{"pageNumber":"119","pageRowStart":"2950","pageSize":"25","recordCount":6233,"records":[{"id":70319,"text":"wdrTX041 - 2005 - Water resources data Texas, water year 2004, volume 1. Arkansas River basin, Red River basin, Sabine River basin, Neches River basin, and intervening coastal basins","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2017-05-23T16:36:57","indexId":"wdrTX041","displayToPublicDate":"2005-04-04T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":340,"text":"Water Data Report","code":"WDR","active":false,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"TX-04-1","title":"Water resources data Texas, water year 2004, volume 1. Arkansas River basin, Red River basin, Sabine River basin, Neches River basin, and intervening coastal basins","docAbstract":"Water-resources data for the 2004 water year for Texas are presented in six volumes, and consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams and canals; stage, contents, and water-quality of lakes and reservoirs; and water levels and water quality of ground-water wells. Volume 1 contains records for water discharge at 72 gaging stations; stage only at 3 gaging stations; elevation at 29 lakes and reservoirs; content at 6 lakes and reservoirs; and water quality at 26 gaging stations. Also included are data for 9 partial-record stations comprised of 6 flood-hydrograph and 3 low-flow stations. Also included are lists of discontinued surface-water discharge or stage-only stations and discontinued surface-water-quality stations. Additional water data were collected at various sites, not part of the systematic data-collection program, and are published as miscellaneous measurements. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating Federal, State, and local agencies in Texas. Records for a few pertinent stations in the bordering States also are included.","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","doi":"10.3133/wdrTX041","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the State of Texas and with other agencies","usgsCitation":"Long, S.C., Reece, B.D., and Eames, D.R., 2005, Water resources data Texas, water year 2004, volume 1. Arkansas River basin, Red River basin, Sabine River basin, Neches River basin, and intervening coastal basins: U.S. Geological Survey Water Data Report TX-04-1, HTML Document; Report: xxx, 440 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/wdrTX041.","productDescription":"HTML Document; Report: xxx, 440 p.","costCenters":[{"id":583,"text":"Texas Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":6451,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/wdrtx041/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":187937,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":341602,"rank":3,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/wdr/2004/WDR-TX-04-1/pdf/VOL1-04.pdf","text":"Report","size":"16.17 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"Report"}],"country":"United States","state":"Texas","geographicExtents":"{\n  \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n  \"features\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"Feature\",\n      \"properties\": {},\n      \"geometry\": {\n        \"type\": \"Polygon\",\n        \"coordinates\": [\n          [\n            [\n              -103.07373046875,\n              36.527294814546245\n            ],\n            [\n              -100.01953125,\n              36.527294814546245\n            ],\n            [\n              -100.01953125,\n              34.63320791137959\n            ],\n            [\n              -99.73388671874999,\n              34.470335121217474\n            ],\n            [\n              -99.49218749999999,\n              34.45221847282654\n            ],\n            [\n              -99.36035156249999,\n              34.470335121217474\n            ],\n            [\n              -99.20654296875,\n              34.361576287484176\n            ],\n            [\n              -99.07470703125,\n              34.23451236236987\n            ],\n            [\n              -98.76708984374999,\n              34.161818161230386\n            ],\n            [\n              -98.5693359375,\n              34.161818161230386\n            ],\n            [\n              -98.23974609375,\n              34.17999758688084\n            ],\n            [\n              -97.998046875,\n              34.08906131584994\n            ],\n            [\n              -97.88818359375,\n              33.96158628979907\n            ],\n            [\n              -97.71240234375,\n              33.97980872872457\n            ],\n            [\n              -97.58056640625,\n              33.925129700072\n            ],\n            [\n              -97.3388671875,\n              33.87041555094183\n            ],\n            [\n              -97.0751953125,\n              33.90689555128866\n            ],\n            [\n              -96.83349609375,\n              33.87041555094183\n            ],\n            [\n              -96.6357421875,\n              33.90689555128866\n            ],\n            [\n              -96.43798828125,\n              33.815666308702774\n            ],\n            [\n              -96.2841796875,\n              33.742612777346885\n            ],\n            [\n              -96.08642578125,\n              33.815666308702774\n            ],\n            [\n              -95.8447265625,\n              33.88865750124075\n            ],\n            [\n              -95.64697265625,\n              33.88865750124075\n            ],\n            [\n              -95.361328125,\n              33.88865750124075\n            ],\n            [\n              -94.9658203125,\n              33.90689555128866\n            ],\n            [\n              -94.81201171875,\n              33.779147331286474\n            ],\n            [\n              -94.482421875,\n              33.61461929233378\n            ],\n            [\n              -94.04296874999999,\n              33.578014746143985\n            ],\n            [\n              -94.04296874999999,\n              32.0639555946604\n            ],\n            [\n              -93.49365234375,\n              31.22219703210317\n            ],\n            [\n              -93.49365234375,\n              30.883369321692268\n            ],\n            [\n              -93.62548828125,\n              30.41078179084589\n            ],\n            [\n              -93.71337890625,\n              30.06909396443887\n            ],\n            [\n              -93.88916015625,\n              29.82158272057499\n            ],\n            [\n              -93.9990234375,\n              29.630771207229\n            ],\n            [\n              -94.3505859375,\n              29.57345707301757\n            ],\n            [\n              -94.6142578125,\n              29.439597566602902\n            ],\n            [\n              -94.94384765625,\n              29.49698759653577\n            ],\n            [\n              -95.25146484374999,\n              29.82158272057499\n            ],\n            [\n              -95.5810546875,\n              30.56226095049944\n            ],\n            [\n              -95.82275390625,\n              31.12819929911196\n            ],\n            [\n              -96.2841796875,\n              31.970803930433096\n            ],\n            [\n              -96.5478515625,\n              32.45415593941475\n            ],\n            [\n              -96.92138671875,\n              32.76880048488168\n            ],\n            [\n              -97.36083984375,\n              32.95336814579932\n            ],\n            [\n              -97.998046875,\n              32.97180377635759\n            ],\n            [\n              -98.76708984374999,\n              32.97180377635759\n            ],\n            [\n              -99.51416015625,\n              32.97180377635759\n            ],\n            [\n              -100.39306640625,\n              32.93492866908233\n            ],\n            [\n              -101.1181640625,\n              33.04550781490999\n            ],\n            [\n              -102.10693359375,\n              33.33970700424026\n            ],\n            [\n              -102.63427734374999,\n              33.779147331286474\n            ],\n            [\n              -103.07373046875,\n              34.34343606848294\n            ],\n            [\n              -103.07373046875,\n              36.527294814546245\n            ]\n          ]\n        ]\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4a61e4b07f02db635901","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Long, Susan C. Aragon","contributorId":78823,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Long","given":"Susan","email":"","middleInitial":"C. Aragon","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":282141,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Reece, Brian D. bdreece@usgs.gov","contributorId":2129,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Reece","given":"Brian","email":"bdreece@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"D.","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":282139,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Eames, Deanna R.","contributorId":49867,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Eames","given":"Deanna","email":"","middleInitial":"R.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":282140,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3}]}}
,{"id":70253,"text":"sir20045197 - 2005 - Simulation of ground-water flow in the basin-fill aquifer of the Tularosa Basin, south-central New Mexico, predevelopment through 2040","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-02T00:13:52","indexId":"sir20045197","displayToPublicDate":"2005-03-20T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2004-5197","title":"Simulation of ground-water flow in the basin-fill aquifer of the Tularosa Basin, south-central New Mexico, predevelopment through 2040","docAbstract":"The hydrology of the basin-fill aquifer in the Tularosa Basin was evaluated through construction and calibration of steady-state and transient three-dimensional ground-water-flow simulations. Simulations were made using the U.S. Geological Survey finite-difference modular ground-water-flow computer software MODFLOW-96. The transient simulation covered 1948-2040. Both steady-state and transient simulations were calibrated by matching simulation output to available ground-water-level measurements. The root-mean-square error of the steady-state calibration in the well-calibrated area of the ground-water-flow simulation was 6.3 meters, and root-mean-square errors of individual transient-calibration points ranged from 0.8 to 17.0 meters. The areal distribution of water-level measurements used in the steady-state and transient calibrations restricts the well-calibrated area of the model to the eastern side of the Tularosa Basin. Water levels in the La Luz Creek subbasin area were underestimated by both the steady-state and transient models, suggesting that the hydrology of this area is not well represented in the model.\r\n\r\nAbout 143,000 cubic meters per day of recharge is estimated to enter the basin-fill aquifer from subbasins that rim the Tularosa Basin. The estimated recharge is about 4-5 percent of total precipitation in most subbasins. Approximately 88 percent of total recharge left the basin-fill aquifer as evapotranspiration under predevelopment conditions.\r\n\r\nWater levels were simulated for 1948, 1995, and 2040 under scenarios of zero and maximum return flows. Estimated return flows from municipalities were calculated on the basis of data in the Tularosa Basin Regional Water Plan for 2000-2040. Agricultural return flows were estimated primarily on the basis of ground-water-withdrawal, ground-water-depletion, surface-water-withdrawal, and surface-water-depletion data for the Tularosa Basin. The ground-water-flow simulation was sensitive to the return-flow scenario in the agricultural area near Tularosa and decreasingly sensitive to the south. Declines in simulated water levels near Tularosa between 1948 and 1995 were as large as 30 meters under the zero return-flow scenario and 15 meters under the maximum return-flow scenario. Declines in simulated water levels between 1995 and 2040 were as large as 25 meters under the zero return-flow scenario and 15 meters under the maximum return-flow scenario. Comparison of water levels measured near Tularosa in 1991 and water levels simulated under the maximum return-flow scenario for 1991 suggests that declines in simulated water levels near Tularosa may be overestimated under the zero return-flow scenario. Declines in simulated water levels near the City of Alamogordo well field between 1948 and 1995 were as large as 15 meters under the zero return-flow scenario and 10 meters under the maximum return-flow scenario. Simulated declines in water levels between 1995 and 2040 were nearly 15 meters under both return-flow scenarios assuming that all projected increases in withdrawal came from existing City of Alamogordo public-supply wells and all withdrawal from the wells came from the basin-fill aquifer. Declines in simulated water levels near the Holloman Air Force Base well fields between 1948 and 1995 and between 1995 and 2040 were less than 5 meters under both the zero and maximum return-flow scenarios. In 1995 under the zero return-flow scenario, an estimated 56,000 cubic meters of water per day was removed from aquifer storage. Of the approximately 199,000 cubic meters of water per day that left the aquifer under 1995 conditions, 40 percent left the basin-fill aquifer as ground-water withdrawal, 51 percent as evapotranspiration, 7 percent by interbasin ground-water flow into the Hueco Bolson, and 2 percent by flow into creeks and springs.\r\n\r\nGeneralized directions of ground-water flow were simulated for 1948, 1995, and 2040 for much of the eastern part of the Tularosa Basin. Localized","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20045197","usgsCitation":"Huff, G.F., 2005, Simulation of ground-water flow in the basin-fill aquifer of the Tularosa Basin, south-central New Mexico, predevelopment through 2040: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5197, 108 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20045197.","productDescription":"108 p.","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":6955,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/sir2004-5197/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":191416,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"}],"noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e48cfe4b07f02db5461c7","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Huff, Glenn F.","contributorId":12079,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Huff","given":"Glenn","email":"","middleInitial":"F.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":282066,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1}]}}
,{"id":70197,"text":"sir20055035 - 2005 - Hydrogeology and trichloroethene contamination in the sea-level aquifer beneath the Logistics Center, Fort Lewis, Washington","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-02T00:14:03","indexId":"sir20055035","displayToPublicDate":"2005-03-11T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2005-5035","title":"Hydrogeology and trichloroethene contamination in the sea-level aquifer beneath the Logistics Center, Fort Lewis, Washington","docAbstract":"The U.S. Army disposed of waste trichloroethene (TCE) and other materials in the East Gate Disposal Yard near the Logistics Center on Fort Lewis, Washington, from the 1940s to the early 1970s. As a result, ground water contaminated with primarily TCE extends more than 3 miles downgradient from the East Gate Disposal Yard. The site is underlain by a complex and heterogeneous sequence of glacial and non-glacial deposits that have been broadly categorized into an upper and a lower aquifer (the latter referred to as the sea-level aquifer). TCE contamination was detected in both aquifers. This report describes an investigation by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) of the source, migration, and attenuation of TCE in the sea-level aquifer.\r\n\r\nA refined conceptual model for ground-water flow and contaminant migration into and through the sea-level aquifer was developed in large part from interpretation of environmental tracer data. The tracers used included stable isotopes of oxygen (18O), hydrogen (2H), and carbon (13C); the radioactive hydrogen isotope tritium (3H); common ions and redox-related analytes; chlorofluorocarbons; and sulfur hexafluoride. Tracer and TCE concentrations were determined for samples collected by the USGS from 37 wells and two surface-water sites in American Lake during 1999-2000. Ground-water levels were measured by the USGS in more than 40 wells during 2000-01, and were combined with measurements by the U.S. Army and others to create potentiometric-surface maps.\r\n\r\nLocalized ground-water flow features were identified that are of particular relevance to the migration of TCE in the study area. A ridge of ground water beneath American Lake diverts the flow of TCE-contaminated ground water in the sea-level aquifer to the west around the southern end of the lake. Tracer data provided clear evidence that American Lake is a significant source of recharge to the sea-level aquifer that has created that ridge of ground water. High ground-water altitudes at locations north and northeast of the Logistics Center combined with the ridge beneath American Lake prevent TCE contaminated water beneath the Logistics Center from migrating toward municipal water-supply wells northeast of the site.\r\n\r\nThe 1999-2000 TCE concentrations measured by the USGS at older wells screened in the sea-level aquifer were similar to those measured since 1995, but the known downgradient extent of the TCE contamination expanded nearly 2 miles after the Army installed and sampled new wells during 2003-04. Concentrations of TCE in the sea-level aquifer were consistently highest in the upper part of the aquifer throughout the plume, although TCE has spread throughout much of the thickness of the aquifer in the downgradient portions of the plume.\r\n\r\nEnvironmental tracer data indicated that the primary pathway for contaminant migration into the sea-level aquifer is through the previously identified confining unit window, an area where the predominately fine-grained confining unit is relatively coarse grained and more permeable. Other less substantial pathways for contaminant migration also were identified near the East Gate Disposal Yard and the I-5 pump-and-treat facilities. Those areas are near active pumping wells and ground-water reintroduction facilities, but there is no evidence that the contaminant migration was caused or enhanced by those activities.\r\n\r\nWithin the sea-level aquifer, TCE concentrations continue to migrate westward in the flow field strongly influenced by ground-water recharge from American Lake. Historical data are not available to definitively determine if the 5-?g/L leading edge of the current TCE plume is stable or if it is still moving downgradient. However, an evaluation of the available data combined with TCE traveltime estimates indicates that the peak TCE concentrations in the sea-level aquifer may have not yet reached the wells near the currently defined leading edge of the plume. Hypothetically, the 5-?g/L leading edge","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20055035","usgsCitation":"Dinicola, R., 2005, Hydrogeology and trichloroethene contamination in the sea-level aquifer beneath the Logistics Center, Fort Lewis, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5035, 59 p.; 1 plate, 42 in. x 30 in., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20055035.","productDescription":"59 p.; 1 plate, 42 in. x 30 in.","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":193219,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":6915,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/sir2005-5035/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"scale":"24000","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4a4ae4b07f02db625210","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Dinicola, Richard S. 0000-0003-4222-294X dinicola@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4222-294X","contributorId":352,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Dinicola","given":"Richard S.","email":"dinicola@usgs.gov","affiliations":[{"id":622,"text":"Washington Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":282007,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1}]}}
,{"id":70199,"text":"sir20045269 - 2005 - Simulated ground-water flow for a pond-dominated aquifer system near Great Sandy Bottom Pond, Pembroke, Massachusetts","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-02T00:14:03","indexId":"sir20045269","displayToPublicDate":"2005-03-11T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2004-5269","title":"Simulated ground-water flow for a pond-dominated aquifer system near Great Sandy Bottom Pond, Pembroke, Massachusetts","docAbstract":"A ground-water flow simulation for a 66.4-square-mile area around Great Sandy Bottom (GSB) Pond (105 acres) near Pembroke, Massachusetts, was developed for use by local and State water managers to assess the yields for public water supply of local ponds and wells for average climatic and drought conditions and the effects of water withdrawals on nearby water levels and streamflows. Wetlands and ponds cover about 30 percent of the study area and the aquifer system is dominated by interactions between ground water and the ponds. The three largest surface-water bodies in the study area are Silver Lake (640 acres), Monponsett Pond (590 acres), and Oldham Pond (236 acres). The study area is drained by tributaries of the Taunton River to the southwest, the South and North Rivers to the northeast, and the Jones River to the southeast. In 2002, 10.8 million gallons per day of water was exported from ponds and 3.5 million gallons per day from wells was used locally for public supply.\r\n\r\nA transient ground-water-flow model with 69 monthly stress periods spanning the period from January 1998 through September 2003 was calibrated to stage at GSB Pond and nearby Silver Lake and streamflow and water levels collected from September 2002 through September 2003. The calibrated model was used to assess hydrologic responses to a variety of water-use and climatic conditions. Simulation of predevelopment (no pumping or export) average monthly (1949-2002) water-level conditions caused the GSB Pond level to increase by 6.3 feet from the results of a simulation using average 2002 pumping for all wells, withdrawals, and exports. Most of this decline can be attributed to pumping, withdrawals, and exports of water from sites away from GSB Pond. The effects of increasing the export rate from GSB Pond by 1.25 and 1.5 times the 2002 rate were a lowering of pond levels by a maximum of 1.6 and 2.8 feet, respectively. Simulated results for two different drought conditions, one mild drought similar to that of 1979-82 and a more severe drought similar to that of 1963-66, but with current (2002) pumping, were compared to results for average monthly recharge conditions (1949-2002). Simulated mild drought conditions showed a reduction of GSB Pond level of about 1.3 feet and a lower streamflow of about 1.7 percent in the nearby stream. Simulated severe drought conditions reduced the pond level at GSB Pond by almost 7 feet and lowered streamflow by about 37 percent. Varying cranberry-irrigation practices had little effect on simulated GSB Pond water levels, but may be important in other ponds. The model was most sensitive to changes in areal recharge. An increase and decrease of 22 percent in recharge produced changes in the GSB Pond water level of +1.4 feet and -2.4 feet, respectively.\r\n\r\nThe accuracy of simulation results was best in the central portion of the study area in the immediate location of GSB Pond. The model was developed with the study-area boundary far enough away from the GSB Pond area that the boundary would have minimal effect on the water levels in GSB Pond, nearby ponds, and the underlying aquifer system. The model is best suited for use by local and State water managers to assess the effects of different withdrawal scenarios for wells and ponds near GSB Pond and for general delineation of areas contributing recharge to wells and ponds in the vicinity of GSB Pond. The model in its current form may not be well suited to detailed analyses of water budgets and flow patterns for parts of the study area farther from GSB Pond without further investigation, calibration, and data collection.","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20045269","usgsCitation":"Carlson, C.S., and Lyford, F.P., 2005, Simulated ground-water flow for a pond-dominated aquifer system near Great Sandy Bottom Pond, Pembroke, Massachusetts: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5269, 43 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20045269.","productDescription":"43 p.","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":6917,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/sir20045269/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":124426,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/sir_2004_5269.jpg"}],"scale":"24000","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e49f9e4b07f02db5f3461","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Carlson, Carl S. 0000-0001-7142-3519 cscarlso@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7142-3519","contributorId":1694,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Carlson","given":"Carl","email":"cscarlso@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"S.","affiliations":[{"id":376,"text":"Massachusetts Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":466,"text":"New England Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":282010,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Lyford, Forest P.","contributorId":43334,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Lyford","given":"Forest","email":"","middleInitial":"P.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":282011,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":70182,"text":"sir20045115 - 2005 - Surface-water/ground-water interaction along reaches of the Snake River and Henrys Fork, Idaho","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-02T00:13:45","indexId":"sir20045115","displayToPublicDate":"2005-03-09T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2004-5115","title":"Surface-water/ground-water interaction along reaches of the Snake River and Henrys Fork, Idaho","docAbstract":"Declining water levels in the eastern Snake River Plain aquifer and decreases in spring discharges from the aquifer to the Snake River have spurred studies to improve understanding of the surface-water/ground-water interaction on the plain. This study was done to estimate streamflow gains and losses along specific reaches of the Snake River and Henrys Fork and to compare changes in gain and loss estimates to changes in ground-water levels over time. Data collected during this study will be used to enhance the conceptual model of the hydrologic system and to refine computer models of ground-water flow and surface-water/ground-water interactions.\r\n\r\nEstimates of streamflow gains and losses along specific subreaches of the Snake River and Henrys Fork, based on the results of five seepage studies completed during 2001?02, varied greatly across the study area, ranging from a loss estimate of 606 ft3/s in a subreach of the upper Snake River near Heise to a gain estimate of 3,450 ft3/s in a subreach of the Snake River that includes Thousand Springs. Some variations over time also were apparent in specific subreaches. Surface spring flow accounted for much of the inflow to subreaches having large gain estimates. Several subreaches alternately gained and lost streamflow during the study.\r\n\r\nChanges in estimates of streamflow gains and losses along some of the subreaches were compared with changes in water levels, measured at three different times during 2001?02, in adjacent wells. In some instances, a strong relation between changes in estimates of gains or losses and changes in ground-water levels was apparent.","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20045115","usgsCitation":"Hortness, J., and Vidmar, P., 2005, Surface-water/ground-water interaction along reaches of the Snake River and Henrys Fork, Idaho (Online only): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5115, 27 p. with 3 appendices online, https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20045115.","productDescription":"27 p. with 3 appendices online","onlineOnly":"Y","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":6885,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/sir2004-5115/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":185661,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"}],"scale":"24000","edition":"Online only","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e48cee4b07f02db5456f9","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Hortness, Jon 0000-0002-9809-2876 hortness@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-2876","contributorId":3601,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Hortness","given":"Jon","email":"hortness@usgs.gov","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":281988,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Vidmar, Peter","contributorId":25242,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Vidmar","given":"Peter","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281989,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":70180,"text":"sir20045254 - 2005 - Chemistry of runoff and shallow ground water at the Cattlemans Detention basin site, South Lake Tahoe, California, August 2000-November 2001","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-02T00:13:45","indexId":"sir20045254","displayToPublicDate":"2005-03-09T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2004-5254","title":"Chemistry of runoff and shallow ground water at the Cattlemans Detention basin site, South Lake Tahoe, California, August 2000-November 2001","docAbstract":"A study at the Cattlemans detention basin site began in November 2000. The site is adjacent to Cold Creek in South Lake Tahoe, California. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effects of the detention basin on ground-water discharge and changes in nutrient loads to Cold Creek, a tributary to Trout Creek and Lake Tahoe. The study is being done in cooperation with the Tahoe Engineering Division of the El Dorado County Department of Transportation. This report summarizes data collected prior to and during construction of the detention basin and includes: (1) nutrient and total suspended solid concentrations of urban runoff; (2) distribution of unconsolidated deposits; (3) direction of ground-water flow; and (4) chemistry of shallow ground water and Cold Creek.\r\n\r\nUnconsolidated deposits in the area of the detention basin were categorized into three classes: fill material consisting of a red-brown loamy sand with some gravel and an occasional cobble that was placed on top of the meadow; meadow deposits consisting of gray silt and sand with stringers of coarse sand and fine gravel; and a deeper brown to yellow-brown sand and gravel with lenses of silt and sand. Prior to construction of the detention basin, ground water flowed west-northwest across the area of the detention basin toward Cold Creek. The direction of ground-water flow did not change during construction of the detention basin. \r\n\r\nMedian concentrations of dissolved iron and chloride were 500 and 30 times higher, respectively, in ground water from the meadow deposits than dissolved concentrations in Cold Creek. Median concentration of sulfate in ground water from the meadow deposits was 0.4 milligrams per liter and dissolved oxygen was below the detection level of 0.3 milligrams per liter. The relatively high concentrations of iron and the lack of sulfate in the shallow ground water likely are caused by chemical reactions and biological microbial oxidation of organic matter in the unconsolidated deposits that result in little to no dissolved oxygen in the ground water. The higher chloride concentrations in ground water compared with Cold Creek likely are caused from the application of salt on Pioneer Trail and streets in Montgomery Estates subdivision during the winter. Runoff from these roads contributes to the recharge of the shallow ground water. The range of dissolved constituents generally was greater in the meadow deposits than in the deeper sand and gravel. \r\n\r\nAmmonia plus organic nitrogen were the dominant forms of dissolved nitrogen and concentrations ranged from 0.04 to 18 milligrams per liter as nitrogen. Highest concentration was beneath the middle of the detention basin. Nitrate plus nitrite concentrations were low (<0.33 milligrams per liter as nitrogen) throughout the area and dissolved phosphorus concentrations ranged from 0.001 to 0.34 milligrams per liter. Nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon showed no consistent pattern in the direction of ground-water flow, which suggests that, similar to iron and sulfate, local variations in the chemical and biological reactions within the meadow deposits controlled the variation in nitrogen concentrations. The gradual increase in dissolved phosphorus along the direction of ground-water flow suggest that phosphorus may be slowly dissolving into ground water. Dissolved phosphorus was consistently low in July, which may be the result of greater microbial activity in the unconsolidated deposits or from uptake by roots during the summer.","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20045254","usgsCitation":"Prudic, D.E., Sager, S.J., Wood, J.L., Henkelman, K.K., and Caskey, R.M., 2005, Chemistry of runoff and shallow ground water at the Cattlemans Detention basin site, South Lake Tahoe, California, August 2000-November 2001: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5254, 48 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20045254.","productDescription":"48 p.","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":6883,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/sir2004-5254/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":185989,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"}],"scale":"24000","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e49dee4b07f02db5e27a7","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Prudic, David E. deprudic@usgs.gov","contributorId":3430,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Prudic","given":"David","email":"deprudic@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"E.","affiliations":[{"id":465,"text":"Nevada Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":281980,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Sager, Sienna J.","contributorId":55082,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Sager","given":"Sienna","email":"","middleInitial":"J.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281983,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Wood, James L.","contributorId":10059,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Wood","given":"James","email":"","middleInitial":"L.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281981,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Henkelman, Katherine K.","contributorId":26751,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Henkelman","given":"Katherine","email":"","middleInitial":"K.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281982,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Caskey, Rachel M.","contributorId":74817,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Caskey","given":"Rachel","email":"","middleInitial":"M.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281984,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5}]}}
,{"id":70163,"text":"sir20045233 - 2005 - Seepage investigation and selected hydrologic data for the Escalante River drainage basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2019-12-30T16:14:37","indexId":"sir20045233","displayToPublicDate":"2005-03-04T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2004-5233","title":"Seepage investigation and selected hydrologic data for the Escalante River drainage basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002","docAbstract":"<p>This report contains the results of an October 2001 seepage investigation conducted along a reach of the Escalante River in Utah extending from the U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging station near Escalante to the mouth of Stevens Canyon. Discharge was measured at 16 individual sites along 15 consecutive reaches. Total reach length was about 86 miles. A reconnaissance-level sampling of water for tritium and chlorofluorcarbons was also done. In addition, hydrologic and water-quality data previously collected and published by the U.S. Geological Survey for the 2,020-square-mile Escalante River drainage basin was compiled and is presented in 12 tables. These data were collected from 64 surface-water sites and 28 springs from 1909 to 2002.</p><p>None of the 15 consecutive reaches along the Escalante River had a measured loss or gain that exceeded the measurement error. All discharge measurements taken during the seepage investigation were assigned a qualitative rating of accuracy that ranged from 5 percent to greater than 8 percent of the actual flow. Summing the potential error for each measurement and dividing by the maximum of either the upstream discharge and any tributary inflow, or the downstream discharge, determined the normalized error for a reach. This was compared to the computed loss or gain that also was normalized to the maximum discharge. A loss or gain for a specified reach is considered significant when the loss or gain (normalized percentage difference) is greater than the measurement error (normalized percentage error). The percentage difference and percentage error were normalized to allow comparison between reaches with different amounts of discharge.</p><p>The plate that accompanies the report is 36\" by 40\" and can be printed in 16 tiles, 8.5 by 11 inches. An index for the tiles is located on the lower left-hand side of the plate. Using Adobe Acrobat, the plate can be viewed independent of the report; all Acrobat functions are available.</p>","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Salt Lake City, UT","doi":"10.3133/sir20045233","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument","usgsCitation":"Wilberg, D.E., and Stolp, B.J., 2005, Seepage investigation and selected hydrologic data for the Escalante River drainage basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5233, Report: vi, 39 p.; 1 Plate: 36.0 x 40.0 inches, https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20045233.","productDescription":"Report: vi, 39 p.; 1 Plate: 36.0 x 40.0 inches","numberOfPages":"45","costCenters":[{"id":610,"text":"Utah Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":6877,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/sir2004-5233/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":334252,"rank":3,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2004/5233/PDF/SIR2004_5233.pdf","size":"3.2 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"}},{"id":185829,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":334253,"rank":4,"type":{"id":17,"text":"Plate"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2004/5233/PDF/plate.pdf","text":"Plate 1","size":"4.6 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"}}],"scale":"24000","country":"United States","state":"Utah","county":"Garfield County, Kane County","otherGeospatial":"Escalante River drainage basin","geographicExtents":"{\"type\":\"FeatureCollection\",\"features\":[{\"type\":\"Feature\",\"geometry\":{\"type\":\"Polygon\",\"coordinates\":[[[-109.9271,38.1494],[-109.9267,38.1454],[-109.9291,38.1409],[-109.9297,38.14],[-109.9357,38.1364],[-109.9434,38.1339],[-109.9499,38.1321],[-109.954,38.1299],[-109.9576,38.1273],[-109.9619,38.1206],[-109.9637,38.1179],[-109.9656,38.1152],[-109.975,38.1113],[-109.9786,38.11],[-109.9815,38.1077],[-109.9876,38.1006],[-109.9905,38.1002],[-109.994,38.1007],[-109.9992,38.1039],[-110.0049,38.1081],[-110.0084,38.1095],[-110.0119,38.1087],[-110.0173,38.1056],[-110.0233,38.0989],[-110.0396,38.0801],[-110.0439,38.0738],[-110.0451,38.0716],[-110.0447,38.0652],[-110.0438,38.0562],[-110.048,38.049],[-110.061,38.0469],[-110.0651,38.0438],[-110.0719,38.0312],[-110.0756,38.0222],[-110.0769,38.0172],[-110.0753,38.0109],[-110.0749,38.0054],[-110.0755,38.0032],[-110.0792,37.9978],[-110.0851,37.9938],[-110.0898,37.9934],[-110.0939,37.9953],[-110.0962,37.9967],[-110.1002,37.9995],[-110.1053,38.0036],[-110.1122,38.0083],[-110.1174,38.0093],[-110.1286,38.009],[-110.1351,38.0059],[-110.1374,38.005],[-110.141,38.0015],[-110.1422,37.9992],[-110.1441,37.9952],[-110.1447,37.9943],[-110.1483,37.9907],[-110.1537,37.9867],[-110.1596,37.9823],[-110.1608,37.9814],[-110.1626,37.9778],[-110.1633,37.9737],[-110.1658,37.9697],[-110.1688,37.9656],[-110.1765,37.9607],[-110.1895,37.9532],[-110.1996,37.9475],[-110.2038,37.9439],[-110.2062,37.9408],[-110.2074,37.9367],[-110.2064,37.9331],[-110.2053,37.9294],[-110.2014,37.9199],[-110.1998,37.9139],[-110.2052,37.9077],[-110.2048,37.9022],[-110.206,37.8977],[-110.2078,37.8955],[-110.2126,37.8933],[-110.2184,37.8929],[-110.226,37.8948],[-110.2335,37.8958],[-110.2364,37.8954],[-110.2394,37.895],[-110.2545,37.898],[-110.262,37.8985],[-110.2685,37.8973],[-110.2738,37.8946],[-110.2756,37.8915],[-110.2781,37.8852],[-110.2788,37.8806],[-110.2767,37.8702],[-110.2803,37.8675],[-110.2855,37.8662],[-110.2896,37.8672],[-110.2907,37.8676],[-110.2913,37.869],[-110.294,37.8763],[-110.2962,37.8836],[-110.2973,37.8868],[-110.3007,37.8895],[-110.3042,37.89],[-110.3077,37.8896],[-110.3147,37.8888],[-110.3206,37.8894],[-110.3258,37.8899],[-110.3404,37.8905],[-110.3549,37.8912],[-110.3666,37.89],[-110.3812,37.8884],[-110.3971,37.8845],[-110.4036,37.8792],[-110.4026,37.8701],[-110.4004,37.8651],[-110.4,37.8578],[-110.4042,37.8501],[-110.4213,37.8408],[-110.4279,37.8355],[-110.4298,37.8269],[-110.4319,37.8097],[-110.4343,37.8075],[-110.439,37.8062],[-110.4442,37.8071],[-110.4494,37.8104],[-110.4529,37.8109],[-110.4704,37.8066],[-110.474,37.8021],[-110.4747,37.7953],[-110.4731,37.7894],[-110.4709,37.7835],[-110.4653,37.7748],[-110.463,37.7716],[-110.4584,37.7697],[-110.4531,37.7705],[-110.449,37.7718],[-110.4402,37.7758],[-110.4337,37.778],[-110.4303,37.778],[-110.4268,37.7756],[-110.4275,37.7716],[-110.4299,37.7689],[-110.4416,37.7631],[-110.4458,37.7587],[-110.4482,37.7532],[-110.449,37.7451],[-110.4492,37.7351],[-110.4662,37.7276],[-110.471,37.7213],[-110.4712,37.7146],[-110.4712,37.7105],[-110.4777,37.706],[-110.4877,37.7025],[-110.4878,37.698],[-110.4861,37.6952],[-110.4834,37.6866],[-110.4841,37.6807],[-110.4924,37.6708],[-110.4949,37.6645],[-110.4961,37.6609],[-110.4969,37.6514],[-110.4986,37.6505],[-110.5032,37.6547],[-110.5083,37.6593],[-110.5142,37.6589],[-110.5183,37.6562],[-110.5201,37.6539],[-110.5236,37.6504],[-110.5249,37.6468],[-110.5273,37.6404],[-110.5315,37.6373],[-110.5373,37.636],[-110.5431,37.6375],[-110.5506,37.6407],[-110.5552,37.6439],[-110.5592,37.6431],[-110.5616,37.6413],[-110.5634,37.6372],[-110.5629,37.6323],[-110.5636,37.6264],[-110.565,37.6182],[-110.5697,37.6142],[-110.5854,37.6117],[-110.5959,37.6086],[-110.6012,37.6055],[-110.6042,37.601],[-110.6038,37.5942],[-110.6027,37.5892],[-110.6005,37.5833],[-110.6,37.5769],[-110.603,37.5711],[-110.6071,37.5684],[-110.6182,37.5658],[-110.6288,37.5596],[-110.6376,37.552],[-110.6424,37.5475],[-110.6471,37.5403],[-110.6542,37.534],[-110.6596,37.5277],[-110.6633,37.5146],[-110.6664,37.5033],[-110.6682,37.5006],[-110.6683,37.4952],[-110.6584,37.4937],[-110.648,37.4927],[-110.6422,37.4913],[-110.6406,37.4881],[-110.6412,37.4849],[-110.6441,37.4831],[-110.6628,37.4784],[-110.6726,37.4789],[-110.686,37.48],[-110.7004,37.481],[-110.7092,37.4798],[-110.7197,37.4767],[-110.725,37.4695],[-110.7245,37.4654],[-110.7257,37.46],[-110.7298,37.4573],[-110.7339,37.4569],[-110.7408,37.4606],[-110.746,37.4602],[-110.7478,37.4561],[-110.7433,37.4488],[-110.7376,37.4438],[-110.7302,37.4378],[-110.7227,37.4341],[-110.7181,37.4345],[-110.7088,37.4349],[-110.7047,37.4344],[-110.7013,37.4316],[-110.7014,37.4226],[-110.7033,37.418],[-110.7086,37.4104],[-110.7163,37.4023],[-110.7227,37.4001],[-110.7348,37.4057],[-110.744,37.4067],[-110.7511,37.4031],[-110.7528,37.4],[-110.7512,37.3927],[-110.7461,37.3872],[-110.7392,37.3835],[-110.7318,37.3793],[-110.7261,37.3729],[-110.725,37.3689],[-110.7321,37.3612],[-110.7364,37.3463],[-110.7387,37.3445],[-110.7416,37.3432],[-110.7457,37.345],[-110.7467,37.3487],[-110.749,37.3519],[-110.7537,37.3506],[-110.7585,37.3384],[-110.762,37.3339],[-110.7708,37.3285],[-110.7755,37.3245],[-110.7819,37.3223],[-110.7993,37.3211],[-110.8367,37.3369],[-110.8493,37.3447],[-110.8568,37.3489],[-110.8625,37.3494],[-110.8701,37.3463],[-110.8731,37.3413],[-110.8726,37.334],[-110.8681,37.3281],[-110.8514,37.323],[-110.8439,37.3211],[-110.8404,37.3174],[-110.8371,37.307],[-110.8396,37.2979],[-110.8443,37.2943],[-110.8524,37.2917],[-110.8663,37.29],[-110.8733,37.2855],[-110.8729,37.2783],[-110.869,37.2692],[-110.8598,37.2641],[-110.8593,37.2591],[-110.8622,37.2555],[-110.8738,37.2534],[-110.8813,37.2539],[-110.8877,37.2517],[-110.889,37.2453],[-110.8827,37.2398],[-110.8805,37.2344],[-110.8799,37.2312],[-110.8783,37.2267],[-110.8835,37.2222],[-110.8899,37.2204],[-110.8946,37.2186],[-110.8975,37.215],[-110.8976,37.2114],[-110.8919,37.2041],[-110.8902,37.2005],[-110.8927,37.1923],[-110.9032,37.1852],[-110.8987,37.1729],[-110.9086,37.1712],[-110.9229,37.1781],[-110.9287,37.1754],[-110.9272,37.1627],[-110.9267,37.1555],[-110.9291,37.1514],[-110.9372,37.1478],[-110.9435,37.1497],[-110.9504,37.1502],[-110.9539,37.1498],[-110.9574,37.1467],[-110.9569,37.1412],[-110.9501,37.1307],[-110.9543,37.1253],[-110.9612,37.1222],[-110.9745,37.1255],[-110.9802,37.1251],[-110.9843,37.122],[-110.9861,37.117],[-110.9879,37.1125],[-110.9908,37.1111],[-110.9949,37.1112],[-110.9989,37.1112],[-111.0046,37.1122],[-111.0173,37.1123],[-111.0306,37.111],[-111.0393,37.1097],[-111.0505,37.0966],[-111.055,37.0976],[-111.0585,37.0994],[-111.0619,37.1013],[-111.0711,37.1041],[-111.0769,37.1032],[-111.0838,37.1028],[-111.0867,37.1028],[-111.0896,37.1024],[-111.0965,37.1024],[-111.1058,37.1034],[-111.1161,37.1053],[-111.123,37.1054],[-111.1365,37.0891],[-111.1469,37.0883],[-111.1498,37.0897],[-111.1549,37.0929],[-111.1652,37.1061],[-111.1732,37.1062],[-111.1837,37.0976],[-111.1884,37.0886],[-111.1978,37.0773],[-111.206,37.0642],[-111.2113,37.0574],[-111.2177,37.0534],[-111.2223,37.0539],[-111.2251,37.0562],[-111.2274,37.063],[-111.2331,37.0667],[-111.24,37.0662],[-111.2429,37.0613],[-111.2465,37.0545],[-111.2459,37.05],[-111.2442,37.0459],[-111.2351,37.0422],[-111.2287,37.0403],[-111.2288,37.034],[-111.2323,37.0286],[-111.2416,37.0227],[-111.2468,37.0219],[-111.2485,37.0264],[-111.253,37.0364],[-111.261,37.0473],[-111.2684,37.0533],[-111.2787,37.0565],[-111.2845,37.0588],[-111.2954,37.0666],[-111.3,37.0653],[-111.3046,37.0626],[-111.307,37.0598],[-111.3053,37.0512],[-111.3013,37.0453],[-111.2921,37.0443],[-111.2858,37.0439],[-111.2835,37.0411],[-111.2847,37.0366],[-111.2905,37.033],[-111.3003,37.0294],[-111.305,37.0272],[-111.3056,37.0218],[-111.3033,37.0177],[-111.3028,37.0131],[-111.3063,37.01],[-111.3103,37.0109],[-111.3177,37.0173],[-111.3241,37.0187],[-111.331,37.0169],[-111.3351,37.0138],[-111.342,37.0093],[-111.349,37.0079],[-111.357,37.0066],[-111.3703,37.0058],[-111.3789,37.0058],[-111.3864,37.0059],[-111.3951,37.0059],[-111.3991,37.0055],[-111.4043,37.0037],[-111.4233,37.0038],[-111.4418,37.0034],[-111.5253,37.0035],[-111.6002,37.0033],[-111.6221,37.0031],[-111.64,37.003],[-111.6613,37.0029],[-111.678,37.0031],[-111.689,37.0032],[-111.7057,37.003],[-111.708,37.003],[-111.7501,37.0033],[-111.7656,37.0032],[-111.8388,37.0028],[-111.8466,37.0028],[-111.8567,37.0028],[-111.8964,37.0027],[-111.961,37.0025],[-112.0013,37.0024],[-112.0284,37.0024],[-112.033,37.0024],[-112.0784,37.0026],[-112.082,37.0026],[-112.0998,37.0026],[-112.1206,37.0027],[-112.1339,37.0027],[-112.1892,37.0028],[-112.207,37.0029],[-112.2284,37.0029],[-112.2433,37.003],[-112.3621,37.0033],[-112.445,37.0032],[-112.4964,37.0032],[-112.5424,37.0032],[-112.6231,37.0031],[-112.7055,37.0031],[-112.7447,37.0033],[-112.8231,37.003],[-112.8697,37.0028],[-112.9037,37.0027],[-112.9029,37.0304],[-112.9035,37.034],[-112.9031,37.0485],[-112.9033,37.0607],[-112.9027,37.0639],[-112.9028,37.0675],[-112.9024,37.0852],[-112.9027,37.1106],[-112.903,37.1315],[-112.9025,37.1387],[-112.9031,37.1451],[-112.9032,37.1532],[-112.9029,37.175],[-112.9038,37.1954],[-112.9023,37.2158],[-112.9029,37.2235],[-112.9029,37.2666],[-112.9031,37.2824],[-112.9054,37.2824],[-112.9056,37.2992],[-112.9057,37.3559],[-112.9058,37.364],[-112.9059,37.3717],[-112.9055,37.3858],[-112.9051,37.4003],[-112.9053,37.4152],[-112.9043,37.4279],[-112.9045,37.4429],[-112.9041,37.4579],[-112.9046,37.5005],[-112.9047,37.5154],[-112.9051,37.5449],[-112.8534,37.5448],[-112.8331,37.5449],[-112.7948,37.5448],[-112.7641,37.5445],[-112.6874,37.545],[-112.6877,37.574],[-112.6902,37.7186],[-112.6931,37.7185],[-112.6934,37.7525],[-112.6931,37.7752],[-112.6928,37.8065],[-112.6567,37.8076],[-112.6491,37.8085],[-112.6275,37.8082],[-112.5949,37.8065],[-112.5815,37.8057],[-112.5812,37.8383],[-112.5815,37.8832],[-112.5909,37.8832],[-112.5909,37.8909],[-112.5623,37.8905],[-112.5256,37.8912],[-112.5245,37.8912],[-112.5075,37.8912],[-112.4895,37.8913],[-112.489,37.9063],[-112.4715,37.9059],[-112.4711,37.9349],[-112.4706,37.9462],[-112.4707,37.9635],[-112.4696,37.9789],[-112.483,37.9788],[-112.4825,37.9847],[-112.4822,38.0273],[-112.4817,38.0418],[-112.4818,38.0572],[-112.4813,38.0658],[-112.4808,38.0862],[-112.481,38.1098],[-112.481,38.1148],[-112.4805,38.1293],[-112.4806,38.1379],[-112.4806,38.1474],[-112.4754,38.1474],[-112.4754,38.1497],[-112.4543,38.1498],[-112.4362,38.1494],[-112.3893,38.1505],[-112.3583,38.1501],[-112.3226,38.1498],[-112.3068,38.1498],[-112.2869,38.1503],[-112.2629,38.1504],[-112.2477,38.1499],[-112.2149,38.15],[-112.1734,38.1496],[-112.1605,38.1496],[-112.1412,38.1501],[-112.0622,38.1497],[-112.0622,38.1465],[-112.0429,38.1466],[-112.0207,38.1466],[-112.0078,38.147],[-112.0019,38.1466],[-111.9855,38.147],[-111.968,38.147],[-111.951,38.147],[-111.9516,38.152],[-111.9352,38.152],[-111.9317,38.152],[-111.8574,38.1528],[-111.8427,38.1528],[-111.8211,38.1523],[-111.7912,38.1527],[-111.7666,38.1527],[-111.7479,38.1522],[-111.7456,38.1522],[-111.7315,38.1526],[-111.7075,38.1526],[-111.6941,38.1525],[-111.6601,38.1524],[-111.6543,38.1524],[-111.6397,38.1524],[-111.5998,38.1527],[-111.5636,38.1521],[-111.5372,38.152],[-111.5074,38.1524],[-111.4594,38.1522],[-111.4284,38.1516],[-111.4173,38.1515],[-111.4172,38.1551],[-111.3897,38.155],[-111.2698,38.1539],[-111.2335,38.1537],[-111.2147,38.154],[-111.189,38.1534],[-111.1785,38.1533],[-111.1229,38.1529],[-111.1176,38.1529],[-111.1024,38.1528],[-111.0936,38.1523],[-111.0842,38.1527],[-111.0661,38.1525],[-111.0608,38.1525],[-111.0152,38.1526],[-111.0105,38.1521],[-111.0023,38.1525],[-110.9918,38.1524],[-110.9847,38.1523],[-110.9742,38.1522],[-110.9689,38.1522],[-110.9561,38.1521],[-110.9011,38.1516],[-110.897,38.1516],[-110.8812,38.1514],[-110.8782,38.1514],[-110.863,38.1517],[-110.8443,38.1515],[-110.7899,38.151],[-110.7863,38.151],[-110.7682,38.1508],[-110.7495,38.1506],[-110.7489,38.1506],[-110.7313,38.1504],[-110.6769,38.1507],[-110.6582,38.151],[-110.6394,38.1512],[-110.6213,38.1511],[-110.5669,38.1509],[-110.547,38.1511],[-110.5282,38.1513],[-110.5101,38.1516],[-110.4703,38.1511],[-110.4557,38.1509],[-110.4375,38.1511],[-110.4205,38.1509],[-110.4024,38.1511],[-110.3468,38.1508],[-110.3269,38.1506],[-110.3087,38.1508],[-110.2906,38.151],[-110.2561,38.1509],[-110.2373,38.1507],[-110.2169,38.1504],[-110.2016,38.1502],[-110.1981,38.1501],[-110.18,38.1503],[-110.1618,38.1505],[-110.0992,38.1495],[-110.0664,38.1499],[-110.0518,38.1497],[-109.9962,38.1492],[-109.9271,38.1494]]]},\"properties\":{\"name\":\"Garfield\",\"state\":\"UT\"}}]}","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4a0ae4b07f02db5fb9fa","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Wilberg, Dale E.","contributorId":101275,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Wilberg","given":"Dale","email":"","middleInitial":"E.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281966,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Stolp, Bernard J. 0000-0003-3803-1497 bjstolp@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-1497","contributorId":963,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Stolp","given":"Bernard","email":"bjstolp@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"J.","affiliations":[{"id":610,"text":"Utah Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":281965,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":70209603,"text":"70209603 - 2005 - Evaluation of groundwater movement in the Frenchman Flat CAU using geochemical and isotopic analysis","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2020-04-15T13:40:05.420066","indexId":"70209603","displayToPublicDate":"2005-03-01T08:18:22","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":4,"text":"Other Government Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":295,"text":"Technical Report","active":false,"publicationSubtype":{"id":4}},"seriesNumber":"DOE/NV/13609-36","title":"Evaluation of groundwater movement in the Frenchman Flat CAU using geochemical and isotopic analysis","docAbstract":"<div class=\"biblio-detail\"><p id=\"citation-abstract\" class=\"description\">The principal pathway for radionuclide migration from underground tests in Frenchman Flat, on the Nevada Test Site, to the accessible environment is groundwater flow. Two potential pathways for radionuclide transport via groundwater have been identified from hydrologic data: (1) radionuclide transport downward from the alluvial and volcanic aquifers into the underlying carbonate aquifer; and (2) radionuclide transport laterally to the carbonate aquifer surrounding Frenchman Flat. This report presents an evaluation of geochemical and environmental isotopic data to test these potential pathways and to identify other groundwater flowpaths in, and out of, Frenchman Flat.</p></div><div class=\"biblio-detail\"><br data-mce-bogus=\"1\"></div>","language":"English","publisher":"Desert Research Institute","doi":"10.2172/839138","usgsCitation":"Hershey, R., Thomas, J., Rose, T., Paces, J.B., Farnham, I.M., and Benedict, F.C., 2005, Evaluation of groundwater movement in the Frenchman Flat CAU using geochemical and isotopic analysis: Technical Report DOE/NV/13609-36, viii, 65 p., https://doi.org/10.2172/839138.","productDescription":"viii, 65 p.","costCenters":[{"id":318,"text":"Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":477679,"rank":0,"type":{"id":41,"text":"Open Access External Repository Page"},"url":"https://www.osti.gov/biblio/839138","text":"External Repository"},{"id":374008,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/outside_thumb.jpg"}],"country":"United States","state":"Nevada","otherGeospatial":"Frenchman Flat","geographicExtents":"{\n  \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n  \"features\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"Feature\",\n      \"properties\": {},\n      \"geometry\": {\n        \"type\": \"Polygon\",\n        \"coordinates\": [\n          [\n            [\n              -116.09939575195312,\n              36.72017310567465\n            ],\n            [\n              -115.89889526367188,\n              36.72017310567465\n            ],\n            [\n              -115.89889526367188,\n              36.89499795802219\n            ],\n            [\n              -116.09939575195312,\n              36.89499795802219\n            ],\n            [\n              -116.09939575195312,\n              36.72017310567465\n            ]\n          ]\n        ]\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationStatus":"PW","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Hershey, R.","contributorId":224122,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Hershey","given":"R.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":787103,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Thomas, J.","contributorId":224124,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Thomas","given":"J.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":787104,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Rose, T.","contributorId":224125,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Rose","given":"T.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":787105,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Paces, James B. 0000-0002-9809-8493 jbpaces@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-8493","contributorId":2514,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Paces","given":"James","email":"jbpaces@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"B.","affiliations":[{"id":318,"text":"Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":787106,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Farnham, I. M.","contributorId":224126,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Farnham","given":"I.","email":"","middleInitial":"M.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":787107,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5},{"text":"Benedict, F. C.","contributorId":97068,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Benedict","given":"F.","email":"","middleInitial":"C.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":787108,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":6}]}}
,{"id":70069,"text":"sir20045295 - 2005 - Effects of decreased ground-water withdrawal on ground-water levels and chloride concentrations in Camden County, Georgia, and ground-water levels in Nassau County, Florida, from September 2001 to May 2003","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2017-01-17T17:13:30","indexId":"sir20045295","displayToPublicDate":"2005-02-11T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2004-5295","title":"Effects of decreased ground-water withdrawal on ground-water levels and chloride concentrations in Camden County, Georgia, and ground-water levels in Nassau County, Florida, from September 2001 to May 2003","docAbstract":"During October 2002, the Durango Paper Company formerly Gillman Paper Company) in St. Marys, Georgia, shut down paper-mill operations; the shutdown resulted in decreased ground-water withdrawal in Camden County by 35.6 million gallons per day. The decrease in withdrawal resulted in water-level rise in wells completed in the Floridan aquifer system and the overlying surficial and Brunswick aquifer systems; many wells in the St. Marys area flowed for the first time since the mill began operations during 1941. \r\n\r\nPumping at the mill resulted in the development of a cone of depression that coalesced with a larger adjacent cone of depression at Fernandina Beach, Florida. Since closure of the mill, the cone at St. Marys is no longer present, although the cone still exists at Fernandina Beach, Florida. Historical water-level data from the production wells at the mill indicate that the pumping water level ranged from 68 to 235 feet (ft) below North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) and averaged about 114 ft when the mill was operating. Since the shutdown, it is estimated that water levels at the mill have risen about 140 ft and are now at about 30 ft above NAVD 88. The water-level rise in wells in outlying areas in Camden County was less pronounced and ranged from about 5 to 10 ft above NAVD 88. Because of the regional upward water-level trend in the Upper Floridan aquifer that started during 1999\u00132000 in most of the coastal area, combined with a steeper upward trend beginning during October 2002, it was not possible to determine if the 5\u001310 ft rise in water levels in wells away from St. Marys was due to the mill closure. In addition to water-level rise of 22\u001326 ft in the Floridan aquifer system, water-level rises in the overlying surficial and Brunswick aquifer systems at St. Marys after the shutdown indicate upward leakage of water. Water levels had stabilized in the confined surficial and Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers by April\u0013May 2003; however, the water level in the upper Brunswick aquifer was still rising as of May 2003.\r\n\r\nChloride concentrations in the Upper Floridan aquifer in Camden County do not exceed the State and Federal drinking-water standard of 250 milligrams per liter (mg/L). With the exception of three wells located at St. Marys, all of the wells sampled during this study (from September 2002 to May 2003) had chloride concentrations ranging from 30 to 50 mg/L, which are considered within background levels for the Upper Floridan aquifer in this area. The three wells\u0014two at the Durango Paper Company and the other an old unused City of St. Marys well\u0014had chloride concentrations that ranged from 74 to 175 mg/L, which are above the background level, but were still below the 250-mg/L drinking-water standard. The source has not been determined for the elevated chloride concentration in these wells; the chloride concentration in one of the wells has decreased slightly since the paper-mill shutdown. Chloride concentrations throughout Camden County showed little change after the paper-mill shutdown.","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20045295","usgsCitation":"Peck, M., McFadden, K.W., and Leeth, D.C., 2005, Effects of decreased ground-water withdrawal on ground-water levels and chloride concentrations in Camden County, Georgia, and ground-water levels in Nassau County, Florida, from September 2001 to May 2003 (Online only): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5295, vi, 31 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20045295.","productDescription":"vi, 31 p.","onlineOnly":"Y","costCenters":[{"id":13634,"text":"South Atlantic Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":186487,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":6740,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/sir2004-5295/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"scale":"5000000","country":"United States","state":"Florida, Georgia","county":"Camden County, Nassau County","otherGeospatial":"Brunswick aquifer system, Floridan aquifer system","geographicExtents":"{\n  \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n  \"features\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"Feature\",\n      \"properties\": {},\n      \"geometry\": {\n        \"type\": \"Polygon\",\n        \"coordinates\": [\n          [\n            [\n              -82.15576171875,\n              30.56226095049944\n            ],\n            [\n              -82.15576171875,\n              31.12819929911196\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.36474609375,\n              31.12819929911196\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.36474609375,\n              30.56226095049944\n            ],\n            [\n              -82.15576171875,\n              30.56226095049944\n            ]\n          ]\n        ]\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}","edition":"Online only","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4af2e4b07f02db6918fd","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Peck, Michael F. mfpeck@usgs.gov","contributorId":1467,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Peck","given":"Michael F.","email":"mfpeck@usgs.gov","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281805,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"McFadden, Keith W. keithmc@usgs.gov","contributorId":1446,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"McFadden","given":"Keith","email":"keithmc@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"W.","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":281804,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Leeth, David C. cleeth@usgs.gov","contributorId":1403,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Leeth","given":"David","email":"cleeth@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"C.","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":281803,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3}]}}
,{"id":70074,"text":"sir20055022 - 2005 - Initial-phase investigation of multi-dimensional streamflow simulations in the Colorado River, Moab Valley, Grand County, Utah, 2004","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2017-01-27T15:41:03","indexId":"sir20055022","displayToPublicDate":"2005-02-11T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2005-5022","title":"Initial-phase investigation of multi-dimensional streamflow simulations in the Colorado River, Moab Valley, Grand County, Utah, 2004","docAbstract":"<p><span>A multi-dimensional hydrodynamic model was applied to aid in the assessment of the potential hazard posed to the uranium mill tailings near Moab, Utah, by flooding in the Colorado River as it flows through Moab Valley. Discharge estimates for the 100- and 500-year recurrence interval and for the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) were evaluated with the model for the existing channel geometry. These discharges also were modeled for three other channel-deepening configurations representing hypothetical scour of the channel at the downstream portal of Moab Valley. Water-surface elevation, velocity distribution, and shear-stress distribution were predicted for each simulation.</span><br><br><span>The hydrodynamic model was developed from measured channel topography and over-bank topographic data acquired from several sources. A limited calibration of the hydrodynamic model was conducted. The extensive presence of tamarisk or salt cedar in the over-bank regions of the study reach presented challenges for determining roughness coefficients.</span><br><br><span>Predicted water-surface elevations for the current channel geometry indicated that the toe of the tailings pile would be inundated by about 4 feet by the 100-year discharge and 25 feet by the PMF discharge. A small area at the toe of the tailings pile was characterized by velocities of about 1 to 2 feet per second for the 100-year discharge. Predicted velocities near the toe for the PMF discharge increased to between 2 and 4 feet per second over a somewhat larger area. The manner to which velocities progress from the 100-year discharge to the PMF discharge in the area of the tailings pile indicates that the tailings pile obstructs the over-bank flow of flood discharges. The predicted path of flow for all simulations along the existing Colorado River channel indicates that the current distribution of tamarisk in the over-bank region affects how flood-flow velocities are spatially distributed. Shear-stress distributions were predicted throughout the study reach for each discharge and channel geometry examined. Material transport was evaluated by applying these shear-stress values to empirically determined critical shear-stress values for grain sizes ranging from very fine sands to very coarse gravels.</span></p>","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/sir20055022","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the Utah Department of Environmmental Quality, Division of Radiation Control; and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","usgsCitation":"Kenney, T.A., 2005, Initial-phase investigation of multi-dimensional streamflow simulations in the Colorado River, Moab Valley, Grand County, Utah, 2004: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5022, viii, 69 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20055022.","productDescription":"viii, 69 p.","numberOfPages":"80","costCenters":[{"id":610,"text":"Utah Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":6778,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/sir20055022/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":185843,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":334238,"rank":3,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2005/5022/pdf/SIR2005_5022.pdf"}],"scale":"5000000","country":"United States","state":"Utah","county":"Grand County","otherGeospatial":"Colorado River, Moab Valley","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ab0e4b07f02db66da0a","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Kenney, Terry A. 0000-0003-4477-7295 tkenney@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4477-7295","contributorId":447,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Kenney","given":"Terry","email":"tkenney@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":281817,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1}]}}
,{"id":70066,"text":"sir20045264 - 2005 - Summary of hydraulic properties of the Floridan Aquifer system in coastal Georgia and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2017-01-17T12:49:26","indexId":"sir20045264","displayToPublicDate":"2005-02-11T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2004-5264","title":"Summary of hydraulic properties of the Floridan Aquifer system in coastal Georgia and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida","docAbstract":"Hydraulic-property data for the Floridan aquifer system and equivalent clastic sediments in a 67-county area of coastal Georgia and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida were evaluated to provide data necessary for development of ground-water flow and solute-transport models. Data include transmissivity at 324 wells, storage coefficient at 115 wells, and vertical hydraulic conductivity of 72 core samples from 27 sites.\r\n\r\nHydraulic properties of the Upper Floridan aquifer vary greatly in the study area due to the heterogeneity (and locally to anisotropy) of the aquifer and to variations in the degree of confinement provided by confining units. Prominent structural features in the area\u0014the Southeast Georgia Embayment, the Beaufort Arch, and the Gulf Trough\u0014influence the thickness and hydraulic properties of the sediments comprising the Floridan aquifer system. Transmissivity of the Upper Floridan aquifer and equivalent updip units was compiled for 239 wells and ranges from 530 feet squared per day (ft2/d) at Beaufort County, South Carolina, to 600,000 ft2/d in Coffee County, Georgia. In carbonate rock settings of the lower Coastal Plain, transmissivity of the Upper Floridan aquifer generally is greater than 20,000 ft2/d, with values exceeding 100,000 ft2/d in the southeastern and southwestern parts of the study area (generally coinciding with the area of greatest aquifer thickness). Transmissivity of the Upper Floridan aquifer generally is less than 10,000 ft2/d in and near the upper Coastal Plain, where the aquifer is thin and consists largely of clastic sediments, and in the vicinity of the Gulf Trough, where the aquifer consists of low permeability rocks and sediments. Large variability in the range of transmissivity in Camden and Glynn Counties, Georgia, and Nassau County, Florida, demonstrates the anisotropic distribution of hydraulic properties that may result from fractures or solution openings in the carbonate rocks. Storage coefficient of the Upper Floridan aquifer was compiled for 106 wells and ranges from about 0.00004 at Beaufort County, South Carolina, to 0.04 in Baker County, Florida. \r\n\r\nTransmissivity of the Lower Floridan aquifer and equivalent updip clastic units was compiled for 53 wells and ranges from about 170 ft2/d in Barnwell County, South Carolina, to about 43,000 ft2/d in Camden County, Georgia. Transmissivity of the Lower Floridan aquifer is greatest where the aquifer is thickest\u0014 in southeastern Georgia and northeastern Florida\u0014where estimates are greater than 10,000 ft2/d; at one well in southeastern Georgia transmissivity was estimated to be as high as 200,000 ft2/d. Storage-coefficient data for the Lower Floridan aquifer are limited to three estimates in Barnwell and Allendale Counties, South Carolina, and to estimates determined from six multi-aquifer tests in Duval County, Florida. In the South Carolina tests, storage coefficient ranges from 0.0003 to 0.0004; this range is indicative of a confined aquifer. The storage coefficient for the combined Upper and Lower Floridan wells in Duval County, Florida, ranges from 0.00002 to 0.02. \r\n\r\nVertical hydraulic conductivity was compiled from core samples collected at 27 sites. For the Upper Floridan confining unit, values from 39 core samples at 17 sites range from 0.0002 to 3 feet per day (ft/d). For the Lower Floridan confining unit, values from 10 core samples at 9 sites range from about 0.000004 to 0.16 ft/d. Vertical hydraulic conductivity of the Upper Floridan aquifer was compiled from 16 core samples at five sites, mostly in the Brunswick, Georgia, area and values range from 0.00134 to 160.4 ft/d. Vertical hydraulic conductivity for the semiconfining unit separating the upper and lower water-bearing zones of the Upper Floridan at Brunswick, Georgia, compiled from 6 core samples at three sites ranges from 0.000008 to 0.000134 ft/d. The vertical hydraulic conductivity of the Lower Floridan aquifer in a core sample from a well at Brunswick, G","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20045264","usgsCitation":"Clarke, J.S., Leeth, D.C., Taylor-Harris, D., Painter, J.A., and Labowski, J.L., 2005, Summary of hydraulic properties of the Floridan Aquifer system in coastal Georgia and adjacent parts of South Carolina and Florida (Online only): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5264, 54 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20045264.","productDescription":"54 p.","onlineOnly":"Y","costCenters":[{"id":13634,"text":"South Atlantic Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":186486,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":6739,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2004/5264/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"scale":"5000000","country":"United States","state":"Florida, Georgia, South Carolina","otherGeospatial":"Floridan aquifer system","geographicExtents":"{\n  \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n  \"features\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"Feature\",\n      \"properties\": {\n        \"stroke\": \"#555555\",\n        \"stroke-width\": 2,\n        \"stroke-opacity\": 1,\n        \"fill\": \"#555555\",\n        \"fill-opacity\": 0.5\n      },\n      \"geometry\": {\n        \"type\": \"Polygon\",\n        \"coordinates\": [\n          [\n            [\n              -81.507568359375,\n              30.670990790779168\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.595458984375,\n              30.70878122625409\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.8701171875,\n              30.784317689718897\n            ],\n            [\n              -82.034912109375,\n              30.70878122625409\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.97998046875,\n              30.642638258763263\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.990966796875,\n              30.510216587229984\n            ],\n            [\n              -82.012939453125,\n              30.396568538569365\n            ],\n            [\n              -82.166748046875,\n              30.36813582872057\n            ],\n            [\n              -82.2216796875,\n              30.462879341709886\n            ],\n            [\n              -82.265625,\n              30.54806979910353\n            ],\n            [\n              -84.18823242187499,\n              30.68988785772121\n            ],\n            [\n              -84.67163085937499,\n              32.838058359277056\n            ],\n            [\n              -83.73779296875,\n              34.175453097578526\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.01318359375,\n              34.266296360583546\n            ],\n            [\n              -80.386962890625,\n              33.81110228864701\n            ],\n            [\n              -79.815673828125,\n              32.676372772089834\n            ],\n            [\n              -80.33203125,\n              32.43097672054704\n            ],\n            [\n              -80.44189453125,\n              32.324275588876525\n            ],\n            [\n              -80.518798828125,\n              32.2778445149827\n            ],\n            [\n              -80.6781005859375,\n              32.15236189465577\n            ],\n            [\n              -80.88134765625001,\n              31.91953017247695\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.14501953125,\n              31.62064369245056\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.23291015625,\n              31.367708915120826\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.309814453125,\n              31.208103321325254\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.39770507812499,\n              31.08586989620833\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.419677734375,\n              30.850363469502337\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.39770507812499,\n              30.68988785772121\n            ],\n            [\n              -81.507568359375,\n              30.670990790779168\n            ]\n          ]\n        ]\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}","edition":"Online only","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e47a3e4b07f02db49641a","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Clarke, John S. jsclarke@usgs.gov","contributorId":400,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Clarke","given":"John","email":"jsclarke@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"S.","affiliations":[{"id":316,"text":"Georgia Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":281798,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Leeth, David C. cleeth@usgs.gov","contributorId":1403,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Leeth","given":"David","email":"cleeth@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"C.","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":281799,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Taylor-Harris, DaVette","contributorId":67977,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Taylor-Harris","given":"DaVette","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281801,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Painter, Jaime A. 0000-0001-8883-9158 jpainter@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8883-9158","contributorId":1466,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Painter","given":"Jaime","email":"jpainter@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[{"id":13634,"text":"South Atlantic Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":316,"text":"Georgia Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":281800,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Labowski, James L.","contributorId":87631,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Labowski","given":"James","email":"","middleInitial":"L.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281802,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5}]}}
,{"id":70006,"text":"ds110 - 2005 - Flow velocity, water temperature, and conductivity at selected locations in Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park, Florida; July 1999 - July 2003","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-02T00:13:35","indexId":"ds110","displayToPublicDate":"2005-02-10T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":310,"text":"Data Series","code":"DS","onlineIssn":"2327-638X","printIssn":"2327-0271","active":false,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"110","title":"Flow velocity, water temperature, and conductivity at selected locations in Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park, Florida; July 1999 - July 2003","docAbstract":"Flow-velocity, water-temperature, and conductivity data were collected at five locations in Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park (ENP), Florida, from 1999 to 2003. The data were collected as part of the U.S. Geological Survey Priority Ecosystems Science Initiative in support of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. This report contains digital files and graphical plots of the processed, quality-checked, and edited data. Information pertinent to the locations and monitoring strategy also is presented.","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/ds110","usgsCitation":"Schaffranek, R.W., and Riscassi, A.L., 2005, Flow velocity, water temperature, and conductivity at selected locations in Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park, Florida; July 1999 - July 2003: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 110, data files and text, https://doi.org/10.3133/ds110.","productDescription":"data files and text","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":6241,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/ds110/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":188091,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"}],"scale":"1","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e49d6e4b07f02db5de819","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Schaffranek, Raymond W.","contributorId":86314,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Schaffranek","given":"Raymond","email":"","middleInitial":"W.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281657,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Riscassi, Ami L.","contributorId":24399,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Riscassi","given":"Ami","email":"","middleInitial":"L.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281656,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":70015,"text":"ofr20051019 - 2005 - Preliminary geologic map of the Los Angeles 30' x 60' quadrangle, Southern California","interactions":[{"subject":{"id":24937,"text":"ofr95800 - 1995 - Preliminary geologic map of the Newhall 7.5' quadrangle, southern California: a digital database","indexId":"ofr95800","publicationYear":"1995","noYear":false,"title":"Preliminary geologic map of the Newhall 7.5' quadrangle, southern California: a digital database"},"predicate":"SUPERSEDED_BY","object":{"id":70015,"text":"ofr20051019 - 2005 - Preliminary geologic map of the Los Angeles 30' x 60' quadrangle, Southern California","indexId":"ofr20051019","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"title":"Preliminary geologic map of the Los Angeles 30' x 60' quadrangle, Southern California"},"id":1}],"lastModifiedDate":"2019-11-19T06:56:09","indexId":"ofr20051019","displayToPublicDate":"2005-02-10T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2005-1019","title":"Preliminary geologic map of the Los Angeles 30' x 60' quadrangle, Southern California","docAbstract":"<p>This data set maps and describes the geology of the Los Angeles 30? x 60? quadrangle, southern California. Compilation of the Los Angeles quadrangle is based upon published mapping at scales of 1:12,000 and smaller, unpublished mapping at scales of 1:12,000 and smaller, with reconnaissance mapping by the compilers to resolve some edge-matching problems. The Los Angeles 30' x 60' quadrangle covers approximately 5,000 km2 including some of the most densely populated urban and suburban areas of the southern California megalopolis. It extends about 90 km E-W and about 55 km N-S, from Fillmore and Thousand Oaks in the west to Vincent in the northeast and Montebello in the southeast, and includes urban San Gabriel Valley and San Gabriel Mountain foothill communities from Monrovia to Pasadena, as well as Glendale, downtown Los Angeles, Hollywood, Santa Monica, Malibu, in addition to all the communities in the San Fernando Valley, Simi Valley, and the upper Santa Clara River Valley. From the 2000 Census, the population of these urban and suburban areas totals approximately 5.6 million, and estimates of property value total hundreds of billions of dollars. Residents and transient visitors are subject to potential hazards from earthquakes, debris flows and other landslides, floods, wildfires, subsidence from ground water and petroleum withdrawal, and swelling soils; and coastal areas are exposed to flooding and erosion by storm and tsunami waves. Topographic relief ranges from about one hundred meters sub sea (in Santa Monica Bay) to more than 2,000 meters above sea level at Pacifico Mountain in the high San Gabriel Mountains. In addition to the populated area, the quadrangle includes significant areas of wilderness in the Angeles and Los Padres National Forests, in the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area, and the Sespe Condor Sanctuary. The geologic map illustrates the general distribution of the rocks and surficial deposits in the area and their structural and stratigraphic relations to one another. The principal characteristics of the map units are described and are part of the database. The map provides a regional geologic framework as an aid to better evaluations of the potential for hazard from active earth processes. It synthesizes and combines studies by many earth scientists. Most of the source maps are at more detailed scales than 1:100,000, and we utilized the most detailed source materials available. We have not attempted to resolve all problems of stratigraphic correlation and nomenclature. In most areas we have retained the unit designations of source-map authors, but in some areas, particularly in the igneous-metamorphic complex of the San Gabriel Mountains, some unit designations have been changed. Hopefully, this map will stimulate further work to describe and correlate the many units within the scope of a more coherent, more accurate geologic history.</p>","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20051019","usgsCitation":"complied by Yerkes, R.F., Campbell, R., Alvarez, R.M., and Bovard, K.R., 2005, Preliminary geologic map of the Los Angeles 30' x 60' quadrangle, Southern California (Version 1.0): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005-1019, HTML, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20051019.","productDescription":"HTML","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":188709,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":6246,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1019/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":110546,"rank":700,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_70332.htm","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"70332"}],"scale":"1","country":"United States","state":"California","city":"Los Angeles","geographicExtents":"{\n  \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n  \"features\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"Feature\",\n      \"properties\": {},\n      \"geometry\": {\n        \"type\": \"Polygon\",\n        \"coordinates\": [\n          [\n            [\n              -119.00,\n              34.30\n            ],\n            [\n              -118.00,\n              34.30\n            ],\n            [\n              -118.00,\n              34.00\n            ],\n            [\n              -119.00,\n              34.00\n            ],\n            [\n              -119.00,\n              34.30\n            ]\n          ]\n        ]\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}","edition":"Version 1.0","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ac7e4b07f02db67b117","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"complied by Yerkes, Robert F.","contributorId":93136,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"complied by Yerkes","given":"Robert","email":"","middleInitial":"F.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281669,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Campbell, Russell H.","contributorId":91074,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Campbell","given":"Russell H.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281667,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Alvarez, Rachel M.","contributorId":66354,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Alvarez","given":"Rachel","email":"","middleInitial":"M.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281666,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Bovard, Kelly R.","contributorId":91577,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Bovard","given":"Kelly","email":"","middleInitial":"R.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281668,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4}]}}
,{"id":70005,"text":"sir20055003 - 2005 - Evaluation of two low-flow releases from Big Tujunga Reservoir, Los Angeles County, California, 2003","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-02-02T00:13:35","indexId":"sir20055003","displayToPublicDate":"2005-02-09T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2005-5003","title":"Evaluation of two low-flow releases from Big Tujunga Reservoir, Los Angeles County, California, 2003","docAbstract":"Since 1973, the Santa Ana Sucker (Catostomus santaanae) has been listed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. The Lower Big Tujunga Creek, in Los Angeles County, is one of the areas in southern California where the Santa Ana Sucker is still present. This study was designed to assess two flow releases from Big Tujunga Dam that may contribute to favorable habitat conditions for the Santa Ana Sucker. It is important for the Santa Ana Sucker's survival that pools in the lower reach of the study area are replenished periodically. The focus of the study area was on the Lower Big Tujunga Creek within a reach extending approximately 6 miles downstream from the Big Tujunga Reservoir. Six sites were established from the Big Tujunga Dam to Delta Flats day-use area for data collection. This report describes the study design, discharge measurements, and the flow data collected from the two releases. \r\n\r\n    Two scheduled flows (phases 1 and 2) were released from the Big Tujunga Reservoir in August and September 2003. During the first phase, which lasted 50 hours, travel times from the dam to four sites downstream were determined. Arrival times at the four sites were determined on the basis of temperature data. Travel time from the dam to site 6 (the furthest downstream site) was about 51.5 hours. Travel times for subreaches were 3 hours from site 1 to site 2, 6.5 hours from site 2 to site 3, almost 18 hours from site 3 to site 4, and 24 hours from site 4 to site 6. The temperature probe at site 5 was destroyed, and thus the arrival time could not be estimated. A probe that measures stage was placed in one of the many pools downstream from site 4 to evaluate a typical pool response to a low-flow release. Also, discharge measurements were taken at four sites along the study reach. \r\n\r\n     In phase 2, which lasted 5 days (121 hours), flow losses along the 6-mile reach were analyzed. Losses were estimated by measuring difference in flow from the dam to sites 3, 4, 5, and 6, when flow was most stable at each site or when the last measurement made before flow decreased due to flow from dam being shut off. Losses in the plunge pool, directly below the dam were assumed to be negligible for this study. Overall creek loss between the dam and site 6 (the last site) was estimated to be between 4.0 and 4.2 ft3/s (cubic feet per second). Estimated losses between the dam and intermediate sites were about 1.5 ft3/s to site 3; 2.5 ft3/s to site 4; and between 3.7 and 4.1 ft3/s to site 5.","language":"ENGLISH","doi":"10.3133/sir20055003","usgsCitation":"Mendez, G.O., 2005, Evaluation of two low-flow releases from Big Tujunga Reservoir, Los Angeles County, California, 2003: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5003, 19 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20055003.","productDescription":"19 p.","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":188090,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"},{"id":6240,"rank":100,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/sir2005-5003/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}}],"scale":"1","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4a08e4b07f02db5f9e00","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Mendez, Gregory O. 0000-0002-9955-3726 gomendez@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-3726","contributorId":1489,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Mendez","given":"Gregory","email":"gomendez@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"O.","affiliations":[{"id":154,"text":"California Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":false,"id":281655,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1}]}}
,{"id":69925,"text":"sir20045242 - 2005 - Summary of sediment data from the Yampa river and upper Green river basins, Colorado and Utah, 1993-2002","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2025-08-19T19:17:11.507526","indexId":"sir20045242","displayToPublicDate":"2005-01-15T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2004-5242","title":"Summary of sediment data from the Yampa river and upper Green river basins, Colorado and Utah, 1993-2002","docAbstract":"The water resources of the Upper Colorado River Basin have been extensively developed for water supply, irrigation, and power generation through water storage in upstream reservoirs during spring runoff and subsequent releases during the remainder of the year. The net effect of water-resource development has been to substantially modify the predevelopment annual hydrograph as well as the timing and amount of sediment delivery from the upper Green River and the Yampa River Basins tributaries to the main-stem reaches where endangered native fish populations have been observed. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Colorado Division of Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, began a study to identify sediment source reaches in the Green River main stem and the lower Yampa and Little Snake Rivers and to identify sediment-transport relations that would be useful in assessing the potential effects of hydrograph modification by reservoir operation on sedimentation at identified razorback spawning bars in the Green River. The need for additional data collection is evaluated at each sampling site. \r\n\r\nSediment loads were calculated at five key areas within the watershed by using instantaneous measurements of streamflow, suspended-sediment concentration, and bedload. Sediment loads were computed at each site for two modes of transport (suspended load and bedload), as well as for the total-sediment load (suspended load plus bedload) where both modes were sampled. Sediment loads also were calculated for sediment particle-size range (silt-and-clay, and sand-and-gravel sizes) if laboratory size analysis had been performed on the sample, and by hydrograph season. Sediment-transport curves were developed for each type of sediment load by a least-squares regression of logarithmic-transformed data.\r\n\r\nTransport equations for suspended load and total load had coefficients of determination of at least 0.72 at all of the sampling sites except Little Snake River near Lily, Colorado. Bedload transport equations at the five sites had coefficients of determination that ranged from 0.40 (Yampa River at Deerlodge Park, Colorado) to 0.80 (Yampa River above Little Snake River near Maybell, Colorado). Transport equations for silt and clay-size material had coefficients of determination that ranged from 0.46 to 0.82.\r\n\r\nWhere particle-size data were available (Yampa River at Deerlodge Park, Colorado, and Green River near Jensen, Utah), transport equations for the smaller particle sizes (fine sand) tended to have higher coefficients of determination than the equations for coarser sizes (medium and coarse sand, and very coarse sand and gravel). Because the data had to be subdivided into at least two subsets (rising-limb, falling-limb and, occasionally, base-flow periods), the seasonal transport equations generally were based on relatively few samples. All transport equations probably could be improved by additional data collected at strategically timed periods.","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","doi":"10.3133/sir20045242","usgsCitation":"Elliott, J.G., and Anders, S.P., 2005, Summary of sediment data from the Yampa river and upper Green river basins, Colorado and Utah, 1993-2002: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5242, 35 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20045242.","productDescription":"35 p.","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":6276,"rank":2,"type":{"id":15,"text":"Index Page"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2004/5242/","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":188787,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/usgs_thumb.jpg"}],"scale":"1000000","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4b01e4b07f02db6987a9","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Elliott, John G. jelliott@usgs.gov","contributorId":832,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Elliott","given":"John","email":"jelliott@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"G.","affiliations":[],"preferred":true,"id":281544,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Anders, Steven P.","contributorId":47466,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Anders","given":"Steven","email":"","middleInitial":"P.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":281545,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":70027603,"text":"70027603 - 2005 - Comparative soil CO2 flux measurements and geostatistical estimation methods on Masaya volcano, Nicaragua","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2022-11-18T17:49:18.443553","indexId":"70027603","displayToPublicDate":"2005-01-01T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":2,"text":"Article"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":10,"text":"Journal Article"},"seriesTitle":{"id":1109,"text":"Bulletin of Volcanology","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":10}},"displayTitle":"Comparative soil CO<sub>2</sub> flux measurements and geostatistical estimation methods on Masaya volcano, Nicaragua","title":"Comparative soil CO2 flux measurements and geostatistical estimation methods on Masaya volcano, Nicaragua","docAbstract":"<p><span>We present a comparative study of soil CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> flux (</span><span id=\"IEq1\" class=\"InlineEquation\"><span id=\"MathJax-Element-1-Frame\" class=\"MathJax\" data-mathml=\"<math xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML&quot;><msub><mi>F</mi><mrow class=&quot;MJX-TeXAtom-ORD&quot;><msub><mrow class=&quot;MJX-TeXAtom-ORD&quot;><mi mathvariant=&quot;normal&quot;>C</mi><mi mathvariant=&quot;normal&quot;>O</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></msub></math>\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-1\" class=\"math\"><span><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-3\" class=\"msubsup\"><span><i><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-4\" class=\"mi\">F</span></span></i><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-5\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-6\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-7\" class=\"msubsup\"><span><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-8\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-9\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-10\" class=\"mi\">C</span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-11\" class=\"mi\">O</span></span></span></span><sub><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-12\" class=\"mn\">2</span></span></sub></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>) measured by five groups (Groups 1–5) at the IAVCEI-CCVG Eighth Workshop on Volcanic Gases on Masaya volcano, Nicaragua. Groups 1–5 measured <i><span id=\"MathJax-Span-4\" class=\"mi\">F</span></i><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-5\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-6\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-7\" class=\"msubsup\"><span><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-8\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-9\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-10\" class=\"mi\">C</span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-11\" class=\"mi\">O</span></span></span></span><sub><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-12\" class=\"mn\">2</span></span></sub></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>&nbsp;using the accumulation chamber method at 5-m spacing within a 900&nbsp;m</span><sup>2</sup><span> grid during a morning (AM) period. These measurements were repeated by Groups 1–3 during an afternoon (PM) period. Measured <i><span id=\"MathJax-Span-4\" class=\"mi\">F</span></i><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-5\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-6\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-7\" class=\"msubsup\"><span><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-8\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-9\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-10\" class=\"mi\">C</span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-11\" class=\"mi\">O</span></span></span></span><sub><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-12\" class=\"mn\">2</span></span></sub></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>&nbsp;ranged from 218 to 14,719&nbsp;g&nbsp;m</span><sup>−2</sup><span>&nbsp;day</span><sup>−1</sup><span>. The variability of the five measurements made at each grid point ranged from ±5 to 167%. However, the arithmetic means of fluxes measured over the entire grid and associated total CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> emission rate estimates varied between groups by only ±22%. All three groups that made PM measurements reported an 8–19% increase in total emissions over the AM results. Based on a comparison of measurements made during AM and PM times, we argue that this change is due in large part to natural temporal variability of gas flow, rather than to measurement error. In order to estimate the mean and associated CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> emission rate of one data set and to map the spatial <i><span id=\"MathJax-Span-4\" class=\"mi\">F</span></i><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-5\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-6\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-7\" class=\"msubsup\"><span><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-8\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-9\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-10\" class=\"mi\">C</span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-11\" class=\"mi\">O</span></span></span></span><sub><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-12\" class=\"mn\">2</span></span></sub></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>&nbsp;distribution, we compared six geostatistical methods: arithmetic and minimum variance unbiased estimator means of uninterpolated data, and arithmetic means of data interpolated by the multiquadric radial basis function, ordinary kriging, multi-Gaussian kriging, and sequential Gaussian simulation methods. While the total CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> emission rates estimated using the different techniques only varied by ±4.4%, the <i><span id=\"MathJax-Span-4\" class=\"mi\">F</span></i><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-5\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-6\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-7\" class=\"msubsup\"><span><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-8\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-9\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-10\" class=\"mi\">C</span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-11\" class=\"mi\">O</span></span></span></span><sub><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-12\" class=\"mn\">2</span></span></sub></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>&nbsp;maps showed important differences. We suggest that the sequential Gaussian simulation method yields the most realistic representation of the spatial distribution of <i><span id=\"MathJax-Span-4\" class=\"mi\">F</span></i><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-5\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-6\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-7\" class=\"msubsup\"><span><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-8\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-9\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-10\" class=\"mi\">C</span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-11\" class=\"mi\">O</span></span></span></span><sub><span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-12\" class=\"mn\">2</span></span></sub></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>, but a variety of geostatistical methods are appropriate to estimate the total CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> emission rate from a study area, which is a primary goal in volcano monitoring research.</span></p>","language":"English","publisher":"Springer","doi":"10.1007/s00445-005-0423-9","issn":"02588900","usgsCitation":"Lewicki, J.L., Bergfeld, D., Cardellini, C., Chiodini, G., Granieri, D., Varley, N., and Werner, C.A., 2005, Comparative soil CO2 flux measurements and geostatistical estimation methods on Masaya volcano, Nicaragua: Bulletin of Volcanology, v. 68, no. 1, p. 76-90, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-005-0423-9.","productDescription":"15 p.","startPage":"76","endPage":"90","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":477765,"rank":1,"type":{"id":41,"text":"Open Access External Repository Page"},"url":"https://www.osti.gov/biblio/886767","text":"External Repository"},{"id":238457,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/outside_thumb.jpg"}],"country":"Nicaragua","state":"Masaya","geographicExtents":"{\n  \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n  \"features\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"Feature\",\n      \"properties\": {},\n      \"geometry\": {\n        \"type\": \"Polygon\",\n        \"coordinates\": [\n          [\n            [\n              -86.16474151611328,\n              11.987774731310632\n            ],\n            [\n              -86.13298416137695,\n              11.987774731310632\n            ],\n            [\n              -86.13298416137695,\n              12.016067391979266\n            ],\n            [\n              -86.16474151611328,\n              12.016067391979266\n            ],\n            [\n              -86.16474151611328,\n              11.987774731310632\n            ]\n          ]\n        ]\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}","volume":"68","issue":"1","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationDate":"2005-06-18","publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"5059f828e4b0c8380cd4cef2","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Lewicki, Jennifer L. 0000-0003-1994-9104 jlewicki@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1994-9104","contributorId":5071,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Lewicki","given":"Jennifer","email":"jlewicki@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"L.","affiliations":[{"id":438,"text":"National Research Program - Western Branch","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":617,"text":"Volcano Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":414323,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Bergfeld, Deborah 0000-0003-4570-7627 dbergfel@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4570-7627","contributorId":152531,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Bergfeld","given":"Deborah","email":"dbergfel@usgs.gov","affiliations":[{"id":617,"text":"Volcano Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":414320,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Cardellini, Carlo","contributorId":52785,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Cardellini","given":"Carlo","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":414318,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Chiodini, Giovanni","contributorId":78223,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Chiodini","given":"Giovanni","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":414322,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Granieri, Domenico","contributorId":95677,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Granieri","given":"Domenico","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":414324,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5},{"text":"Varley, Nick","contributorId":191444,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Varley","given":"Nick","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":414319,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":6},{"text":"Werner, Cynthia A. cwerner@usgs.gov","contributorId":2540,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Werner","given":"Cynthia","email":"cwerner@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[{"id":114,"text":"Alaska Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":617,"text":"Volcano Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":414321,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":7}]}}
,{"id":70027580,"text":"70027580 - 2005 - Data collection and documentation of flooding downstream of a dam failure in Mississippi","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-03-12T17:20:48","indexId":"70027580","displayToPublicDate":"2005-01-01T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":24,"text":"Conference Paper"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":19,"text":"Conference Paper"},"title":"Data collection and documentation of flooding downstream of a dam failure in Mississippi","docAbstract":"On March 12, 2004, the Big Bay Lake dam failed, releasing water and affecting lives and property downstream in southern Mississippi. The dam is located near Purvis, Mississippi, on Bay Creek, which flows into Lower Little Creek about 1.9 miles downstream from the dam. Lower Little Creek flows into Pearl River about 16.9 miles downstream from the dam. Knowledge of the hydrology and hydraulics of floods caused by dam breaks is essential to the design of dams. A better understanding of the risks associated with possible dam failures may help limit the loss of life and property that often occurs downstream of a dam failure. The USGS recovered flood marks at the one crossing of Bay Creek and eight crossings of Lower Little Creek. Additional flood marks were also flagged at three other bridges crossing tributaries where backwater occurred. Flood marks were recovered throughout the stream reach of about 3/4 to 15 miles downstream of the dam. Flood marks that were flagged will be surveyed so that a flood profile can be documented downstream of the Big Bay Lake dam failure. Peak discharges are also to be estimated where possible. News reports stated that the peak discharge at the dam was about 67,000 cubic feet per second. Preliminary data suggest the peak discharge from the dam failure attenuated to about 13,000 cubic feet per second at Lower Little Creek at State Highway 43, about 15 miles downstream of the dam.","largerWorkTitle":"Proceedings of the 2005 Watershed Management Conference - Managing Watersheds for Human and Natural Impacts: Engineering, Ecological, and Economic Challenges","conferenceTitle":"2005 Watershed Management Conference - Managing Watersheds for Human and Natural Impacts: Engineering, Ecological, and Economic Challenges","conferenceDate":"19 July 2005 through 22 July 2005","conferenceLocation":"Williamsburg, VA","language":"English","isbn":"0784407630","usgsCitation":"Van Wilson, K., 2005, Data collection and documentation of flooding downstream of a dam failure in Mississippi, <i>in</i> Proceedings of the 2005 Watershed Management Conference - Managing Watersheds for Human and Natural Impacts: Engineering, Ecological, and Economic Challenges, Williamsburg, VA, 19 July 2005 through 22 July 2005.","startPage":"1277","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":238092,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/outside_thumb.jpg"}],"noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"5059fd6ee4b0c8380cd4e81f","contributors":{"editors":[{"text":"Moglen G.E.","contributorId":128404,"corporation":true,"usgs":false,"organization":"Moglen G.E.","id":536622,"contributorType":{"id":2,"text":"Editors"},"rank":1}],"authors":[{"text":"Van Wilson, K. Jr.","contributorId":62403,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Van Wilson","given":"K.","suffix":"Jr.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":414217,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1}]}}
,{"id":70027986,"text":"70027986 - 2005 - Anatahan, Northern Mariana Islands: Reconnaissance geological observations during and after the volcanic crisis of spring 1990, and monitoring prior to the May 2003 eruption","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2019-05-14T08:38:24","indexId":"70027986","displayToPublicDate":"2005-01-01T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":2,"text":"Article"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":10,"text":"Journal Article"},"seriesTitle":{"id":2499,"text":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":10}},"title":"Anatahan, Northern Mariana Islands: Reconnaissance geological observations during and after the volcanic crisis of spring 1990, and monitoring prior to the May 2003 eruption","docAbstract":"<p>Anatahan island is 9.5 km east–west by 3.5 km north–south and truncated by an elongate caldera 5 km east–west by 2.5 km north–south. A steep-walled pit crater ∼1 km across and ∼200 m deep occupies the eastern part of the caldera. The island is the summit region of a mostly submarine stratovolcano. The oldest subaerial rocks (stage 1) are exposed low on the outer flanks and in the caldera walls. These include thick (∼10 m) and thin (2–3 m) lava flows, well-indurated tuffs, and scoria units that make up the bulk of the island. Rock compositions range from basaltic andesite to dacite, and most are plagioclase-phyric. On the steep north and south flanks of the volcano, these rocks are cut by numerous east–west-oriented, few-hundred-m-long lineaments of undetermined origin. Indurated breccias unconformably overlie scarps cut into stage 1 units low on the south flank. Intermediate-age eruptive units (stage 2) include caldera-filling lava flows and pyroclastic deposits and, on the outer flanks, vents and valley-filling lava flows. The youngest pre-2003 volcanic unit on Anatahan (stage 3) is a hydromagmatic surge and fall deposit rich in accretionary lapilli. Prior to 2003, this unit was found over almost the entire island, and in many places original depositional surfaces and outcrops could be found in high-energy environments along the coast, indicating a young (but undetermined) age. During reconnaissance visits in 1990, 1992, 1994, and 2001, geothermal activity (fumaroles as well as pits with boiling, sediment-laden pools) was observed in the southern part of the pit crater.</p><p>In March and April 1990, increased local seismicity, a large regional earthquake, and reported increased fumarolic activity in the pit crater prompted evacuation of Anatahan village, at the west end of the island. Our first field investigation took place in late April 1990 to assess the level of volcanic unrest, conduct reconnaissance geological observations, collect rock and geothermal water samples, and set up a geophysical monitoring network. Results at this time were inconclusive with respect to determining whether the activity was anomalous. Water in some of the geothermal pits within the pit crater was boiling, and pH values as low as 0.7 were recorded in the field. An electronic distance measurement (EDM) network was installed, and over a ∼1-week period, up to 9 cm of extension occurred across some lines but not others. Seismicity was characterized by intermittent local earthquakes but no sustained swarms or tremor. A brief visit in June 1990 revealed that the shallow lake near the boiling pits was gone, but activity in the pits themselves was similar to that of April 1990. Only minor extension had occurred along a single EDM line since the previous visit, and no earthquakes &gt;M2.5 occurred during the visit.</p><p>Subsequent 1- to 2-day visits occurred in October 1990, May 1992, May 1994, and June 2001. Activity within the geothermal pits was relatively constant during every visit, although during this 11-year period the level of the water in each pit decreased. In June 2001, a ∼50-m-wide region of mud pots and steaming ground in the central part of the geothermal area had developed. No geologic evidence, however, suggested that an eruption would occur &lt;&nbsp;2 years afterward. Most of the EDM lines showed slight extension between late 1990 and 1992, followed by very gradual contraction from 1992 to 2001. A more extensive seismic-monitoring system was installed on the Northern Mariana Islands during these visits, and it recorded a small seismic swarm at Anatahan from May to July 1993. The telemetry component of the seismic equipment broke prior to 2001 and had not been repaired by the time of the May 2003 eruption, so no precursory seismic data were recorded to indicate pre-eruption unrest.</p>","language":"English","publisher":"Elsevier","doi":"10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.10.020","issn":"03770273","usgsCitation":"Rowland, S., Lockwood, J.P., Trusdell, F., Moore, R.B., Sako, M., Koyanagi, R.Y., and Kojima, G., 2005, Anatahan, Northern Mariana Islands: Reconnaissance geological observations during and after the volcanic crisis of spring 1990, and monitoring prior to the May 2003 eruption: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, v. 146, no. 1-3 SPEC. ISS., p. 26-59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.10.020.","productDescription":"34 p.","startPage":"26","endPage":"59","numberOfPages":"34","costCenters":[{"id":615,"text":"Volcano Hazards Program","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":237079,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/outside_thumb.jpg"}],"country":"United States","state":"Northern Mariana Islands","otherGeospatial":"Anatahan","geographicExtents":"{\n  \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n  \"features\": [\n    {\n      \"type\": \"Feature\",\n      \"properties\": {},\n      \"geometry\": {\n        \"type\": \"Polygon\",\n        \"coordinates\": [\n          [\n            [\n              145.6182861328125,\n              16.32672912425378\n            ],\n            [\n              145.74188232421875,\n              16.32672912425378\n            ],\n            [\n              145.74188232421875,\n              16.36889775921193\n            ],\n            [\n              145.6182861328125,\n              16.36889775921193\n            ],\n            [\n              145.6182861328125,\n              16.32672912425378\n            ]\n          ]\n        ]\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}","volume":"146","issue":"1-3 SPEC. ISS.","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"5059ebefe4b0c8380cd48f95","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Rowland, S.K.","contributorId":103855,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Rowland","given":"S.K.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":416040,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Lockwood, J. P.","contributorId":104473,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Lockwood","given":"J.","email":"","middleInitial":"P.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":416041,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Trusdell, F. A.","contributorId":57471,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Trusdell","given":"F. A.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":416038,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Moore, R. B.","contributorId":98720,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Moore","given":"R.","email":"","middleInitial":"B.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":416039,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Sako, M. K.","contributorId":50152,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Sako","given":"M. K.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":416037,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5},{"text":"Koyanagi, R. Y.","contributorId":35719,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Koyanagi","given":"R.","email":"","middleInitial":"Y.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":416036,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":6},{"text":"Kojima, G.","contributorId":15001,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Kojima","given":"G.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":416035,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":7}]}}
,{"id":70027661,"text":"70027661 - 2005 - Repeated surveys by acoustic Doppler current profiler for flow and sediment dynamics in a tidal river","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2018-09-13T16:30:05","indexId":"70027661","displayToPublicDate":"2005-01-01T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":2,"text":"Article"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":10,"text":"Journal Article"},"seriesTitle":{"id":2342,"text":"Journal of Hydrology","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":10}},"title":"Repeated surveys by acoustic Doppler current profiler for flow and sediment dynamics in a tidal river","docAbstract":"A strategy of repeated surveys by acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) was applied in a tidal river to map velocity vectors and suspended-sediment indicators. The Sacramento River at the junction with the Delta Cross Channel at Walnut Grove, California, was surveyed over several tidal cycles in the Fall of 2000 and 2001 with a vessel-mounted ADCP. Velocity profiles were recorded along flow-defining survey paths, with surveys repeated every 27 min through a diurnal tidal cycle. Velocity vectors along each survey path were interpolated to a three-dimensional Cartesian grid that conformed to local bathymetry. A separate array of vectors was interpolated onto a grid from each survey. By displaying interpolated vector grids sequentially with computer animation, flow dynamics of the reach could be studied in three-dimensions as flow responded to the tidal cycle. Velocity streamtraces in the grid showed the upwelling of flow from the bottom of the Sacramento River channel into the Delta Cross Channel. The sequential display of vector grids showed that water in the canal briefly returned into the Sacramento River after peak flood tides, which had not been known previously. In addition to velocity vectors, ADCP data were processed to derive channel bathymetry and a spatial indicator for suspended-sediment concentration. Individual beam distances to bed, recorded by the ADCP, were transformed to yield bathymetry accurate enough to resolve small bedforms within the study reach. While recording velocity, ADCPs also record the intensity of acoustic backscatter from particles suspended in the flow. Sequential surveys of backscatter intensity were interpolated to grids and animated to indicate the spatial movement of suspended sediment through the study reach. Calculation of backscatter flux through cross-sectional grids provided a first step for computation of suspended-sediment discharge, the second step being a calibrated relation between backscatter intensity and sediment concentration. Spatial analyses of ADCP data showed that a strategy of repeated surveys and flow-field interpolation has the potential to simplify computation of flow and sediment discharge through complex waterways. The use of trade, product, industry, or firm names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement of products by the US Government. ?? 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","largerWorkType":{"id":2,"text":"Article"},"largerWorkTitle":"Journal of Hydrology","largerWorkSubtype":{"id":10,"text":"Journal Article"},"language":"English","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.019","issn":"00221694","usgsCitation":"Dinehart, R., and Burau, J., 2005, Repeated surveys by acoustic Doppler current profiler for flow and sediment dynamics in a tidal river: Journal of Hydrology, v. 314, no. 1-4, p. 1-21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.019.","startPage":"1","endPage":"21","numberOfPages":"21","costCenters":[{"id":154,"text":"California Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":238275,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/outside_thumb.jpg"},{"id":211092,"rank":9999,"type":{"id":10,"text":"Digital Object Identifier"},"url":"https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.019"}],"volume":"314","issue":"1-4","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"505aa74be4b0c8380cd8532f","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Dinehart, R.L.","contributorId":54610,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Dinehart","given":"R.L.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":414616,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Burau, J.R. 0000-0002-5196-5035","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5196-5035","contributorId":7307,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Burau","given":"J.R.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":414615,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":72472,"text":"sir20055123 - 2005 - Evaluation of models and data for assessing whooping crane habitat in the central Platte River, Nebraska","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2016-05-27T13:41:53","indexId":"sir20055123","displayToPublicDate":"2005-01-01T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":334,"text":"Scientific Investigations Report","code":"SIR","onlineIssn":"2328-0328","printIssn":"2328-031X","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2005-5123","title":"Evaluation of models and data for assessing whooping crane habitat in the central Platte River, Nebraska","docAbstract":"<p>The primary objectives of this evaluation were to improve the performance of the Whooping Crane Habitat Suitability model (C4R) used by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for defining the relationship between river discharge and habitat availability, and to assist the Service in implementing improved model(s) with existing hydraulic files. The C4R habitat model is applied at the scale of individual river cross-sections, but the model outputs are scaledup to larger reaches of the river using a decision support &ldquo;model&rdquo; comprised of other data and procedures. Hence, the validity of the habitat model depends at least partially on how its outputs are incorporated into this larger context. For that reason, we also evaluated other procedures including the PHABSIM data files, the FORTRAN computer programs used to implement the model, and other parameters used to simulate the relationship between river flows and the availability of Whooping Crane roosting habitat along more than 100 miles of heterogeneous river channels. An equally important objective of this report was to fully document these related procedures as well as the model and evaluation results so that interested parties could readily understand the technical basis for the Service&rsquo;s recommendations.</p>","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/sir20055123","usgsCitation":"Farmer, A.H., Cade, B.S., Terrell, J.W., Henriksen, J.H., and Runge, J.T., 2005, Evaluation of models and data for assessing whooping crane habitat in the central Platte River, Nebraska: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5123, ix, 64 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20055123.","productDescription":"ix, 64 p.","numberOfPages":"77","onlineOnly":"N","additionalOnlineFiles":"N","costCenters":[{"id":291,"text":"Fort Collins Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":191083,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/sir20055123.PNG"},{"id":320250,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2005/5123/report.pdf","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"}}],"country":"United States","state":"Nebraska","otherGeospatial":"Platte River","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4a4ae4b07f02db624bfc","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Farmer, Adrian H.","contributorId":107759,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Farmer","given":"Adrian","email":"","middleInitial":"H.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":285715,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Cade, Brian S. 0000-0001-9623-9849 cadeb@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9623-9849","contributorId":1278,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Cade","given":"Brian","email":"cadeb@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"S.","affiliations":[{"id":291,"text":"Fort Collins Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":285711,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Terrell, James W. 0000-0001-5394-5663","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5394-5663","contributorId":92726,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Terrell","given":"James","email":"","middleInitial":"W.","affiliations":[{"id":291,"text":"Fort Collins Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":285714,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Henriksen, Jim H.","contributorId":54684,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Henriksen","given":"Jim","email":"","middleInitial":"H.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":285712,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Runge, Jeffery T.","contributorId":66356,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Runge","given":"Jeffery","email":"","middleInitial":"T.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":285713,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5}]}}
,{"id":70027712,"text":"70027712 - 2005 - Distribution and abundance of nonnative fishes in streams of the western United States","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-03-12T17:20:50","indexId":"70027712","displayToPublicDate":"2005-01-01T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":2,"text":"Article"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":10,"text":"Journal Article"},"seriesTitle":{"id":2886,"text":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":10}},"title":"Distribution and abundance of nonnative fishes in streams of the western United States","docAbstract":"This report presents data from one of the largest standardized stream surveys conducted in he western United States, which shows that one of every four individual fish in streams of 12 western states are nonnative. The states surveyed included Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. The most widely distributed and abundant nonnative fishes in the western USA were brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis, brown trout Salmo trutta, rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, common carp Cyprinus carpio, smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu, largemouth bass M. salmoides, green sunfish Lepomis cyanellus, fathead minnow Pimephales promelas, yellow perch Percaflavescens, yellow bullhead Ameiurus natalis, cutthroat trout O. clarkii, western mosquitofish Gambusia affinis, golden shiner Notemigonus crysoleucas, channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus, and red shiner Cyprinella lutrensis. The greatest abundance and distribution of nonnative fishes was in interior states, and the most common nonnatives were introduced for angling. Nonnative fishes were widespread in pristine to highly disturbed streams influenced by all types of land use practices. We present ranges in water temperature, flow, stream order, riparian cover, human disturbance, and other environmental conditions where the 10 most common introduced species were found. Of the total western U.S. stream length bearing fish, 50.1% contained nonnative fishes while 17.9% contained physical environment that was ranked highly or moderately disturbed by humans. Introduced fishes can adversely affect stream communities, and they are much more widespread in western U.S. streams than habitat destruction. The widespread distribution and high relative abundance of nonnative fishes and their documented negative effects suggest their management and control should elicit at least as much attention as habitat preservation in the protection of native western U.S. stream biota. ?? Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2005.","largerWorkType":{"id":2,"text":"Article"},"largerWorkTitle":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","largerWorkSubtype":{"id":10,"text":"Journal Article"},"language":"English","doi":"10.1577/M05-037.1","issn":"02755947","usgsCitation":"Schade, C., and Bonar, S.A., 2005, Distribution and abundance of nonnative fishes in streams of the western United States: North American Journal of Fisheries Management, v. 25, no. 4, p. 1386-1394, https://doi.org/10.1577/M05-037.1.","startPage":"1386","endPage":"1394","numberOfPages":"9","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":477880,"rank":10000,"type":{"id":40,"text":"Open Access Publisher Index Page"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.1577/m05-037.1","text":"Publisher Index Page"},{"id":237957,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/outside_thumb.jpg"},{"id":210887,"rank":9999,"type":{"id":10,"text":"Digital Object Identifier"},"url":"https://dx.doi.org/10.1577/M05-037.1"}],"volume":"25","issue":"4","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationDate":"2005-11-01","publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"505a026ee4b0c8380cd50049","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Schade, C.B.","contributorId":82119,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Schade","given":"C.B.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":414873,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Bonar, Scott A.","contributorId":79617,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Bonar","given":"Scott","email":"","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":414872,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}}
,{"id":1015040,"text":"1015040 - 2005 - Population genetics of Gunnison sage-grouse: Implications for management","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2017-12-28T10:02:37","indexId":"1015040","displayToPublicDate":"2005-01-01T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":2,"text":"Article"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":10,"text":"Journal Article"},"seriesTitle":{"id":2508,"text":"Journal of Wildlife Management","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":10}},"title":"Population genetics of Gunnison sage-grouse: Implications for management","docAbstract":"<p>The newly described Gunnison sage-grouse (<i>Centrocercus minimus</i>) is a species of concern for management because of marked declines in distribution and abundance due to the loss and fragmentation of sagebrush habitat. This has caused remaining populations to be unusually small and isolated. We utilized mitochondrial DNA sequence data and data from 8 nuclear microsatellites to assess the extent of population subdivision among Gunnison sage-grouse populations in southwestern Colorado and southeastern Utah, USA. We found a high degree of population structure and low amounts of gene flow among all pairs of populations except the geographically adjacent Gunnison and Curecanti populations. Population structure for Gunnison sage-grouse was significantly higher than has been reported for greater sage-grouse (<i>C. urophasianus</i>). Further, we documented low levels of genetic diversity in some populations (particularly Dove Creek/Monticello and Piñon Mesa with an average of only 3.00 and 2.13 alleles per locus respectively) indicating that translocations from larger, more genetically diverse populations may be warranted. Bayesian analysis identified 3 potential migrants (involving San Miguel, Dove Creek/Monticello, Crawford, and Curecanti). Further, this analysis showed that 4 individuals from Cerro/Cimarron were more closely related to birds from San Miguel than to its geographically closer neighbors Gunnison and Curecanti. This suggests the Cerro/Cimarron area may act as a stepping stone for gene flow between San Miguel and Gunnison and that habitat restoration and protection in areas between these 2 basins should be a priority in an attempt to facilitate natural movement among these populations. Conservation plans should include monitoring and maintaining genetic diversity, preventing future habitat loss and fragmentation, enhancing existing habitat, and restoring converted sagebrush communities.</p>","language":"English","publisher":"The Wildlife Society","doi":"10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0630:PGOGSI]2.0.CO;2","usgsCitation":"Oyler-McCance, S., St. John, J., Taylor, S., Apa, A., and Quinn, T., 2005, Population genetics of Gunnison sage-grouse: Implications for management: Journal of Wildlife Management, v. 69, no. 2, p. 630-637, https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0630:PGOGSI]2.0.CO;2.","productDescription":"8 p.","startPage":"630","endPage":"637","costCenters":[{"id":291,"text":"Fort Collins Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":131084,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/outside_thumb.jpg"}],"volume":"69","issue":"2","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4ad6e4b07f02db683eb9","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Oyler-McCance, S.J.","contributorId":75877,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Oyler-McCance","given":"S.J.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":321935,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"St. John, J.","contributorId":39737,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"St. John","given":"J.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":321933,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Taylor, S.E.","contributorId":30948,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Taylor","given":"S.E.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":321931,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Apa, A.D.","contributorId":70341,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Apa","given":"A.D.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":321934,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Quinn, T.W.","contributorId":37285,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Quinn","given":"T.W.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":321932,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5}]}}
,{"id":70029342,"text":"70029342 - 2005 - Forest cover influences dispersal distance of white-tailed deer","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-03-12T17:20:50","indexId":"70029342","displayToPublicDate":"2005-01-01T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":2,"text":"Article"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":10,"text":"Journal Article"},"seriesTitle":{"id":2373,"text":"Journal of Mammalogy","onlineIssn":"1545-1542","printIssn":"0022-2372","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":10}},"title":"Forest cover influences dispersal distance of white-tailed deer","docAbstract":"Animal dispersal patterns influence gene flow, disease spread, population dynamics, spread of invasive species, and establishment of rare or endangered species. Although differences in dispersal distances among taxa have been reported, few studies have described plasticity of dispersal distance among populations of a single species. In 2002-2003, we radiomarked 308 juvenile (7- to 10-month-old), male white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in 2 study areas in Pennsylvania. By using a meta-analysis approach, we compared dispersal rates and distances from these populations together with published reports of 10 other nonmigratory populations of white-tailed deer. Population density did not influence dispersal rate or dispersal distance, nor did forest cover influence dispersal rate. However, average (r2 = 0.94, P < 0.001, d.f. = 9) and maximum (r2 = 0.86, P = 0.001, d.f. = 7) dispersal distances of juvenile male deer were greater in habitats with less forest cover. Hence, dispersal behavior of this habitat generalist varies, and use of landscape data to predict population-specific dispersal distances may aid efforts to model population spread, gene flow, or disease transmission. ?? 2005 American Society of Mammalogists.","largerWorkType":{"id":2,"text":"Article"},"largerWorkTitle":"Journal of Mammalogy","largerWorkSubtype":{"id":10,"text":"Journal Article"},"language":"English","doi":"10.1644/1545-1542(2005)86[623:FCIDDO]2.0.CO;2","issn":"00222372","usgsCitation":"Long, E., Diefenbach, D., Rosenberry, C., Wallingford, B., and Grund, M., 2005, Forest cover influences dispersal distance of white-tailed deer: Journal of Mammalogy, v. 86, no. 3, p. 623-629, https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2005)86[623:FCIDDO]2.0.CO;2.","startPage":"623","endPage":"629","numberOfPages":"7","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":477910,"rank":10000,"type":{"id":40,"text":"Open Access Publisher Index Page"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2005)86[623:fciddo]2.0.co;2","text":"Publisher Index Page"},{"id":210588,"rank":9999,"type":{"id":10,"text":"Digital Object Identifier"},"url":"https://dx.doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2005)86[623:FCIDDO]2.0.CO;2"},{"id":237557,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/outside_thumb.jpg"}],"volume":"86","issue":"3","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"505a1331e4b0c8380cd54558","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Long, E.S.","contributorId":85305,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Long","given":"E.S.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":422341,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Diefenbach, Duane R. 0000-0001-5111-1147","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5111-1147","contributorId":106592,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Diefenbach","given":"Duane R.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":422343,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Rosenberry, C.S.","contributorId":22884,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Rosenberry","given":"C.S.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":422339,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Wallingford, B.D.","contributorId":62726,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Wallingford","given":"B.D.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":422340,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Grund, M.D.","contributorId":92865,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Grund","given":"M.D.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":422342,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5}]}}
,{"id":70027994,"text":"70027994 - 2005 - Field intercomparison of channel master ADCP with RiverSonde Radar for measuring river discharge","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2012-03-12T17:20:55","indexId":"70027994","displayToPublicDate":"2005-01-01T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":24,"text":"Conference Paper"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":19,"text":"Conference Paper"},"title":"Field intercomparison of channel master ADCP with RiverSonde Radar for measuring river discharge","docAbstract":"The RiverSonde radar makes non-contact measurement of a horizontal swath of surface velocity across a river section. This radar, which has worked successfully at several rivers in the Western USA, has shown encouraging correlation with simultaneous measurements of average currents at one level recorded by an acoustic travel-time system. This work reports a field study intercomparing data sets from a 600 kHz Channel Master ADCP with the RiverSonde radar. The primary goal was to begin to explore the robustness of the radar data as a reliable index of discharge. This site Is at Three Mile Slough in Northern California, USA. The larger intent of the work is to examine variability in space and time of the radar's surface currents compared with subsurface flows across the river section. Here we examine data from a couple of periods with strong winds. ?? 2005 IEEE.","largerWorkTitle":"Proceedings of the IEEE Working Conference on Current Measurement Technology","conferenceTitle":"IEEE/OES Eight working Conference on Current Measurement Technology: Experimental, Practical and Operational Current and Wave Monitoring Systems and Applications","conferenceDate":"28 June 2005 through 29 June 2005","conferenceLocation":"Southhampton","language":"English","usgsCitation":"Spain, P., Marsden, R., Barrick, D., Teague, C., and Ruhl, C., 2005, Field intercomparison of channel master ADCP with RiverSonde Radar for measuring river discharge, <i>in</i> Proceedings of the IEEE Working Conference on Current Measurement Technology, Southhampton, 28 June 2005 through 29 June 2005.","startPage":"111","costCenters":[],"links":[{"id":237218,"rank":0,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/outside_thumb.jpg"}],"noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"505a0fc1e4b0c8380cd539de","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Spain, P.","contributorId":22565,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Spain","given":"P.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":416070,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Marsden, R.","contributorId":92038,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Marsden","given":"R.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":416073,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Barrick, D.","contributorId":105888,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Barrick","given":"D.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":416074,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Teague, C.","contributorId":30412,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Teague","given":"C.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":416071,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Ruhl, C.","contributorId":43156,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Ruhl","given":"C.","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":416072,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5}]}}
,{"id":50813,"text":"ofr0382 - 2005 - Evaluating water management strategies with the Systems Impact Assessment Model: SIAM version 4","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2016-05-24T10:22:29","indexId":"ofr0382","displayToPublicDate":"2003-05-01T00:00:00","publicationYear":"2005","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2003-82","title":"Evaluating water management strategies with the Systems Impact Assessment Model: SIAM version 4","docAbstract":"<p>Water from many of California's coastal rivers has been used for a wide variety of development ventures, including major agricultural diversions, hydropower generation, and contaminant assimilation from industry, agriculture and logging. Anthropogenic impacts often degrade water quality and decrease the quantity and quality of aquatic habitat. Reallocating streamflow away from uses that degrade water quality to uses that foster higher water quality is a critical step in restoring riverine habitat and the anadromous fish that rely on that habitat for a portion of their life cycle. Reallocation always brings with it the need to examine the economic efficiency of the proposed changes. If the dollar benefits of improving water quality are greater than the costs, the criterion of improving economic efficiency is satisfied, a fact that can be highly persuasive to decision makers contemplating reallocation.</p>\n<p>Previous related studies have examined nonmarket benefits of the Trinity River in northern California (Douglas and Taylor, 1998; Douglas and Taylor, 1999abc) but nothing of this kind had been done on the Klamath River, another system with numerous uses for and competition over water in times of drought. An economic survey is nearing completion for the mid- to lower Klamath River, including the Scott, Shasta, and Salmon Rivers, but excluding the Trinity River. This survey provides valuable insights about the magnitude of the benefits and nature of the costs of reallocating water from market uses to instream flows that improve water quality and assist in the recovery of Klamath River fish stocks.</p>\n<p>Preliminary survey results (Douglas and Johnson, 2002; Douglas and Sleeper, In Prep.) indicate that about 234,000 California, Oregon, and Nevada households made recreation trips to the Klamath River Basin 1997-1998 and that these users spent about $372 million on trip related expenditures. Clearly the prosperity of the region is closely linked to the demand for mid- and lower Klamath River Basin recreation trips. Further, respondents indicated that they would make roughly 36% more recreational trips per annum to the Klamath if the water quality and the fishery were restored to an unspoiled condition. Using two distinct types of survey data, these additional trips would yield benefits with a present value of approximately $9.6 billion (at a discount rate of 7.5%).</p>\n<p>Calculating costs to restore the fishery and raise water quality involved five major hypothetical restoration activities: (1) purchasing Klamath project farmland and environmentally&nbsp;sensitive forest lands, (2) allocating more water down the Trinity River to enhance the quantity and quality of Klamath flows below the confluence, (3) removing four mainstem dams along the Klamath River and losing their associated hydropower production, (4) eliminating all harvest of Klamath-Trinity fish stocks for a 12-year period including the acquisition of fishing rights from both tribal and commercial marine fishermen, and (5) operating all Klamath-Trinity fish hatcheries to restore self-reproducing stocks. In total, restoration costs were estimated to be about $1.7 to $2.3 billion. If the assumptions used in this study are valid, it is clear that the benefits ($9.6B) outweigh the costs of restoring water quality and the fishery.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>The apparent disparity between restoration benefits and costs for the Klamath River may suggest to some that water resources on the Klamath be reallocated to environmentally friendly nonmarket uses. The economic analysis rests in part on the information made available to the survey designers by the biological, hydrologic, and water quality data incorporated in The System Impact Assessment Model (SIAM). It is our hope that SIAM can be used to improve the river's water quality and fishery, and strengthen the important regional economy.</p>","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr0382","usgsCitation":"Bartholow, J.M., Heasley, J., Hanna, B., Sandelin, J., Flug, M., Campbell, S., Henriksen, J., and Douglas, A., 2005, Evaluating water management strategies with the Systems Impact Assessment Model: SIAM version 4 (Revised October 2005, supersedes SIAM v.3): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2003-82, xvi, 122 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr0382.","productDescription":"xvi, 122 p.","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"N","costCenters":[{"id":291,"text":"Fort Collins Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":176996,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/ofr0382.PNG"},{"id":320251,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/0082/report.pdf","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"}}],"edition":"Revised October 2005, supersedes SIAM v.3","publicComments":"Supersedes OFR 2003-82 SIAM version 3.","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationStatus":"PW","scienceBaseUri":"4f4e4a09e4b07f02db5fb04f","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Bartholow, John M.","contributorId":77598,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Bartholow","given":"John","email":"","middleInitial":"M.","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":242371,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Heasley, John","contributorId":57004,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Heasley","given":"John","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":242370,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Hanna, Blair","contributorId":38013,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Hanna","given":"Blair","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":242367,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Sandelin, Jeff","contributorId":78681,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Sandelin","given":"Jeff","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":242372,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Flug, Marshall","contributorId":56404,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Flug","given":"Marshall","email":"","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":242369,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5},{"text":"Campbell, Sharon","contributorId":55273,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Campbell","given":"Sharon","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":242368,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":6},{"text":"Henriksen, Jim","contributorId":23638,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Henriksen","given":"Jim","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":242366,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":7},{"text":"Douglas, Aaron","contributorId":7968,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Douglas","given":"Aaron","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":242365,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":8}]}}
]}