<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>USGS Publications Warehouse</title>
		<link>https://pubs.usgs.gov</link>
		<description>New publications of the USGS.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 19:30:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<webmaster>https://pubs.usgs.gov/feedback</webmaster>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 19:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<item>
			<title>High-resolution transboundary vegetation community maps of the Sonoran and Mojave Desert ecoregion to support critical landscape conservation planning and habitat management needs</title>
			<author>Nagler, Pamela; Duberstein, Jennie N.; Broska, James; Didan, Kamel; Traphagen, Myles</author>
			<link>https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70276333</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;We produced a 30-m resolution binational land cover map of Bird Conservation Region 33 (BCR 33) for the U.S. North American Bird Conservation Initiative. The region covers large portions of the Sonoran and Mojave Deserts. The map can support the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Migratory Bird Program’s recovery planning efforts and constitutes the first known binational land cover dataset spanning sections of the United States–Mexico border and using a consistent classification system for both countries. The mapped region includes 152 distinct land cover classes, covering a total area of 38,421,453 ha (148,345 mi&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;), of which 13,148,345 ha (52,706 mi&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) are located in Mexico and 24,770,640 ha (95,639 mi&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) in the United States.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We primarily used Landsat 8 (OLI) imagery, supplemented by limited ground surveys from two field campaigns, drone-based aerial data, and existing vegetation classification frameworks from both countries. The classification applied a data-fusion approach integrating 30-m Landsat 8 imagery, decadal phenology metrics from vegetation indices, and a random forest model trained mainly with datasets from a comprehensive national mapping project from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) GAP Analysis Project (GAP) and federal wildland fire agencies’ Landscape Fire and Resource Management Planning Tools (LANDFIRE) (GAP/LANDFIRE) [United States side] and the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI) [Mexico side] as well as land cover maps and opportunistic open-access and field observations. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mapping of the full BCR 33 region was carried out in two phases: 1) Phase I, the prototype map, covered a smaller portion of the transboundary area and identified 31 land cover classes, and 2) Phase II, the full BCR 33 map (refer to Figure 1), which resulted in 152 land cover classes. Using a Random Forest classifier, we achieved an overall prediction accuracy of 92% for the Phase I map and 87% for the Phase II full region map. This slight decrease can be attributed to working on a larger, more complex area with a greater number of land cover classes. No formal validation was conducted, aside from using a subset of the collected field observations and training data to assess model performance during and after training. The training sites were further verified using Google Earth (Google, 2026) imagery. Two undergraduate students who worked for over a year visually inspected imagery and open access public images to confirm each training site during model training using in-house developed, online, visual tools. A portion of this field training data was reserved for model validation, and the corresponding results are to be presented in later sections.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The project developed an end-to-end, medium- and fine-resolution remote sensing–based data fusion mapping approach. This effort produced a map (Nagler et al., 2025) and the online tools to support a dynamic, live, online map for visualizing the transboundary vegetation communities in BCR 33. The toolset is currently hosted by the University of Arizona (UofA) Vegetation Index and Phenology (VIP) Lab to support FWS partners (https://vip.arizona.edu/viplab_data_explorer?LCM_BCR33). The online map is designed to allow rapid updates using new training, validation, or correction data, making it dynamic and maintainable.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The approach we took established a framework for rapid updating and correction of land cover maps, as the model can be quickly retrained with new field observations, updated training data, or other sources. This enables dynamic mapping and change detection of the region’s vegetation. This framework is an advance in data fusion and crowdsourced mapping of complex, vulnerable regions, providing support to regional stakeholders and the wider user community.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This transboundary map can inform the protection, conservation, and restoration of vegetation, habitat, and ecosystems, particularly for threatened and endangered species across the two nations using consistent and harmonized binational mapping systems. Beyond supporting land management decisions and stakeholders in the transboundary desert ecoregions, this BCR 33 mapping effort establishes a foundation for future rapid, low-cost, cross-border land cover mapping that can benefit and advance ecosystem management.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 14:04:44</pubDate>
			<category>Cooperator Report</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ECCOE Landsat quarterly calibration and validation report—Quarter 4, 2025</title>
			<author>Haque, Md Obaidul; Hasan, Nahid; Shrestha, Ashish; Rengarajan, Rajagopalan; Lubke, Mark; Steinwand, Daniel; Bresnahan, Paul; Shaw, Jerad L.; Ruslander, Kathryn; Micijevic, Esad; Choate, Michael J.; Anderson, Cody; Clauson, Jeff; Thome, Kurt; Angal, Amit; Levy, Raviv; Miller, Jeff; Teixeira Pinto, Cibele</author>
			<link>https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20261014</link>
			<description>&lt;h1&gt;Executive Summary&amp;nbsp;&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Calibration and Validation (Cal/Val) Center of Excellence (ECCOE) focuses on improving the accuracy, precision, calibration, and product quality of remote-sensing data, leveraging years of multiscale optical system geometric and radiometric calibration and characterization experience. The ECCOE Landsat Cal/Val Team continually monitors the geometric and radiometric performance of active Landsat missions and makes calibration adjustments, as needed, to maintain data quality at the highest level.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This report provides observed geometric and radiometric analysis results for Landsats 8 and 9 for quarter 4 (October–December) of 2025. All data used to compile the Cal/Val analysis results presented in this report are freely available from the U.S. Geological Survey EarthExplorer website:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a data-mce-href=&quot;https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov&quot; href=&quot;https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov&quot;&gt;https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One specific activity that the ECCOE Landsat Cal/Val Team closely monitored was a Landsat 9 safehold anomaly. On October 17, 2025, Landsat 9 experienced a Solar Array Drive Assembly potentiometer fault. The onboard fault response put both the Operational Land Imager sensor and the Thermal Infrared Sensor into safe mode. Additionally, the Thermal Infrared Sensor focal plane assembly was turned off, but the cryocooler remained on. On October 20, 2025, the Solar Array Drive Assembly recovery commanding was successfully performed to put the spacecraft into nadir viewing mode. The following day, Operational Land Imager activation and recovery started, including focal plane assembly warmup. After reaching nominal operational temperatures and achieving thermal stability, science imaging resumed on October 23, 2025. Additional information about the Landsat 9 safehold anomaly is here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a data-mce-href=&quot;https://www.usgs.gov/landsat-missions/news/landsat-9-returns-normal-operations-following-brief-safehold&quot; href=&quot;https://www.usgs.gov/landsat-missions/news/landsat-9-returns-normal-operations-following-brief-safehold&quot;&gt;https://www.usgs.gov/landsat-missions/news/landsat-9-returns-normal-operations-following-brief-safehold&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:12:17</pubDate>
			<category>Open-File Report</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>System characterization report on Tanager</title>
			<author>Kim, Minsu; Park, Seonkyung; Clauson, Jeff; Vrabel, Jim; Sampath, Ajit</author>
			<link>https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20211030W</link>
			<description>&lt;h1&gt;Executive Summary&amp;nbsp;&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;p&gt;This report addresses the system characterization of the Tanager satellite hyperspectral sensor created by Planet Labs PBC. and is part of a series of system characterization reports produced and delivered by the U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Cal/Val Center of Excellence. These reports present and detail the methodology and procedures for characterization; present technical and operational information about the Tanager hyperspectral sensor; and provide a summary of test measurements, data retention practices, data analysis results, and conclusions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This report summarizes the sensor performance of the Tanager based on the U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Cal/Val Center of Excellence system characterization process. In summary, we determined that the Tanager exhibits a band-to-band geometric error ranging from -0.074 to 0.097 pixels. Compared to the Landsat Operational Land Imager, geometric offsets ranged from -5.980 meters (-0.20 pixels) to 11.348 meters (0.40 pixels). Radiometric comparisons showed offsets between -0.004 and 0.056 with slopes from 0.830 to 1.066. Spectral shifts are found between 0.65 and 0.75 nanometers. Finally, spatial performance evaluation yielded a PSF full width at half maximum of 1.27 to 1.75 pixels, a relative edge response of 0.802 to 0.651, and a modulation transfer function at Nyquist of 0.488 to 0.253.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:03:45</pubDate>
			<category>Open-File Report</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Aligning legacy NLCD land cover maps based on Landsat Collection 1 to Collection 2</title>
			<author>Li, Congcong; Jin, Suming</author>
			<link>https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70276258</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The transition from Landsat Collection 1 to Collection 2 introduced significant improvements in radiometric and geometric accuracy. However, the improvements cause location misalignment between the existing Landsat-derived land cover products and the new collection. The legacy National Land Cover Database (NLCD) has been used as a cornerstone land cover source for a variety of research. Therefore, a method aligning the legacy NLCD product to Collection 2 is required to ensure its continuity and consistency of service. We developed a strategy to not only align legacy NLCD to match new Collection 2 geometric locations but also improve land cover labeling in the region that was affected by the geometric shifts. The method identifies boundary pixels of homogeneous land cover patches as potential problem areas that are likely impacted by geometric shifts and generates candidate labels from 3&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;3 window with the target pixel at the center and segmentation-derived majority label. Standard phenology patterns of each candidate land cover type are established based on the random samples except boundary pixels within a 1000-pixels&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;1000-pixels processing window region. The phenological distance to each standard land cover type pattern is calculated through a penalty dynamic time warping (DTW) method for each target pixel in the boundary region. Finally, the method determines the most suitable label based on the phenological distance from the candidate labels. Both visual and accuracy assessment results demonstrate that the alignment preserves the overall land cover patterns in the original legacy NLCD product while reducing the spatial discrepancies between the Landsat Collection 2 and land cover. In addition, it enhances the accuracy of land cover labeling of boundary pixels. The overall accuracy (OA) was increased by 7% in the land cover boundary regions after alignment. The quality and confusion matrix comparison between the alignment results and the original legacy NLCD confirm the reliability of the method. Our alignment method has the potential to serve as a framework for aligning other Landsat-derived land cover products to future collections.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 14:40:45</pubDate>
			<category>International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Historical ice jams and associated environmental conditions on Osoyoos Lake</title>
			<author>Sutfin, Nicholas; Breen, Stephen</author>
			<link>https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/sir20265003</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Ice jams occur regularly at the southern outlet of Osoyoos Lake, which spans the border between the State of Washington and British Columbia, Canada. In recent winters, ice jams caused (1) decreases in downstream discharge that may adversely affect salmon spawning habitat and (2) short-duration lake-level rise that can interfere with lake level management agreements. In response, water managers sought to understand the environmental conditions associated with the historical ice-jam occurrences on Osoyoos Lake. Researchers compiled datasets of discharge, lake level, and air temperature from four meteorological and three hydrologic stations near Oroville, Washington, to determine “ice-jam” or “non-ice-jam” days from 1942 to 2024.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After confirming known ice jams since 1994 using Landsat 8–9 and Sentinel–2 satellite imagery along with discharge, lake level, and air temperature data, researchers designated ice-jam days. They conducted statistical analyses to examine environmental conditions associated with ice-jam occurrences on Osoyoos Lake. Statistical tests indicated significant differences in wind speed, wind direction, and air temperature between ice-jam and non-ice-jam days. A linear discriminant-analysis model correctly predicted 12 of 13 historical ice-jam days since 1994 and determined that ice jams are more likely under westerly and northwesterly winds near or above 10 kilometers per hour (km/h) and minimum temperatures near or below –9.4 degrees Celsius (°C). An analysis of historical discharge suggests that ice jams have occurred since at least the 1940s, but 13 ice jam days occurred in the past decade (2014–2024), exceeding any previous decade. The daily minimum air temperature in the Osoyoos Lake region has increased at a rate of 0.021 °C per year since the 1940s, but ice jams usually occur in winters with colder average temperatures.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 17:42:39</pubDate>
			<category>Scientific Investigations Report</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
