phosphorus (0.136 mg/L), nitrate plus nitrate (9.32 mg/L), and copper (38 ?g/L) were reported for samples collected at the Root River Canal site. The highest concentrations of fecal coliforms (3,600 colonies per 100 mL) and Escherichia coli (2,300 colonies per 100 mL) were reported in samples collected at Kewaskum. The highest concentrations of s","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/ofr20061121","usgsCitation":"Hall, D.W., 2006, Surface-Water Quantity and Quality of the Upper Milwaukee River, Cedar Creek, and Root River Basins, Wisconsin, 2004: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1121, viii, 52 p.; 28 figs.; 14 tables, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20061121.","productDescription":"viii, 52 p.; 28 figs.; 14 tables","numberOfPages":"60","temporalStart":"2004-05-01","temporalEnd":"2004-11-15","costCenters":[{"id":677,"text":"Wisconsin Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":194891,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8819,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1121/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ae5e4b07f02db68acf3","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Hall, David W.","contributorId":39362,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Hall","given":"David","email":"","middleInitial":"W.","affiliations":[{"id":677,"text":"Wisconsin Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":false,"id":289672,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1}]}}
,{"id":79326,"text":"ds214 - 2006 - Agricultural Chemicals in Leary Weber Ditch Basin, Hancock County, Indiana, 2003-04","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2016-05-13T11:19:50","indexId":"ds214","displayToPublicDate":"2006-11-16T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":310,"text":"Data Series","code":"DS","onlineIssn":"2327-638X","printIssn":"2327-0271","active":false,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"214","title":"Agricultural Chemicals in Leary Weber Ditch Basin, Hancock County, Indiana, 2003-04","docAbstract":"<p>Leary Weber Ditch Basin, Hancock County, Indiana, is part of an Agricultural Chemicals: Source, Transport, and Fate study conducted by the National Water-Quality Assessment Program of the U.S. Geological Survey. Water-quality samples were collected in Leary Weber Ditch and in the major hydrologic compartments of the Leary Weber Ditch Basin during 2003 and 2004. Hydrologic compartments that contribute water and agricultural chemicals to Leary Weber Ditch are rain water, overland-flow water, soil water, tile-drain water, and ground water. Samples were analyzed for selected pesticides, nutrients, and major ions.</p>","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","doi":"10.3133/ds214","usgsCitation":"Baker, N.T., and Lathrop, T., 2006, Agricultural Chemicals in Leary Weber Ditch Basin, Hancock County, Indiana, 2003-04: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 214, 3 tables; 2 p. accompanying text, https://doi.org/10.3133/ds214.","productDescription":"3 tables; 2 p. accompanying text","numberOfPages":"2","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"N","temporalStart":"2003-01-01","temporalEnd":"2004-12-31","costCenters":[{"id":346,"text":"Indiana Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":451,"text":"National Water Quality Assessment Program","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":321220,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/ds214.GIF"},{"id":8814,"rank":1,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/2006/214/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"country":"United States","state":"Indiana","county":"Hancock","otherGeospatial":"Leary Weber Ditch Basin","geographicExtents":"{\"type\":\"FeatureCollection\",\"features\":[{\"type\":\"Feature\",\"id\":\"724\",\"properties\":{\"name\":\"Hancock\",\"state\":\"IN\"},\"geometry\":{\"type\":\"Polygon\",\"coordinates\":[[[-85.5774,39.9459],[-85.5759,39.8738],[-85.5969,39.8735],[-85.5968,39.786],[-85.6333,39.7862],[-85.6338,39.6987],[-85.6876,39.6987],[-85.7993,39.6993],[-85.913,39.6976],[-85.9518,39.6969],[-85.9541,39.8696],[-85.9379,39.87],[-85.9369,39.9272],[-85.8625,39.9286],[-85.8624,39.9436],[-85.5774,39.9459]]]}}]}","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ae3e4b07f02db6890c9","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Baker, Nancy T. 0000-0002-7979-5744 ntbaker@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7979-5744","contributorId":1955,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Baker","given":"Nancy","email":"ntbaker@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"T.","affiliations":[{"id":27231,"text":"Indiana-Kentucky Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":27111,"text":"National Water Quality Program","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":451,"text":"National Water Quality Assessment Program","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":346,"text":"Indiana Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289665,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Lathrop, Timothy R. trlathro@usgs.gov","contributorId":4065,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Lathrop","given":"Timothy R.","email":"trlathro@usgs.gov","affiliations":[{"id":346,"text":"Indiana Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289666,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":79304,"text":"sir20065146 - 2006 - Magnitude and Frequency of Floods on Nontidal Streams in Delaware","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-02T00:14:07","indexId":"sir20065146","displayToPublicDate":"2006-11-02T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5146","title":"Magnitude and Frequency of Floods on Nontidal Streams in Delaware","docAbstract":"Reliable estimates of the magnitude and frequency of annual peak flows are required for the economical and safe design of transportation and water-conveyance structures. This report, done in cooperation with the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) and the Delaware Geological Survey (DGS), presents methods for estimating the magnitude and frequency of floods on nontidal streams in Delaware at locations where streamgaging stations monitor streamflow continuously and at ungaged sites. Methods are presented for estimating the magnitude of floods for return frequencies ranging from 2 through 500 years. These methods are applicable to watersheds exhibiting a full range of urban development conditions. The report also describes StreamStats, a web application that makes it easy to obtain flood-frequency estimates for user-selected locations on Delaware streams.\r\n     Flood-frequency estimates for ungaged sites are obtained through a process known as regionalization, using statistical regression analysis, where information determined for a group of streamgaging stations within a region forms the basis for estimates for ungaged sites within the region. One hundred and sixteen streamgaging stations in and near Delaware with at least 10 years of non-regulated annual peak-flow data available were used in the regional analysis. Estimates for gaged sites are obtained by combining the station peak-flow statistics (mean, standard deviation, and skew) and peak-flow estimates with regional estimates of skew and flood-frequency magnitudes. Example flood-frequency estimate calculations using the methods presented in the report are given for: (1) ungaged sites, (2) gaged locations, (3) sites upstream or downstream from a gaged location, and (4) sites between gaged locations.\r\n     Regional regression equations applicable to ungaged sites in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain Physiographic Provinces of Delaware are presented. The equations incorporate drainage area, forest cover, impervious area, basin storage, housing density, soil type A, and mean basin slope as explanatory variables, and have average standard errors of prediction ranging from 28 to 72 percent. Additional regression equations that incorporate drainage area and housing density as explanatory variables are presented for use in defining the effects of urbanization on peak-flow estimates throughout Delaware for the 2-year through 500-year recurrence intervals, along with suggestions for their appropriate use in predicting development-affected peak flows.\r\n     Additional topics associated with the analyses performed during the study are also discussed, including: (1) the availability and description of more than 30 basin and climatic characteristics considered during the development of the regional regression equations; (2) the treatment of increasing trends in the annual peak-flow series identified at 18 gaged sites, with respect to their relations with maximum 24-hour precipitation and housing density, and their use in the regional analysis; (3) calculation of the 90-percent confidence interval associated with peak-flow estimates from the regional regression equations; and (4) a comparison of flood-frequency estimates at gages used in a previous study, highlighting the effects of various improved analytical techniques.","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20065146","usgsCitation":"Ries, K., and Dillow, J., 2006, Magnitude and Frequency of Floods on Nontidal Streams in Delaware: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5146, v, 57 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065146.","productDescription":"v, 57 p.","numberOfPages":"62","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":192100,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8792,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5146/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4a80e4b07f02db6494be","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Ries, Kernell G. III kries@usgs.gov","contributorId":1913,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Ries","given":"Kernell G.","suffix":"III","email":"kries@usgs.gov","affiliations":[{"id":502,"text":"Office of Surface Water","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":false,"id":289618,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Dillow, Jonathan J.A.","contributorId":18412,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Dillow","given":"Jonathan J.A.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289619,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":79283,"text":"ofr20061204 - 2006 - Aeromagnetic and Gravity Surveys in Afghanistan: A Web Site for Distribution of Data","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2023-07-13T11:02:12.648809","indexId":"ofr20061204","displayToPublicDate":"2006-10-30T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-1204","title":"Aeromagnetic and Gravity Surveys in Afghanistan: A Web Site for Distribution of Data","docAbstract":"Aeromagnetic data were digitized from aeromagnetic maps created from\r\n      aeromagnetic surveys flown in southeastern and southern Afghanistan\r\n      in 1966 by PRAKLA, Gesellschaft fur praktische Lagerstattenforschung\r\n      GmbH, Hannover, Germany, on behalf of the 'Bundesanstalt fur\r\n      Bodenforschung', Hannover, Germany.  The digitization was done along\r\n      contour lines, followed by interpolation of the data along the original\r\n      survey flight-lines.  Survey and map specifications can be found in two\r\n      project reports, 'prakla_report_1967.pdf' and 'bgr_report_1968.pdf',\r\n      made available in this open-file report.","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","doi":"10.3133/ofr20061204","usgsCitation":"Sweeney, R.E., Kucks, R.P., Hill, P.L., and Finn, C.A., 2006, Aeromagnetic and Gravity Surveys in Afghanistan: A Web Site for Distribution of Data: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1204, HTML Document; Metadata, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20061204.","productDescription":"HTML Document; Metadata","additionalOnlineFiles":"Y","temporalStart":"1911-01-01","temporalEnd":"1967-12-31","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":192306,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8764,"rank":2,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1204/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":8765,"rank":3,"type":{"id":16,"text":"Metadata"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1204/Gravity/afghan_metadata.txt","linkFileType":{"id":2,"text":"txt"}}],"geographicExtents":"{ \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\", \"features\": [ { \"type\": \"Feature\", \"properties\": {}, \"geometry\": { \"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [ [ [ 60.8,29.4 ], [ 60.8,38.1 ], [ 71.6,38.1 ], [ 71.6,29.4 ], [ 60.8,29.4 ] ] ] } } ] }","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4b02e4b07f02db698a22","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Sweeney, Ronald E.","contributorId":89564,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Sweeney","given":"Ronald","email":"","middleInitial":"E.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289576,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Kucks, Robert P.","contributorId":11648,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Kucks","given":"Robert","email":"","middleInitial":"P.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289575,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Hill, Patricia L. pathill@usgs.gov","contributorId":1327,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Hill","given":"Patricia","email":"pathill@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"L.","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":289574,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Finn, Carol A. 0000-0002-6178-0405 cfinn@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-0405","contributorId":1326,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Finn","given":"Carol","email":"cfinn@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[{"id":211,"text":"Crustal Geophysics and Geochemistry Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289573,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4}]}}
,{"id":79274,"text":"sir20065259 - 2006 - The Effectiveness of Cattlemans Detention Basin, South Lake Tahoe, California","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2018-09-19T18:53:15","indexId":"sir20065259","displayToPublicDate":"2006-10-30T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5259","title":"The Effectiveness of Cattlemans Detention Basin, South Lake Tahoe, California","docAbstract":"Lake Tahoe (Nevada-California) has been designated as an 'outstanding national water resource' by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, in part, for its exceptional clarity. Water clarity in Lake Tahoe, however, has been declining at a rate of about one foot per year for more than 35 years. To decrease the amount of sediment and nutrients delivered to the lake by way of alpine streams, wetlands and stormwater detention basins have been installed at several locations around the lake. Although an improvement in stormwater and snowmelt runoff quality has been measured, the effectiveness of the detention basins for increasing the clarity of Lake Tahoe needs further study. It is possible that poor ground-water quality conditions exist beneath the detention basins and adjacent wetlands and that the presence of the basins has altered ground-water flow paths to nearby streams. A hydrogeochemical and ground-water flow modeling study was done at Cattlemans detention basin, situated adjacent to Cold Creek, a tributary to Lake Tahoe, to determine whether the focusing of storm and snowmelt runoff into a confined area has (1) modified the ground-water flow system beneath the detention basin and affected transport of sediment and nutrients to nearby streams and (2) provided an increased source of solutes which has changed the distribution of nutrients and affected nutrient transport rates beneath the basin.\r\n\r\nResults of slug tests and ground-water flow modeling suggest that ground water flows unrestricted northwest across the detention basin through the meadow. The modeling also indicates that seasonal flow patterns and flow direction remain similar from year to year under transient conditions. Model results imply that about 34 percent (0.004 ft3/s) of the total ground water within the model area originates from the detention basin. Of the 0.004 ft3/s, about 45 percent discharges to Cold Creek within the modeled area downstream of the detention basin. The remaining 55 percent of ground water is either consumed by evapotranspiration, is discharged to Cold Creek outside the modeled area downstream of the detention basin, or is discharged directly to Lake Tahoe. Of the 45 percent discharging to Cold Creek, about 9 percent enters directly downstream of the detention basin and 36 percent enters further downstream.\r\n\r\nGeochemical and microbial data suggest that a seasonal variation of chemical constituents and microbe population size is present at most wells. The geochemical data also indicate that construction of Cattlemans detention basin has not substantially changed the composition of the ground water in the area. High concentrations of ammonia, iron, and dissolved organic carbon, low concentrations of sulfate and nitrate, and large populations of sulfate-reducing microbes imply that the major geochemical process controlling nutrient concentrations beneath the detention basin is sulfate reduction. High concentrations of total nitrogen indicate that oxidation of organic carbon is a second important geochemical process occurring beneath the basin. The influx of surface runoff during spring 2002 apparently provided sufficient oxidized organic carbon to produce iron-reducing conditions and an increase in reduced iron, sulfate, and iron-reducing microorganisms. The increase in recharge of oxygenated water to the ground water system beneath the basin in future intervals of increased recharge may eventually redistribute nutrients and speed up transport of dissolved nutrients from the ground water system to Cold Creek.\r\n","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20065259","usgsCitation":"Green, J., 2006, The Effectiveness of Cattlemans Detention Basin, South Lake Tahoe, California: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5259, viii, 81 p.; 32 figs.; 19 tables; Excel file, https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065259.","productDescription":"viii, 81 p.; 32 figs.; 19 tables; Excel file","numberOfPages":"89","onlineOnly":"Y","temporalStart":"2001-01-01","temporalEnd":"2005-12-31","costCenters":[{"id":465,"text":"Nevada Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":8754,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5259/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":194572,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"}],"noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ac9e4b07f02db67c9c6","contributors":{"editors":[{"text":"Green, Jena M.","contributorId":78033,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Green","given":"Jena M.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":745700,"contributorType":{"id":2,"text":"Editors"},"rank":1}],"authors":[{"text":"Green, Jena M.","contributorId":78033,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Green","given":"Jena M.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289551,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1}]}}
,{"id":79263,"text":"sir20065187 - 2006 - Simulation of Water Levels and Salinity in the Rivers and Tidal Marshes in the Vicinity of the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge, Coastal South Carolina and Georgia","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2017-01-12T10:26:13","indexId":"sir20065187","displayToPublicDate":"2006-10-30T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5187","title":"Simulation of Water Levels and Salinity in the Rivers and Tidal Marshes in the Vicinity of the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge, Coastal South Carolina and Georgia","docAbstract":"The Savannah Harbor is one of the busiest ports on the East Coast of the United States and is located downstream from the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge, which is one of the Nation?s largest freshwater tidal marshes. The Georgia Ports Authority and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers funded hydrodynamic and ecological studies to evaluate the potential effects of a proposed deepening of Savannah Harbor as part of the Environmental Impact Statement. These studies included a three-dimensional (3D) model of the Savannah River estuary system, which was developed to simulate changes in water levels and salinity in the system in response to geometry changes as a result of the deepening of Savannah Harbor, and a marsh-succession model that predicts plant distribution in the tidal marshes in response to changes in the water-level and salinity conditions in the marsh. Beginning in May 2001, the U.S. Geological Survey entered into cooperative agreements with the Georgia Ports Authority to develop empirical models to simulate the water level and salinity of the rivers and tidal marshes in the vicinity of the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge and to link the 3D hydrodynamic river-estuary model and the marsh-succession model. \r\n\r\nFor the development of these models, many different databases were created that describe the complexity and behaviors of the estuary. The U.S. Geological Survey has maintained a network of continuous streamflow, water-level, and specific-conductance (field measurement to compute salinity) river gages in the study area since the 1980s and a network of water-level and salinity marsh gages in the study area since 1999. The Georgia Ports Authority collected water-level and salinity data during summer 1997 and 1999 and collected continuous water-level and salinity data in the marsh and connecting tidal creeks from 1999 to 2002. Most of the databases comprise time series that differ by variable type, periods of record, measurement frequency, location, and reliability. \r\n\r\nUnderstanding freshwater inflows, tidal water levels, and specific conductance in the rivers and marshes is critical to enhancing the predictive capabilities of a successful marsh succession model. Data-mining techniques, including artificial neural network (ANN) models, were applied to address various needs of the ecology study and to integrate the riverine predictions from the 3D model to the marsh-succession model. ANN models were developed to simulate riverine water levels and specific conductance in the vicinity of the tidal marshes for the full range of historical conditions using data from the river gaging networks. ANN models were also developed to simulate the marsh water levels and pore-water salinities using data from the marsh gaging networks. Using the marsh ANN models, the continuous marsh network was hindcasted to be concurrent with the long-term riverine network. The hindcasted data allow ecologists to compute hydrologic parameters?such as hydroperiods and exposure frequency?to help analyze historical vegetation data.\r\n\r\nTo integrate the 3D hydrodynamic model, the marsh-succession model, and various time-series databases, a decision support system (DSS) was developed to support the various needs of regulatory and scientific stakeholders. The DSS required the development of a spreadsheet application that integrates the database, 3D hydrodynamic model output, and ANN riverine and marsh models into a single package that is easy to use and can be readily disseminated. The DSS allows users to evaluate water-level and salinity response for different hydrologic conditions. Savannah River streamflows can be controlled by the user as constant flow, a percentage of historical flows, a percentile daily flow hydrograph, or as a user-specified hydrograph. The DSS can also use output from the 3D model at stream gages near the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge to simulate the effects in the tidal marshes. The DSS is distributed with a two-dimensional (","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20065187","usgsCitation":"Conrads, P., Roehl, E.A., Daamen, R.C., and Kitchens, W.M., 2006, Simulation of Water Levels and Salinity in the Rivers and Tidal Marshes in the Vicinity of the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge, Coastal South Carolina and Georgia: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5187, x, 134 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065187.","productDescription":"x, 134 p.","numberOfPages":"144","onlineOnly":"Y","costCenters":[{"id":13634,"text":"South Atlantic Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":194571,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8742,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5187/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"country":"United States","state":"Georgia, South Carolina","otherGeospatial":"Savannah National Wildlife Refuge","geographicExtents":"{\n  \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n  \"features\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"Feature\",\n      \"properties\": {},\n      \"geometry\": {\n        \"type\": \"Polygon\",\n        \"coordinates\": [\n          [\n            [\n              -81.51031494140625,\n              31.811062019751912\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.51031494140625,\n              32.55607364492026\n            ],\n            [\n              -80.60531616210938,\n              32.55607364492026\n            ],\n            [\n              -80.60531616210938,\n              31.811062019751912\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.51031494140625,\n              31.811062019751912\n            ]\n          ]\n        ]\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4a7ee4b07f02db648602","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Conrads, Paul 0000-0003-0408-4208 pconrads@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0408-4208","contributorId":764,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Conrads","given":"Paul","email":"pconrads@usgs.gov","affiliations":[{"id":13634,"text":"South Atlantic Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":559,"text":"South Carolina Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":false,"id":289517,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Roehl, Edwin A.","contributorId":89242,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Roehl","given":"Edwin","email":"","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289519,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Daamen, Ruby C.","contributorId":105391,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Daamen","given":"Ruby","email":"","middleInitial":"C.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289520,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Kitchens, Wiley M. kitchensw@usgs.gov","contributorId":2851,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Kitchens","given":"Wiley","email":"kitchensw@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"M.","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":289518,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4}]}}
,{"id":79256,"text":"ofr20061299 - 2006 - Inversion of Gravity Data to Define the Pre-Cenozoic Surface and Regional Structures Possibly Influencing Groundwater Flow in the Rainier Mesa Region, Nye County, Nevada","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-10T00:11:41","indexId":"ofr20061299","displayToPublicDate":"2006-10-30T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-1299","title":"Inversion of Gravity Data to Define the Pre-Cenozoic Surface and Regional Structures Possibly Influencing Groundwater Flow in the Rainier Mesa Region, Nye County, Nevada","docAbstract":"A three-dimensional inversion of gravity data from the Rainier Mesa area and surrounding regions reveals a topographically complex pre-Cenozoic basement surface. This model of the depth to pre-Cenozoic basement rocks is intended for use in a 3D hydrogeologic model being constructed for the Rainier Mesa area. Prior to this study, our knowledge of the depth to pre-Cenozoic basement rocks was based on a regional model, applicable to general studies of the greater Nevada Test Site area but inappropriate for higher resolution modeling of ground-water flow across the Rainier Mesa area. The new model incorporates several changes that lead to significant improvements over the previous regional view. First, the addition of constraining wells, encountering old volcanic rocks lying above but near pre-Cenozoic basement, prevents modeled basement from being too shallow. Second, an extensive literature and well data search has led to an increased understanding of the change of rock density with depth in the vicinity of Rainier Mesa. The third, and most important change, relates to the application of several depth-density relationships in the study area instead of a single generalized relationship, thereby improving the overall model fit. In general, the pre-Cenozoic basement surface deepens in the western part of the study area, delineating collapses within the Silent Canyon and Timber Mountain caldera complexes, and shallows in the east in the Eleana Range and Yucca Flat regions, where basement crops out. In the Rainier Mesa study area, basement is generally shallow (< 1 km). The new model identifies previously unrecognized structures within the pre-Cenozoic basement that may influence ground-water flow, such as a shallow basement ridge related to an inferred fault extending northward from Rainier Mesa into Kawich Valley. ","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/ofr20061299","usgsCitation":"Hildenbrand, T.G., Phelps, G., and Mankinen, E.A., 2006, Inversion of Gravity Data to Define the Pre-Cenozoic Surface and Regional Structures Possibly Influencing Groundwater Flow in the Rainier Mesa Region, Nye County, Nevada (Version 1.0): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1299, 28 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20061299.","productDescription":"28 p.","numberOfPages":"28","costCenters":[{"id":314,"text":"Geophysics Unit of Menlo Park, CA (GUMP)","active":false,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":190630,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8730,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1299/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":8733,"rank":9999,"type":{"id":25,"text":"Version History"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1299/version_history.txt","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"geographicExtents":"{ \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\", \"features\": [ { \"type\": \"Feature\", \"properties\": {}, \"geometry\": { \"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [ [ [ -116.5,36.5 ], [ -116.5,37.5 ], [ -116,37.5 ], [ -116,36.5 ], [ -116.5,36.5 ] ] ] } } ] }","edition":"Version 1.0","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e48eae4b07f02db55519b","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Hildenbrand, Thomas G.","contributorId":61787,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Hildenbrand","given":"Thomas","email":"","middleInitial":"G.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289500,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Phelps, Geoffrey A.","contributorId":17262,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Phelps","given":"Geoffrey A.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289499,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Mankinen, Edward A. 0000-0001-7496-2681 emank@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7496-2681","contributorId":1054,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Mankinen","given":"Edward","email":"emank@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[{"id":312,"text":"Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289498,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3}]}}
,{"id":79288,"text":"ofr20061176 - 2006 - Geophysical Investigations of the Smoke Creek Desert and their Geologic Implications, Northwest Nevada and Northeast California","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-10T00:11:36","indexId":"ofr20061176","displayToPublicDate":"2006-10-30T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-1176","title":"Geophysical Investigations of the Smoke Creek Desert and their Geologic Implications, Northwest Nevada and Northeast California","docAbstract":"The Smoke Creek Desert is a large basin about 100 km (60 mi) north of Reno near the California-Nevada border, situated along the northernmost parts of the Walker Lane Belt, a physiographic region defined by diverse topographic expression consisting of northweststriking topographic features and strike-slip faulting. Because geologic and geophysical framework studies play an important role in understanding the hydrogeology of the Smoke Creek Desert, a geophysical effort was undertaken to help determine basin geometry, infer structural features, and estimate depth to basement. \r\n\r\nIn the northernmost parts of the Smoke Creek Desert basin, along Squaw Creek Valley, geophysical data indicate that the basin is shallow and that granitic rocks are buried at shallow depths throughout the valley. These granitic rocks are faulted and fractured and presumably permeable, and thus may influence ground-water resources in this area. \r\n\r\nThe Smoke Creek Desert basin itself is composed of three large oval sub-basins, all of which reach depths to basement of up to about 2 km (1.2 mi). In the central and southern parts of the Smoke Creek Desert basin, magnetic anomalies form three separate and narrow EW-striking features. These features consist of high-amplitude short-wavelength magnetic anomalies and probably reflect Tertiary basalt buried at shallow depth. In the central part of the Smoke Creek Desert basin a prominent EW-striking gravity and magnetic prominence extends from the western margin of the basin to the central part of the basin. Along this ridge, probably composed of Tertiary basalt, overlying unconsolidated basin-fill deposits are relatively thin (< 400 m). \r\n\r\nThe central part of the Smoke Creek Desert basin is also characterized by the Mid-valley fault, a continuous geologic and geophysical feature striking NS and at least 18-km long, possibly connecting with faults mapped in the Terraced Hills and continuing southward to Pyramid Lake. The Mid-valley fault may represent a lateral (east-west) barrier to ground-water flow. In addition, the Mid-valley fault may also be a conduit for along-strike (north-south) ground-water flow, channeling flow to the southernmost parts of the basin and the discharge areas north of Sand Pass. ","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/ofr20061176","usgsCitation":"Ponce, D.A., Glen, J., and Tilden, J.E., 2006, Geophysical Investigations of the Smoke Creek Desert and their Geologic Implications, Northwest Nevada and Northeast California (Version 1.0): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1176, ii, 25 p.; Excel file, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20061176.","productDescription":"ii, 25 p.; Excel file","costCenters":[{"id":314,"text":"Geophysics Unit of Menlo Park, CA (GUMP)","active":false,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":191152,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8776,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1176/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":8777,"rank":9999,"type":{"id":25,"text":"Version History"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1176/version_history.txt","linkFileType":{"id":2,"text":"txt"}},{"id":8778,"rank":1000,"type":{"id":22,"text":"Related Work"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1197/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"geographicExtents":"{ \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\", \"features\": [ { \"type\": \"Feature\", \"properties\": {}, \"geometry\": { \"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [ [ [ -120.5,40 ], [ -120.5,41 ], [ -119.25,41 ], [ -119.25,40 ], [ -120.5,40 ] ] ] } } ] }","edition":"Version 1.0","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ac9e4b07f02db67c490","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Ponce, David A. 0000-0003-4785-7354 ponce@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4785-7354","contributorId":1049,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Ponce","given":"David","email":"ponce@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[{"id":312,"text":"Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":300,"text":"Geologic Hazards Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289596,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Glen, Jonathan M. G.","contributorId":45756,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Glen","given":"Jonathan M. G.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289598,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Tilden, Janet E. 0000-0002-4759-3814","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4759-3814","contributorId":20423,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Tilden","given":"Janet","email":"","middleInitial":"E.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289597,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3}]}}
,{"id":79291,"text":"sir20065110 - 2006 - StreamVOC - A deterministic source-apportionment model to estimate volatile organic compound concentrations in rivers and streams","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2017-10-15T11:21:52","indexId":"sir20065110","displayToPublicDate":"2006-10-30T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5110","title":"StreamVOC - A deterministic source-apportionment model to estimate volatile organic compound concentrations in rivers and streams","docAbstract":"This report documents the construction and verification of the model, StreamVOC, that estimates (1) the time- and position-dependent concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in rivers and streams as well as (2) the source apportionment (SA) of those concentrations. The model considers how different types of sources and loss processes can act together to yield a given observed VOC concentration. Reasons for interest in the relative and absolute contributions of different sources to contaminant concentrations include the need to apportion: (1) the origins for an observed contamination, and (2) the associated human and ecosystem risks. For VOCs, sources of interest include the atmosphere (by absorption), as well as point and nonpoint inflows of VOC-containing water. Loss processes of interest include volatilization to the atmosphere, degradation, and outflows of VOC-containing water from the stream to local ground water.\r\n\r\nThis report presents the details of StreamVOC and compares model output with measured concentrations for eight VOCs found in the Aberjona River at Winchester, Massachusetts. Input data for the model were obtained during a synoptic study of the stream system conducted July 11-13, 2001, as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program of the U.S. Geological Survey. The input data included a variety of basic stream characteristics (for example, flows, temperature, and VOC concentrations). The StreamVOC concentration results agreed moderately well with the measured concentration data for several VOCs and provided compound-dependent SA estimates as a function of longitudinal distance down the river. For many VOCs, the quality of the agreement between the model-simulated and measured concentrations could be improved by simple adjustments of the model input parameters. In general, this study illustrated: (1) the considerable difficulty of quantifying correctly the locations and magnitudes of ground-water-related sources of contamination in streams; and (2) that model-based estimates of stream VOC concentrations are likely to be most accurate when the major sources are point sources or tributaries where the spatial extent and magnitude of the sources are tightly constrained and easily determined.","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","doi":"10.3133/sir20065110","usgsCitation":"Asher, W., Bender, D.A., Zogorski, J.S., and Bartholomay, R.C., 2006, StreamVOC - A deterministic source-apportionment model to estimate volatile organic compound concentrations in rivers and streams (Version 1.0): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5110, xii, 167 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065110.","productDescription":"xii, 167 p.","additionalOnlineFiles":"Y","costCenters":[{"id":562,"text":"South Dakota Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":34685,"text":"Dakota Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":124954,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/sir_2006_5110.jpg"},{"id":8783,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5110/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"edition":"Version 1.0","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4b15e4b07f02db6a4fd0","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Asher, William E.","contributorId":44986,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Asher","given":"William E.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289609,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Bender, David A. 0000-0002-1269-0948 dabender@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1269-0948","contributorId":985,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Bender","given":"David","email":"dabender@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[{"id":562,"text":"South Dakota Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289607,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Zogorski, John S. jszogors@usgs.gov","contributorId":189,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Zogorski","given":"John","email":"jszogors@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"S.","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":289606,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Bartholomay, Roy C. 0000-0002-4809-9287 rcbarth@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4809-9287","contributorId":1131,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Bartholomay","given":"Roy","email":"rcbarth@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"C.","affiliations":[{"id":343,"text":"Idaho Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289608,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4}]}}
,{"id":79249,"text":"sir20065184 - 2006 - Application of a stream-aquifer model to Monument Creek for development of a method to estimate transit losses for reusable water, El Paso County, Colorado","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2017-05-24T17:33:06","indexId":"sir20065184","displayToPublicDate":"2006-10-25T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5184","title":"Application of a stream-aquifer model to Monument Creek for development of a method to estimate transit losses for reusable water, El Paso County, Colorado","docAbstract":"<p>The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with Colorado Springs Utilities, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the El Paso County Water Authority, began a study in 2004 to (1) apply a stream-aquifer model to Monument Creek, (2) use the results of the modeling to develop a transit-loss accounting program for Monument Creek, (3) revise the existing transit-loss accounting program for Fountain Creek to incorporate new water-management strategies and allow for incorporation of future changes in water-management strategies, and (4) integrate the two accounting programs into a single program with a Web-based user interface. The purpose of this report is to present the results of applying a stream-aquifer model to the Monument Creek study reach.</p><p>Transit losses were estimated for reusable-water flows in Monument Creek that ranged from 1 to 200 cubic feet per second (ft<sup>3</sup>/s) and for native streamflows that ranged from 0 to 1,000 ft<sup>3</sup>/s. Transit losses were estimated for bank-storage, channel-storage, and evaporative losses. The same stream-aquifer model used in the previously completed (1988) Fountain Creek study was used in the Monument Creek study.</p><p>Sixteen model nodes were established for the Monument Creek study reach, defining 15 subreaches. Channel length, aquifer length, and aquifer width for the subreaches were estimated from available topographic and geologic maps. Thickness of alluvial deposits and saturated thickness were estimated using lithologic and water-level data from about 100 wells and test holes in or near the Monument Creek study reach. Estimated average transmissivities for the subreaches ranged from 2,000 to 12,000 feet squared per day, and a uniform value of 0.20 was used for storage coefficient.</p><p>Qualitative comparison of recorded and simulated streamflow at the downstream node for the calibration and verification simulations indicated that the two streamflows compared reasonably well. No adjustments were made to the model parameters. Differences between recorded and simulated streamflow volumes for all calibration and verification simulations ranged from about –8.8 to 7.5 percent; the total error for all simulations was about –0.7 percent.</p><p>The model was used to estimate bank-storage losses for 10 to 15 native streamflows for each reusable-water flow of 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100, and 200 ft<sup>3</sup>/s. Then the 10 to 15 bank-storage loss values were used in least-squares linear regression to estimate a relation between bank-storage loss and native streamflow for each of the 12 reusable-water flow rates. The 12 regression relations then were used to develop “look-up” tables of bank-storage loss for reusable-water flows ranging from 1 to 200 ft<sup>3</sup>/s (in 1-ft<sup>3</sup>/s increments). Additional model simulations indicated that (1) when the ratio of downstream native streamflow to upstream native streamflow was less than 1, bank-storage loss generally increased and (2) when the ratio of downstream native streamflow to upstream native streamflow was larger than 1, bank-storage loss generally decreased. These results were used to develop a bank-storage loss adjustment factor based on the ratio of native streamflow at the downstream node to native streamflow at the upstream node. The model also was used to estimate a recovery period, which is the length of time needed for the bank-storage loss to return to the stream. The recovery period was 1 day for six subreaches; 2 days for four subreaches; between 3 and 12 days for four subreaches; and 28 days for one subreach.</p><p>Channel-storage losses are about 10 percent of the reusable-water flow for most of the subreaches, except for two subreaches, where the channel-storage losses are about 20 percent, and one subreach, where the losses are about 30 percent, owing to the greater channel lengths. Evaporative losses were estimated by the use of monthly pan-evaporation data and the incremental increase in stream width resulting from any reusable-water flows. Monthly pan-evaporation data were converted to a daily rate. The daily rate, when multiplied by the stream-width increase (in feet) that results from reusable-water flow and by the subreach length (in miles) gives the daily evaporative loss in cubic feet per second.</p>","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey ","doi":"10.3133/sir20065184","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the Colorado Springs Utilities, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the El Paso County Water Authority","usgsCitation":"Kuhn, G., and Arnold, L., 2006, Application of a stream-aquifer model to Monument Creek for development of a method to estimate transit losses for reusable water, El Paso County, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5184, viii, 111 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065184.","productDescription":"viii, 111 p.","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":121442,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/sir_2006_5184.jpg"},{"id":341739,"rank":3,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5184/pdf/SIR06-5184_508.pdf","text":"Report","size":"9.64 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"Report"},{"id":8720,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5184/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"country":"United States","state":"Colorado","otherGeospatial":"Monument Creek","geographicExtents":"{\n  \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n  \"features\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"Feature\",\n      \"properties\": {},\n      \"geometry\": {\n        \"type\": \"Polygon\",\n        \"coordinates\": [\n          [\n            [\n              -104.91806030273438,\n              39.13006024213511\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.92218017578125,\n              39.081040177486095\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.89883422851562,\n              38.971154274048345\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.86862182617188,\n              38.85575072276977\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.83291625976561,\n              38.73373238087942\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.78897094726562,\n              38.71766178810086\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.74639892578125,\n              38.72944724289828\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.74639892578125,\n              38.77871080859691\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.77386474609375,\n              38.84291652482239\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.78897094726562,\n              38.89317057287496\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.80545043945312,\n              38.9476613635683\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.80819702148438,\n              39.00424469849724\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.8370361328125,\n              39.07144530820888\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.85214233398438,\n              39.11727568585598\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.88784790039061,\n              39.131125517089906\n            ],\n            [\n              -104.91806030273438,\n              39.13006024213511\n            ]\n          ]\n        ]\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ac7e4b07f02db67abc9","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Kuhn, Gerhard","contributorId":102080,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Kuhn","given":"Gerhard","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289475,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Arnold, L. Rick","contributorId":101613,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Arnold","given":"L. Rick","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289474,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":79246,"text":"sir20065217 - 2006 - A logistic regression equation for estimating the probability of a stream in Vermont having intermittent flow","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2022-12-30T19:42:10.410325","indexId":"sir20065217","displayToPublicDate":"2006-10-21T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5217","title":"A logistic regression equation for estimating the probability of a stream in Vermont having intermittent flow","docAbstract":"A logistic regression equation was developed for estimating the probability of a stream flowing intermittently at unregulated, rural stream sites in Vermont. These determinations can be used for a wide variety of regulatory and planning efforts at the Federal, State, regional, county and town levels, including such applications as assessing fish and wildlife habitats, wetlands classifications, recreational opportunities, water-supply potential, waste-assimilation capacities, and sediment transport. The equation will be used to create a derived product for the Vermont Hydrography Dataset having the streamflow characteristic of 'intermittent' or 'perennial.' The Vermont Hydrography Dataset is Vermont's implementation of the National Hydrography Dataset and was created at a scale of 1:5,000 based on statewide digital orthophotos.\r\n\r\nThe equation was developed by relating field-verified perennial or intermittent status of a stream site during normal summer low-streamflow conditions in the summer of 2005 to selected basin characteristics of naturally flowing streams in Vermont. The database used to develop the equation included 682 stream sites with drainage areas ranging from 0.05 to 5.0 square miles. When the 682 sites were observed, 126 were intermittent (had no flow at the time of the observation) and 556 were perennial (had flowing water at the time of the observation).\r\n\r\nThe results of the logistic regression analysis indicate that the probability of a stream having intermittent flow in Vermont is a function of drainage area, elevation of the site, the ratio of basin relief to basin perimeter, and the areal percentage of well- and moderately well-drained soils in the basin. Using a probability cutpoint (a lower probability indicates the site has perennial flow and a higher probability indicates the site has intermittent flow) of 0.5, the logistic regression equation correctly predicted the perennial or intermittent status of 116 test sites 85 percent of the time.","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","doi":"10.3133/sir20065217","usgsCitation":"Olson, S.A., and Brouillette, M.C., 2006, A logistic regression equation for estimating the probability of a stream in Vermont having intermittent flow: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5217, iv, 15 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065217.","productDescription":"iv, 15 p.","numberOfPages":"22","costCenters":[{"id":612,"text":"Vermont Water Science Center","active":false,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":8715,"rank":2,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5217/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":411240,"rank":3,"type":{"id":36,"text":"NGMDB Index Page"},"url":"https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_78117.htm","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":194661,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"}],"country":"United States","state":"Vermont","geographicExtents":"{\"type\":\"FeatureCollection\",\"features\":[{\"type\":\"Feature\",\"geometry\":{\"type\":\"Polygon\",\"coordinates\":[[[-72.433796,43.232999],[-72.4405,43.219049],[-72.440563,43.215254],[-72.437719,43.20275],[-72.45028,43.192485],[-72.449435,43.18917],[-72.443749,43.182221],[-72.443405,43.179729],[-72.452556,43.172117],[-72.451868,43.170174],[-72.451802,43.153486],[-72.45714,43.148493],[-72.45689,43.146558],[-72.451986,43.138924],[-72.448303,43.137187],[-72.444214,43.13737],[-72.440905,43.135793],[-72.44078,43.131472],[-72.442746,43.131152],[-72.442933,43.130192],[-72.432972,43.119655],[-72.433129,43.112637],[-72.434845,43.109917],[-72.440587,43.106145],[-72.442427,43.10363],[-72.443051,43.100841],[-72.435191,43.086622],[-72.435316,43.083536],[-72.445202,43.071352],[-72.45471,43.063487],[-72.463812,43.057404],[-72.467363,43.052648],[-72.465896,43.047505],[-72.462248,43.044214],[-72.460252,43.040671],[-72.46299,43.028531],[-72.462397,43.02556],[-72.457035,43.017285],[-72.444635,43.010566],[-72.443762,43.006245],[-72.448714,43.001169],[-72.451797,43.000577],[-72.456936,43.001306],[-72.459951,43.00008],[-72.46294,42.996943],[-72.464714,42.993582],[-72.465335,42.989558],[-72.461627,42.982906],[-72.473827,42.972045],[-72.476722,42.971746],[-72.479245,42.973597],[-72.481706,42.973985],[-72.486872,42.971789],[-72.492597,42.967648],[-72.504226,42.965815],[-72.507901,42.964171],[-72.518422,42.96317],[-72.532186,42.954945],[-72.534554,42.949894],[-72.531693,42.94651],[-72.52855,42.94532],[-72.527431,42.943148],[-72.526346,42.935717],[-72.527097,42.928584],[-72.524242,42.918501],[-72.52443,42.915575],[-72.530218,42.911576],[-72.531588,42.907164],[-72.531469,42.89795],[-72.532777,42.896076],[-72.540708,42.889379],[-72.552834,42.884968],[-72.555415,42.875428],[-72.555131,42.871058],[-72.556214,42.86695],[-72.555132,42.865731],[-72.554232,42.860038],[-72.557247,42.853019],[-72.553426,42.846709],[-72.54855,42.842021],[-72.546133,42.823938],[-72.542784,42.808482],[-72.5396,42.804832],[-72.515838,42.78856],[-72.508858,42.779919],[-72.508372,42.77461],[-72.514836,42.771436],[-72.516731,42.76867],[-72.516082,42.765949],[-72.513105,42.763822],[-72.507985,42.764414],[-72.50069,42.767657],[-72.499249,42.769054],[-72.497949,42.772918],[-72.491122,42.772465],[-72.484878,42.76554],[-72.479354,42.763119],[-72.477615,42.761245],[-72.475938,42.757702],[-72.473071,42.745916],[-72.461001,42.733209],[-72.458488,42.729094],[-72.458519,42.726853],[-72.809113,42.736581],[-73.276421,42.746019],[-73.290944,42.80192],[-73.286337,42.808038],[-73.28375,42.813864],[-73.287063,42.82014],[-73.285388,42.834093],[-73.284311,42.834954],[-73.278673,42.83341],[-73.26978,43.035923],[-73.265574,43.096223],[-73.256493,43.259249],[-73.24672,43.518875],[-73.247631,43.51924],[-73.247698,43.523173],[-73.246821,43.52578],[-73.241891,43.529418],[-73.241589,43.534973],[-73.246585,43.541855],[-73.250132,43.543429],[-73.250408,43.550425],[-73.24842,43.552577],[-73.248641,43.553857],[-73.252602,43.556851],[-73.258631,43.564949],[-73.26938,43.571973],[-73.279726,43.574241],[-73.280952,43.575407],[-73.281296,43.577579],[-73.284912,43.579272],[-73.294621,43.57897],[-73.295344,43.580235],[-73.29444,43.582494],[-73.292113,43.584509],[-73.296924,43.587323],[-73.292801,43.593861],[-73.292232,43.60255],[-73.29802,43.610028],[-73.300285,43.610806],[-73.302076,43.624364],[-73.302552,43.625708],[-73.306234,43.628018],[-73.310606,43.624114],[-73.317566,43.627355],[-73.323893,43.627629],[-73.327702,43.625913],[-73.342181,43.62607],[-73.347621,43.622509],[-73.358593,43.625065],[-73.365562,43.62344],[-73.368899,43.62471],[-73.371889,43.624489],[-73.372486,43.622751],[-73.369933,43.619093],[-73.376036,43.612596],[-73.372469,43.604848],[-73.377748,43.599656],[-73.383446,43.596778],[-73.383426,43.584727],[-73.382549,43.579193],[-73.383369,43.57677],[-73.39196,43.569915],[-73.395767,43.568087],[-73.398125,43.568065],[-73.405629,43.571179],[-73.416964,43.57773],[-73.420378,43.581489],[-73.428636,43.583994],[-73.431229,43.588285],[-73.421616,43.603023],[-73.423708,43.612356],[-73.417668,43.621687],[-73.42791,43.634428],[-73.428583,43.636543],[-73.426463,43.642598],[-73.423539,43.645676],[-73.418763,43.64788],[-73.415513,43.65245],[-73.414546,43.658209],[-73.408061,43.669438],[-73.407776,43.672519],[-73.404126,43.681339],[-73.403474,43.684694],[-73.405243,43.688367],[-73.404739,43.690213],[-73.402078,43.693106],[-73.395517,43.696831],[-73.385883,43.711336],[-73.377756,43.717712],[-73.370612,43.725329],[-73.369916,43.728789],[-73.370724,43.735571],[-73.369725,43.744274],[-73.354597,43.764167],[-73.350593,43.771939],[-73.354758,43.776721],[-73.357547,43.785933],[-73.362498,43.790211],[-73.376361,43.798766],[-73.37827,43.805995],[-73.380804,43.810951],[-73.390302,43.817371],[-73.392492,43.820779],[-73.392751,43.822196],[-73.388389,43.832404],[-73.381865,43.837315],[-73.376598,43.839357],[-73.372247,43.845337],[-73.373742,43.847693],[-73.380987,43.852633],[-73.382046,43.855008],[-73.381501,43.859235],[-73.374051,43.875563],[-73.383491,43.890951],[-73.395878,43.903044],[-73.400926,43.917048],[-73.408589,43.932933],[-73.405525,43.948813],[-73.406823,43.967317],[-73.412613,43.97998],[-73.405977,44.011485],[-73.405999,44.016229],[-73.407739,44.021312],[-73.410776,44.026944],[-73.414364,44.029526],[-73.42312,44.032759],[-73.427987,44.037708],[-73.43688,44.042578],[-73.43774,44.045006],[-73.431991,44.06345],[-73.429239,44.079414],[-73.416319,44.099422],[-73.411316,44.112686],[-73.411722,44.11754],[-73.415761,44.132826],[-73.41172,44.137825],[-73.408118,44.139373],[-73.402381,44.145856],[-73.399634,44.155326],[-73.398728,44.162248],[-73.395532,44.166122],[-73.397385,44.171596],[-73.396892,44.173846],[-73.395862,44.175785],[-73.390383,44.179486],[-73.389658,44.181249],[-73.390583,44.190886],[-73.388502,44.192318],[-73.383987,44.193158],[-73.382252,44.197178],[-73.375289,44.199868],[-73.370678,44.204546],[-73.362013,44.208545],[-73.355276,44.219554],[-73.355252,44.22287],[-73.350806,44.225943],[-73.349889,44.230356],[-73.342312,44.234531],[-73.34323,44.238049],[-73.336778,44.239557],[-73.3305,44.244254],[-73.323596,44.243897],[-73.319802,44.249547],[-73.312852,44.265346],[-73.311025,44.27424],[-73.312299,44.280025],[-73.316838,44.287683],[-73.322267,44.301523],[-73.324229,44.310023],[-73.323997,44.333842],[-73.327335,44.344369],[-73.334637,44.356877],[-73.334939,44.364441],[-73.333575,44.372288],[-73.330369,44.375987],[-73.320954,44.382669],[-73.315016,44.388513],[-73.310491,44.402601],[-73.296031,44.428339],[-73.293613,44.440559],[-73.295216,44.445884],[-73.300114,44.454711],[-73.298725,44.463957],[-73.298939,44.471304],[-73.299885,44.476652],[-73.304418,44.485739],[-73.306707,44.500334],[-73.312871,44.507246],[-73.320836,44.513631],[-73.322026,44.525289],[-73.323935,44.52712],[-73.329458,44.529203],[-73.331595,44.535924],[-73.338995,44.543302],[-73.338751,44.548046],[-73.342932,44.551907],[-73.356788,44.557918],[-73.360088,44.562546],[-73.367275,44.567545],[-73.374389,44.575455],[-73.375666,44.582038],[-73.381848,44.589316],[-73.38164,44.590583],[-73.376806,44.595455],[-73.376849,44.599598],[-73.380726,44.605239],[-73.382932,44.612184],[-73.38982,44.61721],[-73.390231,44.618353],[-73.386497,44.626924],[-73.385899,44.631044],[-73.386783,44.636369],[-73.378561,44.641475],[-73.383157,44.645764],[-73.377973,44.652918],[-73.379074,44.656772],[-73.374134,44.66234],[-73.37059,44.662518],[-73.369669,44.663478],[-73.370065,44.666071],[-73.37272,44.668739],[-73.371843,44.676956],[-73.367209,44.678513],[-73.367414,44.681292],[-73.370142,44.684853],[-73.365297,44.687546],[-73.361308,44.694523],[-73.36556,44.700297],[-73.365561,44.741786],[-73.363791,44.745254],[-73.354361,44.755296],[-73.347072,44.772988],[-73.344254,44.776282],[-73.335713,44.782086],[-73.333771,44.785192],[-73.333154,44.788759],[-73.333933,44.7992],[-73.335443,44.804602],[-73.3502,44.816394],[-73.354945,44.8215],[-73.369647,44.829136],[-73.375345,44.836307],[-73.379452,44.83801],[-73.381359,44.845021],[-73.379822,44.857037],[-73.375709,44.860745],[-73.371967,44.862414],[-73.369103,44.86668],[-73.362229,44.891463],[-73.35808,44.901325],[-73.353657,44.907346],[-73.341106,44.914632],[-73.338979,44.917681],[-73.338482,44.924112],[-73.339603,44.94337],[-73.337906,44.960541],[-73.338243,44.96475],[-73.350218,44.976222],[-73.352886,44.980644],[-73.354633,44.987352],[-73.350188,44.994304],[-73.343124,45.01084],[-73.085972,45.015494],[-73.084969,45.014751],[-73.065098,45.014786],[-73.059685,45.015869],[-73.048386,45.01479],[-72.968039,45.014098],[-72.845633,45.016659],[-72.67477,45.015459],[-72.58988,45.013237],[-72.582371,45.011543],[-72.555912,45.008304],[-72.448865,45.008537],[-72.310073,45.003822],[-72.160506,45.006185],[-72.103058,45.005598],[-72.052169,45.006369],[-72.033614,45.008878],[-72.029739,45.006782],[-72.023292,45.006792],[-71.947201,45.008359],[-71.915009,45.007791],[-71.767452,45.011437],[-71.464555,45.013637],[-71.466247,45.011959],[-71.473269,45.010586],[-71.476168,45.009054],[-71.477907,45.007453],[-71.479611,45.002905],[-71.487565,45.000936],[-71.497412,45.003878],[-71.501055,45.006742],[-71.507767,45.00817],[-71.514609,45.003957],[-71.525016,45.001881],[-71.530091,44.999656],[-71.53698,44.994177],[-71.538592,44.988182],[-71.537784,44.984298],[-71.531605,44.976023],[-71.527163,44.973668],[-71.52237,44.966308],[-71.516223,44.964569],[-71.514843,44.958741],[-71.516814,44.947588],[-71.515498,44.94352],[-71.516949,44.939704],[-71.515189,44.927317],[-71.509207,44.923429],[-71.500788,44.914535],[-71.494403,44.911837],[-71.49392,44.910923],[-71.495844,44.90498],[-71.496968,44.904225],[-71.501088,44.904433],[-71.508642,44.897703],[-71.51387,44.894648],[-71.51409,44.893149],[-71.511712,44.891571],[-71.512292,44.890246],[-71.522393,44.880811],[-71.528342,44.877819],[-71.529154,44.873559],[-71.534588,44.869698],[-71.540116,44.868625],[-71.545901,44.866134],[-71.549533,44.862592],[-71.550304,44.859552],[-71.548377,44.857016],[-71.548345,44.85553],[-71.553656,44.852123],[-71.556805,44.848808],[-71.55675,44.846862],[-71.552654,44.842049],[-71.552218,44.837775],[-71.553712,44.836065],[-71.557672,44.834421],[-71.562256,44.824632],[-71.567907,44.823832],[-71.5755,44.816058],[-71.575139,44.813565],[-71.572864,44.810383],[-71.569216,44.808813],[-71.569098,44.807044],[-71.573129,44.797947],[-71.571706,44.79483],[-71.573247,44.791882],[-71.580005,44.78548],[-71.584392,44.785733],[-71.592966,44.782776],[-71.596949,44.778987],[-71.596035,44.775422],[-71.601471,44.772067],[-71.604615,44.767738],[-71.611767,44.764345],[-71.614267,44.760622],[-71.614238,44.758664],[-71.617941,44.755883],[-71.623924,44.755135],[-71.631883,44.752463],[-71.631109,44.748689],[-71.626909,44.747224],[-71.62518,44.743978],[-71.625611,44.730312],[-71.624922,44.729032],[-71.622593,44.727773],[-71.619067,44.729283],[-71.617656,44.728918],[-71.618355,44.72261],[-71.613094,44.718933],[-71.604912,44.70815],[-71.59975,44.705318],[-71.599205,44.703878],[-71.600772,44.700815],[-71.600162,44.698919],[-71.594136,44.696932],[-71.598042,44.692818],[-71.596437,44.687059],[-71.594224,44.683815],[-71.596304,44.679083],[-71.590024,44.675543],[-71.583009,44.674836],[-71.581983,44.673533],[-71.585645,44.669277],[-71.584574,44.665351],[-71.586578,44.659478],[-71.582965,44.656621],[-71.576013,44.655691],[-71.576312,44.653179],[-71.575145,44.650612],[-71.570235,44.650483],[-71.567645,44.65356],[-71.566144,44.653863],[-71.561772,44.650224],[-71.558571,44.644373],[-71.558026,44.641791],[-71.558859,44.640122],[-71.562636,44.639505],[-71.562636,44.637266],[-71.554634,44.632197],[-71.551722,44.627598],[-71.55576,44.624119],[-71.55656,44.616988],[-71.553873,44.607069],[-71.556014,44.601383],[-71.553447,44.593451],[-71.549268,44.593174],[-71.536251,44.588441],[-71.537724,44.584785],[-71.544922,44.579278],[-71.547448,44.578547],[-71.5532,44.580683],[-71.5533,44.576924],[-71.548952,44.573084],[-71.548728,44.571873],[-71.55167,44.569657],[-71.557972,44.570451],[-71.558985,44.568779],[-71.558565,44.565572],[-71.559846,44.564119],[-71.569599,44.562777],[-71.575519,44.564775],[-71.59017,44.565694],[-71.593923,44.563813],[-71.596137,44.560898],[-71.598116,44.555412],[-71.596804,44.553424],[-71.575193,44.540859],[-71.573083,44.53798],[-71.574456,44.53366],[-71.582505,44.524403],[-71.587104,44.522436],[-71.592855,44.523006],[-71.594259,44.52168],[-71.593971,44.519738],[-71.592117,44.517773],[-71.586909,44.514666],[-71.583233,44.508268],[-71.577771,44.504886],[-71.577068,44.504041],[-71.577643,44.502692],[-71.579974,44.501778],[-71.58387,44.503217],[-71.586648,44.502873],[-71.585881,44.500057],[-71.586972,44.498526],[-71.589622,44.498525],[-71.591917,44.500975],[-71.594303,44.500749],[-71.595484,44.494424],[-71.59948,44.486455],[-71.609568,44.484348],[-71.617614,44.485715],[-71.622089,44.481387],[-71.625019,44.481784],[-71.625676,44.483201],[-71.627655,44.484207],[-71.632795,44.48389],[-71.639312,44.477836],[-71.64589,44.475141],[-71.648178,44.472023],[-71.647864,44.469976],[-71.640847,44.465935],[-71.640404,44.464186],[-71.645068,44.460545],[-71.65232,44.461117],[-71.653348,44.460499],[-71.657313,44.454003],[-71.659021,44.444932],[-71.66183,44.440293],[-71.664191,44.438351],[-71.668944,44.436523],[-71.679263,44.435018],[-71.67995,44.427908],[-71.68585,44.423405],[-71.699434,44.416069],[-71.708041,44.411977],[-71.715087,44.41049],[-71.726199,44.411385],[-71.735923,44.410062],[-71.739921,44.406778],[-71.743104,44.401657],[-71.749533,44.401955],[-71.756091,44.406401],[-71.761966,44.407027],[-71.767888,44.405445],[-71.778613,44.399799],[-71.790688,44.40026],[-71.793924,44.399271],[-71.803488,44.39189],[-71.803489,44.390384],[-71.799899,44.385951],[-71.800316,44.384276],[-71.803461,44.383335],[-71.808828,44.383862],[-71.814388,44.381932],[-71.815773,44.375464],[-71.812235,44.371492],[-71.816157,44.367559],[-71.812206,44.357356],[-71.814351,44.354541],[-71.833261,44.350136],[-71.852628,44.340873],[-71.861941,44.340109],[-71.872472,44.336628],[-71.902332,44.347499],[-71.906909,44.348284],[-71.917434,44.346535],[-71.925088,44.342024],[-71.92911,44.337577],[-71.935395,44.33577],[-71.939049,44.335844],[-71.945163,44.337744],[-71.958119,44.337544],[-71.963133,44.336556],[-71.98112,44.3375],[-71.984617,44.336243],[-71.986484,44.331218],[-71.988306,44.329768],[-72.009977,44.321951],[-72.01913,44.320383],[-72.029061,44.322398],[-72.033136,44.320365],[-72.033806,44.317349],[-72.032341,44.315752],[-72.032317,44.306677],[-72.033465,44.301878],[-72.03703,44.297834],[-72.046302,44.291983],[-72.053355,44.290501],[-72.05888,44.28624],[-72.065434,44.277235],[-72.067774,44.270976],[-72.066464,44.268331],[-72.064544,44.267997],[-72.060846,44.269972],[-72.05874,44.270005],[-72.058969,44.265911],[-72.061174,44.263377],[-72.059782,44.256018],[-72.05399,44.246926],[-72.050112,44.244046],[-72.047889,44.238493],[-72.053582,44.22604],[-72.0539,44.222703],[-72.052662,44.218841],[-72.053233,44.216876],[-72.058605,44.208215],[-72.058066,44.206067],[-72.058987,44.202114],[-72.064577,44.196949],[-72.066166,44.189773],[-72.061338,44.184951],[-72.057496,44.179444],[-72.053021,44.167903],[-72.047593,44.161801],[-72.042387,44.160817],[-72.040167,44.157023],[-72.040082,44.155749],[-72.042867,44.151288],[-72.041983,44.137165],[-72.033703,44.131541],[-72.037506,44.124708],[-72.041948,44.125653],[-72.04643,44.123911],[-72.052342,44.119891],[-72.054831,44.110137],[-72.052391,44.101088],[-72.048334,44.096905],[-72.043482,44.096996],[-72.042592,44.100744],[-72.039674,44.103371],[-72.032983,44.101655],[-72.03124,44.100101],[-72.031878,44.093359],[-72.03429,44.090138],[-72.040012,44.088762],[-72.046235,44.089538],[-72.048781,44.087141],[-72.047305,44.085382],[-72.033739,44.07883],[-72.031898,44.076241],[-72.03345,44.074531],[-72.036641,44.073999],[-72.039076,44.07452],[-72.042088,44.077008],[-72.051166,44.075826],[-72.051144,44.07385],[-72.04857,44.071359],[-72.048289,44.069136],[-72.053482,44.06473],[-72.056341,44.059582],[-72.058863,44.057921],[-72.067612,44.058034],[-72.06915,44.054817],[-72.062713,44.051618],[-72.06215,44.049931],[-72.066422,44.049299],[-72.074881,44.045892],[-72.078989,44.042886],[-72.079397,44.039531],[-72.075486,44.034614],[-72.075004,44.032789],[-72.081357,44.028529],[-72.082432,44.022154],[-72.084871,44.021308],[-72.09203,44.024459],[-72.0951,44.021831],[-72.095193,44.016666],[-72.090504,44.012736],[-72.090059,44.009903],[-72.093257,44.009376],[-72.095247,44.01358],[-72.098897,44.015477],[-72.102475,44.014882],[-72.105292,44.012663],[-72.103765,44.002837],[-72.109019,44.000535],[-72.116985,43.99448],[-72.116706,43.991954],[-72.112813,43.98802],[-72.111756,43.984943],[-72.11249,43.975654],[-72.114702,43.969478],[-72.114273,43.967513],[-72.110945,43.966959],[-72.104972,43.96995],[-72.096161,43.968132],[-72.091104,43.966443],[-72.090357,43.965409],[-72.098563,43.963833],[-72.100543,43.962478],[-72.100894,43.960851],[-72.098689,43.95766],[-72.105875,43.94937],[-72.110872,43.947654],[-72.117839,43.946828],[-72.118985,43.943225],[-72.116767,43.933923],[-72.118013,43.923292],[-72.121002,43.918956],[-72.135117,43.910024],[-72.151324,43.901704],[-72.158585,43.892762],[-72.159216,43.888313],[-72.160819,43.887223],[-72.170604,43.886388],[-72.172785,43.883716],[-72.173576,43.87967],[-72.167476,43.86915],[-72.174774,43.866386],[-72.182956,43.865335],[-72.184788,43.863393],[-72.187916,43.856126],[-72.182864,43.845109],[-72.182203,43.834032],[-72.18857,43.821153],[-72.184184,43.812524],[-72.183333,43.808177],[-72.184847,43.804698],[-72.190754,43.800807],[-72.193184,43.794697],[-72.195552,43.791492],[-72.20407,43.786097],[-72.2053,43.784474],[-72.20476,43.771263],[-72.210815,43.767696],[-72.218099,43.765729],[-72.223645,43.757842],[-72.232713,43.748286],[-72.264245,43.734158],[-72.27118,43.734138],[-72.276072,43.727054],[-72.284805,43.72036],[-72.292215,43.711333],[-72.299715,43.706558],[-72.302867,43.702718],[-72.305326,43.69577],[-72.30602,43.683061],[-72.303092,43.678078],[-72.304322,43.669507],[-72.31402,43.656158],[-72.315059,43.649415],[-72.313863,43.646558],[-72.314083,43.64281],[-72.315247,43.641164],[-72.322517,43.638901],[-72.329126,43.635563],[-72.329471,43.632843],[-72.327236,43.630534],[-72.328966,43.626991],[-72.33236,43.62507],[-72.334401,43.61925],[-72.334745,43.614519],[-72.3327,43.610313],[-72.328232,43.606839],[-72.327665,43.602679],[-72.328514,43.600805],[-72.332382,43.599364],[-72.349926,43.587726],[-72.363916,43.583652],[-72.373126,43.579419],[-72.37944,43.574069],[-72.382783,43.562459],[-72.381187,43.554915],[-72.380383,43.54088],[-72.38331,43.53519],[-72.389097,43.528266],[-72.3907,43.527261],[-72.394218,43.5274],[-72.395949,43.52388],[-72.395825,43.52056],[-72.398563,43.513435],[-72.398376,43.510829],[-72.396305,43.508062],[-72.384773,43.500259],[-72.380894,43.493394],[-72.380428,43.488525],[-72.381723,43.480091],[-72.382951,43.476],[-72.3925,43.467364],[-72.390567,43.451225],[-72.393992,43.444666],[-72.395659,43.438541],[-72.395916,43.430974],[-72.399972,43.415249],[-72.403811,43.391935],[-72.405253,43.389992],[-72.413154,43.384302],[-72.415381,43.380211],[-72.415978,43.376531],[-72.415099,43.365896],[-72.413377,43.362741],[-72.403949,43.358098],[-72.39217,43.357865],[-72.390103,43.356926],[-72.39092,43.354984],[-72.400981,43.345775],[-72.410353,43.331675],[-72.408696,43.327674],[-72.402532,43.32038],[-72.397619,43.317064],[-72.395462,43.312994],[-72.401666,43.303395],[-72.407842,43.282892],[-72.41545,43.271374],[-72.421583,43.263442],[-72.435221,43.258483],[-72.438693,43.252905],[-72.438937,43.24424],[-72.433796,43.232999]]]},\"properties\":{\"name\":\"Vermont\",\"nation\":\"USA  \"}}]}","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4b23e4b07f02db6ae24a","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Olson, Scott A. 0000-0002-1064-2125 solson@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1064-2125","contributorId":2059,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Olson","given":"Scott","email":"solson@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[{"id":405,"text":"NH/VT office of New England Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289467,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Brouillette, Michael C.","contributorId":107806,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Brouillette","given":"Michael","email":"","middleInitial":"C.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289468,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":79199,"text":"sir20065207 - 2006 - Evaluation of baseline ground-water conditions in the Mosteiros, Ribeira Paul, and Ribeira Fajã Basins, Republic of Cape Verde, West Africa, 2005-06","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2017-02-03T19:56:39","indexId":"sir20065207","displayToPublicDate":"2006-10-07T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5207","title":"Evaluation of baseline ground-water conditions in the Mosteiros, Ribeira Paul, and Ribeira Fajã Basins, Republic of Cape Verde, West Africa, 2005-06","docAbstract":"<p>This report documents current (2005-06) baseline ground-water conditions in three basins within the West African Republic of Cape Verde (Mosteiros on Fogo, Ribeira Paul on Santo Antão, and Ribeira Fajã on São Nicolau) based on existing data and additional data collected during this study. Ground-water conditions (indicators) include ground-water levels, ground-water recharge altitude, ground-water discharge amounts, ground-water age (residence time), and ground-water quality. These indicators are needed to evaluate (1) long-term changes in ground-water resources or water quality caused by planned ground-water development associated with agricultural projects in these basins, and (2) the feasibility of artificial recharge as a mitigation strategy to offset the potentially declining water levels associated with increased ground-water development.</p><p>Ground-water levels in all three basins vary from less than a few meters to more than 170 meters below land surface. Continuous recorder and electric tape measurements at three monitoring wells (one per basin) showed variations between August 2005 and June 2006 of as much as 1.8 meters. Few historical water-level data were available for the Mosteiros or Ribeira Paul Basins. Historical records from Ribeira Fajã indicate very large ground-water declines during the 1980s and early 1990s, associated with dewatering of the Galleria Fajã tunnel. More-recent data indicate that ground-water levels in Ribeira Fajã have reached a new equilibrium, remaining fairly constant since the late 1990s.</p><p>Because of the scarcity of observation wells within each basin, water-level data were combined with other techniques to evaluate ground-water conditions. These techniques include the quantification of ground-water discharge (well withdrawals, spring discharge, seepage to springs, and gallery drainage), field water-quality measurements, and the use of environmental tracers to evaluate sources of aquifer recharge, flow paths, and ground-water residence times.</p><p>In the Mosteiros Basin, measured well and spring discharge is about 220,000 cubic meters per year. For the Ribeira Paul Basin, measured well discharge, spring discharge, and ground-water seepage to springs is about 1,600,000 cubic meters per year. Ribeira Fajã Basin is the driest of the three basins with a precipitation rate of about half that of the other two basins. The only measurable ground-water discharge from this basin is from Galleria Fajã, estimated to be about 150,000 cubic meters per year. Measured discharge for all three basins does not include submarine outflow or agricultural/phreatophyte consumptive use (Paul Basin, only) and is assumed to be less than total ground-water discharge.</p><p>Ground-water ages indicate that recharge to wells and springs occurred from more than 50 years ago at some locations to within the past decade at other sites. Ground water in Paul is younger than that in the other two basins, indicating that recharge generally occurred within the past 50 years. Ground water at all the dateable sites using tritium/helium in both the Mosteiros and Ribeira Fajã Basins show that recharge occurred more than 50 years before the sampling dates. Ground-water tritium/helium age dating was not possible at some sites in Mosteiros and Ribeira Fajã Basins because of the presence of helium in the aquifer derived from the mantle or aquifer matrix. However, this helium was useful for accurate age dating of the unaffected ground-water sites.</p><p>Dissolved gases indicate that most ground-water recharge occurs at mid and high altitudes within all three basins; calculated recharge altitudes ranged from 700 to more than 2,000 meters. In the Mosteiros and Ribeira Fajã Basins, recharge altitudes are much higher than the wells and springs. This suggests that it may take many years for artificial recharge to result in a beneficial impact on the aquifer in areas where the agricultural projects are implemented. Recharge altitudes in Paul Basin also were generally higher than their respective ground-water discharge sampling sites except for one spring, Seladinha. This spring, in combination with generally younger ground-water ages in Paul, indicates the existence of some short flow paths where artificial recharge may possibly enhance available water resources within a few years.</p><p>The salinity of wells and springs is generally low in the Ribeira Paul and Ribeira Fajã Basins, but somewhat higher in Mosteiros Basin. Specific-conductance measurements of wells and springs in Ribeira Paul and Ribeira Fajã ranged from about 200 to 700 microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius. Although the Monte Vermelho spring in Mosteiros Basin also has very low salinity (200 microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius), water from the wells along the coastal plain has specific-conductance measurements of as much as 16,000 microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius. These higher values indicate some brackish water intrusion. Additional ground-water development of the Mosteiros coastal plain may exacerbate this situation.</p>","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/sir20065207","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the Millenium Challenge Corporation, Millenium Challenge Account, and Instituto Nacional de Gestão dos Recursos Hídricos","usgsCitation":"Heilweil, V.M., Earle, J.D., Cederberg, J.R., Messer, M.M., Jorgensen, B.E., Verstraeten, I.M., Moura, M.A., Querido, A., , S., and Osorio, T., 2006, Evaluation of baseline ground-water conditions in the Mosteiros, Ribeira Paul, and Ribeira Fajã Basins, Republic of Cape Verde, West Africa, 2005-06: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5207, viii, 42 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065207.","productDescription":"viii, 42 p.","numberOfPages":"53","temporalStart":"2005-01-01","temporalEnd":"2006-12-31","costCenters":[{"id":610,"text":"Utah Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":334775,"rank":3,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5207/PDF/SIR2006_5207.pdf"},{"id":8651,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5207/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":195616,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"}],"country":"Cape Verde","otherGeospatial":"Mosteiros basin, Ribeira Fajã basin, Ribeira Paul basin","geographicExtents":"{\n  \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n  \"features\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"Feature\",\n      \"properties\": {},\n      \"geometry\": {\n        \"type\": \"Polygon\",\n        \"coordinates\": [\n          [\n            [\n              -26.323242187499996,\n              14.061988097202269\n            ],\n            [\n              -26.323242187499996,\n              17.936928637549443\n            ],\n            [\n              -21.676025390625,\n              17.936928637549443\n            ],\n            [\n              -21.676025390625,\n              14.061988097202269\n            ],\n            [\n              -26.323242187499996,\n              14.061988097202269\n            ]\n          ]\n        ]\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4a4be4b07f02db62574e","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Heilweil, Victor M. heilweil@usgs.gov","contributorId":837,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Heilweil","given":"Victor","email":"heilweil@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"M.","affiliations":[{"id":610,"text":"Utah Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289340,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Earle, John D.","contributorId":34537,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Earle","given":"John","email":"","middleInitial":"D.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289345,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Cederberg, Jay R. 0000-0001-6649-7353 cederber@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6649-7353","contributorId":964,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Cederberg","given":"Jay","email":"cederber@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"R.","affiliations":[{"id":128,"text":"Arizona Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289341,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Messer, Mickey M.","contributorId":8956,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Messer","given":"Mickey","email":"","middleInitial":"M.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289343,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Jorgensen, Brent E.","contributorId":22446,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Jorgensen","given":"Brent","email":"","middleInitial":"E.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289344,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5},{"text":"Verstraeten, Ingrid M. imverstr@usgs.gov","contributorId":3630,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Verstraeten","given":"Ingrid","email":"imverstr@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"M.","affiliations":[{"id":5066,"text":"Office of the Director USGS","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289342,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":6},{"text":"Moura, Miguel A.","contributorId":104586,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Moura","given":"Miguel","email":"","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289349,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":7},{"text":"Querido, Arrigo","contributorId":101761,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Querido","given":"Arrigo","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289348,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":8},{"text":" Spencer","contributorId":55924,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"given":"Spencer","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289347,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":9},{"text":"Osorio, Tatiana","contributorId":50986,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Osorio","given":"Tatiana","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289346,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":10}]}}
,{"id":79225,"text":"ds216 - 2006 - Base-flow yields of watersheds in the Berkeley County area, West Virginia","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2024-12-05T17:32:29.87068","indexId":"ds216","displayToPublicDate":"2006-10-07T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":310,"text":"Data Series","code":"DS","onlineIssn":"2327-638X","printIssn":"2327-0271","active":false,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"216","title":"Base-flow yields of watersheds in the Berkeley County area, West Virginia","docAbstract":"Base-flow yields at approximately 50 percent of the annual mean ground-water recharge rate were estimated for watersheds in the Berkeley County area, W.Va. These base-flow yields were determined from two sets of discharge measurements made July 25-28, 2005, and May 4, 2006. Two sections of channel along Opequon Creek had net flow losses that are expressed as negative base-flow watershed yields; these and other base-flow watershed yields in the eastern half of the study area ranged from -940 to 2,280 gallons per day per acre ((gal/d)/acre) and averaged 395 (gal/d)/acre. The base-flow yields for watersheds in the western half of the study area ranged from 275 to 482 (gal/d)/acre and averaged 376 (gal/d)/acre.","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","doi":"10.3133/ds216","usgsCitation":"Evaldi, R.D., and Paybins, K.S., 2006, Base-flow yields of watersheds in the Berkeley County area, West Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 216, Report: 4 p.; 1 Figure: 22.00 x 34.00 inches, https://doi.org/10.3133/ds216.","productDescription":"Report: 4 p.; 1 Figure: 22.00 x 34.00 inches","numberOfPages":"4","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"Y","costCenters":[{"id":37280,"text":"Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center ","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":191569,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8681,"rank":2,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/2006/216/index.htm","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"country":"United States","state":"West Virginia","county":"Berkeley County","geographicExtents":"{ \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\", \"features\": [ { \"type\": \"Feature\", \"properties\": {}, \"geometry\": { \"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [ [ [ -78.25,39.166666666666664 ], [ -78.25,39.666666666666664 ], [ -77.75,39.666666666666664 ], [ -77.75,39.166666666666664 ], [ -78.25,39.166666666666664 ] ] ] } } ] }","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4a7fe4b07f02db64884c","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Evaldi, Ronald D.","contributorId":103329,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Evaldi","given":"Ronald","email":"","middleInitial":"D.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289420,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Paybins, Katherine S. 0000-0002-3967-5043 kpaybins@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3967-5043","contributorId":2805,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Paybins","given":"Katherine","email":"kpaybins@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"S.","affiliations":[{"id":642,"text":"West Virginia Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289419,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":79210,"text":"sir20065230 - 2006 - Instream flow characterization of Upper Salmon River basin streams, central Idaho, 2005","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2014-05-05T14:48:55","indexId":"sir20065230","displayToPublicDate":"2006-10-07T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5230","title":"Instream flow characterization of Upper Salmon River basin streams, central Idaho, 2005","docAbstract":"<p>Anadromous fish populations in the Columbia River Basin have plummeted in the last 100 years. This severe decline led to Federal listing of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) stocks as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in the 1990s. Historically, the upper Salmon River Basin (upstream of the confluence with the Pahsimeroi River) in Idaho provided migration corridors and significant habitat for these ESA-listed species, in addition to the ESA-listed bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus). Human development has modified the original streamflow conditions in many streams in the upper Salmon River Basin. Summer streamflow modifications resulting from irrigation practices, have directly affected quantity and quality of fish habitat and also have affected migration and (or) access to suitable spawning and rearing habitat for these fish.</p>\n<br>\n<p>As a result of these ESA listings and Action 149 of the Federal Columbia River Power System Biological Opinion of 2000, the Bureau of Reclamation was tasked to conduct streamflow characterization studies in the upper Salmon River Basin to clearly define habitat requirements for effective species management and habitat restoration. These studies include collection of habitat and streamflow information for the Physical Habitat Simulation System (PHABSIM) model, a widely applied method to determine relations between habitat and discharge requirements for various fish species and life stages. Model simulation results can be used by resource managers to guide habitat restoration efforts by evaluating potential fish habitat and passage improvements by increasing or decreasing streamflow.</p>\n<br>\n<p>In 2005, instream flow characterization studies were completed on Big Boulder, Challis, Bear, Mill, and Morgan Creeks. Continuous streamflow data were recorded upstream of all diversions on Big Boulder. Instantaneous measurements of discharge were also made at selected sites. In addition, natural summer streamflows were estimated for each study site using regional regression equations.</p>\n<br>\n<p>This report describes PHABSIM modeling results for bull trout, Chinook salmon, and steelhead trout during summer streamflows. Habitat/discharge relations were summarized for adult and spawning life stages at each study site. In addition, streamflow needs for riffle dwelling invertebrate taxa (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) are presented. Adult fish passage and discharge relations were evaluated at specific transects that were identified as potential low-streamflow passage barriers at each study site.</p>\n<br>\n<p>Continuous summer water temperature data for selected study sites were summarized and compared with Idaho Water Quality Standards and various water temperature requirements of targeted fish species.</p>\n<br>\n<p>Results of these habitat studies can be used to prioritize and direct cost-effective actions to improve fish habitat for ESA-listed anadromous and native fish species in the basin. These actions may include acquiring water during critical low-flow periods by leasing or modifying irrigation delivery systems to minimize out-of-stream diversions.</p>","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/sir20065230","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation","usgsCitation":"Maret, T.R., Hortness, J., and Ott, D.S., 2006, Instream flow characterization of Upper Salmon River basin streams, central Idaho, 2005: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5230, Report: vi, 110 p.; Appendices; Data files, https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065230.","productDescription":"Report: vi, 110 p.; Appendices; Data files","numberOfPages":"120","temporalStart":"2005-01-01","temporalEnd":"2005-12-31","costCenters":[{"id":343,"text":"Idaho Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":191376,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/sir20065230.PNG"},{"id":8663,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5230/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":286898,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5230/pdf/sir20065230.pdf"},{"id":286899,"type":{"id":3,"text":"Appendix"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5230/pdf/appendixes.zip"},{"id":286900,"type":{"id":7,"text":"Companion Files"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5230/data/"}],"scale":"40000","projection":"Transverse Mercator Projection","country":"United States","state":"Idaho","otherGeospatial":"Salmon River Basin","geographicExtents":"{ \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\", \"features\": [ { \"type\": \"Feature\", \"properties\": {}, \"geometry\": { \"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [ [ [ -115.0,44.0 ], [ -115.0,44.75 ], [ -114.0,44.75 ], [ -114.0,44.0 ], [ -115.0,44.0 ] ] ] } } ] }","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ab0e4b07f02db66d76b","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Maret, Terry R. trmaret@usgs.gov","contributorId":953,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Maret","given":"Terry","email":"trmaret@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"R.","affiliations":[{"id":343,"text":"Idaho Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289370,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Hortness, Jon 0000-0002-9809-2876 hortness@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-2876","contributorId":3601,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Hortness","given":"Jon","email":"hortness@usgs.gov","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":289372,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Ott, Douglas S. dott@usgs.gov","contributorId":3552,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Ott","given":"Douglas","email":"dott@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"S.","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":289371,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3}]}}
,{"id":79181,"text":"sir20065212 - 2006 - An assessment of flow data from Klamath River sites between Link River Dam and Keno Dam, south-central Oregon","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-03-08T17:16:24","indexId":"sir20065212","displayToPublicDate":"2006-09-30T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5212","title":"An assessment of flow data from Klamath River sites between Link River Dam and Keno Dam, south-central Oregon","docAbstract":"Records of diversion and return flows for water years 1961?2004 along a reach of the Klamath River between Link River and Keno Dams in south-central Oregon were evaluated to determine the cause of a water-balance inconsistency in the hydrologic data. The data indicated that the reach was losing flow in the 1960s and 1970s and gaining flow in the 1980s and 1990s. The absolute mean annual net water-balance difference in flows between the first and second half of the 44-year period (1961-2004) was approximately 103,000 acre-feet per year (acre-ft/yr). The quality of the diversion and return-flow records used in the water balance was evaluated using U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) criteria for accuracy. With the exception of the USGS Klamath River at Keno record, which was rated as 'good' or 'excellent,' the eight other flow records, all from non-USGS flow-measurement sites, were rated as 'poor' by USGS standards due to insufficient data-collection documentation and a lack of direct discharge measurements to verify the rating curves. The record for the Link River site, the most upstream in the study area, included both river and westside power canal flows. Because of rating curve biases, the river flows might have been overestimated by 25,000 acre-ft/yr on average from water years 1961 to 1982 and underestimated by 7,000 acre-ft/yr on average from water years 1983 to 2004. For water years 1984-2004, westside power canal flows might have been underestimated by 11,000 acre-ft/yr.\r\n\r\nSome diversion and return flows (for mostly agricultural, industrial, and urban use) along the Klamath River study reach, not measured continuously and not included in the water-balance equation, also were evaluated. However, the sum of these diversion and return flows was insufficient to explain the water-balance inconsistency.\r\n\r\nThe possibility that ground-water levels in lands adjacent to the river rose during water years 1961-2004 and caused an increase in ground-water discharge to the river also was evaluated. However, water-level data from local wells did not have a rising trend during the period.\r\n\r\nThe most likely cause of the water-balance inconsistency was flow measurement error in the eight non-USGS flow records. Part of the water-balance inconsistency can be explained by a 43,000 acre-foot error in the river and canal flow portions of the Link River flow record. A remaining 60,000 acre-foot error might have been distributed among the seven other flow records, or much of the remaining 60,000 acre-foot error might have been in the Link River flow record because flows in that record had a greater magnitude than flows in the seven other records.\r\n\r\nAs an additional analysis of the water-balance issue, flow records used in the water balance were evaluated for trends and compared to known changes in water management in the Bureau of Reclamation Klamath Project and Lower Klamath and Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuges over the 44-year period. Many of the water-management changes were implemented in the early 1980s. For three diversion flow records, 1983-2004 mean annual flows were 16,000, 8,000, and 21,000 acre-ft/yr greater than their 1961-82 mean annual flows. Return flows to the Klamath River at two flow-measurement sites decreased by 31,000 and 27,000 acre-ft/yr for 1983-2004 compared with the 1961-82 period. ","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20065212","usgsCitation":"Risley, J.C., Hess, G.W., and Fisher, B.J., 2006, An assessment of flow data from Klamath River sites between Link River Dam and Keno Dam, south-central Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5212, 38 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065212.","productDescription":"38 p.","numberOfPages":"38","costCenters":[{"id":518,"text":"Oregon Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":194900,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8637,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5212/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ad9e4b07f02db685150","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Risley, John C. 0000-0002-8206-5443 jrisley@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8206-5443","contributorId":2698,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Risley","given":"John","email":"jrisley@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"C.","affiliations":[{"id":518,"text":"Oregon Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289312,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Hess, Glen W.","contributorId":19136,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Hess","given":"Glen","email":"","middleInitial":"W.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289313,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Fisher, Bruce J.","contributorId":40293,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Fisher","given":"Bruce","email":"","middleInitial":"J.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289314,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3}]}}
,{"id":79182,"text":"sir20065145 - 2006 - Annual ground-water discharge by evapotranspiration from areas of spring-fed riparian vegetation along the eastern margin of Death Valley, 2000-02","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-03-08T17:16:20","indexId":"sir20065145","displayToPublicDate":"2006-09-30T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5145","title":"Annual ground-water discharge by evapotranspiration from areas of spring-fed riparian vegetation along the eastern margin of Death Valley, 2000-02","docAbstract":"Flow from major springs and seeps along the eastern margin of Death Valley serves as the primary local water supply and sustains much of the unique habitat in Death Valley National Park. Together, these major spring complexes constitute the terminus of the Death Valley Regional Ground-Water Flow System--one of the larger flow systems in the Southwestern United States. The Grapevine Springs complex is the least exploited for water supply and consequently contains the largest area of undisturbed riparian habitat in the park. Because few estimates exist that quantify ground-water discharge from these spring complexes, a study was initiated to better estimate the amount of ground water being discharged annually from these sensitive, spring-fed riparian areas. Results of this study can be used to establish a basis for estimating water rights and as a baseline from which to assess any future changes in ground-water discharge in the park.\r\n\r\nEvapotranspiration (ET) is estimated volumetrically as the product of ET-unit (general vegetation type) acreage and a representative ET rate. ET-unit acreage is determined from high-resolution multi-spectral imagery; and a representative ET rate is computed from data collected in the Grapevine Springs area using the Bowen-ratio solution to the energy budget, or from rates given in other ET studies in the Death Valley area. The ground-water component of ET is computed by removing the local precipitation component from the ET rate.\r\n\r\nTwo different procedures, a modified soil-adjusted vegetation index using the percent reflectance of the red and near-infrared wavelengths and land-cover classification using multi-spectral imagery were used to delineate the ET units within each major spring-discharge area. On the basis of the more accurate procedure that uses the vegetation index, ET-unit acreage for the Grapevine Springs discharge area totaled about 192 acres--of which 80 acres were moderate-density vegetation and 112 acres were high-density vegetation. ET-unit acreage for two other discharge areas delineated in the Grapevine Springs area (Surprise Springs and Staininger Spring) totaled about 6 and 43 acres, respectively; and for the discharge areas delineated in the Furnace Creek area (Nevares Springs, Cow Creek-Salt Springs, Texas Spring, and Travertine Springs) totaled about 29, 13, 11, and 21 acres, respectively. In discharge areas other than Grapevine Springs, watering and spring diversions have altered the natural distribution of the vegetation. More...","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20065145","usgsCitation":"Laczniak, R.J., Smith, J.L., and DeMeo, G.A., 2006, Annual ground-water discharge by evapotranspiration from areas of spring-fed riparian vegetation along the eastern margin of Death Valley, 2000-02: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5145, 46 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065145.","productDescription":"46 p.","numberOfPages":"46","onlineOnly":"Y","temporalStart":"2000-01-01","temporalEnd":"2002-12-31","costCenters":[{"id":465,"text":"Nevada Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":192388,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8638,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5145/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ac8e4b07f02db67baac","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Laczniak, Randell J.","contributorId":90687,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Laczniak","given":"Randell","email":"","middleInitial":"J.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289317,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Smith, J. LaRue jlsmith@usgs.gov","contributorId":1863,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Smith","given":"J.","email":"jlsmith@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"LaRue","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":289315,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"DeMeo, Guy A. gademeo@usgs.gov","contributorId":2124,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"DeMeo","given":"Guy","email":"gademeo@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":289316,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3}]}}
,{"id":79175,"text":"sir20065137 - 2006 - A graphical modeling tool for evaluating nitrogen loading to and nitrate transport in ground water in the mid-Snake region, south-central Idaho","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-03-08T17:16:20","indexId":"sir20065137","displayToPublicDate":"2006-09-27T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5137","title":"A graphical modeling tool for evaluating nitrogen loading to and nitrate transport in ground water in the mid-Snake region, south-central Idaho","docAbstract":"A flow and transport model was created with a graphical user interface to simplify the evaluation of nitrogen loading and nitrate transport in the mid-Snake region in south-central Idaho. This model and interface package, the Snake River Nitrate Scenario Simulator, uses the U.S. Geological Survey's MODFLOW 2000 and MOC3D models. The interface, which is enabled for use with geographic information systems (GIS), was created using ESRI's royalty-free MapObjects LT software. The interface lets users view initial nitrogen-loading conditions (representing conditions as of 1998), alter the nitrogen loading within selected zones by specifying a multiplication factor and applying it to the initial condition, run the flow and transport model, and view a graphical representation of the modeling results.\r\n\r\nThe flow and transport model of the Snake River Nitrate Scenario Simulator was created by rediscretizing and recalibrating a clipped portion of an existing regional flow model. The new subregional model was recalibrated with newly available water-level data and spring and ground-water nitrate concentration data for the study area. An updated nitrogen input GIS layer controls the application of nitrogen to the flow and transport model. Users can alter the nitrogen application to the flow and transport model by altering the nitrogen load in predefined spatial zones contained within similar political, hydrologic, and size-constrained boundaries.","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20065137","usgsCitation":"Clark, D.W., Skinner, K.D., and Pollock, D.W., 2006, A graphical modeling tool for evaluating nitrogen loading to and nitrate transport in ground water in the mid-Snake region, south-central Idaho: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5137, 40 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065137.","productDescription":"40 p.","numberOfPages":"40","additionalOnlineFiles":"Y","costCenters":[{"id":343,"text":"Idaho Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":8632,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5137/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":192132,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8633,"rank":9999,"type":{"id":21,"text":"Referenced Work"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5137/Software.zip"}],"noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4b24e4b07f02db6ae512","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Clark, David W.","contributorId":77146,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Clark","given":"David","email":"","middleInitial":"W.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289299,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Skinner, Kenneth D. 0000-0003-1774-6565 kskinner@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1774-6565","contributorId":1836,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Skinner","given":"Kenneth","email":"kskinner@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"D.","affiliations":[{"id":343,"text":"Idaho Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289297,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Pollock, David W. dwpolloc@usgs.gov","contributorId":4248,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Pollock","given":"David","email":"dwpolloc@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"W.","affiliations":[{"id":493,"text":"Office of Ground Water","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289298,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3}]}}
,{"id":79166,"text":"ofr20061261 - 2006 - Deep resistivity structure of Yucca Flat, Nevada Test Site, Nevada","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-10T00:11:41","indexId":"ofr20061261","displayToPublicDate":"2006-09-23T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-1261","title":"Deep resistivity structure of Yucca Flat, Nevada Test Site, Nevada","docAbstract":"The Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) at their Nevada Site Office are addressing groundwater contamination resulting from historical underground nuclear testing through the Environmental Management program and, in particular, the Underground Test Area project. One issue of concern is the nature of the somewhat poorly constrained pre Tertiary geology and its effects on ground-water flow in the area adjacent to a nuclear test. Ground water modelers would like to know more about the hydrostratigraphy and geologic structure to support a hydrostratigraphic framework model that is under development for the Yucca Flat Corrective Action Unit (CAU).\r\n\r\nDuring 2003, the U.S. Geological Survey, supported by the DOE and NNSA-NSO, collected and processed data from 51 magnetotelluric (MT) and audio-magnetotelluric (AMT) stations at the Nevada Test Site in and near Yucca Flat to assist in characterizing the pre-Tertiary geology in that area. The primary purpose was to refine the character, thickness, and lateral extent of pre Tertiary confining units. In particular, a major goal has been to define the upper clastic confining unit (late Devonian - Mississippian-age siliciclastic rocks assigned to the Eleana Formation and Chainman Shale) in the Yucca Flat area. The MT and AMT data have been released in separate USGS Open File Reports.\r\n\r\nThe Nevada Test Site magnetotelluric data interpretation presented in this report includes the results of detailed two-dimensional (2 D) resistivity modeling for each profile (including alternative interpretations) and gross inferences on the three dimensional (3 D) character of the geology beneath each station. The character, thickness, and lateral extent of the Chainman Shale and Eleana Formation that comprise the Upper Clastic Confining Unit are generally well determined in the upper 5 km. Inferences can be made regarding the presence of the Lower Clastic Confining Unit at depths below 5 km. Large fault structures such as the CP Thrust fault, the Carpetbag fault, and the Yucca fault that cross Yucca Flat are also discernable as are other smaller faults. The subsurface electrical resistivity distribution and inferred geologic structures determined by this investigation should help constrain the hydrostratigraphic framework model that is under development.","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/ofr20061261","usgsCitation":"Asch, T., Rodriguez, B.D., Sampson, J.A., Wallin, E.L., and Williams, J.M., 2006, Deep resistivity structure of Yucca Flat, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Version 1.0): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1261, iv, 33 p. plus 55 unnumbered; plate, 22 x 34 in., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20061261.","productDescription":"iv, 33 p. plus 55 unnumbered; plate, 22 x 34 in.","numberOfPages":"37","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"Y","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":190628,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8621,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1261/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"geographicExtents":"{ \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\", \"features\": [ { \"type\": \"Feature\", \"properties\": {}, \"geometry\": { \"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [ [ [ -116.2175,36.83416666666667 ], [ -116.2175,37.25 ], [ -115.9175,37.25 ], [ -115.9175,36.83416666666667 ], [ -116.2175,36.83416666666667 ] ] ] } } ] }","edition":"Version 1.0","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4abbe4b07f02db67254d","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Asch, Theodore H.","contributorId":83617,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Asch","given":"Theodore H.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289274,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Rodriguez, Brian D. 0000-0002-2263-611X brod@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2263-611X","contributorId":836,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Rodriguez","given":"Brian","email":"brod@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"D.","affiliations":[{"id":211,"text":"Crustal Geophysics and Geochemistry Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289270,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Sampson, Jay A.","contributorId":13939,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Sampson","given":"Jay","email":"","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289272,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Wallin, Erin L.","contributorId":70066,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Wallin","given":"Erin","email":"","middleInitial":"L.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289273,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Williams, Jackie M.","contributorId":11217,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Williams","given":"Jackie","email":"","middleInitial":"M.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289271,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5}]}}
,{"id":79169,"text":"ofr20061255 - 2006 - Aeromagnetic and gravity data over the Central Transantarctic Mountains (CTAM), Antarctica: a website for the distribution of data and maps","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-10T00:11:40","indexId":"ofr20061255","displayToPublicDate":"2006-09-23T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-1255","title":"Aeromagnetic and gravity data over the Central Transantarctic Mountains (CTAM), Antarctica: a website for the distribution of data and maps","docAbstract":"Near complete coverage of the East Antarctic Shield by ice hampers geological study of crustal architecture important for understanding global tectonic and climate history. Limited exposures in the central Transantarctic Mountains (CTAM), however, show that Archean and Proterozoic rocks of the shield as well as Neoproterozoic-lower Paleozoic sedimentary successions were involved in oblique convergence associated with Gondwana amalgamation. Subsequently, the area was overprinted by Jurassic magmatism and Cenozoic uplift. To extend the known geology of the region to ice-covered areas, we conducted an aeromagnetic survey flown in draped mode by helicopters over the Central Transantarctic Mountains and by fixed-wing aircraft over the adjacent polar plateau. We flew more than 32,000 line km covering an area of nearly 60,000 km2 at an average altitude of 600 m, with average line spacing 2.5 km over most areas and 1.25 km over basement rocks exposed in the Miller and Geologists ranges. Additional lines flown to the north, south, and west extended preliminary coverage and tied with existing surveys. Gravity data was collected on the ground along a central transect of the helicopter survey area.","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/ofr20061255","usgsCitation":"Anderson, E., Finn, C., Damaske, D., Abraham, J., Goldmann, F., Goodge, J., and Braddock, P., 2006, Aeromagnetic and gravity data over the Central Transantarctic Mountains (CTAM), Antarctica: a website for the distribution of data and maps (Version 1.0, Revised and reprinted 2006): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1255, iii, 17 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20061255.","productDescription":"iii, 17 p.","numberOfPages":"20","additionalOnlineFiles":"Y","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":192131,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8624,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1255/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"geographicExtents":"{ \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\", \"features\": [ { \"type\": \"Feature\", \"properties\": {}, \"geometry\": { \"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [ [ [ 140,-88 ], [ 140,-82 ], [ 160,-82 ], [ 160,-88 ], [ 140,-88 ] ] ] } } ] }","edition":"Version 1.0, Revised and reprinted 2006","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4b01e4b07f02db698441","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Anderson, E. D. 0000-0002-0138-6166","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0138-6166","contributorId":104561,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Anderson","given":"E. D.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289286,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Finn, C. A. 0000-0002-6178-0405","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-0405","contributorId":93917,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Finn","given":"C. A.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289284,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Damaske, D.","contributorId":66771,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Damaske","given":"D.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289283,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Abraham, J.D.","contributorId":20686,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Abraham","given":"J.D.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289280,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Goldmann, F.","contributorId":41092,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Goldmann","given":"F.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289281,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5},{"text":"Goodge, J. W.","contributorId":102146,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Goodge","given":"J. W.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289285,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":6},{"text":"Braddock, P.","contributorId":54304,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Braddock","given":"P.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289282,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":7}]}}
,{"id":79163,"text":"sir20065141 - 2006 - Effects of streambank fencing of pasture land on benthic macroinvertebrates and the quality of surface water and shallow ground water in the Big Spring Run basin of Mill Creek watershed, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, 1993-2001","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2017-07-06T16:02:10","indexId":"sir20065141","displayToPublicDate":"2006-09-23T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2006","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2006-5141","title":"Effects of streambank fencing of pasture land on benthic macroinvertebrates and the quality of surface water and shallow ground water in the Big Spring Run basin of Mill Creek watershed, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, 1993-2001","docAbstract":"<p>Streambank fencing along stream channels in pastured areas and the exclusion of pasture animals from the channel are best-management practices designed to reduce nutrient and suspended-sediment yields from drainage basins. Establishment of vegetation in the fenced area helps to stabilize streambanks and provides better habitat for wildlife in and near the stream. This study documented the effectiveness of a 5- to 12-foot-wide buffer strip on the quality of surface water and near-stream ground water in a 1.42-mi2 treatment basin in Lancaster County, Pa. Two miles of stream were fenced in the basin in 1997 following a 3- to 4-year pre-treatment period of monitoring surface- and ground-water variables in the treatment and control basins. Changes in surface- and ground-water quality were monitored for about 4 years after fence installation. </p><p>To alleviate problems in result interpretation associated with climatic and hydrologic variation over the study period, a nested experimental design including paired-basin and upstream/downstream components was used to study the effects of fencing on surface-water quality and benthic-macroinvertebrate communities. Five surface-water sites, one at the outlet of a 1.77-mi2 control basin (C-1), two sites in the treatment basin (T-3 and T-4) that were above any fence installation, and two sites (one at an upstream tributary site (T-2) and one at the outlet (T-1)) that were treated, were sampled intensively. Low-flow samples were collected at each site (approximately 25-30 per year at each site), and stormflow was sampled with automatic samplers at all sites except T-3. For each site where stormflow was sampled, from 35 to 60 percent of the storm events were sampled over the entire study period. Surface-water sites were sampled for analyses of nutrients, suspended sediment, and fecal streptococcus (only low-flow samples), with field parameters (only low-flow samples) measured during sample collection. Benthic-macroinvertebrate samples were collected in May and September of each year; samples were collected at the outlet of the control and treatment basins and at three upstream sites, two in the treatment basin and one in the control basin. For each benthic-macroinvertebrate sample: Stream riffles and pools were sampled using the kick-net method; habitat was characterized using Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP); water-quality samples were collected for nutrients and suspended sediment; stream field parameters were measured; and multiple biological metrics were calculated. </p><p>The experimental design to study the effects of fencing on the quality of near-stream shallow ground water involved a nested well approach. Two well nests were in the treatment basin, one each at surface-water sites T-1 and T-2. Within each well nest, the data from one deep well and three shallow wells (no greater than 12 ft deep) were used for regional characterization of ground-water quality. At each site, two of the shallow wells were inside the eventual fence (treated wells); the other shallow well was outside the eventual fence (control well). The wells were sampled monthly, primarily during periods with little to no recharge, for laboratory analysis of nutrients and fecal streptococcus; field parameters of water quality also were measured. </p><p><br data-mce-bogus=\"1\"></p>","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/sir20065141","collaboration":"In cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection","usgsCitation":"Galeone, D.G., Brightbill, R.A., Low, D.J., and O’Brien, D.L., 2006, Effects of streambank fencing of pasture land on benthic macroinvertebrates and the quality of surface water and shallow ground water in the Big Spring Run basin of Mill Creek watershed, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, 1993-2001: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5141, xiv, 183 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20065141.","productDescription":"xiv, 183 p.","temporalStart":"1993-01-01","temporalEnd":"2001-12-31","costCenters":[{"id":532,"text":"Pennsylvania Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":191244,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":8618,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5141/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"country":"United States","state":"Pennsylvania","county":"Lancaster County","otherGeospatial":" Big Spring Run Basin","geographicExtents":"{ \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\", \"features\": [ { \"type\": \"Feature\", \"properties\": {}, \"geometry\": { \"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [ [ [ -76.55,39.833333333333336 ], [ -76.55,40.166666666666664 ], [ -76,40.166666666666664 ], [ -76,39.833333333333336 ], [ -76.55,39.833333333333336 ] ] ] } } ] }","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4a28e4b07f02db610a01","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Galeone, Daniel G. 0000-0002-8007-9278 dgaleone@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8007-9278","contributorId":2301,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Galeone","given":"Daniel","email":"dgaleone@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"G.","affiliations":[{"id":532,"text":"Pennsylvania Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289262,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Brightbill, Robin A. 0000-0003-4683-9656 rabright@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4683-9656","contributorId":618,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Brightbill","given":"Robin","email":"rabright@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[{"id":532,"text":"Pennsylvania Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289261,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Low, Dennis J. djlow@usgs.gov","contributorId":3450,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Low","given":"Dennis","email":"djlow@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"J.","affiliations":[{"id":532,"text":"Pennsylvania Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":289263,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"O’Brien, David L.","contributorId":91578,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"O’Brien","given":"David","email":"","middleInitial":"L.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":289264,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4}]}}
]}