The bedrock geology of the 7.5-minute Port Henry quadrangle consists of deformed and metamorphosed Mesoproterozoic gneisses of the Adirondack Highlands unconformably overlain by weakly deformed lower Paleozoic sedimentary rocks of the Champlain Valley. The Mesoproterozoic rocks occur on the eastern edge of the Adirondack Highlands and represent an extension of the Grenville Province of Laurentia. Mesoproterozoic paragneiss, marble, and amphibolite hosted the emplacement of an anorthosite-mangerite-charnockite-granite (AMCG) suite, now exposed mostly as orthogneiss, at approximately 1.18–1.15 Ga (giga-annum). In the Port Henry quadrangle, the AMCG metaigneous rocks (Yhg, Ygb, Yanw) intruded older, mostly metasedimentary rocks of the Grenville Complex during the middle to late Shawinigan orogeny (~1,160–1,150 Ma [mega-annum]). All rocks were subsequently metamorphosed to upper amphibolite to granulite facies conditions during the 1,080–1,050 Ma Ottawan orogeny. New mapping reveals four periods of deformation: (1) D1 produced rarely preserved isoclinal folds in the paragneiss and marble and predates AMCG magmatism. (2) Subsequent D2 deformation produced the dominant gneissic fabric preserved in the rock, recumbent folding, and deformed all the Proterozoic units in the map area. Syn- to late-D2 felsic magmatism resulted in the regionally extensive Lyon Mountain Granite Gneiss, which hosts numerous magnetite ore bodies. (3) Mylonitic extensional shear zones and core complex formation marked the beginning of D3 deformation. Protracted D3 deformation resulted in F3 upright folding, dome and basin formation, pegmatite intrusion, reactivation of the S2 foliation, partial melting, metamorphism, metasomatism, iron-ore remobilization, and intrusion of magnetite-bearing pegmatite both as layer-parallel sills and crosscutting dikes. (4) D4 created northeast- and northwest-trending local high-grade ductile shear zones and boudinage, northwest-trending regional kilometer (km)-wide ductile shear zones, and crosscutting granitic pegmatite dikes. The development of the late-stage regional shear zones (D4) was likely due to the continuation of extensional doming and uplift from upper amphibolite facies conditions at the end of the Ottawan orogeny. The majority of iron-ore deposits in the Port Henry and adjacent Witherbee quadrangles are in the hanging wall of these extensional shear zones. In the Port Henry quadrangle, the km-wide Cheney Mountain shear zone is the result of D4 deformation. Kilometer-scale lineaments readily observed in lidar data are Ediacaran mafic dikes and Phanerozoic brittle faults. The Paleozoic rocks are part of the Early Cambrian to Late Ordovician carbonate bank on the ancient margin of Laurentia. The approximately 1-km-thick Cambrian to Ordovician stratigraphy records a transition from synrift clastics to passive-margin peritidal carbonate buildups to gradually deeper-water subtidal- to shelf-carbonates during foreland basin development associated with the Taconic orogeny. The Paleozoic rocks are weakly folded and block faulted. Large areas of the Champlain Valley are covered by undifferentiated glacial deposits, some of which contain mapped landslides. The map also shows waste rock piles and tailings from historical mining operations.
This study was undertaken to improve our understanding of the bedrock geology in the Adirondack Highlands, establish a modern framework for 1:24,000-scale bedrock geologic mapping in the Adirondacks, provide a context for historical iron mines in the eastern Adirondacks, and update the stratigraphy of the Champlain Valley in New York and Vermont. This Open-File Report includes a bedrock geologic map; a description of map units; a correlation of map units; and a geographic information system database that includes bedrock geologic units, faults, outcrops, and structural geologic information.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20261062","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the State of Vermont, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, Vermont Geological Survey and the State of New York, Department of Education, New York Geological Survey","programNote":"National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program","usgsCitation":"Valley, P.M., Parker, M., Walsh, G.J., Orndorff, R.C., Walton, M.S., Jr., and Crider, E.A., Jr., 2026, Preliminary bedrock geologic map of the Port Henry quadrangle, Essex County, New York, and Addison County, Vermont: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2026–1062, 1 sheet, scale 1:24,000, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20261062.","productDescription":"1 Sheet: 63.17 x 30.58 inches; Data Release","numberOfPages":"1","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"N","ipdsId":"IP-158945","costCenters":[{"id":40020,"text":"Florence Bascom Geoscience Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":500360,"rank":4,"type":{"id":36,"text":"NGMDB Index Page"},"url":"https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_119212.htm","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":499704,"rank":3,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13HYFPM","text":"USGS data release","linkHelpText":"Database for the preliminary bedrock geologic map of the Port Henry quadrangle, Essex County, New York, and Addison County, Vermont"},{"id":499702,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2026/1062/coverthb4.jpg"},{"id":499703,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2026/1062/ofr20261062.pdf","text":"Sheet","size":"5.45 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2026-1062 PDF"}],"country":"United States","state":"New York, Vermont","county":"Addison County, Essex County","otherGeospatial":"Port Henry quadrangle","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -73.5,\n 44.125\n ],\n [\n -73.5,\n 44\n ],\n [\n -73.375,\n 44\n ],\n [\n -73.375,\n 44.125\n ],\n [\n -73.5,\n 44.125\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"Director, Florence Bascom Geoscience Center
U.S. Geological Survey
926A National Center
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive
Reston, VA 20192
Mining uranium from breccia-pipe deposits in the greater Grand Canyon region has occurred since the mid-1900s. However, possible ecosystem contamination with harmful levels of radionuclides may have occurred due to mining activities in the 21st century. In response, a 20-year Federal moratorium on new mining claims in the Grand Canyon watershed was initiated in 2012, to allow time to evaluate the potential effects of uranium exploration and mining on human health, wildlife, and water resources. This moratorium, nor the 2023 designation of the “Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni–Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument,” precludes operation or development of mining claims predating 2012.
Vegetation is a core ecosystem component that may be affected by uranium mining (for instance, through uptake and storage of radionuclides from the air or soil) or may act as a vector of exposure to wildlife, livestock, and humans (for instance, via their consumption of contaminated plant tissues). To provide baseline information about the plant communities associated with uranium mines in the Grand Canyon region, the U.S. Geological Survey surveyed an approximately 200-meter-wide buffer surrounding four breccia-pipe deposits, each in a unique stage of mine development, and at one reference area (a livestock water tank) that underwent ground disturbance but contains no mineral deposits. We sectioned the buffer zones into 0.65–4.52 hectare plots, within which we (1) inventoried all plant species, (2) measured percent cover of plant species, plant functional groups, and ground surface types (dark cyanobacteria, lichen, moss, bedrock, rock, embedded litter, duff, plant bases, and bare soil) using line-point intercept, and (3) measured length and frequency of gaps between perennial plant canopies using canopy gap intercept. We found that plant composition at the mines and the reference area differed from one another but were all characteristic of expected regional vegetation patterns. We provide this data summary as potential baseline information for future research and management efforts.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251024","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service","usgsCitation":"Mann, R.K., Duniway, M.C., and Hinck, J.E., 2026, Vegetation cover and composition in environments surrounding uranium mines in the Grand Canyon ecosystem, Northern Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1024, 44 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251024.","productDescription":"Report: vii, 44 p.; Data Release","numberOfPages":"44","onlineOnly":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-100773","costCenters":[{"id":568,"text":"Southwest Biological Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":499605,"rank":7,"type":{"id":36,"text":"NGMDB Index Page"},"url":"https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_119200.htm","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":499095,"rank":6,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P912U706","text":"USGS data release","description":"Mann, R.K., and Duniway, M.C., 2020, Vegetation cover and composition data in environments surrounding uranium mines in the Grand Canyon ecosystem, USA: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P912U706","linkHelpText":"Vegetation cover and composition data in environments surrounding uranium mines in the Grand Canyon ecosystem, USA"},{"id":499094,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1024/images"},{"id":499091,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1024/ofr20251024.pdf","text":"Report","size":"10 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1024 PDF"},{"id":499090,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1024/coverthb.jpg"},{"id":499092,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251024/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1024 HTML"},{"id":499093,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1024/ofr20251024.XML","linkFileType":{"id":8,"text":"xml"},"description":"OFR 2025-1024 XML"}],"country":"United States","state":"Arizona","otherGeospatial":"Grand Canyon region","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -113.1667,\n 36.667\n ],\n [\n -113.1667,\n 35.667\n ],\n [\n -111.667,\n 35.667\n ],\n [\n -111.667,\n 36.667\n ],\n [\n -113.1667,\n 36.667\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"Southwest Biological Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
2255 N. Gemini Drive
Flagstaff, AZ 86001
The U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Calibration and Validation (Cal/Val) Center of Excellence (ECCOE) focuses on improving the accuracy, precision, calibration, and product quality of remote-sensing data, leveraging years of multiscale optical system geometric and radiometric calibration and characterization experience. The ECCOE Landsat Cal/Val Team continually monitors the geometric and radiometric performance of active Landsat missions and makes calibration adjustments, as needed, to maintain data quality at the highest level.
This report provides observed geometric and radiometric analysis results for Landsats 8 and 9 for quarter 2 (April–June) of 2025. All data used to compile the Cal/Val analysis results presented in this report are freely available from the U.S. Geological Survey EarthExplorer website: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20261059","usgsCitation":"Haque, M.O., Hasan, M.N., Shrestha, A., Rengarajan, R., Lubke, M., Steinwand, D., Bresnahan, P., Shaw, J.L., Ruslander, K., Micijevic, E., Choate, M.J., Anderson, C., Clauson, J., Thome, K., Kaita, E., Angal, A., Levy, R., Miller, J., Ding, L., and Teixeira Pinto, C., 2026, ECCOE Landsat quarterly calibration and validation report—Quarter 2, 2025 (ver. 1.2, June 2026): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2026–1059, 56 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20261059.","productDescription":"Report: viii, 56 p.; Dataset","numberOfPages":"68","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-181128","costCenters":[{"id":222,"text":"Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":500674,"rank":4,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2026/1059/coverthb4.jpg"},{"id":499063,"rank":2,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2026/1059/images"},{"id":499064,"rank":3,"type":{"id":28,"text":"Dataset"},"url":"https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/","text":"USGS database","linkHelpText":"- EarthExplorer"},{"id":499062,"rank":1,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2026/1059/ofr20261059.XML","linkFileType":{"id":8,"text":"xml"},"description":"OFR 2026-1059 XML"},{"id":505291,"rank":6,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20261059/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2026-1059 HTML"},{"id":505290,"rank":5,"type":{"id":25,"text":"Version History"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2026/1059/versionHist_ofr20261059.txt","text":"Version History","linkFileType":{"id":2,"text":"txt"}},{"id":505292,"rank":7,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2026/1059/ofr20261059.pdf","text":"Report","size":"5.97 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2026-1059"}],"edition":"Version 1.0: January 2026; Version 1.1: March 2026; Version 1.2: June 2026","contact":"Director, Earth Resources Observation and Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
47914 252nd Street
Sioux Falls, SD 57198
The U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Calibration and Validation Center of Excellence Team assesses and calibrates Landsat remote-sensing data to ensure high-quality data products are publicly available. These data products are used to make informed decisions about natural resources and the environment. This report is part of a series of quarterly reports intended to provide updated observed geometric and radiometric analysis results for Landsats 8 and 9.
","publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationStatus":"PW","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Haque, Md Obaidul 0000-0002-0914-1446","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-1446","contributorId":290335,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Haque","given":"Md Obaidul","affiliations":[{"id":54490,"text":"KBR, Inc., under contract to USGS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954468,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Hasan, Nahid 0000-0002-0463-601X","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0463-601X","contributorId":292342,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Hasan","given":"Nahid","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":40546,"text":"KBR, Contractor to the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954469,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Shrestha, Ashish 0000-0002-9407-5462","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9407-5462","contributorId":298063,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Shrestha","given":"Ashish","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":40546,"text":"KBR, Contractor to the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954470,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Rengarajan, Rajagopalan 0000-0003-1860-7110","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1860-7110","contributorId":242014,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Rengarajan","given":"Rajagopalan","affiliations":[{"id":48475,"text":"KBR, Contractor to USGS EROS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954471,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Lubke, Mark 0000-0002-7257-2337","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-2337","contributorId":261911,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Lubke","given":"Mark","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":53079,"text":"KBR, contractor to U.S. Geological Survey","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954472,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5},{"text":"Steinwand, Daniel 0009-0008-6588-9775","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6588-9775","contributorId":357557,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Steinwand","given":"Daniel","affiliations":[{"id":54490,"text":"KBR, Inc., under contract to USGS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954473,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":6},{"text":"Bresnahan, Paul 0000-0002-3491-0956","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3491-0956","contributorId":306120,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Bresnahan","given":"Paul","affiliations":[{"id":27608,"text":"Contractor to the USGS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954474,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":7},{"text":"Shaw, Jerad L. 0000-0002-8319-2778","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-2778","contributorId":270396,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Shaw","given":"Jerad L.","affiliations":[{"id":40546,"text":"KBR, Contractor to the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954475,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":8},{"text":"Ruslander, Kathryn 0000-0003-3036-1731","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3036-1731","contributorId":330181,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Ruslander","given":"Kathryn","affiliations":[{"id":54490,"text":"KBR, Inc., under contract to USGS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954476,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":9},{"text":"Micijevic, Esad 0000-0002-3828-9239 emicijevic@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3828-9239","contributorId":3075,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Micijevic","given":"Esad","email":"emicijevic@usgs.gov","affiliations":[{"id":223,"text":"Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center (Geography)","active":false,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":954477,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":10},{"text":"Choate, Michael J. 0000-0002-8101-4994","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8101-4994","contributorId":268248,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Choate","given":"Michael J.","affiliations":[{"id":222,"text":"Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":954478,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":11},{"text":"Anderson, Cody 0000-0001-5612-1889 chanderson@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5612-1889","contributorId":195521,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Anderson","given":"Cody","email":"chanderson@usgs.gov","affiliations":[{"id":222,"text":"Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":954479,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":12},{"text":"Clauson, Jeff 0000-0003-3406-4988 jclauson@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3406-4988","contributorId":5230,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Clauson","given":"Jeff","email":"jclauson@usgs.gov","affiliations":[{"id":54490,"text":"KBR, Inc., under contract to USGS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":true,"id":954480,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":13},{"text":"Thome, Kurt","contributorId":140792,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Thome","given":"Kurt","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":7049,"text":"NASA Goddard Space Flight Center","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954481,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":14},{"text":"Angal, Amit","contributorId":360771,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Angal","given":"Amit","affiliations":[{"id":78842,"text":"SSAI, under contract to NASA","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954482,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":15},{"text":"Levy, Raviv","contributorId":131008,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Levy","given":"Raviv","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":7209,"text":"SSAI / NASA / GSFC","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954483,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":16},{"text":"Miller, Jeff","contributorId":204570,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Miller","given":"Jeff","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":36245,"text":"NPS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954484,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":17},{"text":"Ding, Leibo","contributorId":330182,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Ding","given":"Leibo","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":78842,"text":"SSAI, under contract to NASA","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954485,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":18},{"text":"Teixeira Pinto, Cibele","contributorId":357558,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Teixeira Pinto","given":"Cibele","affiliations":[{"id":78842,"text":"SSAI, under contract to NASA","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":954486,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":19}]}} ,{"id":70273409,"text":"ofr20251057 - 2026 - Distribution, abundance, breeding activities, and habitat use of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2020–24 summary report","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2026-02-03T17:09:16.100992","indexId":"ofr20251057","displayToPublicDate":"2026-01-21T07:00:00","publicationYear":"2026","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2025-1057","displayTitle":"Distribution, Abundance, Breeding Activities, and Habitat Use of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2020–24 Summary Report","title":"Distribution, abundance, breeding activities, and habitat use of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2020–24 summary report","docAbstract":"The purpose of this report is to provide the Marine Corps with a summary of abundance, breeding activity, demography, and habitat use of endangered Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus) at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California (MCBCP or Base). The report presents results of vireo surveys and monitoring in 2024 and summarizes a subset of data collected from 2020 through 2024. Surveys for the Least Bell's Vireo were completed at MCBCP between April 4 and July 9, 2024. Core survey areas and a subset of non-core areas in drainages containing riparian habitat suitable for vireos were surveyed two to four times. We detected 542 territorial male vireos and 17 transient vireos in core survey areas. An additional 102 territorial male vireos and 2 transients were detected in non-core survey areas. Transient vireos were detected on 5 of the 10 drainages/sites surveyed (core and non-core areas). In core survey areas, 87 percent of vireo territories were on the four most populated drainages, with the Santa Margarita River containing 67 percent of all territories in core areas surveyed on Base. In core areas, 77 percent of male vireos were confirmed as paired; 76 percent of male vireos in non-core areas were confirmed as paired.
The number of documented Least Bell’s Vireo territories in core survey areas on MCBCP decreased 3 percent from 2023. In five core survey area drainages, the number of territories increased by at least two, and in two core survey area drainages, the Santa Margarita River and Las Flores Creek, the number of vireo territories decreased by at least nine between 2023 and 2024. The number of vireo territories at Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendleton did not change from 2023 to 2024. The proportion of surveys during which Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater) were detected decreased to 0.03 from a peak of 0.45 in 2022. Cowbirds were detected in April and June in 2024.
Most core-area vireos (58 percent, including transients) used mixed willow (Salix spp.) riparian habitat. An additional 9 percent of birds occupied willow habitat co-dominated by Western sycamores (Platanus racemosa). Riparian scrub dominated by mule fat (Baccharis salicifolia), sandbar willow (S. exigua), or blue elderberry (Sambucus mexicana) was used by 33 percent of vireos. Habitat dominated by non-native vegetation was used by 1 percent of vireos.
Since 2020, the number of vireos detected in each of the non-core survey groups was greater than expected, based on the change in vireo numbers in core survey areas. Although, the number of vireo territories on Base decreased from 2020–24, from approximately 1,224 to approximately 960, the trend in vireo territory numbers on Base since 2005 has been positive.
In 2019, MCBCP began operating an artificial seep along the Santa Margarita River; then, in 2021, two additional artificial seeps became operational. The artificial seeps pumped water to the surface during daylight hours starting in mid-April and ending in August each year and were designed to increase the amount of surface water to enhance Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) breeding habitat. Although this enhancement was designed to benefit flycatchers, few flycatchers have inhabited MCBCP, including the seep areas, within the past several years; therefore, vireos were selected as a surrogate species to determine effects of the habitat enhancement. This report presents the fifth year of annual monitoring and analyses summarizing all 5 years of vireo and vegetation response to the artificial seeps.
In 2020, we established four study sites along the Santa Margarita River, two surrounding and extending downstream from existing and proposed seep pumps at the Old Treatment Ponds and along Pump Road and two Reference sites in similar habitat downstream from the Seep sites. Seep pumps began operating at the Old Treatment Ponds in 2020 and along Pump Road in 2021. In 2023, seep pumps at the Pump Road Seep site did not function, and we recategorized that study site as Intermediate. We sampled vegetation at Seep, Intermediate, and Reference sites to determine the effects of surface-water enhancement by seep pumps. In 2024, vegetation cover was highest near the ground and decreased with increasing height. Woody vegetation made up most of the cover at all height categories. We determined that Seep and Intermediate sites differed from each other in addition to differing from Reference sites, which likely is, in part, because seep-pump operation at the Intermediate site was inconsistent compared to the Seep site. Soil saturation in 2024 was high at the Intermediate site and was associated with high native herbaceous cover and low non-native herbaceous cover. Sites differed, with the Intermediate site having more upper canopy cover in general, the Seep site having more low woody cover, and the Reference sites having more mid-canopy non-native vegetation cover.
Soil saturation significantly increased from 2020 through 2024 at the Seep site and was significantly higher at Seep and Intermediate sites than at their paired Reference sites in all years. Soil saturation likely was increased by the supplemental surface water at the Seep site. However, soil saturation at the Intermediate site was not clearly associated with seep pumps but likely affected by soil saturation at the site before seep-pump installation and flooding from high precipitation. Canopy height increased at the Intermediate site from 2020 through 2024 and increased with increasing soil saturation at the Intermediate and Reference sites. The canopy at the Seep site was shorter than at the Intermediate and Reference sites and decreased from 2020 through 2024 because tall trees were damaged and killed by shothole borer beetles (Euwallacea spp.).
We used Redundancy Analysis to discover associations among vegetation types, plant species, and other environmental variables (soil saturation, site, precipitation, and seep operation, defined as the site and year seep pumps were operating). These associations explained less than 15 percent of the variability in the vegetation, with the remaining 85 percent of variation unexplained. Generally, as soil saturation increased, understory vegetation increased and non-native cover decreased in the mid-and upper canopy. Non-native herbaceous plant species decreased in wetter soil.
The Seep site was characterized by more understory and less canopy, contrasting with the Intermediate site, which was characterized by less understory and more higher canopy cover. The addition of surface water via seep pumps or precipitation was associated with more vegetation near the ground. Higher early winter precipitation was associated with taller canopy and more woody vegetation in the upper canopy. We also created a Redundancy Analysis model isolating the components of Southwestern Willow Flycatcher habitat, as identified by Howell and others (2018). In this model, increased soil saturation resulted in increased cover of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and black willow (Salix gooddingii) below 3 meters (m), total cover 3–6 m, and black willow above 6 m. Cover of poison hemlock (Conium maculatum) and stinging nettle below 3 m was higher at the Seep site and lower at the Intermediate site.
Vireo territory density among the Seep, Intermediate, and Reference sites was similar before the seep pumps were installed. However, vireo territory density at Seep and Intermediate sites combined was significantly higher than at Reference sites after the seep pumps were installed.
We banded and resighted color banded vireos as part of a long-term evaluation of vireo survival, site fidelity, between-year movement, and the effect of surface-water enhancement on vireo return rate and between-year movement. We banded 164 Least Bell's Vireo nestlings during the 2024 season.
In 2024, we resighted 31 Least Bell's Vireos on Base that had been banded before the 2024 breeding season, and we were able to identify 25 of them. Of the 25 that we could identify, 24 were banded on Base and 1 was originally banded on the San Luis Rey River. Adult birds of known age ranged from 1 to 9 years old.
Base-wide survival of vireos was affected by sex, age, and year. Males had significantly higher annual survival than females (60 percent versus 47 percent, respectively). Adults had higher annual survival than first-year vireos (61 percent versus 11 percent, respectively). The return rate of adult vireos to Seep, Intermediate, or Reference sites was not affected by the original banding site (Seep versus Intermediate versus Reference).
Most returning adult vireos, predominantly males, showed strong between-year site fidelity. Of the adults present in 2023, 92 percent (all males) returned in 2024 to within 100 m of their previous territory. The average between-year movement for returning adult vireos was 0.4±0.03 kilometers (km). The average movement of first-year vireos detected in 2024 that fledged from a known nest on MCBCP in 2023 was 2.4±3.1 km.
We monitored 47 Least Bell's Vireo pairs to evaluate the effects of surface-water enhancement on nest success and breeding productivity. Breeding productivity in 2024 was similar among Seep, Intermediate, and Reference sites (2.8, 3.0, and 3.0 young fledged per pair, respectively), and the percentage of pairs that fledged at least one young was not significantly different among sites (83, 91, and 96 percent, respectively). According to the best model, daily nest survival from 2020–24 was not related to site. Other measures of breeding productivity were also similar among Seep, Intermediate, and Reference site pairs.
Between 2020 and 2024, the number of vireo fledglings produced per pair increased with increasing native herbaceous cover under 3 m and decreasing cover of all herbaceous vegetation under 5 m and was not affected by precipitation, site, or seep operation. The number of vireo fledglings produced per egg was lower at the Seep and Intermediate sites than at the Reference sites and increased with decreasing late winter precipitation, cover of poison hemlock, black mustard, non-native vegetation above 2 m, and all vegetation over 2 m. Vireo pairs at Seep and Intermediate sites were less likely to fledge young than vireo pairs at Reference sites. All vireo pairs were more likely to fledge young with less cover of poison hemlock and more cover of poison oak.
From 2020 through 2024, vireos placed their nests in 24 plant species. The most used plants in all years were willows, mostly red (S. laevigata), or arroyo (S. lasiolepis). The fate of a vireo nest (whether it successfully fledged young or not) was not affected by placement in native or non-native vegetation, by site, or by year, but nests were more likely to be successful if they were placed in woody plants than in herbaceous plants. Successful nests were placed higher in the host plant and farther from the outer edge of the nest clump than unsuccessful nests.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251057","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton","programNote":"Ecosystems Mission Area—Species Management Research Program","usgsCitation":"Lynn, S., Houston, A., Kus, B.E., and Mendia, S.M., 2026, Distribution, abundance, breeding activities, and habitat use of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California—2020–24 summary report: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1057, 128 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251057.","productDescription":"xii, 128 p.","numberOfPages":"128","onlineOnly":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-176723","costCenters":[{"id":651,"text":"Western Ecological Research Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":498564,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1057/images"},{"id":498563,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1057/ofr20251057.XML","linkFileType":{"id":8,"text":"xml"},"description":"OFR 2025-1057 XML"},{"id":498562,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251057/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1057 HTML"},{"id":498561,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1057/ofr20251057.pdf","size":"13.4 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1057 PDF"},{"id":498560,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1057/coverthb.jpg"}],"country":"United States","state":"California","otherGeospatial":"Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -117.5833,\n 33.5\n ],\n [\n -117.5833,\n 33.1667\n ],\n [\n -117.25,\n 33.1667\n ],\n [\n -117.25,\n 33.5\n ],\n [\n -117.5833,\n 33.5\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"Western Ecological Research Center
U.S. Geological Survey
3020 State University Drive East
Sacramento, California 95819
No abstract available.
","language":"English","publisher":"Utah Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, and the Great Salt Lake Salinity Advisory Committee","doi":"10.34191/OFR-779","usgsCitation":"Rumsey, C., and Hynek, S., 2026, Methodology to estimate South Arm dissolved salt mass and volume-weighted salinity values: Open-File Report 779, 15 p., https://doi.org/10.34191/OFR-779.","productDescription":"15 p.","ipdsId":"IP-184865","costCenters":[{"id":610,"text":"Utah Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":504084,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/thumbnails/outside_thumb.jpg"}],"country":"United States","state":"Utah","otherGeospatial":"Great Salt Lake","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"type\": \"Polygon\",\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -113.09767277906911,\n 41.71012700153673\n ],\n [\n -112.05448526034972,\n 41.71012700153673\n ],\n [\n -112.05448526034972,\n 40.637910543605216\n ],\n [\n -113.09767277906911,\n 40.637910543605216\n ],\n [\n -113.09767277906911,\n 41.71012700153673\n ]\n ]\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n}","noUsgsAuthors":false,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationStatus":"PW","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Rumsey, Christine 0000-0001-7536-750X crumsey@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7536-750X","contributorId":146240,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Rumsey","given":"Christine","email":"crumsey@usgs.gov","affiliations":[{"id":610,"text":"Utah Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":958982,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Hynek, Scott 0000-0002-6885-0445","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6885-0445","contributorId":216634,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Hynek","given":"Scott","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":610,"text":"Utah Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":958983,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}} ,{"id":70272812,"text":"ofr20251042 - 2025 - Assessment of dragonfly and damselfly (Odonata) occupancy and habitat suitability at −12 Mile Slough, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Arizona","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2026-04-27T14:37:56.153038","indexId":"ofr20251042","displayToPublicDate":"2025-12-12T11:15:36","publicationYear":"2025","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2025-1042","displayTitle":"Assessment of Dragonfly and Damselfly (Odonata) Occupancy and Habitat Suitability at −12 Mile Slough, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Arizona","title":"Assessment of dragonfly and damselfly (Odonata) occupancy and habitat suitability at −12 Mile Slough, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Arizona","docAbstract":"Management practices that enhance habitat complexity in dam tailwaters often aim to increase biodiversity and improve ecosystem health. However, in other instances, management practices may simplify habitat features to help minimize the establishment of invasive species. These tradeoffs are complex, particularly in the face of drought and warming water temperatures. In Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, a backwater known as −12 Mile Slough (henceforth the Slough), located 5-kilometers downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, is being considered for removal to reduce breeding habitat for warmwater nonnative fishes.
In this report, the habitat suitability for and occupancy of dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) at the Slough are assessed. U.S. Geological Survey staff conducted three site visits to the Colorado River in Glen Canyon, the Slough, and another backwater (“Frogwater”) on September 11–13, and 26, 2024. The physical habitat of the sampling sites was characterized by recording water temperatures, specific conductance, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, flow, depth, and benthic substratum size distribution. We sampled aquatic macroinvertebrates and riparian macroinvertebrates using benthic and aerial collection methods, respectively. We describe three distinct benthic aquatic invertebrate communities in and around the Slough, two of which contained Odonata. We found no Odonata larvae in the mainstem, at Frogwater, or in the Lower Slough. Using historic specimen data from the Museum of Northern Arizona, we report 8 species of damselflies from one family (Coenagrionidae) and 8 species of dragonflies from three families (Aeshnidae, Gomphidae, and Libellulidae) in Glen Canyon between 1985 and 2024. We discuss the habitat requirements of Odonata larvae known to occur in the Slough, as well as their cultural and recreational values. We conclude that channelization of the Slough to cool water temperatures may reduce larval Odonata habitat locally but is unlikely to affect their diversity and abundance on a regional scale.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251042","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service, Bureau of Reclamation, and Springs Stewardship Institute","usgsCitation":"Metcalfe, A.N., Ford, M.A., Stevens, L.E., and Kennedy, T.A., 2025, Assessment of dragonfly and damselfly (Odonata) occupancy and habitat suitability at −12 Mile Slough, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1042, 15 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251042.","productDescription":"Report, ix, 15 p.; Data Release","numberOfPages":"15","onlineOnly":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-173051","costCenters":[{"id":568,"text":"Southwest Biological Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":497290,"rank":6,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1EJXMAO","text":"USGS Data Release","linkHelpText":"Aquatic Invertebrate and Habitat Assessment in Glen Canyon and Associated Backwaters, September 2024"},{"id":497288,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1042/ofr20251042.XML","description":"OFR 2025-1042 XML"},{"id":497287,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251042/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1042 HTML"},{"id":497286,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1042/ofr20251042.pdf","text":"Report","size":"7.28 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1042 PDF"},{"id":497291,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1042/coverthb2.jpg"},{"id":497289,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1042/images"}],"country":"United States","state":"Arizona","otherGeospatial":"12 Mile Slough, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -111.49179778654118,\n 36.90754527885582\n ],\n [\n -111.57073960910685,\n 36.90754527885582\n ],\n [\n -111.57073960910685,\n 36.8586991785957\n ],\n [\n -111.49179778654118,\n 36.8586991785957\n ],\n [\n -111.49179778654118,\n 36.90754527885582\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"Director, Southwest Biological Science Center
Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center
U.S. Geological Survey
2255 N Gemini Drive
Flagstaff, AZ 86001
This report presents chemical and isotopic compositions of volcanic gases collected from thermal areas within Lassen Volcanic National Park in northern California from 1974 through 2019. As the southernmost volcano in the Cascade Range and designated a very-high-threat volcano by the U.S. Geological Survey, the Lassen Volcanic Center (LVC) requires consistent monitoring to assess potential volcanic hazards. In 2014, the California Volcano Observatory established a gas geochemical monitoring program at LVC to provide baseline data to evaluate future changes.</p>
Results demonstrate consistent spatial patterns in bulk gas chemistry that support a two-circulation-cell hydrothermal model previously established for LVC. Gas samples from circulation cell 1 thermal areas have higher helium isotope ratios (6.59–7.50 times the air value) than those from circulation cell 2 (5.86–6.52 times the air value), indicating a stronger magmatic signature. The Sulphur Works and Pilot Pinnacle thermal areas within circulation cell 1 consistently emit gases with the highest magmatic helium contents, suggesting gas at these areas best represents conditions in the underlying volcanic system. A slight decrease in helium isotope values since 1974 may indicate progressive dilution of magmatic helium-3 (3He) by radiogenic helium-4 (4He) in the absence of recent magma intrusion. Carbon isotope compositions of carbon dioxide across all thermal areas are relatively uniform (−9.7–−7.3 per mil), falling within the range observed at other Cascade Range volcanoes. Based on gas geochemical characteristics and site accessibility, the Sulphur Works and Pilot Pinnacle thermal areas represent optimal targets for continued monitoring of the LVC magmatic-hydrothermal system. This study includes the most comprehensive helium isotope dataset collected at LVC currently available and establishes critical baseline data for future volcanic monitoring efforts.</p>
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251056","usgsCitation":"Bergfeld, D., Lewicki, J.L., Peek, S.E., and Hunt, A.G., 2025, Gas chemistry and isotope data for volcano monitoring at the Lassen Volcanic Center, Lassen Volcanic National Park: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1056, 23 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251056.","productDescription":"ix, 23 p.","numberOfPages":"23","onlineOnly":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-177202","costCenters":[{"id":617,"text":"Volcano Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":497152,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1056/coverthb2.jpg"},{"id":497153,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1056/ofr20251056.pdf","text":"Report","size":"2.58 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1056 PDF"},{"id":497155,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1056/ofr20251056.XML","description":"OFR 2025-1056 XML"},{"id":497156,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1056/images"},{"id":497157,"rank":6,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P9W29CON","text":"USGS data release","linkHelpText":"Chemical and isotopic compositions of gases from volcanic and geothermal areas in California"},{"id":497154,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251056/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1056 HTML"}],"contact":"Director, Volcano Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
1300 SE Cardinal Court Bldg. 10
Vancouver, WA 98683
Managers of the Central Valley Project (CVP) and State Water Projects (SWP) in California are confronted with difficult tradeoffs between water uses and associated values affected by water management decisions. These decisions involve altering the timing and magnitude of water releases from dams and reservoirs, which can affect habitats for economically important and Federally and State-listed endangered fish species, water deliveries for agriculture or municipalities, and water quality. In this report, we describe the results of a rapid structured decision-making process used to assist management agencies in evaluating tradeoffs while gathering input from cooperating agencies, rightsholders, or interested parties (hereafter participants) through facilitated workshops in spring 2025. Consideration of alternative water management actions was initiated by the continued decline of Hypomesus transpacificus (delta smelt) populations and the issuance of a new biological opinion for the CVP and SWP long-term operations on the effects on delta smelt and other Endangered Species Act-listed species in November 2024. An Executive Order was also issued in January 2025, directing the Bureau of Reclamation to maximize water deliveries. Participants, led by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating agencies, identified 8 fundamental values (hereafter objectives) and 11 alternative water management scenarios (or “alternative management actions” based on the PrOACT model). Using multicriteria decision analysis, we evaluated performance (or “consequences” based on a consequence table analysis) and analyzed tradeoffs of alternative water management actions to the fundamental objectives. We ranked the alternative water management actions based on four participants’ objective weights and composite utility scores calculated using a linear value function. The three highest ranking alternative water management actions had the poorest performance for delta smelt but performed best for CVP and SWP water exports and objectives related to coldwater pool operations for salmonids. An optimum strategy that could prevent the extinction of delta smelt was not determined for this study. However, insights gained from our rapid decision analysis suggested nonflow scenarios could benefit the delta smelt population, including in drier years, and could be considered to avoid curtailment of water exports.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251055","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, and the California Department of Water Resources","usgsCitation":"Healy, B.D., Phillis, C.C., Mahardja, B., Koizumi, C., Pien, C., Parker, N., Conrad, J.L., Ekstrom, J., Leimbach, J., Silberblatt, R., Fischer, T., and Ehlo, C., 2025, Rapid structured decision making for Hypomesus transpacificus (delta smelt) summer–fall freshwater outflow management: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1055, 36 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251055.","productDescription":"Report: viii, 36 p.; Data Release","numberOfPages":"36","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"N","ipdsId":"IP-179521","costCenters":[{"id":568,"text":"Southwest Biological Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":497241,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1055/ofr20251055.pdf","size":"1.53 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1055 PDF"},{"id":497240,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1055/coverthb.jpg"},{"id":497244,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1055/images/"},{"id":497245,"rank":6,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P13BBC7D","text":"USGS data release","linkHelpText":"Multicriteria decision analysis scores for rapid delta smelt decision analysis"},{"id":497242,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251055/full","description":"OFR 2025-1055 HTML"},{"id":497243,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1055/ofr20251055.XML","description":"OFR 2025-1055 XML"}],"contact":"Director, Southwest Biological Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
2255 N. Gemini Drive
Flagstaff, AZ 86001
Decisions on how to store and distribute water in California’s Central Valley are made considering the use of water resources by people, fish and wildlife, and the effects on water quality. Water is stored behind dams throughout the Central Valley for later release into rivers and canals for distribution to meet different water needs. Declining water availability and increasing human demands for water over recent decades have made these decisions increasingly difficult, especially because different uses of water resources often conflict. This report summarizes a facilitated decision-making process, led by the U.S. Geological Survey, involving water, fish, wildlife managers, and those that have an interest in how water is used (interest holders) in the Central Valley. This process provides information for water managers to consider when deciding how to distribute water resources to meet the needs for endangered Hypomesus transpacificus (delta smelt), different runs of Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Chinook salmon), and Oncorhynchus mykiss (Central Valley steelhead), while maximizing water deliveries for human use and maintaining water quality standards.
","publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationStatus":"PW","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Healy, Brian D. 0000-0002-4402-638X","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4402-638X","contributorId":304257,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Healy","given":"Brian","middleInitial":"D.","affiliations":[{"id":50464,"text":"Eastern Ecological Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":951768,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Phillis, Corey C. 0000-0002-8940-3441","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-3441","contributorId":344284,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Phillis","given":"Corey","middleInitial":"C.","affiliations":[{"id":82325,"text":"The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":951769,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Mahardja, Brian 0000-0003-0695-3745","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0695-3745","contributorId":288940,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Mahardja","given":"Brian","affiliations":[{"id":7183,"text":"U.S. Bureau of Reclamation","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":951770,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Koizumi, Cameron","contributorId":363551,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Koizumi","given":"Cameron","affiliations":[{"id":86721,"text":"US Bureau of Reclamation, Bay-Delta Office, Sacramento, California","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":951771,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Pien, Catarina","contributorId":297193,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Pien","given":"Catarina","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":37342,"text":"California Department of Water Resources","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":951772,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5},{"text":"Parker, Nancy","contributorId":363552,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Parker","given":"Nancy","affiliations":[{"id":86721,"text":"US Bureau of Reclamation, Bay-Delta Office, Sacramento, California","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":951773,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":6},{"text":"Conrad, J. Louise","contributorId":363553,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Conrad","given":"J.","middleInitial":"Louise","affiliations":[{"id":86722,"text":"California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":951774,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":7},{"text":"Ekstrom, Julie","contributorId":363554,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Ekstrom","given":"Julie","affiliations":[{"id":86722,"text":"California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":951775,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":8},{"text":"Leimbach, Julie","contributorId":363555,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Leimbach","given":"Julie","affiliations":[{"id":86723,"text":"Kearns & West, Sacramento, California","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":951776,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":9},{"text":"Silberblatt, Rafael","contributorId":363556,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Silberblatt","given":"Rafael","affiliations":[{"id":86723,"text":"Kearns & West, Sacramento, California","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":951777,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":10},{"text":"Fischer, Tom","contributorId":363557,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Fischer","given":"Tom","affiliations":[{"id":86723,"text":"Kearns & West, Sacramento, California","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":951778,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":11},{"text":"Ehlo, Chase","contributorId":145448,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Ehlo","given":"Chase","affiliations":[],"preferred":false,"id":951779,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":12}]}} ,{"id":70272621,"text":"ofr20251051 - 2025 - Report of the River Master of the Delaware River for the period December 1, 2017–November 30, 2018","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2026-02-03T16:42:39.284179","indexId":"ofr20251051","displayToPublicDate":"2025-12-01T14:45:00","publicationYear":"2025","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2025-1051","displayTitle":"Report of the River Master of the Delaware River for the Period December 1, 2017–November 30, 2018","title":"Report of the River Master of the Delaware River for the period December 1, 2017–November 30, 2018","docAbstract":"A Decree of the Supreme Court of the United States entered June 7, 1954 (New Jersey v. New York, 347 U.S. 995), established the position of Delaware River Master within the U.S. Geological Survey. In addition, the Decree authorizes the diversion of water from the Delaware River Basin and requires that compensating releases from certain reservoirs owned by New York City be made under the supervision and direction of the River Master. The Decree stipulates that the River Master provide reports to the Court, not less frequently than annually. This report is the 65th annual report of the River Master of the Delaware River. The report covers the 2018 River Master report year, from December 1, 2017, to November 30, 2018.
During the report year, precipitation in the upper Delaware River Basin was 60.39 inches or 136 percent of the long-term average. On December 1, 2017, combined useable storage in the New York City reservoirs in the upper Delaware River Basin was 193.230 billion gallons or 71.3 percent of the combined useable storage capacity of 270.837 billion gallons. The reservoirs had a usable capacity of 99.5 percent on May 31, 2018. Combined storage remained high (above 80 percent combined capacity) and did not decline below 80 percent of combined capacity through November 30, 2018. River Master operations during the year were conducted as stipulated by the Decree and the Flexible Flow Management Program.
Diversions from the Delaware River Basin by New York City and New Jersey fully complied with the Decree. Reservoir releases were made as directed by the River Master at rates designed to meet the flow objective for the Delaware River at Montague, New Jersey, on 42 days during the report year. Interim Excess Release Quantity banks and conservation releases, designed to relieve thermal stress and protect the fishery and aquatic habitat in the tailwaters of the reservoirs, were also made during the report year.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251051","isbn":"978-1-4113-4631-4","usgsCitation":"Russell, K.L., Andrews, W.J., and McHugh, A.R., 2025, Report of the River Master of the Delaware River for the period December 1, 2017–November 30, 2018: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1051, 79 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251051.","productDescription":"x, 79 p.","numberOfPages":"79","onlineOnly":"N","additionalOnlineFiles":"N","ipdsId":"IP-170329","costCenters":[{"id":509,"text":"Office of the Associate Director for Water","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":496884,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1051/images/"},{"id":496883,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1051/ofr20251051.XML","linkFileType":{"id":8,"text":"xml"},"description":"OFR 2025-1051 XML"},{"id":496882,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251051/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1051 HTML"},{"id":496881,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1051/ofr20251051.pdf","text":"Report","size":"16.1 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1051 PDF"},{"id":496880,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1051/coverthb.jpg"}],"country":"United States","state":"Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania","otherGeospatial":"Delaware River basin","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -76,\n 42.75\n ],\n [\n -76,\n 39.7\n ],\n [\n -73.5,\n 39.7\n ],\n [\n -73.5,\n 42.75\n ],\n [\n -76,\n 42.75\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"Delaware River Master
Office of the Delaware River Master
U.S. Geological Survey
Director, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
2885 Mission Street
Santa Cruz, California 95060
Urban stream rehabilitation plans can benefit from knowledge of the landscape setting and vegetative communities that were adjacent to streams prior to urbanization. Downstream to upstream connections of these characteristics can be relevant for native migratory fish species that have a range of preferred spawning habitats. Based on a need for more quantitative data on these potential connections, the U.S. Geological Survey assembled geomorphic characteristics, surficial geology, and pre-Euro-American settlement vegetation for 333 kilometers of stream segments in the Kinnickinnic River and Menomonee River subbasins of the Milwaukee River, Wisconsin. Channel slopes ranged from less than 0.3 percent to greater than 2 percent, covering at least two channel morphology and bedform types spanning low-energy irregular and pool-riffle complexes. Postglacial surficial geology ranged from coarse-grained outwash sand and gravel to lacustrine silt and clay, allowing for a range of stream substrate sizes. Presettlement riparian vegetation was mainly forest, including forested uplands, forested lowlands, and to a lesser extent, conifer-dominated wetlands in headwaters. This resulting framework of geomorphic habitat response units can be used for habitat rehabilitation projects for migratory native fish in other urban Great Lakes tributaries.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251049","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District and the University of Wisconsin","usgsCitation":"Fitzpatrick, F.A., Sterner, S.P., Blount, J.D., and Stewart, J.S., 2025, Geomorphic habitat response units for urban stream rehabilitation, Milwaukee, Wisconsin: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1049, 17 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251049.","productDescription":"Report: vi, 17 p.; Data Release","numberOfPages":"17","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"N","ipdsId":"IP-154626","costCenters":[{"id":37947,"text":"Upper Midwest Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":496620,"rank":6,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P90S2FMB","text":"USGS data release","linkHelpText":"Geomorphic habitat response units attributes for the Wisconsin DNR 24k hydrography flowline network in the Milwaukee River Basin, Wisconsin"},{"id":496619,"rank":5,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1049/ofr20251049.XML","linkFileType":{"id":8,"text":"xml"},"description":"OFR 2025-1049 XML"},{"id":496615,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1049/coverthb.jpg"},{"id":496616,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1049/ofr20251049.pdf","text":"Report","size":"7 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025–1049"},{"id":496617,"rank":3,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1049/images"},{"id":496618,"rank":4,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251049/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025–1049 HTML"}],"country":"United States","state":"Wisconsin","city":"Milwaukee","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -88.21,\n 43.3\n ],\n [\n -88.21,\n 42.8\n ],\n [\n -87.8,\n 42.8\n ],\n [\n -87.8,\n 43.3\n ],\n [\n -88.21,\n 43.3\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"Director, Upper Midwest Water Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
1 Gifford Pinchot Dr.
Madison, WI 53726
The U.S. Geological Survey intersected stream network geomorphic characteristics with maps of original pre-Euro-American settlement vegetation, surficial geology, and land-use attributes for the Kinnickinnic River and Menomonee River subbasins of the Milwaukee River Basin in eastern Wisconsin. The resulting framework of geomorphic habitat response units can be used for planning, designing, and evaluating ongoing and future native fish passage and spawning habitat rehabilitation projects in other urban areas where concrete-lined channels are being replaced with more natural counterparts.
","publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationStatus":"PW","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Fitzpatrick, Faith A. 0000-0002-9748-7075 fafitzpa@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9748-7075","contributorId":209516,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Fitzpatrick","given":"Faith","email":"fafitzpa@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"A.","affiliations":[{"id":37947,"text":"Upper Midwest Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":950539,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Sterner, Shelby P. 0000-0002-3103-7960","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3103-7960","contributorId":292246,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Sterner","given":"Shelby","email":"","middleInitial":"P.","affiliations":[{"id":37947,"text":"Upper Midwest Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":950540,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Blount, James D. 0000-0002-0006-3947 jblount@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0006-3947","contributorId":200231,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Blount","given":"James","email":"jblount@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"D.","affiliations":[{"id":37947,"text":"Upper Midwest Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":950541,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Stewart, Jana S. 0000-0002-8121-1373","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8121-1373","contributorId":211037,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Stewart","given":"Jana","middleInitial":"S.","affiliations":[{"id":677,"text":"Wisconsin Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true},{"id":37947,"text":"Upper Midwest Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":950542,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4}]}} ,{"id":70272104,"text":"ofr20251046 - 2025 - Modeling floods, sediment entrainment, and downstream debris flows from hypothetical breaches of the blockage at Spirit Lake, Washington","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2026-02-03T16:29:30.731045","indexId":"ofr20251046","displayToPublicDate":"2025-11-17T07:48:44","publicationYear":"2025","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2025-1046","displayTitle":"Modeling Floods, Sediment Entrainment, and Downstream Debris Flows from Hypothetical Breaches of the Blockage at Spirit Lake, Washington","title":"Modeling floods, sediment entrainment, and downstream debris flows from hypothetical breaches of the blockage at Spirit Lake, Washington","docAbstract":"This report describes a modeling investigation by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) of hazards in the Toutle and Cowlitz River valleys posed by hypothetical outburst floods from Spirit Lake, Washington. A massive debris avalanche resulting from the collapse of Mount St. Helens’ north flank during the May 18, 1980, eruption blocked Spirit Lake’s natural outlet into the North Fork Toutle River. Lacking a natural outlet, subsequent runoff in the Spirit Lake watershed contributed to a rising lake level, elevating the potential for debris-dam breaching or catastrophic failure. The influence of highly erodible bed sediment in the upper North Fork Toutle River on downstream flood and debris-flow dynamics and extent is assessed in this study. Simulations of clear-water (non-erosive) outburst floods were used as a baseline and compared to erosive flows that entrain large volumes of material and transition into debris flows along their flow path, revealing the influence of entrainment on hazard extent. Clear-water floods were modeled with the shallow water equations. Erosive flows were modeled with a two-phase granular fluid model that accommodates mobilization and incorporation of sediment from the bed into the overlying flow and resultant changes in flow rheology across a wide range of solid concentrations, from dilute suspensions to dense-granular debris flows. Entrainment of bed material was found to substantially increase the total flow volume (total volume of transported water and sediment is approximately 150 percent of the water volume for non-erosive flows). Erosive flows are shown to exhibit higher flow-front speeds and faster downstream arrival times than non-erosive flows, consistent with volume amplification effects near the actively mobilizing flow front. However, the larger total volume of transported material does not necessarily lead to an enhancement of total volume throughput (cumulative discharge) or inundation extent (total affected area) for all locations along the entire flow path; while entrainment leads to the displacement of a larger volume of material overall, much of this dislocated material (water and sediment) deposits upstream from the distal extent of the flows. These results are consistent with energetic considerations of initial potential energy and granular shear resistance.","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251046","usgsCitation":"George, D.L., and Cannon, C.M., 2025, Modeling floods, sediment entrainment, and downstream debris flows from hypothetical breaches of the blockage at Spirit Lake, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1046, 37 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251046.","productDescription":"Report: ix, 37 p.; Data Release","numberOfPages":"37","onlineOnly":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-154709","costCenters":[{"id":617,"text":"Volcano Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":496509,"rank":6,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P139AC3R","text":"USGS data release","description":"George, D.L., and Cannon, C.M., 2025, Simulated floods, sediment entrainment, and debris-flow inundation in the Toutle and Cowlitz River valleys resulting from hypothetical dam breaches of Spirit Lake, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P139AC3R.","linkHelpText":"Simulated floods, sediment entrainment, and debris-flow inundation in the Toutle and Cowlitz River valleys resulting from hypothetical dam breaches of Spirit Lake, Washington"},{"id":496505,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1046/ofr20251046.pdf","text":"Report","size":"26.4 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1046 PDF"},{"id":496504,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1046/coverthb.jpg"},{"id":497791,"rank":7,"type":{"id":36,"text":"NGMDB Index Page"},"url":"https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_118953.htm"},{"id":496508,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1046/images"},{"id":496507,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1046/ofr20251046.XML","linkFileType":{"id":8,"text":"xml"},"description":"OFR 2025-1046 XML"},{"id":496506,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251046/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1046 HTML"}],"country":"United States","state":"Washington","otherGeospatial":"Spirit Lake","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -122.133333,\n 46.2833\n ],\n [\n -122.2,\n 46.2833\n ],\n [\n -122.2,\n 46.25\n ],\n [\n -122.133333,\n 46.25\n ],\n [\n -122.133333,\n 46.2833\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"David A. Johnston Cascades Volcano Observatory
U.S. Geological Survey
1300 SE Cardinal Court
Building 10, Suite 100
Vancouver, WA 98683
Email: askCVO@usgs.gov
","tableOfContents":"Seven potential sources of water, consisting of free-flowing discharge from abandoned coal mines at six locations and one abandoned flooded underground coal mine air shaft, were sampled for chemical analysis to assess the quality of the groundwater emanating from the seven mine sources. The six free-flowing mine discharge sources were also assessed for discharge by current-meter measurements on two separate occasions. The U.S. Geological Survey assessed these seven sources to provide information to the City of Gary, West Virginia (W. Va.), and the City of Gary’s consulting engineer with groundwater-quality and flow data to allow them to assess the seven sites as potential alternate sources of water for the City of Gary to augment its existing supply.
For the six sites where discharge could be measured, discharge ranged from a minimum of 0.082 cubic feet per second (ft3/s) to a maximum of 3.685 ft3/s. Of the six sites measured, only two, Harmon Branch at Thorpe, W. Va. (USGS site 372201081303501) and the abandoned public-supply water wells near Havaco, W. Va. (USGS site 372358081344601), had discharge in excess of 1.00 ft3/s. Discharge from the abandoned public supply wells was 3.685 ft3/s on September 20, 2023, and 2.888 ft3/s on October 16, 2023, and discharge from Harmon Branch at Thorpe, W. Va., was 1.049 ft3/s on September 22, 2023, and 1.038 ft3/s on October 17, 2023. Discharge in the abandoned underground mine air shaft (USGS site 372224081340901) could not be assessed, but the air shaft drains an abandoned mine that likely contains water stored in approximately 1.7 square miles (mi2) of abandoned underground coal mines in the Pocahontas No. 3 coal seam, and possibly an additional 0.9 mi2 of leakage from the overlying Pocahontas No. 4 coal seam. Discharge for the six sites measured for the study was measured during a period between September 20 and October 18, 2023, and corresponded to the 12th to the 15th percentile of flow-duration statistics for the Tug Fork downstream of Elkhorn Creek at Welch, W. Va. streamgage (USGS site 03212750).
Water-quality data for the seven sites sampled overall were acceptable with respect to drinking water standards. Of the 203 constituents analyzed, only a few failed to meet applicable U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) drinking water standards. Iron exceeded the 300 micrograms per liter (μg/L) secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) at only 1 of the 7 sites (14.3 percent) sampled. Iron concentrations ranged from a minimum of less than (<) 5.00 μg/L to a maximum of 724 μg/L with a median concentration of 7.62 μg/L. Manganese exceeded the 50.0 μg/L SMCL at 2 of the 7 sites (28.6 percent) sampled. Manganese concentrations ranged from a minimum of 1.93 μg/L to a maximum of 271 μg/L with a median concentration of 4.03 μg/L. No sites sampled exceeded the arsenic maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 μg/L. Arsenic concentrations ranged from a minimum of <0.100 μg/L to a maximum of 2.35 μg/L with a median arsenic concentration of 0.200 μg/L. None of the seven sites sampled for selenium for this study exceeded the EPA MCL of 50.0 μg/L. Selenium concentrations ranged from a minimum of <0.050 μg/L to a maximum of 5.26 μg/L with a median concentration of 3.21 μg/L.
All seven sites were sampled for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), but most had concentrations below the detection limit. Of the 10 PCB compounds analyzed for the seven sites sampled, none contained detectable concentrations of PCBs or Aroclor compounds. Of the 44 SVOCs analyzed at each of the seven sites sampled, only 1 SVOC, acenaphthene, was detected, at a concentration of 0.02 μg/L. Of the 96 VOCs analyzed, from each of the seven sites sampled, only two were found at detectable concentrations. Trichloromethane was detected only at 1 of the 7 (14.3 percent) sites sampled at a concentration of 0.027 μg/L, and benzene was detected at the same site and 3 additional sites (4 of the 7 sites or 57.1 percent of the sites sampled) at concentrations of 0.028, 0.029, 0.021, and 0.035 μg/L, but none exceeded the EPA MCL for benzene of 5.00 μg/L.
Total coliform bacteria are ubiquitous in the environment, and their presence only suggests the potential for contamination by near-surface processes. Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria are derived from either human or animal fecal material and can be an indicator of potential contamination by pathogenic bacteria or viruses. Total coliform bacteria were detected at all 7 sites sampled at concentrations ranging from 17.5 to greater than (>) 2,420 most probable number per 100 mL (MPN/100 mL) of sample, with a median total coliform concentration of 1,553 MPN/100 mL. Escherichia coli bacteria were detected at 4 of the 7 sites sampled at concentrations ranging from <1 to 11.9 MPN/100 mL, with a median E. coli concentration of 5.1 MPN/100 mL.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251037","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the City of Gary, West Virginia","usgsCitation":"Kozar, M.D., and Austin, S.H., 2025, Reconnaissance of potential alternate water supply sources for the City of Gary, West Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1037, 27 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251037.","productDescription":"Report: viii, 27 p.; Appendix","numberOfPages":"27","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-176784","costCenters":[{"id":37280,"text":"Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center ","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":496467,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1037/ofr20251037.pdf","text":"Report","size":"5.71 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1037 PDF"},{"id":496466,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1037/coverthb.jpg"},{"id":497789,"rank":7,"type":{"id":36,"text":"NGMDB Index Page"},"url":"https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_118952.htm"},{"id":496471,"rank":6,"type":{"id":3,"text":"Appendix"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1037/ofr20251037_app2.csv","text":"Appendix 2","size":"222 KB","linkFileType":{"id":7,"text":"csv"},"linkHelpText":"- Water-Quality Data Collected During the Study"},{"id":496470,"rank":5,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1037/ofr20251037.XML","linkFileType":{"id":8,"text":"xml"},"description":"OFR 2025-1037 XML"},{"id":496469,"rank":4,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1037/images/"},{"id":496468,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251037/full","text":"Report","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1037 HTML"}],"country":"United States","state":"West Virginia","city":"Gary","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -81.616667,\n 37.433333\n ],\n [\n -81.616667,\n 37.25\n ],\n [\n -81.45,\n 37.25\n ],\n [\n -81.45,\n 37.433333\n ],\n [\n -81.616667,\n 37.433333\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"Director, Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
1730 East Parham Road
Richmond, Virginia 23228
This report provides an overview of the U.S. Geological Survey National Map Corps —Federal Emergency Management Agency and Oak Ridge National Laboratory pilot project in St. James Parish, Louisiana, that began in February 2024 and ended at the end of March 2024. The project used the power of The National Map Corps’ volunteer community to improve building classifications in the original Federal Emergency Management Agency’s U.S.A. Structures dataset. The report highlights the project’s completion and details the work and results achieved through a collaborative effort to enhance geospatial data quality and utility.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251052","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency","programNote":"National Geospatial Program","usgsCitation":"Dimascio, T., Matthews, G.D., and Korris, E.M., 2025, The National Map Corps—Federal Emergency Management Agency and Oak Ridge National Laboratory pilot project report: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1052, 11 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251052.","productDescription":"vi, 11 p.","onlineOnly":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-179574","costCenters":[{"id":5047,"text":"NGTOC Denver","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":496083,"rank":5,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251052/full","text":"Report","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1052"},{"id":496000,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1052/ofr20251052.xml"},{"id":495999,"rank":3,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1052/images"},{"id":495984,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1052/ofr20251052.pdf","text":"Report","size":"12.7 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1052"},{"id":495983,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1052/coverthb.jpg"}],"contact":"Director, National Geospatial Technical Operations Center
U.S. Geological Survey
Box 25046, Mail Stop 510
Denver, Colorado 80225-0046
The Upper Mississippi River Restoration (UMRR) program, a broad partnership of State and Federal agencies administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, integrates ecosystem monitoring, research, and modeling to rehabilitate habitat and evaluate ecosystem trends over time in the Upper Mississippi River System. Hydrologic data are integral to the UMRR program because they are used in scientific research, decision-making, and restoration project planning. However, a lack of quantitative hydrologic data representing potential future conditions limits the ability to complete informative research on how future conditions may affect river ecology, achieve management goals, and design restoration projects for 50-year horizons.
The U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers led a series of workshops with UMRR partners to (1) prioritize needs for understanding future hydrology, (2) discuss appropriate datasets that could address these needs, and (3) develop a plan for acquiring and distributing a hydrologic dataset of potential future conditions. Agency priorities for understanding future hydrology were broad, spanning ecologic, geomorphic, resource management, and engineering disciplines, and were identified for a range of spatial (project site, navigation pool, reach, system) and temporal (daily, seasonal, annual) scales. The LOcalized Constructed Analogs-Variable Infiltration Capacity-mizuRoute hydrologic data products were identified as a potential source of off-the-shelf data to meet UMRR priority needs but warranted a robust quantitative evaluation. The final meeting in the series scoped a proposal to evaluate the LOcalized Constructed Analogs-Variable Infiltration Capacity-mizuRoute hydrologic data products for use in UMRR applications, including contingencies if the data were determined to be unreliable.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251050","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers","usgsCitation":"Van Appledorn, M., and Sawyer, L., 2025, Upper Mississippi River Restoration future hydrology meeting series: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1050, 93 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251050.","productDescription":"vii, 93 p.","numberOfPages":"106","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"N","ipdsId":"IP-144284","costCenters":[{"id":606,"text":"Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":495840,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1050/coverthb.jpg"},{"id":495844,"rank":5,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251050/full"},{"id":495843,"rank":4,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1050/images/"},{"id":495842,"rank":3,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1050/ofr20251050.XML"},{"id":495841,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1050/ofr20251050.pdf","text":"Report","size":"4.3 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1050"}],"country":"United States","state":"Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin","otherGeospatial":"Upper Mississippi River system","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -89.2103238355043,\n 37.043422473537504\n ],\n [\n -87.69596012242188,\n 41.69069025518516\n ],\n [\n -89.11501122546446,\n 44.87351523241463\n ],\n [\n -89.14678376857329,\n 46.12049934311611\n ],\n [\n -92.37672035941334,\n 46.134727618766064\n ],\n [\n -94.31468231391703,\n 47.910742701911886\n ],\n [\n -96.86686171848238,\n 47.08812323847167\n ],\n [\n -94.08172387608387,\n 40.82297944373079\n ],\n [\n -89.40096330837447,\n 37.051916822243555\n ],\n [\n -89.2103238355043,\n 37.043422473537504\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"Director, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center
U.S. Geological Survey
2630 Fanta Reed Road
La Crosse, Wisconsin 54603
A series of workshops was held so participants from several agencies could work together to prioritize needs for understanding future hydrologic scenarios, discuss appropriate datasets that could address these needs, and develop a plan for acquiring and distributing a hydrologic dataset representing potential future conditions. Agency priorities for understanding future hydrology spanned ecologic, geomorphic, resource management, and engineering disciplines and were identified for a range of spatial (project site, navigation pool, reach, system) and temporal (daily, seasonal, annual) scales. Participants described desired characteristics of a hydrologic dataset of potential future conditions that could meet agency priority needs and developed a workflow to evaluate a readily available data product.
","publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationStatus":"PW","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Van Appledorn, Molly 0000-0002-8029-0014","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8029-0014","contributorId":205785,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Van Appledorn","given":"Molly","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":606,"text":"Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":949216,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Sawyer, Lucie","contributorId":345904,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Sawyer","given":"Lucie","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":590,"text":"U.S. Army Corps of Engineers","active":false,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":949217,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2}]}} ,{"id":70271481,"text":"ofr20251045 - 2025 - Three-dimensional seismic velocity model for the Cascadia Subduction Zone with shallow soils and topography, version 1.7","interactions":[{"subject":{"id":70194208,"text":"ofr20171152 - 2017 - P- and S-wave velocity models incorporating the Cascadia subduction zone for 3D earthquake ground motion simulations, Version 1.6—Update for Open-File Report 2007–1348","indexId":"ofr20171152","publicationYear":"2017","noYear":false,"title":"P- and S-wave velocity models incorporating the Cascadia subduction zone for 3D earthquake ground motion simulations, Version 1.6—Update for Open-File Report 2007–1348"},"predicate":"SUPERSEDED_BY","object":{"id":70271481,"text":"ofr20251045 - 2025 - Three-dimensional seismic velocity model for the Cascadia Subduction Zone with shallow soils and topography, version 1.7","indexId":"ofr20251045","publicationYear":"2025","noYear":false,"title":"Three-dimensional seismic velocity model for the Cascadia Subduction Zone with shallow soils and topography, version 1.7"},"id":1}],"lastModifiedDate":"2026-02-03T15:28:23.518326","indexId":"ofr20251045","displayToPublicDate":"2025-09-19T09:48:59","publicationYear":"2025","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2025-1045","displayTitle":"Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Model for the Cascadia Subduction Zone with Shallow Soils and Topography, Version 1.7","title":"Three-dimensional seismic velocity model for the Cascadia Subduction Zone with shallow soils and topography, version 1.7","docAbstract":"The U.S. Geological Survey’s seismic velocity model for the Cascadia Subduction Zone provides P- and S-wave velocity (VP and VS, respectively) information from 40.2° to 50.0° N. latitude and −129.0° to −121.0° W. longitude, and is used to support a variety of research topics, including three-dimensional (3D) earthquake simulations and seismic hazard assessment in the Pacific Northwest. This report describes an update to the previous version (v) 1.6 of the 3D seismic velocity model for the Cascadia Subduction Zone. This new model (herein referred to as v1.7) contains more detailed near-surface structure for improved earthquake ground motion modeling. Updated features include the addition of a new shallow soil velocity model in the top few hundred meters and the option of adding user-specified topography. Although v1.6 of the Cascadia seismic velocity model has a minimum VS of 600 meters per second (m/s), the new model (v1.7) has a minimum VS of approximately 40 m/s. Overall, this update will allow for more accurate ground motion estimates from 3D simulations of scenario earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone region.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251045","usgsCitation":"Wirth, E.A., Grant, A.R., Stone, I.P., Stephenson, W.J., and Frankel, A.D., 2025, Three-dimensional seismic velocity model for the Cascadia Subduction Zone with shallow soils and topography, version 1.7: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1045, 18 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251045.","productDescription":"Report: vi, 18 p.; Data Release","numberOfPages":"18","onlineOnly":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-161899","costCenters":[{"id":237,"text":"Earthquake Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":495639,"rank":6,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P14HJ3IC","text":"USGS data release","description":"Wirth, E.A., Grant, A.R., Stone, I.P., Stephenson, W.J., and Frankel, A.D., 2025, Data for A 3-D Seismic Velocity Model for Cascadia with Shallow Soils & Topography, Version 1.7: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P14HJ3IC","linkHelpText":"Data for A 3-D Seismic Velocity Model for Cascadia with Shallow Soils & Topography, Version 1.7"},{"id":495638,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1045/images"},{"id":495637,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1045/ofr20251045.XML","description":"OFR 2025-1045 XML"},{"id":495636,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251045/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1045 HTML"},{"id":495635,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1045/ofr20251045.pdf","text":"Report","size":"4.4 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1045 PDF"},{"id":495634,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1045/coverthb.jpg"}],"country":"Canada, United States","state":"British Columbia, California, Oregon, Washington","otherGeospatial":"Cascadia Subduction Zone","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -121,\n 50\n ],\n [\n -129,\n 50\n ],\n [\n -129,\n 40.2\n ],\n [\n -121,\n 40.2\n ],\n [\n -121,\n 50\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"Earthquake Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
350 N. Akron Rd.
Moffett Field, CA 94035
The U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Calibration and Validation (Cal/Val) Center of Excellence (ECCOE) focuses on improving the accuracy, precision, calibration, and product quality of remote-sensing data, leveraging years of multiscale optical system geometric and radiometric calibration and characterization experience. The ECCOE Landsat Cal/Val Team continually monitors the geometric and radiometric performance of active Landsat missions and makes calibration adjustments, as needed, to maintain data quality at the highest level.
This report provides observed geometric and radiometric analysis results for Landsats 8 and 9 for quarter 1 (January–March) of 2025. All data used to compile the Cal/Val analysis results presented in this report are freely available from the U.S. Geological Survey EarthExplorer website: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251048","usgsCitation":"Haque, M.O., Hasan, M.N., Shrestha, A., Rengarajan, R., Lubke, M., Steinwand, D., Bresnahan, P., Shaw, J.L., Ruslander, K., Micijevic, E., Choate, M.J., Anderson, C., Clauson, J., Thome, K., Kaita, E., Angal, A., Levy, R., Miller, J., Ding, L., and Teixeira Pinto, C., 2025, ECCOE Landsat quarterly calibration and validation report—Quarter 1, 2025 (ver. 1.1, June 2026): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1048, 56 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251048.","productDescription":"Report: viii, 56 p.; Dataset","numberOfPages":"68","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-178690","costCenters":[{"id":222,"text":"Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":505289,"rank":7,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1048/ofr20251048.pdf","text":"Report","size":"6.19 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1048"},{"id":505288,"rank":6,"type":{"id":25,"text":"Version History"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1048/versionHist.txt","linkFileType":{"id":2,"text":"txt"}},{"id":505286,"rank":5,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251048/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1048 HTML"},{"id":495088,"rank":4,"type":{"id":28,"text":"Dataset"},"url":"https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/","text":"USGS database","linkHelpText":"- EarthExplorer"},{"id":495084,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1048/coverthb2.jpg"},{"id":495086,"rank":2,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1048/ofr20251048.XML"},{"id":495087,"rank":3,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1048/images/"}],"edition":"Version 1.0: September 2025; Version 1.1: June 2026","contact":"Director, Earth Resources Observation and Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
47914 252nd Street
Sioux Falls, SD 57198
The U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Calibration and Validation Center of Excellence Team assesses and calibrates Landsat remote-sensing data to ensure high-quality data products are publicly available. These data products are used to make informed decisions about natural resources and the environment. This report is part of a series of quarterly reports intended to provide updated observed geometric and radiometric analysis results for Landsats 8 and 9.
","publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationStatus":"PW","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Haque, Md Obaidul 0000-0002-0914-1446","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-1446","contributorId":290335,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Haque","given":"Md Obaidul","affiliations":[{"id":54490,"text":"KBR, Inc., under contract to USGS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947607,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Hasan, Nahid 0000-0002-0463-601X","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0463-601X","contributorId":292342,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Hasan","given":"Nahid","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":40546,"text":"KBR, Contractor to the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947608,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Shrestha, Ashish 0000-0002-9407-5462","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9407-5462","contributorId":298063,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Shrestha","given":"Ashish","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":40546,"text":"KBR, Contractor to the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947609,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"Rengarajan, Rajagopalan 0000-0003-1860-7110","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1860-7110","contributorId":242014,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Rengarajan","given":"Rajagopalan","affiliations":[{"id":48475,"text":"KBR, Contractor to USGS EROS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947610,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Lubke, Mark 0000-0002-7257-2337","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-2337","contributorId":261911,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Lubke","given":"Mark","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":53079,"text":"KBR, contractor to U.S. Geological Survey","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947611,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5},{"text":"Steinwand, Daniel 0009-0008-6588-9775","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6588-9775","contributorId":357557,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Steinwand","given":"Daniel","affiliations":[{"id":54490,"text":"KBR, Inc., under contract to USGS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947612,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":6},{"text":"Bresnahan, Paul 0000-0002-3491-0956","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3491-0956","contributorId":306120,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Bresnahan","given":"Paul","affiliations":[{"id":27608,"text":"Contractor to the USGS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947613,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":7},{"text":"Shaw, Jerad L. 0000-0002-8319-2778","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-2778","contributorId":270396,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Shaw","given":"Jerad L.","affiliations":[{"id":40546,"text":"KBR, Contractor to the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947614,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":8},{"text":"Ruslander, Kathryn 0000-0003-3036-1731","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3036-1731","contributorId":330181,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Ruslander","given":"Kathryn","affiliations":[{"id":54490,"text":"KBR, Inc., under contract to USGS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947615,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":9},{"text":"Micijevic, Esad 0000-0002-3828-9239 emicijevic@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3828-9239","contributorId":3075,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Micijevic","given":"Esad","email":"emicijevic@usgs.gov","affiliations":[{"id":223,"text":"Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center (Geography)","active":false,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":947616,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":10},{"text":"Choate, Michael J. 0000-0002-8101-4994","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8101-4994","contributorId":268248,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Choate","given":"Michael J.","affiliations":[{"id":222,"text":"Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":947617,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":11},{"text":"Anderson, Cody 0000-0001-5612-1889 chanderson@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5612-1889","contributorId":195521,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Anderson","given":"Cody","email":"chanderson@usgs.gov","affiliations":[{"id":222,"text":"Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":947618,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":12},{"text":"Clauson, Jeff 0000-0003-3406-4988 jclauson@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3406-4988","contributorId":5230,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Clauson","given":"Jeff","email":"jclauson@usgs.gov","affiliations":[{"id":54490,"text":"KBR, Inc., under contract to USGS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":true,"id":947619,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":13},{"text":"Thome, Kurt","contributorId":140792,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Thome","given":"Kurt","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":7049,"text":"NASA Goddard Space Flight Center","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947620,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":14},{"text":"Kaita, Ed","contributorId":251782,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Kaita","given":"Ed","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":50397,"text":"SSAI","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947621,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":15},{"text":"Angal, Amit","contributorId":360771,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Angal","given":"Amit","affiliations":[{"id":78842,"text":"SSAI, under contract to NASA","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947622,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":16},{"text":"Levy, Raviv","contributorId":131008,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Levy","given":"Raviv","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":7209,"text":"SSAI / NASA / GSFC","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947623,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":17},{"text":"Miller, Jeff","contributorId":204570,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Miller","given":"Jeff","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":36245,"text":"NPS","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947624,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":18},{"text":"Ding, Leibo","contributorId":330182,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Ding","given":"Leibo","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":78842,"text":"SSAI, under contract to NASA","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947625,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":19},{"text":"Teixeira Pinto, Cibele","contributorId":357558,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Teixeira Pinto","given":"Cibele","affiliations":[{"id":78842,"text":"SSAI, under contract to NASA","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":947626,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":20}]}} ,{"id":70270830,"text":"ofr20251043 - 2025 - A crosswalk of the 2015 World Terrestrial Ecosystems to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Global Ecosystem Typology Framework","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2026-02-03T15:15:11.657303","indexId":"ofr20251043","displayToPublicDate":"2025-08-26T14:15:00","publicationYear":"2025","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2025-1043","displayTitle":"A Crosswalk of the 2015 World Terrestrial Ecosystems to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Global Ecosystem Typology Framework","title":"A crosswalk of the 2015 World Terrestrial Ecosystems to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Global Ecosystem Typology Framework","docAbstract":"To support ecosystem mapping and accounting applications, we aligned the 2015 U.S. Geological Survey/Esri/The Nature Conservancy-World Terrestrial Ecosystems (WTEs) with the International Union for Conservation of Nature Global Ecosystem Typology (GET) framework. This process, known as “crosswalking,” enabled the development of a global map of GET level 3 Ecosystem Functional Groups (EFGs) at a 250-meter spatial resolution. Crosswalking involved manually assigning 1,781 biogeographically stratified WTEs to their most probable EFG based on similarities in climate, terrain, vegetation, and geographic distribution. We compared attributes of the WTE dataset with summary characteristics of the EFGs. The resulting crosswalked global map of International Union for Conservation of Nature GET ecosystems is intended to be useful for standardizing ecosystem classification and reporting under frameworks such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and the United Nations System of Environmental-Economic Accounting. We discuss key challenges in reconciling non-identical classifications, such as many-to-one relationships and variation in data quality.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251043","programNote":"National Land Imaging Program","usgsCitation":"Sides, K.B., Naji, N., Kremer, A., Burton, D., and Sayre, R., 2025, A crosswalk of the 2015 World Terrestrial Ecosystems to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Global Ecosystem Typology Framework: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1043, 10 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251043.","productDescription":"Report: iv, 10 p.; 2 Appendixes","numberOfPages":"10","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-174837","costCenters":[{"id":86069,"text":"National Land Imaging","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":494756,"rank":7,"type":{"id":3,"text":"Appendix"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1043/ofr20251043_appendix.csv","text":"Appendix","size":"215 KB","linkFileType":{"id":7,"text":"csv"},"description":"OFR 2025-1043 Appendix CSV","linkHelpText":"- A Crosswalk of the U.S. Geological Survey/Esri/The Nature Conservancy World Terrestrial Ecosystems to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Global Ecosystem Typology (GET) Ecosystem Functional Groups in a CSV file"},{"id":494750,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1043/coverthb.jpg"},{"id":494755,"rank":6,"type":{"id":3,"text":"Appendix"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1043/ofr20251043_appendix.xlsx","text":"Appendix","size":"70.4 KB","linkFileType":{"id":3,"text":"xlsx"},"description":"OFR 2025-1043 Appendix XLSX","linkHelpText":"- A Crosswalk of the U.S. Geological Survey/Esri/The Nature Conservancy World Terrestrial Ecosystems to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Global Ecosystem Typology (GET) Ecosystem Functional Groups"},{"id":494754,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1043/images/"},{"id":494753,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1043/ofr20251043.XML","linkFileType":{"id":8,"text":"xml"},"description":"OFR 2025-1043 XML"},{"id":494752,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251043/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1043 HTML"},{"id":494751,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1043/ofr20251043.pdf","text":"Report","size":"12.6 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1043 PDF"}],"contact":"Director, National Land Imaging Program
U.S. Geological Survey
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive
Reston, VA 20192
The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey, is tasked by section 7002 (“Mineral Security”) of title VII (“Critical Minerals”) of the Energy Act of 2020 (Public Law 116–260, December 27, 2020, 116th Congress) with reviewing and revising the methodology used to evaluate mineral commodity supply risk and the U.S. List of Critical Minerals (LCM) no less than every 3 years. Following two previous LCM assessments, this analysis represents the latest technical input for evaluating each mineral commodity’s supply risk and determining their recommended status on the LCM. We evaluated mineral commodity supply risk using two criteria: (1) an economic effects assessment that quantified the potential effects of various trade disruption scenarios on the U.S. economy, and (2) an examination of whether the mineral commodity’s U.S. supply chain relied on a sole domestic producer that represented a single point of failure. For the first criterion, postdisruption equilibrium quantities and prices for each mineral commodity were calculated based on their price elasticities of supply and demand and the availability of excess production capacity for each yearlong foreign trade disruption scenario. Subsequently, a nonlinear optimization routine was used with detailed economic input-output tables to estimate the potential economic effects on the U.S. economy of over 1,200 scenarios for 84 mineral commodities. After accounting for the probability of each scenario’s occurrence, the overall results are presented in terms of changes in U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) by individual industry and the economy overall. The results, which ranged from a net decrease in U.S. GDP of nearly $4.5 billion to a net increase of $33 million, largely reflect U.S. import dependency and world production concentration. Using the Jenks natural breaks optimization method, a statistical classification technique, we categorized the mineral commodities into several classes based on this overall risk quantification. Mineral commodities with annualized probability-weighted net decreases in U.S. GDP greater than $2 million were recommended for inclusion on the LCM. If a mineral commodity did not meet the threshold for inclusion on the LCM under the first criterion, its domestic supply chain was examined under the second criterion, which recommended a mineral commodity for inclusion on the LCM if there was only a single domestic producer. Ultimately, the two criteria resulted in the recommendation of the addition of six mineral commodities (in descending risk order, potash, silicon, copper, silver, rhenium, and lead) to and the removal of two mineral commodities (arsenic and tellurium) from the LCM. By using an economic effects assessment, the results of this analysis provide a prioritization that can also be compared directly against other risk analyses and the cost of various risk mitigation strategies.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251047","usgsCitation":"Nassar, N.T., Pineault, D., Allen, S.M., McCaffrey, D.M., Padilla, A.J., Brainard, J.L., Bayani, M., Shojaeddini, E., Ryter, J.W., Lincoln, S., and Alonso, E., 2025, Methodology and technical input for the 2025 U.S. List of Critical Minerals— Assessing the potential effects of mineral commodity supply chain disruptions on the U.S. economy (ver. 2.0, 2026): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1047, 215 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251047.","productDescription":"Report: vi, 215 p.; Data Release","numberOfPages":"215","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"N","ipdsId":"IP-180772","costCenters":[{"id":432,"text":"National Minerals Information Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":494012,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1047/ofr20251047.pdf","text":"Report","size":"3.17 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1047 PDF"},{"id":494011,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1047/coverthb3.jpg"},{"id":494013,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251047/full","text":"Report","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1047 HTML"},{"id":494014,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1047/ofr20251047.XML","linkFileType":{"id":8,"text":"xml"},"description":"OFR 2025-1047 XML"},{"id":494015,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1047/images/"},{"id":499034,"rank":7,"type":{"id":36,"text":"NGMDB Index Page"},"url":"https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_118752.htm","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":502425,"rank":8,"type":{"id":25,"text":"Version History"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1047/versionHist.txt","size":"3.01 KB","linkFileType":{"id":2,"text":"txt"}},{"id":494403,"rank":6,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P14BRF29","text":"USGS data release","linkHelpText":"U.S. Geological Survey Minerals Yearbook data for select mineral commodities referenced in “U.S. Geological Survey Methodology and Technical Input for the 2025 U.S. List of Critical Minerals—Assessing the Potential Effects of Mineral Commodity Supply Chain Disruptions on the U.S. Economy”"}],"edition":"Version 1.0: August 2025; Version 2.0: April 2026","contact":"Director, National Minerals Information Center
U.S. Geological Survey
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive
988 National Center
Reston, VA 20192
Email: nmicrecordsmgt@usgs.gov
","tableOfContents":"To quantify the risks associated with potential disruptions and to recommend mineral commodities for inclusion on the updated U.S. List of Critical Minerals, as required by the Energy Act of 2020, the U.S. Geological Survey developed an economic model to estimate the potential effects of foreign trade disruptions of mineral commodities on the U.S. economy. The results of the study recommend the addition of six mineral commodities (in descending risk order, potash, silicon, copper, silver, rhenium, and lead) to and the removal of two mineral commodities (arsenic and tellurium) from the List of Critical Minerals. The analysis also provides a prioritization based on the results. The economic model has several advantages over previous assessments including the ability to directly compare the results against other economic risks and the costs of initiatives aimed at reducing the risks.
","publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationStatus":"PW","contributors":{"authors":[{"text":"Nassar, Nedal T. 0000-0001-8758-9732 nnassar@usgs.gov","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8758-9732","contributorId":197864,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Nassar","given":"Nedal","email":"nnassar@usgs.gov","middleInitial":"T.","affiliations":[{"id":432,"text":"National Minerals Information Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":945905,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":1},{"text":"Pineault, David 0009-0001-6801-4711","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6801-4711","contributorId":352217,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Pineault","given":"David","affiliations":[{"id":432,"text":"National Minerals Information Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":945906,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":2},{"text":"Allen, Sydney M. 0000-0001-6560-3548","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6560-3548","contributorId":359608,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Allen","given":"Sydney","middleInitial":"M.","affiliations":[{"id":432,"text":"National Minerals Information Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":945907,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":3},{"text":"McCaffrey, Dalton M. 0000-0002-2539-4865","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2539-4865","contributorId":298840,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"McCaffrey","given":"Dalton","middleInitial":"M.","affiliations":[{"id":432,"text":"National Minerals Information Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":945908,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":4},{"text":"Padilla, Abraham J. 0000-0002-8371-533X","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-533X","contributorId":290608,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Padilla","given":"Abraham","email":"","middleInitial":"J.","affiliations":[{"id":432,"text":"National Minerals Information Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":945909,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":5},{"text":"Brainard, Jamie L. 0000-0002-1712-0821","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1712-0821","contributorId":201465,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Brainard","given":"Jamie","middleInitial":"L.","affiliations":[{"id":432,"text":"National Minerals Information Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":945910,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":6},{"text":"Bayani, Mani 0000-0003-4730-3140","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4730-3140","contributorId":359609,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Bayani","given":"Mani","affiliations":[{"id":432,"text":"National Minerals Information Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":945911,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":7},{"text":"Shojaeddini, Ensieh 0000-0001-9584-6399","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9584-6399","contributorId":346849,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Shojaeddini","given":"Ensieh","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":432,"text":"National Minerals Information Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":945912,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":8},{"text":"Ryter, John W. 0000-0002-0343-7553","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0343-7553","contributorId":345416,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Ryter","given":"John","middleInitial":"W.","affiliations":[{"id":432,"text":"National Minerals Information Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":945913,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":9},{"text":"Lincoln, Sara 0000-0002-0162-3563","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0162-3563","contributorId":359610,"corporation":false,"usgs":false,"family":"Lincoln","given":"Sara","affiliations":[{"id":85881,"text":"Contractor to the U.S. Geological Survey","active":true,"usgs":false}],"preferred":false,"id":945914,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":10},{"text":"Alonso, Elisa 0000-0002-0090-8284","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0090-8284","contributorId":223015,"corporation":false,"usgs":true,"family":"Alonso","given":"Elisa","email":"","affiliations":[{"id":432,"text":"National Minerals Information Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"preferred":true,"id":945915,"contributorType":{"id":1,"text":"Authors"},"rank":11}]}} ,{"id":70270766,"text":"ofr20251038 - 2025 - Python Hyperspectral Analysis Tool (PyHAT) user guide","interactions":[],"lastModifiedDate":"2026-02-03T15:13:26.159322","indexId":"ofr20251038","displayToPublicDate":"2025-08-22T14:59:30","publicationYear":"2025","noYear":false,"publicationType":{"id":18,"text":"Report"},"publicationSubtype":{"id":5,"text":"USGS Numbered Series"},"seriesTitle":{"id":330,"text":"Open-File Report","code":"OFR","onlineIssn":"2331-1258","printIssn":"0196-1497","active":true,"publicationSubtype":{"id":5}},"seriesNumber":"2025-1038","displayTitle":"Python Hyperspectral Analysis Tool (PyHAT) User Guide","title":"Python Hyperspectral Analysis Tool (PyHAT) user guide","docAbstract":"This report is a user guide for the 0.1.2 release of the Python Hyperspectral Analysis Tool (PyHAT) and its graphical user interface (GUI). The GUI is intended to provide an intuitive front end to allow users to apply sophisticated preprocessing and analysis methods to spectroscopic data. Though the PyHAT package has been developed with a particular focus on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), the package uses a simple comma separated values (CSV)-based data format and is readily applicable in other spectroscopy applications. This guide provides background information about the package and its capabilities. It also provides practical guidance on usage and example workflows for a wide variety of datasets.","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251038","usgsCitation":"Anderson, R.B., Aneece, I.P., and Gabriel, T.S.J., 2025, Python Hyperspectral Analysis Tool (PyHAT) user guide: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1038, 59 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251038.","productDescription":"xi, 59 p.","numberOfPages":"59","onlineOnly":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-120336","costCenters":[{"id":131,"text":"Astrogeology Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":494678,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1038/images"},{"id":494677,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1038/ofr20251038.XML","description":"OFR 2025-1038 XML"},{"id":494676,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251038/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1038 HTML"},{"id":494675,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1038/ofr20251038.pdf","text":"Report","size":"12.8 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1038 PDF"},{"id":494653,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1038/coverthb.jpg"}],"contact":"Astrogeology Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
2255 N. Gemini Dr.
Flagstaff, AZ 86001
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is using collaborative, interdisciplinary planning to develop data and tools needed to optimize the management of water resources and land use by resource management agencies during an ongoing, multidecadal drought in the Colorado River Basin. The USGS Actionable and Strategic Integrated Science and Technology team works to build relationships with resource management agencies and other stakeholders who can benefit from the use of USGS data and products. In 2023, the Actionable and Strategic Integrated Science and Technology team hosted a series of collaborative workshops to bring together representatives of resource management agencies and other stakeholders (any person or entity with interests in a resource or location) with USGS program managers, scientists, and multidisciplinary subject matter experts to codevelop concepts for interdisciplinary drought science and technology projects to address pressing needs related to drought in the Colorado River Basin. Workshop participants identified current and recent scientific data that could be shared through a centralized online data portal. Workshop participants also identified drought science and technology needs and developed project concepts to address those science needs. Participants categorized project concepts based on their potential to develop short-, mid-, and long-term drought science data and tools, provide for the spatial or temporal expansion of ongoing USGS science projects, and address high-priority science needs. Participants developed nine project concepts: (1) understanding shifting ecohydrologic baselines, (2) San Juan River Basin synthesis, (3) incorporating dynamic land cover into hydrologic models, (4) aridification compared to drought, (5) surface water-groundwater interactions, (6) cascading effects of drought on dust, (7) cascading effects of drought on water availability, (8) cascading effects of drought on socioeconomic factors, and (9) the value of water in the Colorado River Basin. This report provides an overview of the 2023 Codesign Workshop Series, synthesized outcomes from workshop materials and discussions, and science project concepts that emerged from the collaborative meetings that will continue to be refined into science project proposals through codevelopment processes. This report also highlights lessons learned and next steps needed to receive feedback and testing of the USGS Science Collaboration Portal, continue collaboration to develop detailed specifics and steps for short-term wins, develop interdisciplinary project proposals, and implement science planning and studies.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251041","usgsCitation":"Anderson, P.J., Godaire, J.E., Jones, D.K., Andrews, W.J., Torregrosa, A.A., Bell, M.T., Holloway, J.M., Blakowski, M.A., Hevesi, J.A., and Qi, S.L., 2025, Collaborative drought science planning in the Colorado River Basin: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1041, 32 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251041.","productDescription":"vi, 32 p.","onlineOnly":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-165607","costCenters":[{"id":291,"text":"Fort Collins Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":494357,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1041/ofr20251041.xml"},{"id":494378,"rank":5,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251041/full","text":"Report","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1041"},{"id":494325,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1041/ofr20251041.pdf","text":"Report","size":"9.41 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1041"},{"id":494356,"rank":3,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1041/images"},{"id":494324,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1041/coverthb.jpg"}],"country":"Mexico, United States","state":"Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming","otherGeospatial":"Colorado River basin","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -106.23441985470737,\n 42.42360949558767\n ],\n [\n -110.0074572875208,\n 42.9273485741041\n ],\n [\n -110.88201818257588,\n 40.83215412591818\n ],\n [\n -112.09041488325958,\n 37.81270064609009\n ],\n [\n -113.86864235906498,\n 37.77076755792572\n ],\n [\n -113.94586057217214,\n 38.21912009189296\n ],\n [\n -115.10119317735365,\n 39.08121928179544\n ],\n [\n -115.47544949784407,\n 35.429353160164375\n ],\n [\n -115.29249888241867,\n 31.986896837542588\n ],\n [\n -110.42076682180414,\n 30.172954165166573\n ],\n [\n -108.95437388160886,\n 30.991312421045535\n ],\n [\n -108.56364522256465,\n 31.857948821439074\n ],\n [\n -107.84802514114666,\n 32.26017852956302\n ],\n [\n -107.22575341999277,\n 34.155285973008596\n ],\n [\n -107.68523996280838,\n 35.482296714195456\n ],\n [\n -106.46728549757393,\n 37.071939542790304\n ],\n [\n -105.6885671199549,\n 39.88037502712785\n ],\n [\n -106.23441985470737,\n 42.42360949558767\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"Director, Fort Collins Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
2150 Centre Ave., Bldg. C
Fort Collins, CO 80526-8118
Aeromagnetic and gravity surveys of the Skaergaard intrusion in East Greenland were carried out in July–August 1971 as part of a grant to the University of Oregon Center for Volcanology to refine the models of crystallization and differentiation of the intrusion, specifically to test whether the intrusion is underlain by dense rocks of a reservoir 20 kilometers (km) thick (referred to as a “hidden zone”). The Skaergaard intrusion is a source of platinum group elements that are critical mineral resources for many technologies, and because no new data have been collected these legacy datasets remain a valuable asset. The total-intensity aeromagnetic survey was flown in early July 1971 with a proton precession magnetometer at a constant barometric altitude of 1.5 km (5,000 feet) with a nominal line spacing of 1 km. Two gravimeters were used to acquire 168 stations of which 86 were at known altitudes (mainly sea level) and 82 had altitudes measured by altimetry in late July–August 1971. Finally, a north-south ground vertical-intensity magnetic traverse was completed across the intrusion together with collection of oriented hand specimens. The hand specimens were measured for remnant magnetization and density, along with density measurements of more specimens collected by expedition geologists for other purposes.
The intrusion is composed of layered gabbro with extensive crystal fractionation that is dense and strongly reversely polarized. After terrain correction and standard Bouguer gravity reduction, the gravity anomaly dataset was corrected for all rock above sea level using the density measurements of the various zones of the intrusion and the topographic and geologic maps (variable density Bouguer gravity reduction).
A large regional gradient in the gravity anomaly data was removed using orthogonal polynomial fitting to the gridded data. The zonal volumes of rock below sea level were calculated from the dipping polygonal layer gravity model of the intrusion below sea level and combined with elliptic cross–section cylinders for the various zones above sea level to approximate the original zonal volumes of the intrusion. The residual gravity anomaly of 18–20 milligals (mGal) was only about half of the expected anomaly if a large hidden zone proposed from petrologic considerations were present, and both two-dimensional and three-dimensional models imply that the exposed series of intrusion zones explain the gravity anomaly by their down-dip extension below sea level together with a small hidden-zone volume. A three-dimensional model of the exposed rocks and their down-dip extension below sea level also can account for the aeromagnetic anomaly with little or no requirement for hidden-zone rock. The middle and upper zone units of the intrusion contain the most magnetite and account for most of the aeromagnetic anomaly.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251030","programNote":"Mineral Resources Program","usgsCitation":"Gettings, M.E., 2025, Gravity and magnetic surveys of the Skaergaard intrusion, East Greenland: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1030, 43 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251030.","productDescription":"Report: ix, 43 p.; Data Release","numberOfPages":"43","onlineOnly":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-126792","costCenters":[{"id":312,"text":"Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":494352,"rank":6,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P91OVG7G","text":"USGS data release","description":"Gettings, M.E., and Parks, H.L., 2025, Aeromagnetic and gravity surveys of the Skaergaard intrusion in East Greenland, 1971: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P91OVG7G.","linkHelpText":"Aeromagnetic and gravity surveys of the Skaergaard intrusion in East Greenland, 1971"},{"id":494347,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1030/coverthb.jpg"},{"id":494348,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1030/ofr20251030.pdf","text":"Report","size":"6.7 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1030 PDF"},{"id":494349,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251030/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1030 HTML"},{"id":494350,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1030/ofr20251030.XML","description":"OFR 2025-1030 XML"},{"id":494351,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1030/images"}],"country":"Greenland","otherGeospatial":"Skaergaard intrusion","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -32.1667,\n 68.3\n ],\n [\n -32.1677,\n 68\n ],\n [\n -31.1667,\n 68\n ],\n [\n -31.1667,\n 68.3\n ],\n [\n -32.1667,\n 68.3\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.
P.O. Box 158
Moffett Field, CA 94035
In 2021, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) published Circular 1490 titled, “Integrated Science for the Study of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the Environment: A Strategic Science Vision for the U.S. Geological Survey” (Tokranov and others, 2021). Circular 1490 was created to be a resource for USGS scientists prioritizing and planning research related to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and to be a guide for developing partnerships with other scientists, State and Federal agencies, and stakeholders engaged in PFAS research and management and mitigation of the environmental and human-health effects of PFAS. This USGS PFAS Strategic Science Vision document was intended to be the foundation for a “living strategic vision,” periodically providing updates on the state of USGS PFAS research, emerging PFAS data gaps and needs, and progress on interagency and stakeholder PFAS partnerships and priorities. To meet this objective, the USGS planned to host an Interagency and Stakeholder PFAS Workshop every 2–3 years.
During September 10–12, 2024, the USGS hosted the first Interagency and Stakeholder PFAS Workshop in Reston, Virginia. The Workshop brought together experts from other Federal agencies (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Food and Drug Administration, Department of Defense [Air Force, Army]), State agencies (Washington Fish and Wildlife, Virginia Department of Transportation), and academia (Harvard University, University of Maryland) to address key challenges relating to the measurement and modeling of PFAS and the implications for environmental health. Participants engaged in in-depth discussions centered around six pivotal topics related to PFAS: (1) sampling protocols, methods and interpretation; (2) environmental sources, source apportionment, and occurrence; (3) environmental fate and transport; (4) human and wildlife exposure routes and risk; (5) bioconcentration, bioaccumulation, and biomagnification; and (6) ecotoxicology and effects. Each topic had three breakout sessions.
A recurrent theme of workshop discussions was how data on a nationwide scale for PFAS occurrence in various environmental matrices, including air, water, food crops, biota, soil, and streambed sediment could help to advance scientific understanding. Participants noted significant geospatial data gaps, particularly in the midwestern and southern United States and the Pacific Northwest. PFAS data collection tends to be more robust along the eastern seaboard and in California.
Participants stressed how enhancing the integration of large and small datasets across various agencies could help to support national scale understanding of PFAS. To address these gaps, attendees suggested leveraging datasets from Federal entities like the USGS and the U.S. Department of Defense, State agencies, and municipal utility services to develop predictive contaminant detection and transport models. Improved coordination between water quality programs and USGS research could help to facilitate access to valuable data, leading to comprehensive databases that inform PFAS point (wastewater treatment plants and landfills) and nonpoint (runoff from land, atmospheric deposition, food packaging) sources, environmental transport mechanisms, environmental detection and concentrations, potential exposure routes, and health effects on different biota, including humans. A specific request was made to develop a map demarking the depth of modern (1953 or later) groundwater, which is susceptible to surface-derived anthropogenic (that is, human-made) contamination, based on tritium-age dating. Emphasis was placed on incorporation of hydrology, groundwater flow paths, groundwater–surface water interactions, and landscape factors in predictive statistical models as a step to improve contaminant source identification and tracking.
Molecular fingerprinting approaches garnered attention as techniques to link specific PFAS mixtures detected in a sample to environmental sources and levels in biota (Dávila-Santiago and others, 2022). Integrating data from abiotic (that is, water, soil, and air) and biotic (that is, living organisms) systems identified as a research opportunity. For example, understanding the composition of soils and sediments, which include a mixture of mineral, plant, and animal components, could advance understanding of exposure pathways.
The discussions highlighted opportunities to explore and understand the potential redistribution and biotic exposures of PFAS from biosolid and wastewater treatment plant effluent land application practices, in addition to atmospheric releases and discharges from landfill and wastewater treatment plants. Participants identified research gaps surrounding how these sources may contribute to contamination and may affect surrounding ecosystems, including a better definition of anthropogenic background concentrations.
Moving forward, the collection of co-occurrence data was noted as a means to improve understanding of complex mixtures and to leverage companion modeling efforts focused on areas with high and low contamination levels to identify areas of concern and unaffected resources. Participants emphasized how centralized USGS databases and the establishment of sample-metadata archives can help to ensure that samples are preserved and accessible for future research.
In conclusion, the workshop participants identified opportunities to bridge data gaps and improve measurement techniques, modeling frameworks, databases, and communication, to enhance the understanding of PFAS and their effects on environmental and human health. Upon completion of the workshop, participants indicated an interest in developing strategic data collection, modeling, and analytical approaches to address these challenges.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251044","programNote":"Environmental Health Program","usgsCitation":"Iwanowicz, D.D., Beisner, K.R., Bradley, P.M., Bright, P.R., Brown, J.B., Churchill, C.J., Gordon, S.E., Karouna, N.K., Kolpin, D.W., Lambert, R.B., Pulster, E.L., Shively, R.S., Smalling, K., Steevens, J.A., and Tokranov, A.K., 2025, Insights and strategic opportunities from the USGS 2024 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Interagency Workshop—Addendum I of Circular 1490: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1044, 10 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251044.","productDescription":"iii, 10 p.","numberOfPages":"10","onlineOnly":"Y","additionalOnlineFiles":"N","ipdsId":"IP-177608","costCenters":[{"id":506,"text":"Office of the AD Ecosystems","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":493438,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1044/coverthb.jpg"},{"id":493439,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1044/ofr20251044.pdf","text":"Report","size":"2.64 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1044 PDF"},{"id":493440,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251044/full","text":"Report","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1044 HTML"},{"id":493442,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1044/images/"},{"id":493441,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1044/ofr20251044.XML","linkFileType":{"id":8,"text":"xml"},"description":"OFR 2025-1044 XML"}],"contact":"Director, Ecosystems Mission Area
U.S. Geological Survey
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive
Reston, Virginia 20192
The Obed River is the last undammed river in Tennessee. The Obed Wild and Scenic River is managed by the National Park Service and covers a protected area of the Obed River headwaters (including four contributing tributaries). The Obed Wild and Scenic River supports a unique ecosystem with eight federally listed species. The National Park Service is responsible for preserving the baseline free-flowing condition of the river and associated outstandingly remarkable values (ORVs). Previous studies have been mostly project-based with differing methods, thus complicating efforts to quantify long-term changes in environmental conditions. This report presents a science plan summarizing (1) ORV conditions, (2) recent results of a decision-support hydrologic model for OBRI, and (3) possible future research priorities. The decision-support model was created to model streamflow conditions and changes in the ORVs since park establishment in 1976 and during three additional time periods. Established baseline conditions could help with management of ORVs not dependent on streamflow.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251035","issn":"2331-1258","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service","programNote":"Water Availability and Use Science Program","usgsCitation":"Crowley-Ornelas, E.R., Schapansky, R., Blount, T., and Nicholas, N.S., 2025, Decision-support modeling and research priorities for establishing baseline conditions for outstandingly remarkable values, Obed Wild and Scenic River, Tennessee: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1035, 18 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251035.","productDescription":"viii, 18 p.","numberOfPages":"30","onlineOnly":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-160489","costCenters":[{"id":24708,"text":"Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":493199,"rank":5,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251035/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1035 HTML"},{"id":493198,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1035/ofr20251035.XML","linkFileType":{"id":8,"text":"xml"},"description":"OFR 2025-1035 XML"},{"id":493197,"rank":3,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1035/ofr20251035.pdf","size":"1.35 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1035"},{"id":493200,"rank":2,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1035/images"},{"id":493196,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1035/coverthb.jpg"}],"country":"United States","state":"Tennessee","otherGeospatial":"Obed Wild and Scenic River","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -84.95125744767695,\n 36.150994941624745\n ],\n [\n -84.95125744767695,\n 36.049079144332424\n ],\n [\n -84.64800767968804,\n 36.049079144332424\n ],\n [\n -84.64800767968804,\n 36.150994941624745\n ],\n [\n -84.95125744767695,\n 36.150994941624745\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"Director, Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
640 Grassmere Park, Suite 100
Nashville, TN 37211
Contact Us- USGS Publications Warehouse
","tableOfContents":"This study by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) provides estimates of the change in sand storage in bed sediments from the 1980s to 2010s in the San Francisco Bay area, California. The study is part of a larger project called “Research to Understand Impacts of Bay Sand Mining on Sand Transport in San Francisco Bay and the Outer Coast” that has the goal of providing information for the California Coastal Conservancy to inform decision making regarding sand mining activities. Information from this study will contribute to the sand budget for the San Francisco Bay system by accounting for sand made available by erosion of bay sediment and sequestered by deposition in the bay.
Sediment budgets for estuaries typically account for change in sediment storage in the bed without discriminating for sediment size. However, the physics of mud and sand erosion, deposition, and transport differ. Sediment budgets that treat mud and sand separately give a more complete understanding of the system, including how human activities related to sediment size, such as sand mining, affect the system. We used bathymetric change analysis in combination with a three-dimensional model to generate estimates of net change in sand storage within the San Francisco Bay floor. We document sediment volume change from a 1980s bathymetric surface to a 2010s bathymetric surface, in combination with information on the sand content of the bed sediment derived from sediment cores and surface samples from six different sediment studies, to estimate the net change in sand volume in the bed of San Francisco Bay. This analysis includes areas heavily affected by human activities (such as sand mining, dredging, and sediment disposal) as well as regions more representative of natural transport processes.
Overall, the sediment bed of San Francisco Bay is losing sand. Across the total area surveyed in San Francisco Bay, including areas affected by natural processes, oyster shell beds, and human activities, a net loss of about 17 million cubic meters (Mm3) of sand from the sediment bed occurred from the 1980s to 2010s, at a rate of about 0.8 Mm3 per year. For the period of this study, sand loss from bed level changes in permitted sand-lease mining areas (about 11 Mm3) accounts for about two-thirds of the total sand loss throughout the study area. It is important to consider potential uncertainty bounds when interpreting these findings. A key part of the report is an assessment of the uncertainties in our estimates of sand volumes. We estimate that variability in modeled sand content values of Bay floor sediments could result in an uncertainty of approximately 25 percent of the net sand volume change. Even larger uncertainty amounts may be associated with uncertainty in the systematic errors in the bathymetric surveys. Further refining estimates of uncertainty in bathymetric change is important in guiding the use of this study. The results presented here can fill a critical gap that may enable the creation of the first comprehensive sand budget of San Francisco Bay.
","language":"English","publisher":"U.S. Geological Survey","publisherLocation":"Reston, VA","doi":"10.3133/ofr20251022","collaboration":"Prepared in cooperation with the San Francisco Estuary Institute","usgsCitation":"Fregoso, T.A., Jaffe, B.E., Foxgrover, A.C., Woodrow, D.L., Kharrazi, B., and Orzech, K., 2025, Contributions of erosion, deposition, and human activities to a change in sand storage in the bed of San Francisco Bay, California, 1980s to 2010s: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1022, 30 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251022.","productDescription":"Report: vii, 30 p.; 4 Data Releases","numberOfPages":"30","onlineOnly":"Y","ipdsId":"IP-154253","costCenters":[{"id":520,"text":"Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center","active":true,"usgs":true}],"links":[{"id":492954,"rank":9,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/F7XG9PB0","text":"USGS data release","description":"Woodrow, D.L., Chin, J.L., Wong, F.L., Fregoso, T.A., Jaffe, B.E., 2017, Gravity cores from San Pablo Bay and Carquinez Strait, San Francisco Bay, California: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7XG9PB0.","linkHelpText":"Gravity cores from San Pablo Bay and Carquinez Strait, San Francisco Bay, California"},{"id":492953,"rank":8,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P9BDEB3K","text":"USGS data release","description":"Takesue, R.K., McGann, M.L., Lorenson, T.D., and Watt, J.T., 2021, Geophysical properties, geochronologic, and geochemical data of sediment cores collected from San Pablo Bay, California, October 17–20, 2016: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9BDEB3K.","linkHelpText":"Geophysical properties, geochronologic, and geochemical data of sediment cores collected from San Pablo Bay, California, October 17–20, 2016"},{"id":492950,"rank":5,"type":{"id":34,"text":"Image Folder"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1022/images"},{"id":492949,"rank":4,"type":{"id":31,"text":"Publication XML"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1022/ofr20251022.XML","description":"OFR 2025-1022 XML"},{"id":492946,"rank":1,"type":{"id":24,"text":"Thumbnail"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1022/coverthb.jpg"},{"id":492951,"rank":6,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P9Y7W1ZM","text":"USGS data release","description":"Fregoso, T.A., Foxgrover, A.C., Kharrazi, B., and Jaffe, B.E., 2025, Estimates of percent sand in cores collected in San Francisco Bay, California: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9Y7W1ZM.","linkHelpText":"Estimates of percent sand in cores collected in San Francisco Bay, California from 1990-2016"},{"id":494160,"rank":10,"type":{"id":36,"text":"NGMDB Index Page"},"url":"https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_118715.htm","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"}},{"id":492947,"rank":2,"type":{"id":11,"text":"Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1022/ofr20251022.pdf","text":"Report","size":"15 MB","linkFileType":{"id":1,"text":"pdf"},"description":"OFR 2025-1022 PDF"},{"id":492948,"rank":3,"type":{"id":39,"text":"HTML Document"},"url":"https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20251022/full","linkFileType":{"id":5,"text":"html"},"description":"OFR 2025-1022 HTML"},{"id":492952,"rank":7,"type":{"id":30,"text":"Data Release"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5066/P1332UUW","text":"USGS data release","description":"Fregoso, T.A., Jaffe, B.E., and Foxgrover, A.C., 2024, Bathymetric change analysis in San Francisco Bay, California, from 1971 to 2020: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P1332UUW.","linkHelpText":"Bathymetric change analysis in San Francisco Bay, California, from 1971 to 2020"}],"country":"United States","state":"California","otherGeospatial":"San Francisco Bay","geographicExtents":"{\n \"type\": \"FeatureCollection\",\n \"features\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"Feature\",\n \"properties\": {},\n \"geometry\": {\n \"coordinates\": [\n [\n [\n -121.92665886931124,\n 37.43918130488805\n ],\n [\n -121.92564934808806,\n 37.46963434470008\n ],\n [\n -122.06193471322499,\n 37.57652234482673\n ],\n [\n -122.2032678189826,\n 37.73596840022175\n ],\n [\n -122.30522946252955,\n 37.810179500556\n ],\n [\n -122.2986675745785,\n 37.9137905621033\n ],\n [\n -122.3829626754601,\n 37.93011613634438\n ],\n [\n -122.38346743607153,\n 37.96713341592792\n ],\n [\n -122.29412480781497,\n 38.01009781481332\n ],\n [\n -122.21891547668399,\n 38.05343451593711\n ],\n [\n -122.21538215240244,\n 38.068536695863344\n ],\n [\n -122.23809637992545,\n 38.08204653047676\n ],\n [\n -122.27141058029224,\n 38.07211307141415\n ],\n [\n -122.36832461772306,\n 38.1447947759593\n ],\n [\n -122.40668642420599,\n 38.154718355441844\n ],\n [\n -122.44353394885432,\n 38.1209726772903\n ],\n [\n -122.49855285552066,\n 38.115810197788846\n ],\n [\n -122.49350524940448,\n 38.07489457595517\n ],\n [\n -122.50057189796729,\n 38.01367704556776\n ],\n [\n -122.45060059741682,\n 37.98662964096465\n ],\n [\n -122.50006713735556,\n 37.96912306390246\n ],\n [\n -122.5091528283647,\n 37.92533835473843\n ],\n [\n -122.44353394885432,\n 37.88112915899923\n ],\n [\n -122.50360061880033,\n 37.89985174071121\n ],\n [\n -122.51773391592565,\n 37.882722875276826\n ],\n [\n -122.4849244761706,\n 37.85363451407311\n ],\n [\n -122.48744827922869,\n 37.827724255087915\n ],\n [\n -122.48139115188934,\n 37.78784454772325\n ],\n [\n -122.39911517219528,\n 37.80020956033748\n ],\n [\n -122.376905705284,\n 37.72798461441667\n ],\n [\n -122.38649615690488,\n 37.71440962998943\n ],\n [\n -122.39760089036038,\n 37.67566732695791\n ],\n [\n -122.39255337904564,\n 37.65169300313262\n ],\n [\n -122.39962002760842,\n 37.63210813094467\n ],\n [\n -122.35520109378587,\n 37.58732332343041\n ],\n [\n -122.26282990185948,\n 37.56572101413991\n ],\n [\n -122.2280014196578,\n 37.494469037181844\n ],\n [\n -122.12957310039236,\n 37.47524337082433\n ],\n [\n -122.09272557574403,\n 37.424752461941296\n ],\n [\n -121.98874488975072,\n 37.41352763235223\n ],\n [\n -121.92665886931124,\n 37.43918130488805\n ]\n ]\n ],\n \"type\": \"Polygon\"\n }\n }\n ]\n}","contact":"Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
2885 Mission St.
Santa Cruz, CA 95060