USGS

Hydrogeologic Framework, Ground-Water Quality, and Simulation of Ground-Water Flow at the Fair Lawn Well Field Superfund Site, Bergen County, New Jersey

By Jean C. Lewis-Brown, Donald E. Rice, Robert Rosman, and Nicholas P. Smith

U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5280

In cooperation with the U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

The body of the report is available in PDF Format (8,667 KB)

Abstract

Production wells in the Westmoreland well field, Fair Lawn, Bergen County, New Jersey (the "Fair Lawn well field Superfund site"), are contaminated with volatile organic compounds, particularly trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane. In 1983, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) placed the Westmoreland well field on its National Priority List of Superfund sites. In an effort to determine ground-water flow directions, contaminant-plume boundaries, and contributing areas to production wells in Fair Lawn, and to evaluate the effect of present pump-and-treat systems on flowpaths of contaminated ground water, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the USEPA, developed a conceptual hydrogeologic framework and ground-water flow model of the study area. MODFLOW-2000, the USGS three-dimensional finite-difference model, was used to delineate contributing areas to production wells in Fair Lawn and to compute flowpaths of contaminated ground water from three potential contaminant sources to the Westmoreland well field. Straddle-packer tests were used to determine the hydrologic framework of, distribution of contaminants in, and hydrologic properties of water-bearing and confining units that make up the fractured-rock aquifer underlying the study area.

The study area consists of about 15 square miles in and near Fair Lawn. The area is underlain by 6 to 100 feet of glacial deposits and alluvium that, in turn, are underlain by the Passaic Formation. In the study area, the Passaic Formation consists of brownish-red pebble conglomerate, medium- to coarse-grained feldspathic sandstone, and micaceous siltstone. The bedrock strata strike N. 9o E. and dip 6.5o to the northwest. The bedrock consists of alternating layers of densely fractured rocks and sparsely fractured rocks, forming a fractured-rock aquifer.

Ground-water flow in the fractured-rock aquifer is anisotropic as a result of the interlayering of dipping water-bearing and confining units. Wells of similar depth aligned along the strike of the bedding intersect the same water-bearing units, but wells aligned along the dip of the bedding may intersect different water-bearing units. Consequently, wells aligned along strike are in greater hydraulic connection than wells aligned along dip.

The Borough of Fair Lawn pumps approximately 770 million gallons per year from 13 production wells. Hydrographs from six observation wells ranging in depth from 162 to 505 feet in Fair Lawn show that water levels in much of the study area are affected by pumping.

Straddle packers were used to isolate discrete intervals within six open-hole observation wells owned by the Fair Lawn Water Department. Transmissivity, water-quality, and static-water-level data were obtained from the isolated intervals. Measured transmissivity ranged from near 0 to 8,900 feet squared per day. The broad range in measured transmissivity is a result of the heterogeneity of the fractured-rock aquifer.

Eight water-bearing units and eight confining units were identified in the study area on the basis of transmissivity. The water-bearing units range in thickness from 21 to 95 feet; the mean thickness is 50 feet. The confining units range in thickness from 22 to 248 feet; the mean thickness is 83 feet. Water-level and water-quality data indicate effective separation of water-bearing units by the confining units.

Water-quality samples were collected from the six observation wells at 16 depth intervals isolated by the straddle packers in 2000 and 2001. Concentrations of volatile organic compounds generally were low in samples from four of the wells, but were higher in samples from a well in Fair Lawn Industrial Park and in a well in the Westmoreland well field.

The digital ground-water flow model was used to simulate steady-state scenarios representing conditions in the study area in 1991 and 2000. These years were chosen because during the intervening period, pumpage from the Westmoreland well field decreased by more than one-half, and a system of shallow wells (less than 19 feet deep) and trenches was installed at one of the contaminant sources to capture shallow ground water. Because precipitation was below average in 2000, a "high-recharge" scenario also was simulated to represent 2000 pumpage conditions during more typical ground-water-recharge conditions.

The digital model was used to delineate contributing areas to production well fields in Fair Lawn and contaminant plumes from three contaminant sources. Two of these sources, Fisher Scientific Company and Sandvik, Inc., are known contaminated sites that were previously identified by the N.J. Department of Environmental Protection as potential sources of volatile organic compounds to the Westmoreland well field. The third source, Eastman Kodak Company, is a known contaminated site not previously identified as a potential source of volatile organic compounds to the Westmoreland well field. In 1991, when 130 million gallons of water was pumped from the Westmoreland well field, the contributing area to that well field included nearly all of the Fisher Scientific Company property, a small part (less than 1 percent) of the Sandvik, Inc., property, and about three-quarters of the Eastman Kodak Company property. In 2000, when only 40 million gallons of water was pumped from the Westmoreland well field, the contributing area included only small parts of the Fisher Scientific Company and Eastman Kodak Company properties, and none of the Sandvik, Inc., property. In the 2000 high-recharge scenario, contributing areas to every pumped well were similar to, but smaller than, the contributing areas in the 2000 scenario.

Contaminant plumes from the three potential contaminant sites were delineated using the ground-water flow model. In 1991, most of the plume from the overburden at Fisher Scientific Company discharged to a well in the Westmoreland well field; about half of the plume from the bedrock discharged to deep recovery wells at Fisher Scientific Company and half discharged to two wells in the Westmoreland well field. Only 3 percent of the water from the overburden and 4 percent of the water from the bedrock was not captured by any well.

In 1991, 3 percent of the plume from the overburden at Sandvik, Inc., discharged to wells in the Westmoreland well field; 93 percent of the plume from the bedrock discharged to wells in that well field. Nearly all (97 percent) of the water from the overburden and 7 percent of the water from the bedrock at Sandvik, Inc., was not captured by any well and flowed instead to Henderson Brook.

In 1991, 73 percent of the plume from the bedrock at Eastman Kodak Company discharged to a well in the Westmoreland well field; the remainder flowed to the Passaic River. No plume from the overburden at Eastman Kodak Company was delineated because simulation results indicate that the overburden was unsaturated.

In 2000, wells in the Westmoreland well field captured less water than in 1991 from all three sites because of the decreased pumpage. Only 6 percent of the plume from the overburden at Fisher Scientific Company discharged to a well in the Westmoreland well field; more than half (55 percent) was captured by the recently installed shallow recovery system and 4 percent was captured by the deep recovery wells at the site. Thirty-four percent of the plume from the bedrock discharged to a well in the Westmoreland well field, and 58 percent was captured by the deep recovery wells at the site. In this simulation, 35 percent of the water from the overburden and 9 percent of the water from the bedrock at Fisher Scientific Company flowed to Henderson Brook and the Passaic River rather than to any well.

In 2000, all of the water originating in the overburden at Sandvik, Inc., discharged to Henderson Brook; none was captured by any well. Twenty-three percent of the plume from the bedrock at Sandvik, Inc., discharged to two wells in the Westmoreland well field; 2 percent discharged to a deep recovery well at Fisher Scientific Company, and the remainder (74 percent) flowed to Henderson Brook and the Passaic River rather than to any well.

In 2000, 9 percent of the water from the bedrock at Eastman Kodak Company discharged to a well in the Westmoreland well field; the remainder discharged to Henderson Brook and the Passaic River.

Table of Contents

Abstract

Introduction

Purpose and Scope

Description of Study Area

Hydrogeologic Framework

Geology

Unconsolidated Overburden

Bedrock

Borehole-Geophysical Logging

Straddle-Packer Testing

Methods of Slug Testing

Transmissivity and Hydraulic Connection Between Adjacent Zones

Transmissivity

Hydraulic Connection Between Adjacent Zones

Orientation and Location of Bedrock Hydrogeologic Units

Ground-Water Levels

Overburden Observation Wells

Well FLS-1

Well FLP-1

Bedrock Observation Wells

Well FL4

Well FL12

Well FL18

Well FL23

Well FL27

Well FL29

Ground-Water Quality

Sampling Methods

Compounds Detected in Individual Wells

Well FL4

Well FL12

Well FL18

Well FL23

Well FL27

Well FL29

Distribution of Volatile Organic Compounds

Simulation of Ground-Water Flow

Description of Ground-Water Flow Model

Conceptual Model of Ground-Water Flow

Grid and Boundary Conditions

Hydrologic Parameters

Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity of the Unconsolidated Overburden

Transmissivity of the Bedrock

Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity

Areal Recharge

Simulation of Discharge Features

Streams

Pumped Wells

Calibration

Static Ground-Water Levels

Base Flow to Streams

Water-Level Rise Resulting from Increased Recharge

Water-Level Rise During Shutdown of Pumped Wells

Sensitivity Analysis

Simulated Water Budgets

Model Limitations

Simulated Ground-Water Flowpaths

Simulated Contributing Areas

1991 Scenario

2000 Scenario

High-Recharge Scenario

Simulated Contaminant Plumes

1991 Scenario

Fisher Scientific Company

Sandvik, Inc.

Eastman Kodak Company

2000 Scenario

Fisher Scientific Company

Sandvik, Inc.

Eastman Kodak Company

Summary and Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Literature Cited


If you have Adobe® Acrobat® or Adobe® Acrobat® Reader® installed on your computer, you may view and print the PDF version of this report. Acrobat Reader, is a free download from . Adobe Systems, IncUsers with disabilities can view information concerning accessibility at access.adobe.com.


For further information, contact:

 

Richard Kropp, Director

U.S. Geological Survey

New Jersey Water Science Center

810 Bear Tavern Road

Suite 206

West Trenton, NJ 08628

 

dc_nj@usgs.gov

(609) 771-3900

 

or visit our Web site at:

http://nj.water.usgs.gov


U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Persistent URL:
Page Contact Information: Contact USGS
Last modified: Thursday, January 10 2013, 06:41:00 PM
FirstGov button  Take Pride in America button